簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃于修
Huang yu-hsiu
論文名稱: 台灣叩應節目中認同的語言策略探討
A Study of Identity Construction Strategies in a Taiwan Call-in Show
指導教授: 蘇席瑤
Su, Hsi-Yao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 150
中文關鍵詞: 認同立場語言策略語碼轉換叩應節目
英文關鍵詞: identity, stance, linguisitc strategies
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:175下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討叩應節目中語言與政治立場、族群認同之關係。以目前最受歡迎的大話新聞為例,我們採用了2008年總統大選的前兩個禮拜叩應內容,總共22個段落,叩應題目與政黨、族群相關。並將這些語料,驗證於巴寇和霍爾(Bucholtz and Hall)於2004和2005提出之認同分析的架構(framework of analyzing identity)與泰伏和透納於1986年提出之社會認同理論(social identity theory)。主要採用巴寇和霍爾提出的其中三個策略做為本研究的主要分類依據,分別為同化(adequation)、異化(distinction),以及證實(authentication)。分析結果顯示原本存在之泛綠泛藍的族群衝突,透過語言策略的應用而越發強烈。
    證實的策略可透過引用、反問句,打油詩,和隱喻達成。同化和異化的策略則可透過代詞、認同標記、否定動詞、被字句和言談策略達成。其中,言談策略又可進一步分為反義詞、否定標記、對比標記、反問句和語碼轉換。
    簡而言之,本研究證實了對同族群的成員,在語言策略上,大多以正面且肯定的面向呈現。相對的,對不同族群的成員,則是以負面且否定的面向呈現。亦即驗證了泰伏和透納的社會認同理論。

    The thesis aims to examine the relations among language use, political stance and ethnic identity. The popular call-in show, Da Hwa News, renowned for the pungent comments attributed by the call-in audience, was selected as the research target. A total of 22 call-in sections, from May 5 to May 19, 2008, whose call-in topics were associated with political party or ethnology were downloaded from Youtube and qualitatively measured based on Bucholtz and Hall’s framework (2004, 2005) of analyzing identity and social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner 1986). Three tactics of intersubjectivity were further adopted as main categories, including adequation, distinction, and authentication. Results of the analyses revealed that the already existed ethnic contradiction between the pan-green and the pan-blue has been aggrandized through the linguistic devices.
    The tactic of authentication was linguistically achieved through quotations, rhetorical questions, doggerels, and metaphors. The tactics of adequation and distinction were linguistically achieved through deixis, identity labels, negative verbs, bei-constructions, and discourse devices inclusive of semantic opposites, negative markers, contrastive markers, rhetorical questions, and codeswitching.
    In sum, the thesis has demonstrated that the in-group members are linguistically favored and out-group members are linguistically derogated. The discrepancy between the groups is aggrandized by the call-in audiences.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT I ENGLISH ABSTRACT II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IV TABLE OF CONTENTS V LIST OF TABLES VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTOIN 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 The history of Taiwan and the Taiwanese language 2 1.3 Scope and Goal 6 1.4 Organization of the Present Study 8 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 Introduction 9 2.1 The Definition of Identity 9 2.2 The Principles for Analyzing Identity (Bucholtz and Hall 2004, 2005) 14 2.2.1 The Emergence Principle 14 2.2.2 The Positionality Principle 15 2.2.3 The Indexicality Principle 16 2.2.4 The Relationality Principle 17 2.2.4.1 Adequation and Distinction 18 2.2.4.2 Authentication and Denaturalization 19 2.2.4.3 Authorization and Illegitimation 20 2.2.4.4 Interactions between Tactics 21 2.2.5 The Partialness Principle 21 2.2.6 Interim Summary 22 2.3 Social Identity Theory and Identity Researches in Gender, Nationality, and Profession 22 2.3.1 Social Identity Theory 23 2.3.2 Gender, Professional, and Nationality Identity 24 2.4 Stancetaking in Discourse 26 2.5 Style in Sociolinguistics 29 2.6 Footing in Sociolinguistics 29 2.7 A Summary of Literature Review 30 CHAPTER THREE METHOLOGY 3.1 Call-in program 32 3.2 Data Collection 33 3.3 Data analysis 39 CHAPTER FOUR DANA ANALYSIS 4.1 Devices that have achieved adequation 41 4.1.1 Deixis 42 4.1.2 Identity Labels 51 4.1.3 Discourse Strategies 55 4.1.4 Interactions among Identity, Deixis, Lexicon, and Other Devices 60 4.2 Devices that Achieve Distinction 61 4.2.1 Deixis 62 4.2.2 Identity Label 94 4.2.3 Discourse Devices 103 4.2.3.1 Semantic Opposites 103 4.2.3.1.1 Complementary Antonymy 104 4.2.3.1.2 Gradable Antonymy 106 4.2.3.1.3 Directional Antonymy 109 4.2.3.2 Negative Marker 112 4.2.3.3 Contrastive Markers 114 4.2.3.4 Rhetorical Question 118 4.2.3.5 Codeswitching 121 4.2.4 Negative Verbs & Bei Construction 122 4.2.5 Interactions among Identity Labels, Deixis, Lexicon, and Discourse Devices 127 4.3 Devices that Achieve Authentication 129 4.4 Results and Discussion 134 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 5.1 Summary and Implications 137 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Future Research 140 REFERENCES 142

    Alexandra, Jaffe. 2009. The sociolinguistics of stance. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, eds. by Jaffe Alexandra. USA: Oxford University Press.
    Antaki, Charles and Sue Widdicombe. 1998. Identities in Talk. London: Sage Publications.
    Antaki, Charles, Susan Condor and Mark Levine. 1996. Social identities in talk: speakers own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology 35: 473-492.
    Bamberg, Michael. 2004. Positioning with Davie Hogan: Stories, tellings, and identities. Narrative Analysis: Studying the Development of Individuals in Society, ed. by Colette Daiute and Cynthia Lightfoot, 5-57. CA: Sage.
    Bauman, Richard. 1977. Verbal art as performance. Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
    Bauman, Richard and Charles Briggs. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59-88.
    Bauman, Richard. 1992. Contextualization, tradition, and the dialogue of genres: Icelandic legends of the Kraftaskald. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 125-45. Cambridge University Press.
    Bauman, Richard. 2004. The ethnography of genre in a Mexican market: Form, function, variation. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Penelope Eckert and John Rickford, 57-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh University Press.
    Besnier, Niko. 2004. Consumption and cosmopolitanism: Practicing modernity at the secondhand marketplace in Nuku’alofa, Tonga. Anthropological Quarterly 77.1: 7-45.
    Biq, Yung-O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 307-321.
    Brewer, Marilynn and Rupert Brown. 1998. Intergroup relations. Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, ed. by Daniel Gilbert, Susan Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey, 554-594. Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.
    Briggs, Charles. 1988. Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
    Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2003. Language and Identity. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 368-394. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7.4-5: 585-614.
    Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2004. Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33.4: 501-547.
    Bucholtz, Mary. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 84-100.
    Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    Cameron, Deborah. 1997. Performing gender identity: young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. Language and Masculinity, ed. by Sally Johnson and Ulrike Meinhof. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Chao, Yuan-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    Chen, Jao-ru. 1994. Call-in!! Underground radio: The Impact and Myth of Taiwan’s New Media Culture. Taipei: Rih-Jen.
    Chen, Shu-Hsin. 2000. Personal Pronouns in Political Discourse: A Study of the 1998 Taipei Mayoral Debates. M.A. thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chu, Chauncey and Chi Tsung-jen. 1999. A Cognitive-functional Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
    Coates, Jennifer. 1989. Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. Women in Their Speech Communities, ed. by Deborah Cameron and Jennifer Coates, 94-122. Longman.
    Cowper, Janet. 2003. Footing, framing and the format sketch: Strategies in political satire. Framing and Perspectivising in Discourse, ed. by Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer, 109-145.
    Cruse, Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20.1: 43-63.
    Drew, Paul. 2005. Conversation analysis. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 71-102. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susunna Cumming, and Danae Paolin. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hilsdale: NJ.
    Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in High School. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
    Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
    Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. England: Longman.
    Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
    Fox, Barbara. 2001. Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11.2: 167-192.
    Gal, Susan and Judith Irvine. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, ed. by Paul Kroskrity, 35-84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
    Gal, Susan, and Judith Irvine. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62: 967-1001.
    Gaudio, Rudolf . 2001. White men do it too: Racialized (homo)sexualities in postcolonial Hausaland. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 36-51.
    Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2002. Narrative and identity management: Discourse and social identities in a tale of tomorrow. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35: 427-451.
    Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
    Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Doubleday.
    Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25: 1-29.
    Goffman, Erving. 1981. Radio talk: A study of the ways of our errors. Forms of Talk, ed. by Erving Goffman, 197-330. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Goodwin, Charles. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96: 606-33.
    Halmari, Helena. 1993. Dividing the world: The dichotomous rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. Multilingua 12.2: 143-176.
    Han, Chung-Hye. 2002. Interpreting interrogotives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112: 201-229.
    Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Harré, Rom. 1991. Physical Being: A Theory for a Corporal Psychology. Blackwell, Oxford.
    Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Heritage, John. 2005. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 103-147. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Hodges, Adam. 2005. “The Battle of Iraq”: The adequation of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden in the Bush war on terror narrative. Colorado Research in Linguistics 18.1: 1-11.
    Holmes, Janet. 1997. Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2.1: 195-223.
    Hsiau, A-chin. 1997. Language ideology in Taiwan: The KMT's language policy, the Tai-yu language movement, and ethnic politics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 18.4: 302-315.
    Hsu, Chan-Chia. 2008. A Corpus-based Approach to Antonym Co-occurrences in Mandarin Chinese. M.A. thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Huang, Ding-Hua. 1959. Personal pronouns in the Minnan dialect. Zhongguo Yuwen 12.90: 571-574.
    Huang, Shuan-fan. 1993. Language, Society, and Ethnic Identity: A Sociolinguistic Study on Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hymes, Dell. 1975. Breakthrough into performance. Folklore: Performance and Communication, ed. by Dan Ben-Amos and Kenneth Goldstein, 11-74. The Hague: Mouton.
    Irvine, Judith. 2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Penelope Eckert and John Rickford, 21-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Irvine, Judith. 2009. Stance in a colonial encounter: How Mr. Taylor lost his footing. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, eds. by Jaffe Alexandra. USA: Oxford University Press.
    Johnstone, Barbara. 1995. Sociolinguistic resources, individual identities, and public speech styles of Texas women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 5.2: 183-202.
    Johnstone, Barbara. 2007. Linking identity and dialect through stancetaking. Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Englebretson, Robert, 49-68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2006. Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text and Talk 26.6: 699-731.
    Kiesling, Scott. 2005. Variation, stance, and style: word-final -er, high rising tone, and ethnicity in Australian English. English World Wide 26: 1-44.
    Kiesling, Scott. 2009. Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, eds. by Jaffe Alexandra. USA: Oxford University Press.
    Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273-309.
    Lakoff, Robin. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.
    Le Page, Robert. 1977. Processes of pidginization and creolization. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, ed. by Albert Valdman, 222-255. Blommington: Indiana University Press.
    Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    Leech, Geoffrey and Jan Svartvik. 1978. A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
    Lin, Hsiu-Chuan. 1993. The Pragmatic Uses of Personal Pronouns in Mandarin Conversation. Unpublished M.A. thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Lu, Shu-xiang. 1992 [1985]. Demonstratives in Contemporary Chinese. Shanghai: Xuelin Publishers.
    Maitland, Karen and John Wilson. 1987. Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 495-512.
    Mills, Sara. 1997. Discourse. London: Routledge.
    Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Park, Joseph. 2004. Globalization, Language, and Social Order: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Unpublished Dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara.
    Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal 48.2: 173-178.
    Qian, Nairong. 1995. Modern Chinese linguistics. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
    Queen, Robin. 1998. “Stay queer!” “Never fear!”: Building queer social networks. World Englishes 17: 203-14.
    Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
    Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. Structures of Social Action, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 21-27. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Saeed, John. 1997. Semantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
    Sarbin, Theodore. 1986. Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger.
    Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier, 219-259. Orlando: Academic Press.
    Su, Hsi-Yao. 2005. Language Styling and Switching in Speech and Online Contexts: Identity and Language Ideologies in Taiwan. Ph. D. dissertation. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas.
    Tajfel, Henri and John Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. by Stephen Worchel and William Austin, 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. by Henri Tajfel, 61-76. London: Academic Press.
    Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33: 1-39.
    Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge UP: Cambridge.
    Tsang, Wai-King and Matilda Wong. 2004. Constructing a shared ‘Hong Kong identity’ in comic discourses. Discourse and Society 15.6: 767-785.
    Tse, Kwock-Ping. 2000. Language and a rising new identity in Taiwan. International Journal of Sociology of Language 143: 151-164.
    Wang, Yu-Fang. 2005. From lexical to pragmatic meaning: Contrastive markers in spoken Chinese discourse. Text 25.4: 469-518.
    Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Yang, Juen-ren. 1997. Betraying Lee Tao: 2100 Behind the Screen. Taipei: Shang Tzou.
    Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34: 431-466.
    吳佳晉 (2001)。<選戰加溫,五成call-in節目收視上揚>,《Open週刊》,第21期,39頁。
    李心怡 (2008)。<馬英九政績跌停 鄭弘儀行情再漲>,《新台灣新聞週刊》, 第643期。
    李筱峰 (2002)。《60分鐘快讀台灣史》。台北市:玉山社。
    洪維仁 (1992)。《臺灣語言危機》。台北:前衛出版社。
    劉月華、潘文娛和故韡 (2001)。《實用現代漢語語法》。北京:商務印書館。
    劉奕伶 (2010)。中央日報網路報。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE