簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 理克
Collart, Aymeric
論文名稱： 語言、大腦與時間的相遇：漢語的觀點
Bridging Time in Language and in the Brain: Insights from Mandarin Chinese
指導教授： 詹曉蕙
Chan, Shiao-Hui
齊莉莎
Zeitoun, Elizabeth
口試委員： 林若望
Lin, Jo-wang
李佳霖
Lee, Chia-Lin
陳振宇
Chen, Jenn-Yeu
李臻儀
Li, Jen-I
詹曉蕙
Chan, Shiao-hui
齊莉莎
Zeitoun, Elizabeth
口試日期： 2022/01/13
學位類別： 博士
Doctor
系所名稱： 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年： 2022
畢業學年度： 110
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 505
中文關鍵詞： 漢語 、構詞句法學 、時間觀念 、時貌 、神經語言學 、事件相關電位 、類型神經語言學
英文關鍵詞： Mandarin, morphosyntax, time, aspect, neurolinguistics, ERP, neurotypology
研究方法: 實驗設計法 、 構詞句法學分析法
DOI URL： http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200490
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：178  下載：40 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 時間被視為人類認知中至關重要的概念，時間標記則因語言而異。不過，大腦處理時間標記仍然不清楚。現今絕大多數的相關研究皆是針對印歐語系語言中的「時態」(tense)標記。本論文將要探討漢語中的「了」及「過」兩個「時貌」(grammatical aspect)標記和過去時間的關係，以及大腦如何處理「了」及「過」之時間標記。首先，本論文針對漢語中存在已久的「了」及「過」是否具有「時態」成分之辯論提供反證，並且主張「了」及「過」被用於表示過去時間是因為其時貌特徵。本論文將兩者時貌特徵與表示過去時間的關係分析成對應到不同語法的意義、功能：「了」對應到「時間先後關係」的認知功能，而「過」對應到「時間定位」的認知功能。接著，本論文透過三個採用事件相關電位(event-related potential，稱ERP)技術的實驗測試/探討以上的分析。相關結果顯現了兩種質變上不同的效果進而支持上述分析：「了」在時間標記上的大腦處理誘發前腦及早期之負極性波幅(early frontal negativity)，而「過」則是誘發晚期之正極性波幅(P600)，此外，「了」及「過」在時間標記上的大腦處理方式與「了」及「過」在時貌上(非時間上)不同。最後，為使以上兩種大腦處理方式有廣義的且跨語言的功能解釋，本論文將漢語的時貌標記在時間上的大腦處理與印歐語系的時態標記在時間上的大腦處理方式做相互對比：前腦及早期之負極性波幅(early frontal negativity)被視為反映「時間先後關係」的認知功能，晚期之正極性波幅(P600) 被視為反映「時間定位」的認知功能。總而言之，本論文採用以上分析及證據提供大腦如何處理時間標記之類型神經語言學模式。

    Time, a crucial concept in human cognition, is differently encoded from one language to another. Yet, how time in language is processed in the brain remains unclear, as such an investigation was mainly conducted based on tense marking in Indo-European languages. The aim of this dissertation is to investigate how past time is expressed in Mandarin with the grammatical aspect markers LE and GUO, as well as how the expression of past time with LE and GUO is processed in the brain. First, this dissertation takes side in the long-standing debate in the linguistic literature concerning whether LE and GUO encode tense in addition to aspect information. Pieces of evidence are brought against the tense analysis of LE and GUO. It is further argued that LE and GUO are used to express past time based on their respective aspectual characteristics, linked with different grammatical processes: ‘temporal sequencing’ for LE and ‘temporal localization’ for GUO. Second, the proposed analysis is tested with a set of three event-related potential (ERP) experiments, in which the temporal and aspectual processing in the brain of LE and GUO is investigated. Results from the ERP experiments support the proposed analysis, in that the processing of time with LE and GUO is reflected by qualitatively distinct ERP signatures: an early frontal negativity for LE, and a P600 for GUO. In addition, these ERP components are different from the ones found concerning the processing of aspect with LE and GUO. Third, the processing of time in the brain with grammatical aspect in Mandarin is contrasted with the one with tense in Indo-European, in order to state a generalized functional account of the above ERP signatures: the early frontal negativity is related to the cognitive operation of ‘temporal sequencing’, and the P600 to the one of ‘temporal localization’. In sum, the pieces of evidence exposed in this dissertation allow us to formulate a neurotypological model of the processing of time in the brain.

    Acknowledgments iii Chinese abstract viii English abstract ix Table of contents x List of tables xvii List of figures xxii Abbreviations and conventions xxviii General introduction 1 0.1. Scope and motivations 1 0.2. Linguistic theoretical background 2 0.3. Neurocognitive perspective 3 0.4. Significant and original contribution to knowledge of the dissertation 5 0.5. Organization of the dissertation 6 Part 1. On the expression of TIME in language and in Mandarin Chapter 1. On the expression of TIME in language 10 1.1. Introduction of Chapter 1 10 1.2. The semantic dimension of TIME in language: tense, aspect and mood/modality (TAM), and beyond 12 1.2.1. The general definitions of TAM 13 1.2.1.1. Tense 13 1.2.1.2. Aspect 17 1.2.1.2.1. Broad definition and terminology 17 1.2.1.2.2. Viewpoint aspect 19 1.2.1.2.3. Situation aspect, or Aktionsart 26 1.2.1.3. Mood, modality and modal systems 33 1.2.1.3.1. Definition and characteristics of mood 33 1.2.1.3.2. Modal systems 37 1.2.2. The time-relational view of tense and viewpoint aspect 42 1.2.3. The possible-world view of TAM 49 1.3. The crosslinguistic and morphosyntactic dimensions of TIME in language: TAM as prominent categories (Bhat, 1999) 52 1.3.1. The formal expressions of TAM 52 1.3.2. On the interpretation of tense, aspect and modality in different syntactic constructions 61 1.3.3. Towards a typology of languages according to their TAM realizations 66 1.4. Summary of Chapter 1 67 Chapter 2. The expression of TIME in Mandarin with LE and GUO 70 2.1. Introduction of Chapter 2 70 2.2. Distinguishing between several types of LE and GUO 72 2.2.1. Distinguishing between three types of LE 73 2.2.2. Distinguishing between four types of GUO 79 2.2.3. Interim summary 89 2.3. Formal characteristics of le1 and the aspectual suffixes guo1 and guo2 94 2.3.1. Formal characteristics of le1 95 2.3.1.1. Overview of the formal characteristics of le1 95 2.3.1.2. Le1 as a perfective marker: on the properties of ‘holisticity’ and ‘boundedness’ 96 2.3.1.3. Le1 and the property of ‘realization’ or ‘actuality’ 104 2.3.1.3.1. Definition and discussion on the ‘realization’ property of le1 104 2.3.1.3.2. Is le1 a realis mood marker? 109 2.3.1.4. Debates around the meaning of le1 111 2.3.1.4.1. On the ‘dynamicity’ property of le1 111 2.3.1.4.2. Le1: termination or completion of an event? 118 2.3.2. Formal characteristics of guo1/2 128 2.3.2.1. Overview of the formal characteristics of guo1/2 128 2.3.2.2. On the ‘discontinuity’ property of guo1/2 130 2.3.2.2.1. Definition and discussion of the ‘discontinuity’ property 130 2.3.2.2.2. The discontinuity effect: an inherent property of guo1/2? 133 2.3.2.3. Guo1/2 and the ‘repeatability’ property 136 2.3.2.4. Guo1/2: assertion of a prior event in time 139 2.3.2.5. Guo1/2: between ‘holisticity’ property and perfective marker 146 2.3.3. Interim summary 150 2.4. Expressing TIME with le1 and guo2 151 2.4.1. Are le1 and guo2 tense markers? 151 2.4.1.1. Overview of the tense-like accounts of le1 and guo1/2 152 2.4.1.1.1. Tense-like accounts of le1 and guo1/2 152 2.4.1.1.2. Unified vs. particularistic accounts 160 2.4.1.2. Assessing tense-like accounts of le1/guo1/2 162 2.4.1.2.1. Future time adverb and le1/guo1/2 in simple sentences 163 2.4.1.2.2. Complex sentences and le1/guo1/2 173 2.4.1.3. Interim summary 177 2.4.2. The expression of TIME with le1 180 2.4.2.1. Le1 without relative past tense meaning 180 2.4.2.2. Generalizations of the expression of TIME with le1 189 2.4.3. The expression of TIME with guo2 190 2.4.3.1. Guo2 without relative past tense meaning 190 2.4.3.2. Generalizations of the expression of TIME with guo2 194 2.5. Summary of Chapter 2 195 Part 2. On the processing of TIME in language in the brain: Experimental evidence Chapter 3. Literature review: On the processing of TIME in the brain in tense-prominent and aspect-prominent languages 200 3.1. Introduction of Chapter 3 200 3.2. Definitions of the terminology: ‘Temporal concord’, ‘tense’, ‘violation’ 200 3.3. Processing TIME in the brain in tense-prominent languages with tense: Evidence and counterevidence 212 3.3.1. Evidence for the distinction of the processing of past and non-past TIME in the brain 212 3.3.1.1. Processing TIME with tense in the brain in French 212 3.3.1.2. Processing TIME with tense in the brain in Dutch 215 3.3.1.3. Processing TIME with tense in the brain in Italian 223 3.3.1.4. Interim summary: Generalizing the results under the Past Discourse Linking Hypothesis (PADILIH) 225 3.3.2. Evidence against the PADILIH: Processing TIME with tense in the brain in German 227 3.4. Processing TIME in the brain in aspect-prominent languages with viewpoint aspect and tense 229 3.4.1. Processing TIME with viewpoint aspect and tense in Hindi 229 3.4.2. Processing TIME with viewpoint aspect in the brain in Mandarin 231 3.5. Summary of Chapter 3 and perspectives 234 3.5.1. Summary of studies keeping the critical verbs constant 235 3.5.2. Summary of studies keeping the time adverb constant 238 3.5.3. Generalizations of the processing of TIME with tense in the brain 241 Chapter 4. Experiment 1. Processing TIME with viewpoint aspect: on the Mandarin morphemes le1 and guo2 244 4.1. Introduction 244 4.1.1. Research question and experimental design 244 4.1.2. Hypotheses 246 4.2. Experimental material 247 4.3. Pilot test 249 4.3.1. Participants of the pilot test 249 4.3.2. Procedure of the pilot test 250 4.3.3. Analyses of the pilot test 250 4.3.4. Results of the pilot test 251 4.4. ERP experiment: Methodology 258 4.4.1. Participants 258 4.4.2. Procedure 259 4.4.3. ERP data acquisition, preprocessing pipeline and statistical analyses 263 4.5. ERP experiment: Results 267 4.5.1. Behavioral results 267 4.5.2. ERP results 271 4.5.2.1. Brainwaves at le1 and guo2 272 4.5.2.1.1. General results 272 4.5.2.1.2. Individual differences in processing the temporal concord of le1 278 4.5.2.2. Brainwaves at the sentence-final word 282 4.6. Summary and discussion 291 Chapter 5. Experiment 2. Processing temporal and aspectual concord in the brain with the viewpoint aspect morpheme le1 295 5.1. Introduction 295 5.1.1. Research question and experimental design 295 5.1.2. Hypotheses 298 5.2. Experimental material 298 5.3. Pilot test 299 5.3.1. Participants of the pilot test 299 5.3.2. Procedure of the pilot test 299 5.3.3. Analyses of the pilot test 300 5.3.4. Results of the pilot test 300 5.4. ERP experiment: Methodology 306 5.4.1. Participants 306 5.4.2. Procedure 306 5.4.3. ERP data acquisition, preprocessing pipeline and statistical analyses 308 5.5. ERP experiment: Results 309 5.5.1. Behavioral results 309 5.5.2. ERP results 315 5.5.2.1. Overview of the brainwaves 315 5.5.2.2. Brainwaves at le1: statistical results 319 5.5.2.3. Brainwaves at the sentence-final word 323 5.5.2.4. Individual differences when processing the temporal concord of le1 328 5.6. Summary and discussion 331 Chapter 6. Experiment 3. Processing temporal and aspectual concord in the brain with the viewpoint aspect morpheme guo2 337 6.1. Introduction 337 6.1.1. Research question and experimental design 337 6.1.2. Hypotheses 339 6.2. Experimental material 340 6.3. Pilot test 341 6.3.1. Participants of the pilot test 341 6.3.2. Procedure of the pilot test 342 6.3.3. Analyses of the pilot test 342 6.3.4. Results of the pilot test 343 6.4. ERP experiment: Methodology 348 6.4.1. Participants 348 6.4.2. Procedure 349 6.4.3. ERP data acquisition, preprocessing pipeline and statistical analyses 351 6.5. ERP experiment: Results 352 6.5.1. Behavioral results 352 6.5.2. ERP results 358 6.5.2.1. Overview of the brainwaves 358 6.5.2.2. Brainwaves at guo2 364 6.5.2.3. Brainwaves at the sentence-final word 367 6.5.2.4. Individual differences when processing the aspectual concord of guo2 371 6.6. Summary and discussion 376 Part 3. Bridging TIME and language in the brain: Insights from Mandarin and neurotypological perspective Chapter 7. Bridging TIME in language and in the brain 382 7.1. Introduction of Chapter 7 382 7.2. On the processing of TIME and aspect in the brain in Mandarin 383 7.2.1. Experiments 1 to 3: summary 383 7.2.2. Comparing Experiments 1 to 3 with previous experiments 386 7.3. Bridging TIME and language in the brain in Mandarin 390 7.3.1. Recap of the grammatical operations of le1 and guo2 and assumptions of their corresponding cognitive operations 390 7.3.1.1. Assumptions 390 7.3.1.2. Structural operation: Definition 391 7.3.1.3. Sequencing operation: Definition 392 7.3.1.4. Localization operation: Definition 394 7.3.2. A functional account of the (L)AN and P600s in Experiments 1 to 3 397 7.3.3. Summary 400 7.3.3.1. How TIME and aspect in Mandarin bridge in the brain 400 7.3.3.2. Alternative explanations? 402 7.3.3.2.1. (L)AN: alternative accounts 402 7.3.3.2.2. P600s: alternative accounts 407 7.4. Towards a crosslinguistic and cross-modality model of processing of TIME in the brain 408 7.4.1. Processing of temporal and aspectual concords across languages and the frontal negativity and P600 effects 408 7.4.1.1. Temporal concord and frontal negativity in Dutch and English 409 7.4.1.2. Temporal concord and P600 in German, Dutch and Italian 411 7.4.1.3. Aspectual concord and P600 in German 414 7.4.1.4. Summary 416 7.4.2. Cross-domain evidence for the functional account of the frontal negativity and the P600 effects 419 7.4.2.1. Sequencing function and frontal negativity: Evidence from ERP studies on narrative and visual events 420 7.4.2.2. Structural operation and P600: Evidence from ERP studies on syntactic, musical and mathematical structure processing 423 7.5. Summary of Chapter 7 428 General conclusion 431 8.1. Summary of the dissertation 431 8.1.1. A tenseless account of the expression of TIME in Mandarin 431 8.1.2. Towards a crosslinguistic neurocognitive model of the processing of TIME in language 432 8.2. Future orientations 434 References 438 Appendix 1. Experimental sentences (Chapter 4, Experiment 1) 453 Appendix 2. Experimental sentences (Chapter 5, Experiment 2) 476 Appendix 3. Experimental sentences (Chapter 6, Experiment 3) 491

    Allen, M., Badecker, W, & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 405–430.
    Arnott, D.W. (1970). The nominal and verbal system of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Bache, C. (1982). Aspect and Aktionsart: towards a semantic distinction. Journal of Linguistics, 18(1), 57–72.
    Baggio, G. (2008). Processing temporal constraints: An ERP study. Language Learning, 58(1), 35–55.
    Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort P. (2012). Language, linguistics and cognition. In R. Kempson, T. Fernando, & N. Asher (Eds.). Handbook of the philosophy of science (vol. 14, pp. 325–355). Amsterdam, Boston: North Holland.
    Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C.-J., Lee, J., Duman, T. Y., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(6), 652–673.
    Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
    van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657–671.
    Bhat, D. N. S. (1999). The prominence of tense, aspect, and mood. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Biondo, N., Bergamini, E., & Vespignani, F. (2021). The processing of temporal concord in sentences: an ERP investigation into the role of verb-adverb distance. In V. Torrens (Ed.), Syntax Processing (pp. 1–47), Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Bohnemeyer, J. (2014). Aspect vs. relative tense: the case reopened. Natural Language & Lingusitic Theory, 32(3), 917–954.
    Boogaart, R. (1999). Aspect and temporal ordering. A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. LOT Publications repository. https://www.lotpublications.nl/aspect-and-temporal-ordering-a-contrastive-analysis-of-dutch-and-english.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013a). 11 Neurotopology: modeling crosslinguistic similarities and differences in the neurocognition of language comprehension. In M. Sanz, I. Laka, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.). Language down the garden path: the cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structures (pp. 241–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013b). Reconciling time, space and function: a new dorsal-ventral stream model of sentence comprehension. Brain & Language, 126, 60–76.
    Bos, L. S., Dragoy, O., Stowe, L. A., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Time reference teased apart from tense: Thinking beyond the present. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(2), 283–297.
    Bos, L. S., Bastiaanse, R., Ries, J., and Wartenburger, I. (2014, September 19-24). The neural correlates of past time reference. Paper presented at the International Science of Aphasia Conference XV, San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
    Bott, O. (2010). Chapter 7. The processing of temporality in the brain. In The Processing of Events (pp. 197–233). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Boulin, M. (2017). Now and xianzai: a contrastive study of two deictic adverbs. Languages in Contrast, 17(1), 1–17.
    Brouwer, H, & Crocker, M. W. (2017). On the proper treatment of the N400 and P600 in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1327.
    Bugenhagen, R. D. (1994). The semantics of irrealis in the Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea. In Reesink, G. P. (Ed.), Topics in Austronesian linguistics (pp. 1–39). Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.
    Butler, C. (2008). Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences, 30(1), 1–30.
    Caffarra, S., Mendoza, M., & Davidson, D. (2019). Is the LAN effect in morphosyntactic processing an ERP artifact? Brain and Language, 191, 9–16.
    Chang, W. (2014). extrafont: Tools for using fonts. R package version 0.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=extrafont.
    Chao, Y. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
    Chappell, H. (2001). A typology of evidential markers in Sinitic languages. In H. Chappell (Ed.), Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives (pp. 56–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chen, G.-T. (1979). The aspect markers le, guo, and zhe in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 14(2), 27–46.
    Cohn, N. (2020). Your brain on comics: a cognitive model of visual narrative comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 352–386.
    Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 1–38.
    Collart, A. (2018, May 26-28). When time is a fact: A semantic and time-relational analysis of ‘you + VP’ in Taiwan Mandarin. Paper presented at the 19th Chinese lexical semantics workshop (CLSW-19). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
    Collart, A., & Chan, S.-H. (2021). Processing past time reference in a tenseless language: an ERP study on the Mandarin aspectual morphemes -le and -guo. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 59, 100998.
    Collart, A. & Su, K. (forthcoming). Expressing the existence of an event with ‘you (to have) + VP’ in Taiwan Mandarin: A corpus-based investigation. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics. [Accepted manuscript].
    Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Cornish, F. (2018). Revisiting the system of English relative clauses: structure, semantics, discourse functionality. English Language and Linguistics, 22(3), 431–456.
    Culioli, A. (1982, August 29 – September 4). The role of metalinguistic representation in syntax. Paper presented at the 13th Congress of Linguistics, Tokyo, Japan.
    Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. New York: Basil Blackwell.
    Dai, Y. (1997). Xiandai Hanyu shiti xitong yanjiu [Study on the temporal system of modern Mandarin Chinese]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.
    Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
    DeLancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 369–382.
    Depraetere, I. (1996). Foregrounding in relative clauses. Linguistics, 34(4), 699–731.
    Dickey, S. (2015). 19 Lexical and grammatical aspect. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp. 338–353). London: Routledge.
    Dillon, B., Nevins, A., Austin, A. C., & Philips, C. (2011). Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: an ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 313–344.
    Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 7, Kluwer, Dordrecht: Reidel.
    Dragoy, O., Stowe, L. A., Bos, L. S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2012). From time to time: Processing time reference violations in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 307–325.
    Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex farm. Online server: http://spellout.net/ibexfarm.
    Fonteneau, E., Frauenfelder, U., & Rizzi, L. (1998). On the contribution of ERPs to the study of language comprehension. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 68, 111–124.
    Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392.
    Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 22(5), 1219–1248.
    Grey, S., Tanner, D., & van Hell, J. G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 27–43.
    de Haan, F. (2006). Typological approaches to modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The Expression of Modality (pp. 27–70). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage, 20(Suppl. 1), S18–S29.
    Hagoort, P. (2016). Chapter 28. MUC (Memory, Unification, Control): a model on the neurobiology of language beyond single word processing. In G., Hickok, & S. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 339–347). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Holler, A. (2018). A discourse-relational approach to continuation. In A., Benz, & P. Kühnlein (Eds.), Constraints in Discourse (pp. 249–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Huang, L. M.-J., (1987). Aspect: a general system and its manifestation in Mandarin Chinese. [Doctoral dissertation, Rice University]. Rice Digital Scholarship Archive repository. https://scholarship.rice.edu/handle/1911/16067.
    Huang, L. M.-J., & Davis, P. W. (1989). An aspectual system in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 17(1), 128–166.
    Hunter, J. (2012). Now: a discourse-based theory. In M. Aloni, V. Kimmelman, F. Roelofsen, G. Sassoon, K. Schulz, & M. Westera (Eds.). Logic, Language and Meaning: 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 371–380). Heidelberg: Springer.
    Iljic, R. (1990). The verbal suffix -guo in Mandarin Chinese and the notion of recurrence. Lingua, 81(4), 301–326.
    Iljic, R. (2009). Grammaticalization of the notion of “passing” in Chinese (aspectual values). Bulletin of SOAS, 72(3), 513–524.
    Iljic, R. (2010). Holisticity, discontinuity, class in Chinese aspect. Language Research, 46(2), 147–198.
    Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removal of eye artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1745–1758.
    Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 621–635.
    Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159–201.
    Khoo, Y. K., & Lin, J. (2020). A corpus-based investigation of yǒu in Singapore Mandarin: The case for an existential perfect marker. In Q. Su & W. Zhan (Eds.), From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct: Corpus-based, Near Synonym Driven Approaches to Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 101–118). Beijing: Beijing University Press.
    Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225.
    Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London, New York: Routledge.
    Klein, W., Li, P., and Hendricks, H. (2000). Aspect and Assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Language & Linguistic Theory, 18(4), 723–770.
    Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT VIII (Vol. 8, pp. 92–110). CLC Publications.
    Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647.
    Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205.
    Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163.
    Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: an event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338.
    Length, R. (2020). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.4.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
    Lei, D. (2020). Hanyu fangyan zaici biaoji “guo3” de gongneng ji qi xingcheng [A study on the function and formation of the recurrence aspect marker guo3 in dialects in Southern China]. Fangyan, 4, 445–451.
    Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
    Li, W. (2012). Temporal and aspectual references in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 2045–2066.
    Li, W.-C. C. (2004). Conflicting notions of language purity: The interplay of archaising, ethnographic, reformist, elitist and xenophobic purism in the perception of Standard Chinese. Language & Communication, 24(2), 97–133.
    Liao, C.-H., & Lau, E. (2020). Enough time to get results? An ERP investigation of prediction with complex events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(9), 1162–1182.
    Lin, J.-W. (2000). On the temporal meaning of -le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 1(2), 109–133.
    Lin, J.-W. (2003). Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12(3), 259–311.
    Lin, J.-W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23(1), 1–53.
    Lin, J.-W. (2007). Predicate restriction, discontinuity property and the meaning of the perfective marker guo in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16, 237–257.
    Liu, C.-T. (2011). Motivations for grammaticalization: A case study of the realis marker you (有) in Taiwan Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 12th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW-12), 42–49.
    Liu, L. H. (2013). Realis le and marked/unmarked aspectual categories in Chinese. Linguistics, 51(5), 893–927.
    Liu, X. (1988). Xiandai Hanyu ciwei ‘le’ de yufa yiyi [On the meaning and syntax of the suffix ‘le’ in modern Chinese]. Zhonguo Yuwen, 5, 321–330.
    Longacre, R. E. (1972). Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents in New Guinea languages: discussion. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14.
    Lü, S. (1980). Xiandai Hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Publishers.
    Luck, S. J., & Gaspelin, N. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn’t). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157.
    Lyons, J. (1977). 17 Modality. In Semantics (Vol. 2, pp. 787–849). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Malko, A. (2018). ibextor package. https://github.com/antonmalko/ibextor.
    Martín-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Gonzalo, R., De Heras, L., & Fernández-Frías, C. (2006). Brain potentials to mathematical syntax problems. Psychophysiology, 43(6), 579–591.
    MathWorks, I. (2005). MATLAB: The Language of Technical Computing. Desktop Tools and Development Environment, Version 7 (Vol. 9): MathWorks.
    McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 477–494.
    McTaggart, J. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17(68), 457–474.
    Mehravari, A. S., Tanner, D., Wampler, E. K., Valentine, G. D., & Osterhout, L. (2015). Effects of grammaticality and morphological complexity on the P600 event-related potential component. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0140850
    Michaelis, L. A. (2006). 10 Tense in English. In B. Arts and A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 220 – 243). Malden, MA, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Co.
    Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14(2), 15–28.
    Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930.
    Münte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 71–73.
    Myers, J. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. London, New York: Routledge.
    Nuyts, J. (2006). Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The expression of modality (Vol. 126, pp. 1–26). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
    Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806
    Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 20, 786–803.
    Osterhout, L., McLaughin, J., & Bersick, M. (1997). Event-related brain potentials and human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 203–209.
    Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 739–773.
    Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 283–317.
    Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Patel, A.D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(6), 717–733.
    Pozniak, C., Hemforth, B., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Cross-domain priming form mathematics to relative-clause attachment: a visual-world study in French. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2056.
    Qiu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2012). Processing temporal agreement in a tenseless language: An ERP study of Mandarin Chinese. Brain Research, 1446, 91–108.
    R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
    Reichenbach, H. (2005). The tenses of verbs. In I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky and R. Gaizauskas (Eds.), The language of time: A reader (pp. 71–78). Oxford University Press on Demand. (Original work: Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Dover Publications.)
    Ren, F. (2008). Temporal meaning of -le in Chinese. In K. M. M. Chan, & H. Kang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20) (pp. 789–800), Columbus, Ohio: NACCL Proceedings Online.
    Richard, L., & Charbonneau, D. (2009). An introduction to E-Prime. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(2), 68–76.
    Roberts, J. R. (1990). Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 363–401.
    Roberts, J. R. (2016). Amele RRG grammatical sketch. [Unpublished manuscript]. Retrieved from: https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/68531.
    Ross, C. (1995). Temporal and aspectual reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 23(1), 87–136.
    Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory & Cognition, 18, 367–379.
    Shapiro, M. (2003). Hindi. In G. Cardona, & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages (pp. 250–285), London: Routledge.
    Shyu, S.-I., & Chuang, Y.-C. (2015). Approximating to the event boundary, (counter)factuality and approximative cha(yi)dian. In M.Y. Tseng (Ed.), Analyzing Language as Material (pp. 97–120). Kaohsiung: Guoli Zhongshan Daxue Chuban She.
    Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 0.28-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.
    Sinha, C., and Gärdenfors, P. (2014). Time, space, and events in language and cognition: A comparative view: Time, space, and events in language and cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1326(1), 72–81.
    Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Smith, C. S., and Erbaugh, M. S. (2005). Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics, 43(4), 713–756.
    Smollett, R. (2005). Quantized direct objects don’t delimit after all. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swaart, and A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on Aspect (pp. 41–60), Dordrecht: Springer.
    Soh, H. L., & Gao, M. (2006). Perfective aspect and transition in Mandarin Chinese: an analysis of double -le sentences. In P. Denis, E. McCready, & A. Palmer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Issues at the Semantics- Pragmatics Interface (pp. 107–122), Somerville Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    Soh, H. L., & Kuo, J. Y. (2005). Perfective aspect and accomplishment situations in Mandarin Chinese. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swaart, and A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on Aspect (pp. 199–216), Dordrecht: Springer.
    Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2011). Language-related ERP components. In E. S. Kappenman, & S. J. Luck (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (pp. 397–439), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Sybesma, R. (1999). The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Sybesma, R. (2007). Whether we tense-agree overtly or not. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), 580–587.
    Sybesma, R. (2017). Aspect, Inner. In R. Sybesma, W. Behr, Y. Gu, Z. Handel, C.-T. J. Huang, & J. Myers (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Leiden: Brill.
    Tai, H.-Y. J. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, & D. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on Lexical Semantics, Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    Talmy, L. (2000). The relation of Grammar to Cognition. In L. Talmy (Ed.), Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol.1, pp. 21–96). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Tanner, D. (2015). On the left anterior negativity (LAN) in electrophysiological studies of morphosyntactic agreement: A Commentary on “Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions” by Molinaro et al., 2014. Cortex, 66, 149–155.
    Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., & Luck, S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 997–1009.
    Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2020). Evidentiality ‘in’ and ‘as’ context: corpus-based insights about the Mandarin V-过 guo construction. In B. Basciano, F. Gatti, & A. Morbiato (Eds.), Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing.
    Teng, S. (1973). Negation and aspects in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguisitcs, 1(1), 14–37.
    Thompson, J. C. (1968). Aspects of the Chinese verb. Linguistics, 38, 70–76.
    Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160.
    Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Herman, K. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41–63.
    Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 559–570.
    Wen, C. (2020). Hanyu fangyan de chongxingti zhuci “guo” [On the resumption-indicating particle guo in Chinese dialects]. Fangyan, 4, 437–444.
    Wen, H. (2002) You ‘y avoir’ grammatical dans le mandarin de Taïwan [Grammatical you ‘to have’ in Taiwan Mandarin]. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 31(2), 279–292.
    Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
    Woo, I.-H. (2018). On perfective -le in Mandarin Chinese: theoretical and pedagogical issues. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 8(2), 139–158.
    Wu, J.-S. (2005). The semantics of the perfective le and its context-dependency: an SDRT approach. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14(4), 299–366.
    Wu, J.-S. (2008). Terminability, wholeness and the semantics of the experiential guo. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17(1), 1–32.
    Wu, J.-S. (2009a). Tense as a discourse feature: Rethinking temporal location in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 18(2), 145–165.
    Wu, J.-S. (2009b). Aspectual influence on temporal relations: A case study of the experiential GUO in Mandarin. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 7(2), 1–24.
    Wu, J.-S. (2010). Interactions between aspect and temporal relations: a case study of the perfective le. Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 65–98.
    Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: a corpus-based study. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Xu, H. (2019). The experiential aspect of Mandarin Chinese (-guo): semantics and pragmatics. Lingua, 229, 102714.
    Yano, M., Niikuni, K., Ono, H., Sato, M., Tang, A. A., & Koizumi, M. (2019). Syntax and processing in Seediq: an event-related potential study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 28, 395–419.
    Yeh, M. (1996). An analysis of the experiential guoexp in Mandarin: a temporal quantifier. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 5, 151–182.
    Zehr, J., & Schwarz, F. (2018). PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832.
    Zhang, N. (2013). Encoding unexpectedness by aspect inflexion. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 39(1), 23–57.
    Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect. Neuroreport, 19(10), 1039–1043.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE