簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李淑惠
Shu-Hui Lee
論文名稱: 尋找一個位置:幼兒園女性園長的領導經驗
Finding a Specific Position: Leadership Experiences of the Female Directors in Kindergartens
指導教授: 廖鳳瑞
Liaw, Fong-Ruey
潘慧玲
Pan, Hui-Ling
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 315
中文關鍵詞: 領導幼兒園領導女性領導
英文關鍵詞: Leadership, Leadership in kindergartens, Female leadership
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:316下載:186
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的目的是透過性別的觀點,探索幼兒園女性園長的領導經驗。目前有關幼兒園園長的領導重心多半放在幼兒園園長的領導行為與風格,以及其領導行為對於教師工作滿意度的影響,但是對於女性領導者如何在社會文化的影響之下,建構出屬於自己的領導風格,以及幼教女性化的工作職場特性如何影響女性園長的領導等,這些在幼兒園園長的研究當中都鮮少被提及。因此,本研究主要從女性園長的經驗出發,探討女性園長從成為一個園長的過程,到身為園長的角色,如何發揮其領導,以及在領導經驗中所面臨的個人、家庭與社會文化的困境,試圖建構出女性幼兒園園長的領導經驗。
    本研究以八位女性幼兒園園長為主體,採取質性研究,以深度訪談、園所觀察以及文件收集等方法蒐集資料,每一位園長至少接受六次以上的訪談與四十小時以上的觀察。園長訪談的內容主要在瞭解女性園長的成長歷程以及領導經驗;觀察部分則以園長的園務工作為主,同時藉由觀察的內容,作為訪談與澄清問題的基礎。另外各園視園所規模至少有一到二位老師接受訪談,教師訪談內容主要在了解老師對園長的領導行為的看法與感受。
    本研究發現幼兒園女性園長在領導的經驗中,受不同園所文化情境脈絡的影響,她們身處於複雜的園所互動關係中,尋找一個屬於自己的領導位置。本研究主要獲致以下結論:
    一、成長歷程、家庭教養與幼教工作特性建構出女性園長關懷領導的特質。
    二、女性園長的晉升受個人、家庭與環境所影響。
    三、女性園長的領導位置視園所屬性差異而有所不同。
    四、女性園長對自己角色與園所文化的譬喻以「家庭」為核心的概念
    五、女性園長的領導充分展現一種對人的關懷與網絡式的領導風格。
    六、男人是女性園長領導背後無形的舵手。
    七、女性園長工作後的進修受制於家庭因素。
    八、女性園長面臨來自個人、家庭、園所組織結構與社會文化結構的困境。

    基於上述結論,本研究分別針對女性園長、師資培育機構、教育行政機關以及後續研究等,提出相關建議作為參考。

    The purpose of this study was to explore the leadership experiences of female directors in kindergartens from a gendered point of view. Most past research has studied the leadership and managerial style of directors in kindergarten and the influence of leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction. However, research studies about how a female director builds her own managerial style under the influence of the social culture and how the feminization of career place of childhood education affects female directors are seldom mentioned at present. Thus, in the view of leadership experiences of female directors, this study aims to discover the process of a female becoming a director in kindergartens; how the female directors function at work and the situations that need their attention; the influences of individual, family and social culture while being a leader; and an attempt to develop more leadership experiences for female directors in kindergarten.

    Quantitative research methods are utilized in this study. Interviews, observations, and reviews of relevant documents are used as tools for data collection. The participants are eight female directors who work in kindergartens in Taiwan. Each director had been interviewed at least six times and observed for more than forty hours. As for the interview, the main purpose is to understand the growing process and leadership experiences of these female directors; as for observations, we focus on kindergarten-related business which laid the foundation of the interview and question clarification. In addition, in order to find out teachers’ opinion and feeling about the leadership of their director, one or two teachers (according to the scale of the kindergarten) were interviewed as well.

    This research indicated that the leadership experiences of female directors were affected by the cultural context of various kindergartens. These female directors were looking for a specific role for themselves from the complicated interaction in kindergartens. The major results drawn from this study are as follows:

    1. Growing process, family education and the characteristic of children education construct caring leadership of female directors.
    2. The advancement of female director is affected by individual, family and objective environments.
    3. The leadership position of female directors differs depending upon properties of kindergarten.
    4. Metaphor of female director: the core conception is ‘family’.
    5. Female directors perform sufficiently in being attentive to people and an intricate web of managerial style.
    6. Male was an invisible challenge behind the female director.
    7. Female directors’ advanced study was bound up with family reason.
    8. Individual, family, the kindergarten organization and social culture system were big challenge for female directors.

    Accordingly, the study goes further to give some recommendations to directors who works in kindergarten; normal universities and universities that provide normal education curriculum, and researchers; educational administration; and future works.

    目 次 謝誌…………………………………………………………………………………..Ⅰ 中文摘要……………………………………………………..………………………Ⅲ 英文摘要……………………………………………………..………………………Ⅴ 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究緣起………………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機………………………………………………………………4 第三節 研究目的……………………………………………………………....7 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………..9 第一節 領導理論………………………………………………………………9 第二節 性別觀點與女性教育領導者之研究………………………………..28 第三節 幼兒教育領導之相關研究…………………………………………..45 第三章 研究方法與歷程……………………………………………………………53 第一節 研究方法……………………………………………………………..53 第二節 研究參與者…………………………………………………………..56 第三節 進入研究田野………………………………………………………..68 第四節 資料的分析與研究信實度…………………………………………..71 第五節 研究者的角色………………………………………………………..77 第四章 成為一個園長………………………………………………………………81 第一節 八位女性園長的成長歷程…………………………………………..81 第二節 工作經歷與邁向園長之路…………………………………………106 第三節 園所結構與園長角色定位……………….………………………...132 第五章 身為一個園長……………………………………………………………..155 第一節 女性園長的角色與園所文化譬喻………………………………….155 第二節 異中求同:女性園長共通的領導理念與策略…………………….163 第三節 同中有異:女性園長不同的領導理念與策略…………………….225 第六章 難為一個園長……………………………………………………………..237 第一節 家庭與個人的困境………………………………………..…………237 第二節 園所組織結構的困境…………………………………….………….254 第三節 外在社會結構的困境………………………………………………..263 第七章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………..269 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………269 第二節 建議………………………..………………………………………..274 論文外一章~研究者的省思………………………………………………………..278 壹、題目在哪裡?研究主題的決定…………………………………………278 貳、我的訓練背景足夠嗎?研究領域的熟悉…………………..………......279 參、什麼方法最適當?研究方法的選擇……………………………………280 肆、誰最適合?研究參與者的尋找…………………………………………281 伍、進入田野:猜心,問不出來的痛苦…………………………….……..282 陸、不只是研究者?與研究參與者的關係...................................................283 柒、迷失在資料的汪洋中:資料的整理與分析……………………………284 捌、該走了嗎?逐漸退出現場………………………………………………284 玖、經驗的對話:女性園長經驗的再思……………………………………285 拾、旅行的終點?還是中點?………………………………………………286 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………....287 中文部分……………………………………………………………………...287 英文部分……………………………………………………………………...294 附錄一 園長訪談導引………………………………………………………307 附錄二 教師訪談導引………………………………………………………309 附錄三 園長參與研究同意函………………………………………………311 附錄四 園長背景資料表……………………………………………………312 附錄五 教師參與研究同意函………………………………………………313 附錄六 教師背景資料表……………………………………………………314 附錄七 研究過程中寄發之謝卡內容………………………………………315 表 次 表3-1 八位女性園長背景資料………………………………………………….57 表3-2 參與訪談教師背景資料………………………………………………….67 表3-3 園長訪談逐字稿相關資料標註………………………………………….72 表3-4 轉譯符號表……………………………………………………………….73 表3-5 訪談資料編碼部分內容……………………………………………….…74 表5-1 八位園長的角色與園所譬喻…………………………………………...155 表5-2 受訪老師對園長角色之譬喻…………………………………………...159 圖 次 圖2-1 領導研究之發展脈絡分析圖…………………………………………………9 圖2-2 領導的五個層級……………………………………………………………..24 圖2-3 破裂的金字塔………………………………………………………………..32 圖4-1 百合園白園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………128 圖4-2 櫻花園應園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………128 圖4-3 荷花園何園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………129 圖4-4 蘭花園藍主任生涯歷程……………………………………………………129 圖4-5 杜鵑園杜園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………130 圖4-6 向日葵園項園長生涯歷程…………………………………………………130 圖4-7 梅花園梅園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………131 圖4-8 桃花園陶園長生涯歷程……………………………………………………131

    參考文獻

    中文部分:
    方志華(2000)。諾丁關懷倫理學之理論發展與教育實踐。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
    王大方(1996)。玻璃天花板:管理女性vs. 女性領導。台北市:時報出版。
    王志中(2003)。高職女性校長領導特質、領導行為與領導效能關係之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    王瑞香(1996)。基進女性主義:女性解放的根本契機。載於顧燕翎(主編),女性主義理論與流派(頁105-137)。台北市:女書文化。
    王慧敏(1988)。教師成就動機、園長領導方式對台北市幼稚園老師工作滿意影響之調查研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    王麗雲、潘慧玲(2002)。種子與土壤:校長與教師在學校革新中的角色與作法。載於潘慧玲(主編),學校革新:理念與實踐(頁101-137)。台北市:學富。
    卯靜儒(2004)。重構女性教師的「主體性」研究—女性主義研究觀點的探索。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁406-423)。台北市:心理。
    田秀蘭(2004)。Farmer的女性生涯動機理論。諮商與輔導,101,6-9。
    行政院主計處(2005)。台灣地區就業者之行業、職業與從業身分。2005年5月30日,取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/562110241471.xls
    何麗香(2003)。花蓮縣國小女性校長學校公共關係之研究。花蓮師範學院國民教育所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
    吳春助(2001)。國民小學校長學校行政混沌現象敏銳度與學校組織文化塑造關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    吳清山(1996)。學校行政。台北市:心理。
    吳清基、陳美玉、楊振昇、顏國樑(2000)。教育行政。台北市:五南。
    吳翌菁(2003)。Carol Gilligan女性倫理學之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    李玉惠(1998)。國民小學女性校長工作壓力與社會支持需求之研究。國立台北師院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    李安明(2003)。析論二十世紀末(1985-1995)學校領導理論之發展。教育研究月刊,7月號,49-66。
    李珮如(2004)。台北縣公立國小附幼園主任行政決定之個案研究。國立台北師範學院幼兒教育系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    李淑惠(2004)。幼兒園園長角色研究。未出版手稿。
    李淑惠(2005)。近二十年國內外幼兒園園長相關領域研究之發展與趨勢分析—兼論從性別與幼教任務觀點討論未來研究之方向。教育經營與管理研究集刊,1,99-130。
    李莉莉(2003)。國小女性校長領導風格之研究---以兩位女校長為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    李曉蓉(2003)。女性教師文化之探討:女性主義的觀點。幼兒保育學刊,1,39-63。
    林天佑、吳清山、張德銳、湯志民、丁一顧、周崇儒、蔡菁芝(2003)。教育行政學。台北市:心理。
    林合懋(1995)。學校主管與企業主管轉型領導之比較研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    林明地、楊振昇、江芳盛(譯)(2000)。R. G. Owens原著。教育組織行為(Organizational Behavior in Education)。台北市:揚智。
    林明地(2002)學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。台北市:高等教育。
    林新發(1995)。教育與學校行政研究。台北市:師大書苑。
    林 瑩(2002)。我國國民中學女性校長學校公共關係處理。暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    林靜慧(2003)。國中初任女校長組織社會化之研究:以六位女校長為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    武曉霞(2002)。台北縣國中女性校長領導行為及生涯發展之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    金耀基(1992)。關係與網絡的建構:一個社會學的詮釋。載於金耀基(主編),中國社會與文化(頁64-83)。香港:牛津大學出版社。
    侯怡楓(1999)。一位國小女性校長領導實際之個案研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
    俞智敏、陳光遠、陳素梅、張君玫(譯)(1995)。P. Abbott & C. Wallace原著。女性主義觀點的社會學(An Introduction to Sociology:Feminist Perspective)。台北市:巨流。
    施妙旻(1995)。隱涵領導理論與領導行為關係之研究:以台北地區公立國民小學校長為例。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    洪久賢(2003)。性別與家庭:女性主義的觀點。載於潘慧玲(主編),性別議題導論(頁103-131)。台北市:高等教育。
    洪瑞璇(2001)。大學女性院長生命故事之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    胡邦欣(2000)。學校與社區家長的互動關係:一位原住民女性校長的理念與策略。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
    徐宗國(1995)。工作內涵與性別角色。台北市:稻鄉。
    秦夢群(2004)。教育行政:理論部分。台北市:五南。
    高士傑(1996)。幼稚園園長的領導型式、教師準備與組織效能關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    高敬文(1996)。質化研究方法論。台北市:師大書苑。
    張沛文(譯)(2001)。J. C. Hunter原著。僕人:修道院的領導啟示錄(The Servant: A simple story about the true essence of leadership)。台北市:商周。
    張晉芬、謝小芩(2004)。性別觀點與量化教育研究。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁347-366)。台北市:心理。
    張瑞村(2002)。行政領導理論。載於張銀富(主編),學校行政:理論與應用(頁197-241)。台北市:五南。
    張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    張慶勳(1997)。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄市:復文。
    教育部統計處(2005)。幼稚園概況表。2005年7月1日,取自 http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/STATISTICS/EDU7220001/data/serial/k.xls
    梁文蓁(2001)。中學女性校長權力運用之研究:以兩位女校長為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁27-45)。台北市:巨流。
    莊安祺譯(2000)。H. Fisher原著。第一性:女人的天賦正在改變世界(The First Sex: The Natural Talents of Women and How They Are Changing the World)台北市:先覺。
    許玉齡(1997)。桃竹苗地區幼稚園園長領導措施與教師工作滿意度之相關研究。新竹師院學報,11,281-300。
    許玉齡(2000)。影響幼兒園領導措施的情境與理念。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC89-2413-H-134-005)。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院幼兒教育系。
    陳木金(1999a)。混沌理論對學校組織變革因應策略之啟示。學校行政,1,61-68。
    陳木金(2002)。學校領導研究:從混沌理論研究彩繪學校經營的天空。台北市:高等教育。
    陳仕仁(2004)。從教師到校長晉升之性別化歷程。佛光人文學院社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,宜蘭縣。
    陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南。
    陳宜宣(2000)。教育領導研究的女性主義觀點分析。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育議題的性別視野(頁41-72)。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
    陳宜宣(2001)。國中女校長溝通行為之研究:以兩位女校長為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳景蔚、鄭新嘉(譯)(2004)。B. George.原著。真誠領導(Authentic leadership)。台北市:天下。
    陳麗如(2000)隱涵領導理論研究—以國民小學校長領導為例。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    童鳳嬌(2004)家管與主管—一位國中女校長的生命經驗。國立政治大學學校行政碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    黃美惠(2004)。國小校長領導實際之質性研究:台北市一位資深女校長的故事。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    黃素華(1997)。幼兒園園長領導型式與教師組織承諾之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北市:心理。
    黃瑜鈞(2004)。台北市托兒所女性主管領導風格與保育人員工作壓力之相關研究。國立台北護理學院嬰幼兒保育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    黃麗蓉(1996)。組織中的女性領導。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    溫明麗(2003)。性別與哲學:女性主義彰顯的哲學思。載於潘慧玲(主編),性別議題導論(頁3-27)。台北市:高等教育。
    萬淑娟(2002)。幼兒園園長運用溝通媒介之個案研究。國立新竹師範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    葉俊伶(2004)。兩位非專業幼教背景的新手幼兒園主管之適應歷程。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    葉紹國(1996,6月)。道德推理中關懷導向與正義導向思考之區辨及其再中國社會實踐的特徵。本土心理學研究,5,264-311。
    翟智怡(2001)。高中職女性校長生涯發展歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    齊若蘭(譯)(2002)。J. Collins原著。從A到A+:向上提升或向下沉淪?企業從優秀到卓越的奧秘(Good to Great)。台北市:遠流。
    劉淑媛(2002)。國小女性校長專業發展現況、困境與需求之研究。國立新竹師範學院學校行政碩士般碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    劉復苓(譯)(2002)L. Cook & B. Rothwell原著。男女領導大不同:職場男女如何各自一展長才(The X & Y of Leadership: How men and women make a difference at work)。台北市:聯經。
    劉毓秀(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北市:時報。
    劉鳳英(2000)。家庭、工作與女性主體:五位國小女性主任追尋自我的生命史研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北市:心理。
    潘慧玲(1999a,6月)。教育學發展的女性主義觀點:女性主義教育學初探。載於國立台灣師範大學教育學系、教育部國家講座(主編),教育科學的國際化與本土化(頁527-552)。台北市:揚智。
    潘慧玲(1999b,11月)。Belenky等人的女性知識論。文章發表於國立台灣師範大學教育系性別與教育論壇。台北市:台灣師範大學教育系。
    潘慧玲、梁文蓁、陳宜宣(2000)。台灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析:女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊,11,151~190。
    潘慧玲(2001,5月)。踏尋研究中女教師生涯的影貌。論文發表於女學會、淡江大學主辦之「性別、心理與文化—本土女性主義的開展科際學術研討會」,台北市。
    潘慧玲(主編)(2003)。教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。台北市:高等教育。
    蔡秀燕(2001)。國小女性校長與社區互動關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    蔡保田等(譯)(1987)教育組織與行政。台北市:五南。
    蔡美儀(1992)。我國女性教育主管性別角色、自我概念、社會支持與工作適應之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學:理論、實務與研究。高雄市:麗文。
    蔡敏玲(2001)。尋找教室團體互動之節奏與變奏—教育質性研究歷程之展現。台北市:桂冠。
    蔡敏玲(2004)。我看教育質性研究創塑意義的問題與難題:經歷、剖析與再脈絡化。國立台北師範學院學報,17(1),493-518。
    蔡淑苓(1988)。幼稚園園長領導型式與教師工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    蔡進雄(2003)。談校長如何展現倫理領導。人文及社會學科教學通訊,14(1),25-36。
    鄭珊姍(2002)。幼教機構主管專業發展及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    鄭茱月(2002)。台北市國小女校長生涯發展歷程中重要他人及關鍵事件之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    鄭瑞銀(2004)。國民中學班級經營發展實例。國立東華大學教育研究所學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
    賴佳敏(2000)。她的故事:一位國小女校長領導風格之個案研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
    謝菊英(2002)。高屏區國小女性校長工作壓力與社會支持之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    顏童文(2001)。中部四縣市國民小學校長道德領導之研究。暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    羅虞村(1999)。領導理論研究。台北市:文景。
    蘇慧貞(2002)。幼兒園園長領導之個案研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

    西文部份
    Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching and feminism. Philadephia: Open University Press.
    Alcoff, L. (1994). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. In N. B. Dirks, G. Eley, & S. B. Ortner (Eds.), Culture/Power/History: A reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 96-122). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Baker, P. J. (1991). Metaphors of mindful engagement and a vision of better schools. Educational Leadership, 48, 32-35.
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
    Bass, B. M. (1988). Evolving perspectives on charismatic leadership. In J. A. Conger, R. N. Kanungo & Associates (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organization effectiveness (pp. 40-77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
    Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
    Bendelow, M. M. (1983). Managerial women’s approaches to organizational conflict: A qualitative study. Dissertation Abstracts international, 44(9), 2620-A.
    Berg, B. L. (1998). Qulitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Berman, B. T. (1997). Barriers to upward mobility in international schools for women administrators. ﹝Abstract﹞.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Berman, J. (1982, March).The managerial behavior of female high school principals: Implications for training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
    Bernard, B. J. (1981). The female world. New York: The Free Press.
    Beshears, P. L. (1996). The feminine ethos and secondary and elementary educational administration. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Biklen, S. K. (1986). ”I Have Always Worked: Elementary Schoolteaching As a Career.” Phi Delta Kappan, March, 504.
    Blackmore, J. (1989). Educational leadership: a feminist critique and reonstruction. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
    Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Open University Press.
    Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Bloom, P. J. (2000). Images from the field: How directors view their organizations, their role, and their jobs. In Culkin, M. L. (Ed.), Managing quality in young children’s program (pp. 59-77). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Bobula, K. A. (1996). Characteristics of administrator’s leadership style in quality child care centers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Portland State University, ME.
    Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. Newbury park, CA: Sage.
    Burgel, S.A. (1993). When a woman is the principal: A case study.﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
    Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 10, 587-599.
    Carlson, R. (1972). Unerstanding women: Implications for personality theory and research. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 17-32.
    Charters, Jr., & Jovick, T. (1981). The gender of principals and principal/teacher relations in elementary schools. In P. A. Schmuck & W. W. Charters, Jr. & S .R. O. Carlson (Eds.), Educational Policy and Management (pp. 307-332) . New York: Academic Press.
    Ciulla, J. B. (1998). Ethics, the heart of leadership. Westport, CT: Quorum.
    Clinch, L. W. (1996). Women superintendents’ forecast of critical leadership roles and responsibilities of the twenty-first century superinyendent.﹝Abstract﹞.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Conley, D. T. & Goldman, P. (1994). Facilitative leadership: How principals lead without dominating. Eugene, OR: Oregon School Study Council.
    Culkin, M. L. (1994). The administrator/leader in early care and education settings: A qualitative study with implications for theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Union Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio.
    Curtis, R. K. (1990). Complexity and predictability: The application of chaos theory to economic forecasting. Futures Research Quarterly, 6(4), 57-70.
    Cwick, E. D. (1999). An investigation into the career paths and leadership experiences of the female high school principals. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 56-59.
    Dex, S. (1987). Women’s occupational mobility. London: Macmillian.
    Dreeben, R. (1970). The nature of teaching: Schools and the work of teachers. Glenview, IL: Foresman.
    Driscoll, L. E. (1996). A study of Massachusetts elementary principals’ knowledge and attitudes toward their leadership role in building-based change. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University.of Massachusetts. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 223-256.
    Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
    Emmert, C. M. (1998). The leadership of women as high school principals. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Evetts, J. (1990). Women in Primary teaching. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Fiedler, F. E. & Chemers, M. W. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
    Floit, P. S. (1997). Transformational leadership and the superintendency in Illinois: A comparative study of women and men superintendents. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Francis, D. (1995). The reflective journal: A window to pre-service teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11 (3), 229-241.
    Furst, M. (1993). Women in leadership positions: Gender issues and reform agenda (Doctoral dissertation, fordham University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 3942.
    Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
    Gibb, J. (1969). Dynamics of leadership. In F. Carver & T. Sergiovanni (Eds. ), Organizations and Human Behavior: Focus on Schools. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Gilligan, C. (1977). In a difference voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4): 481-517.
    Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gilligan, C. & Attanucci, J. (1988c) .Two moral orientations. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, J. M. Tatlor, B. Bardige (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: a contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and educatio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gordon, A. L. (1986). Administrative behaviors of directors of early childhood programs: A descriptive analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, TN.
    Granier, A. (1991). The woman in the principal’s office. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, CO.
    Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant-leadership: A Journal into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
    Griffiths, D. E., Hart, A. W., & Blair, B. G. (1991). Still another approach to administration: Chaos theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(3), 430-451.
    Gross,N. & Trask, A. (1976). The sex factor in the management of schools. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
    Halpin, A. W. (1957). The Leader behavior and effectiveness of Aircraft commanders, in R. Stogdill & A. Coons (Eds. ), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, OH: College of Education, Ohio State University.
    Hanner, M. A. (1994). The feminine ethos and higher education administration (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 3050.
    Hart, A. W. (1995). Women ascending to leadership: The organizational socialization of principals. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp.105-124). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Hebert, K. B. (1996). Women who lead high schools: A missing element in leadership theory. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Louisiana State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday Currency.
    Hemphill, J. K., Griffiths, D. E., & Frederiksen, N. (1962). Administrative performance and personality: A study of the principal in a simulated elementary school. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. (1977). The managerial woman. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
    Hersey , P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resource(3nd Eds.). Englewood Cliffs,. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    House, R. J. & Mitchell, T. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 74 (3), 81-97.
    Hoyle, J., & Randall, R. (1967). Problem-attack behavior and sex, prior teaching experience, and college preparation of elementary school principals. Journal of Experimental Education, 36, 28-33.
    Hudson, J. (1997). Ethical leadership: The soul of policy making. Journal of school leadership, 7(5), 506-520.
    Hughes, L. W., & Roberston, T. A. (1980). Principals and the management of conflict. Planning and Changing, 11(1), 3-16.
    Hunt, P. (1980). Gender and class consciousness. London, Macmillan.
    Hyler, L. R. (1992). Leadership styles of secondary and elementary school administrators in selected Kansas public schools as related to gender and selected demographic variables. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas, KS.
    Indvik, J. (2001). Women and leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (pp. 215-247.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Johnson, C. L. C. (1995). Career paths, barriers and strategies of female school superintendents in the Rocky Mountain Region. ﹝Abstract﹞.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Jones, D. M. (1999). Facing the leadership challenge: A study of the pathways to leadership for black women in three urban public school districts. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Unversity. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
    Kezar, A. (2002). Reconstructing static images of leadership: An application of positionality theory. Jounal of leadership Studies, 8. 94-109.
    Kim, S. H. (1992). Women secondary school administrators in the Republic of Korea: Factors associated with success and failure. ﹝Abstract﹞.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Kopp, R. R. (1995). Metaphor therapy. New York: Doubleday.
    Korabik, K. (1996). Gender, leadership style, and managerial effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Association of Management. Toronto, Ontario: Association of Management.
    Korman, A. (1974). Contingency approach to leadership: An overview. In J. Hunt & L. Larson (Eds. ), Contingency approaches to leadership. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Larkin, E. (1992). The preschool administrator: Perspectives on leadership in early childhood education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, MA.
    Larwood, L., & Gutek, B. (1987). Working towards a theory of women’s career development. In B. Gutek and L. Larwood (Eds.), Women’s career development(pp. 170-184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Lashway, L. (1997). Visionary leadership. Eric Digest 110.Retrieved February1, 2001 from http://eric.uroegon.edu/publications/digestes/digest110.html.
    Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., and Maxine, G.. (1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, H. Hallinger & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 785-840). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Lewis, E. T., & McCarthy, P. R. (1988). Perceptions of self-disclosure as a function of gender-linked variables. Sex Roles, 19, 47-56.
    Liontos, L. B. (1993). Transformational leadership. ERIC Digest, 72. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 636)
    Loden, M. (1985). Feminine leadership, or how to succeed in business without being one of the boys. New York: Time Books.
    Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lyons, G.. (1980). Teacher careers and career perspectives. Windsor: NFFR-Nelson.
    Mann, D. (1976). The politics of training teachers in school. Teachers College record, 77, 323-338.
    Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241-270.
    McCabe, D. H. (2001). Metaphorical descriptions of the role of women school superintendents. Education, 121, 690-703.
    McIntosh, P. (1983). ’Stage of curricular revision’. Claremont McKenna College Conference on Women’s Studies. Claremont, CA.
    Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Ballantine Books.
    Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
    Morgan, G.. (1986). Images of organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Noddings, N. (1995). Care and moral education. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.
    Northouse, P. G.. (2001). Leadership : Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Oakly, A. (1982). Subject women, London: Fontana.
    Ogawa, R. T. & Pederson, T. (1987). Implicit theory of leadership A-mong Educators. Paper presented at the National Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
    Owens, R. G.. (1981). Organizational behavior in education. (2nd ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Paddock, S. C. (1981). Male and female career paths in school administration. In P. A. Schmuck, W. W. Charters, & R. O. Carlson (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 187-198). New York: Academic Press.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage .
    Prolman, S. (1982). Gender, career paths, and administrative perceptions. Administrator’s Notebook, 30(5), 1-4.
    Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Regan, H. B. & Brooks G.. H. (1995). Out of women’s experience: Creating relational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Riehl, C., & Lee, V. E. (1996) . Gender, organization, and leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration: Part 2 (pp. 873-919). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Robbins, S. P. (1983). Organizational behavior:Concepts, controversies, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Rodd, J. (1998). Leadership in early childhood: The pathway to professionalism. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business. Nov-Dec: 119-125.
    Schlechty, P., & Joslin, A. W. (1984). Images of schools. Teacher College Record, 86(1), 156-170.
    Schmuck, P. A. (1996). Women’s place in educational administration: Past, present, and future. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds. ), International handbook of educational leadership and administration: Part 1 (pp. 337-367). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
    Seplocha, H. (1998). The good preschool: profiles of leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick, NJ.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990a). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Skrla, L. (1998, April). The social construction of gender in superintendency. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
    Smith, D. (1979). A sociology for women. In J. Sherman and E. Beck (Eds.), The prism of sex. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    Smith, D. M. (1997). Women and leadership. In P. G.. Northouse(Ed. ), Leadership: theory and practice(pp. 204-238).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Smith, D. M. (2000). Gender and leadership style. In D.A. Smith (Ed. ), Women at work : Leadership for the next century (pp. 36-50). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Smith, K. A. (1995). How do we find them here? A case study of three women superintendents. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Spears, L. C. (2002). Tracing the past, present, and future of servant-leadership. In L. C. Spears & M. Lawrence(Eds.), Focus of leadership: Servant-leadership for the twenty-first century (pp. 1-16). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
    Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.
    Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Trainor, K. B. (1996). Women and leadership: A study of women leaders in Psychology. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Antioch University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Valentine, P. (1995). Women’s working worlds: A case study of a female organization, In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schumuck (Eds.), Women leading in education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Vanhuss, D. W. (1996). The women high school principal in Tennessee: A Qualitative study. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Waddell, A. M. (1996). A female in the elementary school principal’s office: A beacon for women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VA.
    Wentling, R. (1995, May). Breaking down barriers to women’s success. HR Magazine, 40, 79-85.
    Wertheimer, R., & Zinga, M. (1997). Attending to the Noise: Applying Chaos Theory to School Reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408707)
    Willower, D. J. (1960). Leadership style and leader’s perceptions of subordinates. Journal of educational sociology, 34, 58-64.
    Wincek, J. (1995). Negotiating the maze of school reform: How metaphor shapes culture in a new magnet school. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Winkler, B. A. (1994). Female public school superintendents in Pennsylvania: A descriptive study. ﹝Abstract﹞.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Witz, A. & Savage, M. (1992). gender and bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Wright, C. H. (1995). Factors that limit the entry of women to the superintendency: Perceptions of female superintendents in the Southeast. ﹝Abstract﹞. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    QR CODE