簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾景泉
論文名稱: 影響生物實習教師使用發問類比之學科教學知識成份
指導教授: 楊榮祥
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 生命科學系
Department of Life Science
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 學科教學知識生物實習教師
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:182下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採詮釋性研究法探討二位實習生物教師在教學情境中使用類比、發問的情形,並分析影響其使用類比、發問的學科教學知識成份,及二位實習生物教師使用類比、發問對學習者的影響作初步的探討,以初步了解其對科學教育的意義。
    結果顯示兩位教師發問型式主要以閉鎖性問題為主,較少使用開放性問題,在發問的技術上兩位教師皆知與生活相連接以引起動機,且這樣的技巧都能引起學生的回饋;而類比的使用次數相較於發問有明顯偏低的情形,在使用類比時顯示二位個案教師並不一定是目標物抽象才使用類比而多半是想比就比,對類比物的提出多半認為只要是日常生活想得到的就應該蠻恰當的,因此教師較少對目標物和類比物進行分析,而對於類比使用的認知只停留在類比重要性的認知,對於何時使用類比、如何使用類比二位實習生物教師有較少的認知。
    本研究將學科教學知識(PCK)的組成分成學生知識、自我知識、環境知識、教學知識、學科知識,而分析影響發問的PCK成份包括學生是否回饋(學生知識)、教師人格特質(自我知識)、教學信念(自我知識)、社會期望(環境知識)、教室環境(環境知識)、發問表徵知識(教學知識)、教材內容知識(學科知識)、實例(學科知識),而影響類比的PCK成份包括教學信念(自我知識)、學習別人使用類比經驗(教學知識)。
    就兩位教師使用發問和類比的成效言,未經精緻化類比和低層次發問對學生科學素養的培養實在非常有限,因此應建議教師在使用類比和發問時,應多使用高層次的發問和經過精緻化的類比。

    目 次 第壹章 緒論(INTRODUCTION) …………………………………..1 第一節 研究理念 ……………………………………….1 第二節 研究背景與動機 ………………………………………2 第三節 研究目的及研究問題 …………………………………3 第四節 研究的限制 ……………………………………………3 第五節 名詞釋義 ………………………………………………4 第六節 研究流程 ……………………………………………4 第貳章 文獻探討(LITERATURE REVIEW) ……………………..6 第一節 建構主義與科學學習 …………………………………6 第二節 學科教學知識(PCK) …………………………………..8 第三節 類比、發問 ……………………………………………14 第四節 教師專業成長 ……..…………………………………..22 第五節 詮釋性研究法 …………………………………………24 第參章 研究方法 (RESEARCH METHOD) ………………………26 第一節 研究架構 ………………………………………………26 第二節 研究個案 ………………………………………………30 第三節 資料收集及分析 ………………………………………31 第四節 信度與效度的考量 ……………………………………36 第肆章 研究結果(RESEARCH RESULT) ………………………….38 第一節 研究基本資料 ………………………………………….38 第二節 個案教師教學表徵(發問、類比)的使用情形………43 第三節 影響個案教師使用發問、類比之PCK成份 …………..67 第四節 個案教師使用發問、類比的成效 …………………… 82 第伍章 討論與建議 第一節 總結 …………………………………………………….90 第二節 討論 …..……………………………………………….93 第三節 建議 ………………………………………………… 99

    參考文獻:
    毛松霖、張菊秀(1997) 探究式教學法與講述式教學法對國中學生地球科學氣象單元學習成效之比較。 科學教育學刊, 5(4), 461-497。
    金鈴、林福來(1998) 準數學教師學習教學之前的教學觀念及其緣起。 科學教育學刊, 6(3), 219-254。
    李宗薇(1991) 教學媒體與教育工學。 師大書苑,187-189。
    李靜、宋立軍和張大松(1994) 科學思維的推理藝術。 台北:淑馨。
    吳正己、林梴裕(1998) 類比清晰度及系統性與程式設計概念之學習。 科學教育學刊, 6(3), 303-320。
    陳忠志, Peter C. T., Jill M. A.(1998) 國中教師科學本質及科學教學信念對理化教室環境的影響。科學教育學刊, 6(4), 383-402。
    陳慧君 (1994) 個案研究—影響教師發問技巧的內在因素。碩士論文。
    楊榮祥 (1992) 解釋研究法在科學教育研究上的運用。科學發展月刊,20(5),539-547。
    楊榮祥 (1993) 詮釋性研究法在科學教育上的運用。科學教育的
    詮釋性研究。1993年國際詮釋性研究研討會講義。
    楊榮祥(1996) 中學科學環境研究整合型計劃。國科會計劃。
    楊榮祥(1998)教師教學表現之研究及檢定。國科會計劃。
    楊榮祥 (1998) 台灣和西澳科學教室環境的合作研究---研究架構、方法及對台灣科學教育的啟思。科學教育學刊, 6(4), 325-342。
    歐陽鍾仁 (1986) 科學教育概論,P9-10。
    馮松林、段曉林 (1994)職前化學教師在微試教教學中之想法與
    決策。 科學教育學刊, 5, 167-205。
    張惠博 (1996) 職前科學教師學科教學知識發展之研究。 科學教育學刊, 4(1), 59-92。
    張美玉(1998) 建構取向的科學教室內師生互動實例。 科學教育學刊, 6(2), 149-168。  
    段曉林 (1994) 職前化學教師教學思考之個案研究。 科學教育學刊, 2(2), 115-140。
    段曉林 (1996) Investigating the Nature and Development of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers' Content Knowledge, Pedagogical knowledgw and Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D) Vol. 6, No. 2, 1996. pp.101-112.  
    鄭湧涇(1996)中等學校生物師資教育的回顧與前瞻。 科學教育學刊, 4(1), 93-110。
    Abell, S.K., & Bryan, L.A.(1997). Development of Professional Knowledge in Learning to Teach Elementary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 121-139.
    Adams and Krockover(1997). Beginning Science Teacher Cognition and Its Origins in the Preservice Secondary Science Teacher Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.34, No.6,633-653.
    Arthur N. Geddis and Eric Wood (1997). Transforming Subject Matter and Managing Dilemmas : A Case Study in Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol. 13, No. 6,pp611-626.
    Ashton, P., & Crocker, L.(1987) Systematic study of planned variation: The essential focus of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 2-8.
    Carlsen, W. S.(1993). Teacher Knowledge and Discourse Control: Quantitative Evidence From Novice Biology Teachers’ Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.30, No.5,471-481.
    Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing:An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
    Dagher et al. (1993) . Comment on “Analogy, Explanation, and Education”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.30, No.6,615-617.
    Daniel S.Domin. (1996). Comment: Concept Mapping and Representational Systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.33, No.8,935-936.
    David, W. E.(1993)Self-Generated Analogies as Tool for Constructing and Evaluating Explanations of Scientific Phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.30, No.4,367-380.
    Donna K. Dorough and James A. Rye.(1997). Mapping for Understanding. The science teacher, January, 36-42.
    Druva, C. & Anderson, R. D.(1983).Science teacher characteristics by teacher bahavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 20, 467-79.
    Duit, R.(1991). On the role of analogies and metaphores in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
    Erickson, (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.119-161). New York : Mecmillan.
    Ferguson and Womack (1993). The Impact of Subject Matter and Education Coursework on Teaching Performance. Journal of Teacher Education, January-February 1993, Vol.44, No.1, 55-62.
    Fouad Abd-El-Khalick and Saouma BouJaoude. (1997). An Exploratory Study of the Knowledge Base for Science Teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.34., No.7, 673-699.
    Harlen & Holroyd(1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, Vol.19., No.1, 93-105.
    Gilbert, S.W.(1989). An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 315-327.
    Grossman, P. L.(1992). Why models matter: An alternate view of professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62, 171-179.
    Hawk, P.,Coble, C. & Swanson M.(1985).Certification: It does matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 13-15.
    Hauslein (1992). Biology Content Cognitive Structure: From Science Student to Science Teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 29, No.9, pp939-964.
    Jonassen, D. H.(1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
    Josephine D.Wallage and Joel J.Mintzes.(1990).The concept map as a research tool: exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.27, No.10, 1033-1052.
    Joram E. and Gabriele J. A.(1998). Preservice Teachers’ Prior Beliefs: Transforming Obstacles Into Opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14(2),175-191.
    Kimberly M. Markham, Joel J. Mintzes, and M. Gail Jones. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.31, No.1, 91-101.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
    King, A.(1994). Guiding Knowledge construction in the classroom : Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368.
    Lawson,A.E.(1993). The Importance of Analogy: A Prelude to the Special Issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.30, No.10,1213-1214.
    LeCompt, M & Coetz, J.(1982). Problems of realibility and validity in the ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 30-60.
    Lederman (1994). The Nature and Development of Preservice Science Teachers' Conceptions of Subject Matter and Pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp129-146.
    Lederman and Huey-Por CHANG (1997) . An International Investigation of Preservice Science Teacher's Pedagogical and Subject Matter Knowledge Structures. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D) Vol. 7, No. 2, 1997. Pp.110-112.
    Mastrilli, M. T.(1997). Instructional Analogies Used by Biology Teachers: Implications for Practice and Teacher Preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 187-204.
    Marx R. W., Blumenfeld P. C., Krajcik J. S. (1998). New Technologies for Teacher Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14(2),175-191.
    Nettle E. B.(1998). Stability and Change in The Beliefs of Student Teachers During Practice Teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14(2),193-204.
    Pittman, M. K.(1999) .Student-Generated Analogies: Another Way of Knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 1-22.
    Roth (1996) .Teacher Questioning in an Open-Inquiry Learning Environment Interactions of Context, Content, and Student Responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.33, NO.7, 709-736.
    Shulman, L. S.(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
    Slavin, R. E. (1984). Research Methods in Education:A Practicial Guide. En-
    glewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Smith, E.L., Blakeslee, T.D., & Anderson, C.W.(1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 111-126.
    Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J.&Gallard, A. J.(1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (p.p.45-93). New York:Macmillan.
    Van Driel, Verloop, N & Wobbe de Vos.(1998). Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.35, NO.6, 673-695.
    Grady J. Venville and David F. Treagust.(1997). The American biology Teacher, Vol 59, No. 5, 282-287.
    Venville, G. J., Treagust F.D., Harrison, A. G.(1998).Teaching science effective with Analogies: An Approach for Preservice and Inservice Teacher Education, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 85-101.
    Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J. & Novake, J.(1994) Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel(Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210).

    無法下載圖示
    QR CODE