研究生: |
葉昭逢 Yeh, Chao-Feng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
師父真能領進門? 高科技產業新進知識工作者組織社會化與工作鑲嵌之探討 Are Mentors Really Important Guidance to Mentees? The Study on Newly Employed Knowledge Worker's Organizational Socialization and Job Embeddedness in High-Tech Industry |
指導教授: |
邱皓政
Chiou, Haw-Jeng |
口試委員: |
邱皓政
Chiou, Haw-Jeng 張媁雯 Chang, Wei-Wen 許書瑋 Hsu, Shu-Wei |
口試日期: | 2022/04/23 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 91 |
中文關鍵詞: | 職場導師制度 、高科技產業 、組織社會化 、知識工作者 、工作鑲嵌 |
英文關鍵詞: | mentoring program, high-tech industry, organizational socialization, knowledge worker, job embeddedness |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200593 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:86 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近幾年本土高科技產業回台投資擴產或蓋新廠,以及外商高科技產業加碼投資台灣設計研發基地,大舉徵才甚至砸銀彈搶人的舉動,凸顯了高科技人才供不應求的問題,也使得留任人才成為燃眉之急;高科技公司紛紛導入職場導師制度,希望能夠協助新進知識工作者適應公司文化及融入組織中,促進其組織社會化的歷程。本研究的主要目的,旨在探討在高科技業的新進知識工作者,剛進到一家公司時,如何進行組織社會化?職場導師制度是否有助於新進知識工作者的組織社會化歷程?從工作鑲嵌理論的觀點,是否可以解釋職場導師制度的實施有利於降低高科技產業知識工作者的離職意願?
本研究除了進行文獻的探討之外,為了收集高科技產業內部真實的情況,採取了「深度訪談法」(in-depth interview)的方式,對任職於三家高科技公司的知識工作者進行深度訪談,從工作鑲嵌理論來探討職場導師制度與組織社會化的情況,並經由資料整理與分析,得出以下的發現與結論:
一、職場導師制度如果有完整的制度規劃,並且慎選職場導師人選,採用並落實「伴隨」的社會化策略,可以發揮預定的功效,有助於高科技業新進知識工作者的組織社會化進程。
二、從工作鑲嵌理論來看,職場導師制度的實施,會讓高科技產業的知識工作者跟組織其他成員有更多的連結,同時也享有較多的人脈資源;當新進員工的價值觀與組織文化更多契合、個人的知識技能與崗位需求條件更多吻合時,可以推論新進員工與組織有比較高的適配,得到更多的理解及共鳴,而傾向留在目前的組織中,不會輕易離職。
對於上述的研究發現與結論,謹提供給高科技公司的管理階層及人力資源部門參考,建議可在工作鑲嵌理論的基礎上,設計職場導師制度來引導新進員工完成組織社會化,成為組織的生力軍,為組織做出貢獻。
In recent years, the local high-tech companies has returned to Taiwan to invest in expanding production or building new factories, as well as foreign high-tech companies to increase investment in Taiwan's design and research and development bases.Each high-tech company tried to recruit talents with unprecedented high remuneration, which highlighted the problem of short supply of high-tech talents, and made retaining talents an urgent need. High-tech companies have implemented the mentoring system, hoping to help new knowledge workers adapt to the company culture and integrate into the organization, and promote the process of organizational socialization. The main purpose of this study is to explore how new knowledge workers in the high-tech industry can complete the organizational socialization when they first enter a company? From the perspective of job embeddedness theory, can it be explained that the implementation of the mentoring system is conducive to reducing the willingness of resignation of knowledge workers in high-tech industries?
In addition to the literature research, in order to collect the real situation in the high-tech industry, this study adopts the method of "in-depth interview", and interviewed five knowledge workers working in three high-tech companies , from the viewpoint of job embeddedness theory to discuss the situation of mentoring system and organizational socialization, and through data sorting and analysis, the following findings and conclusions are drawn:
First, if there is a complete system planning, and carefully select the mentor candidate, the implementation of accompanying socialization strategies can play a predetermined role in helping the process of organizational socialization of new knowledge workers in the high-tech industry.
Second, from the perspective of job embeddedness theory, the implementation of the mentoring system will help the knowledge workers in high-tech industry have more links with other members of the organization, whom are their good connections as well. When the value of the newly hired employee is more in line with the organizational culture, and the personal knowledge and skill fits the job requirements, it can be inferred that the he or she will be more compatible with the organization owing to more understanding , and tend to stay in the current organization, rather than to leave easily.
For the above research findings and conclusions, I would like to provide the management and human resources departments of high-tech companies with reference, and suggest that on the basis of the theory of job embeddedness, a mentoring system can be implemented to guide new employees to complete the organizational socialization , become the new force of the organization, and contribute to the organization.
參考文獻
中文部分
109年人力資源調查統計-年報-歷年就業者之職業(表14),中華民國統計資訊網,https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=47012&ctNode=518
王豫萱、紀乃文與蘇妙悅(2021),探討員工組織鑲嵌形態與其對任務績效、工作態度與行為的差異化影響,人力資源管理學報,第21卷第1期( 2021年6月) 1-26頁。
江烘貴與蔡志豪(2008),創業歷程的鑲嵌效果:社群中的結構理論觀點,創業管理研究,2008 年 12 月,第三卷第四期, p.53-67。
汪睿祥(2005),壽險行銷中的社會鑲嵌,關係管理研究,2005年12月,NO.2,P.77-102。
李家聖與陳益世(1999),高科技產業特性、工作壓力、工作滿意暨離職傾向之相關性研究:以新竹科學園區高科技廠商研發技術人員為例。人力資源學報,11,93-115。
李秋慧(2014),人格特質、工作特性與工作績效之關係探討~以台灣高科技員工為例(未出版碩士論文)。中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
李佳逸、高煌彥、余坤東、林宜真與諸承明(2014),新進員工社會化與工作鑲嵌、離職意願之關聯探討-以台灣海運業為例,航運季刊,第二十三卷第三期(民國103年9月)25-45頁。
吳佳珍(2005),[題名:社會網絡結構與組織創新績效-以電影產製組織的知識傳遞為例]。《數位典藏與數位學習聯合目錄》。http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/66/9e/92.html
吳美連、蔡明洋、張振傑與莊文隆(2007),師徒功能對組織社會化影響之研究-以志願役軍官為例(未出版碩士論文)。人力資源管理學報,7(2),2007。
吳天佑(2010),國際經濟情勢對我國高科技產業之機會與挑戰,經濟研究,第20期,210-220。邱惠玲、王玉珍、蔡惠華、馬辰明與鄭萬助(2006),建立人力資本統計之研究,主計專題研究報告,民國95年6月,頁45。
邱皓政(2012),「鑲嵌留人,好聚好散」,能力雜誌,672,36-43。
季旭昇 等著(2008),中文經典100句--荀子,商周出版,2008年07月06日。
卓怡君(2021),「聯發科狂搶人才!首度祭出限時轉職獎金15-25萬元」,2021年9月16日,自由時報,https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3674056
涂博崧(2000),師徒制度功能對徒弟職涯成效影響之整合分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學心理研究所。
許士軍(1996),知識社會下的管理與領導,世界經理文摘,122,44-54。
張蓮生(1996),企業從傳統產業轉入高科技產業之考量因素(未出版碩士論文)。政治大學科技管理研究所。
張玉文(譯)(2000),知識管理,臺北市:天下遠見。(Peter F. Drucker等)
張淑昭、陳志忠與許銘賢(2004),知識工作者工作滿意之管理機制建構研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,2004年9月18日。張曉芸(2006),金融產業基層員工組織鑲嵌、組織承諾及工作績效之相關性研究(未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學管理科學研究所。
許博翔(2006),知識工作者生活型態研究-以數位遊戲產業為例(未出版碩士論文)。中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
許姎娛(2011),企業推動導師制度之研究—以台電公司為例(未出版碩士論文)。中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
許甘霖(2017),社會團結經濟與鑲嵌性營運模式:博蘭尼取徑的嘗試,2017台灣社會學年會論文。
陳怡靜,林淑姬(2004),知識工作者的分類架構與人力資源管理,2004科技整合管理國際研討會,May 22,2004,PP 930~948。
陳雅雯(2007),營建從業人員組織鑲嵌、工作滿意度及離職傾向之相關性研究(未出版碩士論文)。高雄科技大學土木工程與防災研究研究所。
陳世傑、李文瑞、唐彥博與楊君偉(2007),台灣中小企業赴大陸投資之社會鑲嵌網絡分析,行銷評論,2007 年春季第 4 卷,第 1 期,1-18頁。
陳怡穎(2016),探討機構式社會化策略對新人適應的影響,科技與人力教育季刊,2(3),2016,PP.50-64。
陳勇與莊和(2000),後漢書,中華書局,2000年10月15日。
陳一姍、盧沛樺與吳靜芳(2020),「2020台灣投資地圖揭密!最大投資潮回台,哪些縣市資金、就業最多?」,天下雜誌,708期,https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102227?from=search
梁珮綺(2021),「台製造業研發經費穩定成長 近9年平均年增5.1%」,2021年08月27日,經濟日報,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/5703346
教育部統計處(2021),大專校院學生及畢業生人數預測分析報告(108~123 學年度)民國108年版,民國 108 年5月。
溫金豐(2004),新進專業人員的組織社會化戰術與組織認同之關係:工作經驗與成長需求強度的干擾效應,臺大管理論叢,15(2), 2004, PP.143-164。
楊朝祥(2007),高科技產業與人才創新--台灣模式與經驗,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,國政研究報告,2007年3月29日。
楊伯峻(2015),論語譯注(大字本),中華書局,2015年03月01日。
湯志傑(2009),新經濟社會學的歷史考察:以鑲嵌的問題史為主軸,政治與社
會哲學評論,第 29 期 2009 年 6 月135-193頁。
黃櫻美、吳祉芸與詹巧汝(2019),機構型社會化戰術與新進員工心理調適:正
向心情、自我效能與知覺社會支持之中介效果,管理學報,2019年12月 (36:4期) PP.421-445。
樊樂正(2014),社會支持及組織社會化程度對組織承諾影響之研究:以新進儲
備幹部為例(未出版碩士論文)。中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
詹巧汝(2018),新進員工的工作心情與組織社會化關係以及調適結果之探究
(未出版碩士論文)。東海大學企業管理學系。
潘乃欣(2021),「4頂大成立半導體學院 招收逾400生明年2月入學」,2021
年9月26日,聯合報,https://udn.com/news/story/6928/5772260
賴淑女、陳淑貞與鄭荻(2004),真實工作預覽、組織社會化與工作態度關聯之
研究:心理契約違反的作用,經營管理論叢,Vol 9,No.2,2014第19-32頁。
謝韻佳(2008),臺灣高科技產業導入數位學習之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺灣
師範大學工業教育學系。
謝彩雲(2020),鑲嵌導向之組織學習發展模式研究-以金融業教育訓練體系發展為例(未出版碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學管理學院高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班。
鳳凰網(2016),傳統的師徒制都長什麼樣?在這時代該何去何從?
2016/09/08 ,原文網址:https://read01.com/zJ4QQ4.html
英文部分
Abdallah Issahaka & Rune Lines(2019), Knowledge Workers: How Are They Different? (And Why Does It Matter?), August 2019,Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2019(1):15232
Allen, Lentz, and Day (2006), Career Success Outcomes Associated with Mentoring
Others: A Comparison of Mentors and Nonmentors, January 2006,Journal of Career Development 32
Ashforth & Saks (1996), Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer
adjustment.Academy of management Journal, 39(1), 149-178. p.152
Ashforth, B.E., Sluss, D.M. & Saks, A.M. (2007), Socialization tactics, proactive
behavior, and newcomer learning: integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70 (3), 447-462.
Banerjee, D.(2006), Information technology, productivity growth and reduced
leisure:revisiting “end of history”. Working USA, 9(2), pp. 199-213.
Belle Rose Ragins & Kathy Kram(2007), The Roots and Meaning of Mentoring, The
handbook of mentoring at work : theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks.
Biddy Fisher(1994), Mentoring (Library Training Guide), Library Association
Publishing, 25 Aug. 1994
Bozeman B, Feeney MK. Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring: A Conceptual
Analysis and Critique. Administration & Society. 2007;39(6):719-739.
Brian Uzzi(1997), Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The
Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 42, No. 1, Mar., 1997, pp. 35-67.
Brim, Orville G., Jr.(1966), Socialization through the life cycle,In Orville G. Brim, Jr.
and Stanton Wheeler (eds.), Socialization after Childhood:Two Essays, 1-49.
New York: Wiley
Brim, Orville G., Jr.(1968), Adult socialization, In John A. Clausen (ed.),
Socialization and Society: 182-226. Boston: Little, Brow
Chao, G. T., OLeary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J. and Gardner, P. D.(1994),
Organizational socialization: its content and consequences, Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(5),1994: 930-743.
Chao, G. T. (1997), Mentoring Phases and Outcomes. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 51, 15-28.
Clegg, C.(1990), The Relationship between Simplified Jobs and Mental Health: A
Replication Study [J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, 63(4): 289-296.
Cooper-Thomas, H.D. & Anderson, N. (2006), Organizational socialization: a new
theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices
in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (5), 492-516.
David Marshall Hunt and Carol Michael.(1985), Mentorship: A Career Training
and Development Tool, : The Academy of Management Review , Jul., 1983, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Jul., 1983), pp. 475-485
Donaldson, S. I., Ensher, E. A., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2000), Longitudinal
examination of mentoring relationships on organizational commitment and citizenship behavior. Journal of Career Development, 26(4), 233-248.
Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990), A comparative study of mentoring among men
and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 75(5), 539–546
Drucker, P.F.(1959), Landmarks of Tomorrow, Harper
Drucker, P.F.(1999), Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge,
California Management Review, 41, 79-94
Drucker, P.F.(2001), The Next Workforce-Knowledge workers are the new
capitalists, November 1, 2001.
Eby, L. T. (1997), Alternative forms of mentoring in changing organizational
environments: A conceptual extension of the mentoring literature. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 125–144.
Echols and Tsai(2005), Niche and Performance: The Moderating Role of Network
Embeddedness, March 2005,Strategic Management Journal 26(3):219 - 238
DOI:10.1002/smj.443
Fagenson(1989), The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of
proteges versus non-proteges, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Volume10, Issue4,October 1989,pp. 309-320.
Fang, Ruolian Duffy, Michelle K. Shaw, Jason D.(2011), The organizational
socialization process: Review and development of a social capital model. Journal of Management, 37(1), 127–152.
Filstad, C. (2004), How Newcomers Use Role Models in Organizational
Socialization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 396-409.
Fisher, K. and Fisher, M. D. (1998), The Distributed Mind: Achieving High
Performance Through the Collective Intelligence of Knowledge Work Teams.
New York: AMACOM.,
Floyd Wickman & Terri Sjodin(1996), Mentoring: The Most Obvious Yet
Overlooked Key to Achieving More in Life than You Ever Dreamed Possible,
McGraw-Hill; 第1版 (1 十月 1996)
Frances Horibe(1999), Managing Knowledge Workers: New Skills and Attitudes
to Unlock the Intellectual Capital in Your Organization, Wiley; 第1版 (18 1 月 1999)
Fred Nickols(2003), The Shift to Knowledge Work, https://www.nickols.us/
Fritz Machlup(1962), The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United
States,Jan 21, 1973, Princeton University Press
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss (1971), Status Passage. Chicago: Aldine.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975), Development of the Job Diagnostic
Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.
Halinen, Aino & Törnroos, Jan-Åke,(1998), "The role of embeddedness in the
evolution of business networks," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier,
vol. 14(3), pages 187-205, March.
Hart, Z. P., Miller, V. D. and Johnson, J. R. (2003), Socialization, re-socialization, and
communication relationships in the context of an organizational change.
Communication Studies. 54(4), 2003: 483-495.
Hassink(2002), Regional Innovation Support Systems: Recent Trends in Germany
and East Asia, March 2002 European Planning Studies 10(2):153-164
James A. Wilson and Nancy S. Elman(1990), Organizational Benefits of
Mentoring, The Executive,Vol. 4, No. 4 (Nov., 1990), pp. 88-94
Josh Zaretsky(2020) , Staying at home: why 20 million workers will continue
remote work after COVID-19, April 28, 2020
Kammeyer-Mueller, J., Wanberg, C., Rubenstein A., & Song, Z. (2013),
Support,undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 1104-1124.
Kathy Kram(1985), Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in
Organisational Life ,September 1985,Administrative Science Quarterly 30(3)
Kowtha, N.R. (2018), Organizational socialization of newcomers: the role of
professional socialization. International Journal of Training and Development, 22: 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12120
Levinson, D. J., Darrow, D., Levinson, M., Klein, E. B., & McKee, B. (1978),
Seasons of a Man’s Life. New York: Academic Press.
Maanen, John van(1976), Breaking in : socialization to work,Handbook of work,
organization, and society. - Chicago, Ill. : Rand McNally, ISBN 0-528-68030-7. - 1976, p. 67-130
Mark Granovetter(1985), Enomic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of
Embeddedness,American Journal of Socioligy,Volume 91,Issue 3(Nov.,1985),481-510
Meryl Reis Louis(1980), Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience
in Entering Unfamiliar Organizational Settings, Administrative Science Quarterly , Jun., 1980, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Jun., 1980), pp.226-251
Mitchell et al.(2001), Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict
Voluntary Turnover, December 2001,The Academy of Management Journal
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001), Why
people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
Naz Beheshti(2019) , Improve Workplace Culture With A Strong Mentoring
Program, Jan 23, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/nazbeheshti/2019/01/23/improve-workplace-culture-with-a-strong-mentoring-program/?sh=7b5549dc76b5
Noyelle, T. (1990), Toward a new labor market segmentation. Skills, Wages and
Productivity in the Service Sector, 212-224.
Rick Dove(1999), Knowledge Management, Response Ability, and the Agile
Enterprise, Journal of Knowledge Management, March 1999
Saks, A. M., &Ashforth, B. E. (1997), Organizational socialization: Making sense of
the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of vocational
Behavior,51(2), 234-279.
Saks et al.,(2007), Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic
review and test of a model, June 2007, Journal of Vocational Behavior 70(3):413-446
Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993), The effects of sex and gender role
orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251-265.
S. D. Reicher, R. Spears & T. Postmes (1995), A Social Identity Model of
Deindividuation Phenomena, European Review of Social Psychology, 6:1, 161-198
Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J. E.(2005), Alternative conceptualizations of the
relationship between voluntary turnover and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 50-68
Stanback, T. M. (1979). Understanding the service economy: Employment,
productivity, location.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Talya N. Bauer et al.,(2007), Newcomer Adjustment during Organizational
Socialization: A Meta-Analytic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, and
Methods, June 2007, Journal of Applied Psychology 92(3):707-21
Terri A. Scandura(1997), Relationships of gender, family responsibility and
flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction, Journal
of Organizational Behavior,Volume18, Issue4,July 1997,pp 377-391
The Benefits of Mentoring for the Mentor, Mentoring Complete by Engagedly, Inc
https://www.get.mentoringcomplete.com/blog/benefits-of-mentoring-for-mentor
Van Maanen, John Eastin.; Schein, Edgar Henry.(1978), Toward a theory of
organizational socialization, Barry Staw (ed.) Annual review of research in
organizational behavior, vol. 1, New York: JIP Press, 1978.
Van Maanen, John, and Edgar H. Schein(1979), Toward a theory of organiza-
tional socialization, In Barry M. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1:209-264
Zidle, M.,(1998) , Retention hooks for keeping your knowledge workers,Manage
50(1)