研究生: |
粘瀞方 Nien, Ching-Fang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
視訊面試的介面與人工智慧判斷功能對應徵者自我推銷印象管理之影響 The impacts of interface and artificial intelligence agent on interviewees’ self-promotion in video interviews |
指導教授: |
孫弘岳
Suen, Hung-Yue |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 56 |
中文關鍵詞: | 自我推銷 、 、印象管理 、同步視訊面試介面 、非同步視訊面試介面 、人工智慧 |
英文關鍵詞: | Self-promotion, Impression management, Synchronous video interview (SVI), Asynchronous video interview (AVI), Artificial intelligence (AI) |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000659 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:227 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
同步視訊面試與非同步視訊面試成為了近幾年來企業主流的面試工具,而人工智慧科技的興起被廣泛地運用在招募作業上,提供雇主有效率的選才。有研究發現,面試官對應徵者的外表知覺與第一印象,會因為不同的視訊面試介面,而影響面試官對應徵者的評價,繼而影響甄選效度。亦有研究發現,應徵者的自我推銷行為會影響面試官的評價。然而,卻鮮少有研究探討對於而應徵者在面試時的自我推銷行為,是否也因不同的介面設置產生差異?以及面試官感知應徵者的自我推銷行為是否也有所不同?此外,隨著愈來愈多視訊面試結合人工智慧的判斷功能,但此功能對於應徵者自我推銷的影響仍撲朔迷離。因此,本研究以同步/非同步視訊面試介面、人工智慧判斷及真人面試官為自變項,以準實驗設計方式探討在不同面試介面與不同決策代理的環境設置下,應徵者使用自我推銷印象管理策略以及面試官感知應徵者使用自我推銷印象管理行為之關聯性。
參與研究對象為116位應徵者,範圍設定在應屆畢業生或是正在尋找全職、兼職或實習工作機會的學生、社會人士。同時亦有116位面試官加入實驗,所有面試官設定為平均五年就業面試經驗的人力資源專業人員,研究方法以網路問卷的方式發放填寫,應徵者與面試官收回總計232有效問卷。根據研究結果顯示,由於同步視訊面試介面的媒體豐富程度較高,在面試中能傳遞較多的訊息,面試官感知到更多應徵者在面試時使用的自我推銷印象管理策略;然而,加入人工智慧面試官的同步或非同步視訊面試與應徵者自我推銷印象管理以及面試官感知應徵者使用印象管理並無顯著差異。
With the ever-changing nature of technology, synchronous video interviews (SVIs) and asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) have emerged as new interview modalities for enterprises in recent years, and the artificial intelligence (AI) technology is widely used in personnel selection.
Studies have shown that the appearance and the first impression of applicants in different video interfaces can affect interviewer’s rating and selection evaluation. Also, researchers found that candidate’s self-promotion behavior can affect interviewer’s rating; However, it has rarely been discussed that whether the interviewees’ self-promotion behaviors may perform differently toward the different interfaces and decision agents, which may distort the hiring decision as well as the interviewer’s perception of the interviewee’s self-promotion behaviors during an interview. Moreover, it is still unknown the effect of using AI agent on interviewee’s self-promotion behaviors. Accordingly, in this study, we conducted a total of four mock video interviews in a 2 (AVI vs. SVI) × 2 (human rater vs. AI agent decision) quasi-experimental design. Using ANOVA hypothesis testing to test the relationship between interviewees’ use of self-promotion and interviewers’ perception of interviewees’ self-promotion with four experimental groups setting.
116 interviewees who are students, fresh graduates, looking for full-time or part-time job opportunities were invited; 116 interviewers with an average 5 years of interview experience Human Resource professionals participated in the experiment. All interviewees and interviewers were randomly assigned to one of our experimental groups, and they were conducted under the one-on-one mode. Received total 232 effective questionnaires, and found that interviewers perceived interviewees present more self-promotion behaviors in SVI with or without AI agent than in AVI with or without AI agent due to higher media richness; Nevertheless, neither interviewees nor interviewers present and percept more self-promotion behaviors with SVI or AVI plus AI agent.
一、中文部分
陳建丞(2007)。甄選面談中外表與性別偏誤之探討:結構式面談能消除它們嗎?臺大管理論叢。17(2),183-208
蔡維奇、陳建丞、陳皓怡、宋立國(2009)。應徵者印象管理戰術與面試官評價:面試官做筆記行為的干擾效果。管理學報。26(5),577-597。
二、外文部分
Apers, C., & Derous, E. (2017). Are they accurate? Recruiters' personality judgments in paper versus video resumes. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 9-19.
Anglim, J., Lievens, F., Everton, L., Grant, S. L., & Marty, A. (2018). HEXACO personality predicts counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior in low-stakes and job applicant contexts. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 11-20.
Baron, R. A. (1989). Impression management by applicants during employment interviews: The “too much of a good thing” effect. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research and practice (pp. 202-215). London: Sage.
Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Babyak, M. A. (2004). What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3), 411-421.
Barron, L. G., & Sackett, P. R. (2008). Asian variability in performance rating modesty and leniency bias. Human Performance, 21, 277-290
Brenner, F. S., Ortner, T. M., & Fay, D. (2016). Asynchronous Video Interviewing as a New Technology in Personnel Selection: The Applicant’s Point of View. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 863.
Blacksmith, N., Willford, J., & Behrend, T. (2016). Technology in the Employment Interview: A Meta-Analysis and Future Research Agenda. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 2, 2-15.
Chapman, D. S., & Webster J. (2003). The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection processes for job candidates. Int. J. Select. Assess, 11, 113-120.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 621-640.
Celiktutan, O., & Gunes, H. (2017). Automatic Prediction of Impressions in Time and across Varying Context: Personality, Attractiveness and Likeability. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 8(1), 29-42.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
Elliot, A., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505-510.
Ellis, A. P. J., West, P. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in a structured interview: A function of question type? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200-1208.
Finkelstein, L. M., Frautschy Demuth, R. L., & Sweeney, D. L. (2007). Bias against overweight job applicants: Further explorations of when and why. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 203-222.
Faul. F, Erdfelder. E, Buchner. A, & Lang. A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (1986). Self-Presentation and Self-Promotion in an Organizational Setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(3), 321.
Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (1989). Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Management, 15, 557-564.
Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (1991). Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gerich, J. (2012). Video-enhanced self-administered computer interviews. In C. N. S. Hershey (Ed.), Online research methods in urban and planning studies: Design and outcomes, 99-119. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 89-106.
Higgins, C.A., & Judge, T.A. (2004). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 622-632.
Hausknecht J. P., Day D. V., & Thomas S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol, 57, 639-683.
Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161-172.
Honkaniemi, L., Tolvanen, A., & Feldt T. (2011). Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 376-381.
Haan, M., Ongena, Y. P., Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T. A., & Glopper, K. D. (2016). Response Behavior in a Video-Web Survey: A Mode Comparison Study. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5(1), 48-69.
Hassell, M. D. & Cotton, J. L. (2017). Some things are better left unseen: Toward more effective communication and team performance in video-mediated interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 200-208.
Helle, A. C., Deshong, H. L., Lengel, G. J., Meyer, N. A., Butler, J., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2018). Utilizing Five Factor Model facets to conceptualize counterproductive, unethical, and organizational citizenship workplace behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 113-120.
HireVue (2018). The original online video job interview. Accessed date: 1 August 2018.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the Self, 231-262. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., & Cable, D. M. (2000). The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 383–406.
"LINE: Free Calls & Messages APKs". APKMirror.
Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13, 572-587.
Levashina, J. & Campion, M.A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview:
Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638-1656.
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge
Lind, L. H., Schober, M. F., Conrad, F. G., & H. Reichert. (2013). Why Do Survey Respondents Disclose More When Computers Ask the Questions? Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(4), 888-935.
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Krause, K. (2017). Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 371-382.
Liu, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., Bai, X., Wang, L., Qing, Q., & Lee, I. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century. IEEE Access, 6, 34403-34421
Moon, Y. (1998). Impression Management in Computer-Based Interviews: The Effects of Input Modality, Output Modality, and Distance. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(4), 610-622.
Martınez-Miranda, J., & Aldea, A. (2005). Emotions in human and artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 323-341.
Marcus, B. (2009). ‘Faking’ From the Applicant's Perspective: A theory of self‐presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 417-430.
Mohammadi G., & Vinciarelli A. (2012). Towards a technology of nonverbal communication: vocal behavior in social and affective phenomena.
Mejia, C., & Torres, E. N. (2018). Implementation and normalization process of asynchronous video interviewing practices in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(2), 685-701.
Nguyen, L. S., Frauendorfer, D., Mast, M. S., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2014). Hire me: Computational inference of hirability in employment interviews based on nonverbal
behavior. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16, 1018-1031.
Nikolaou, I. & Foti, K. (2018) Personnel Selection and Personality. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences. (pp. 659-677). London: Sage.
Naim, I., Tanveer, M. I., Gildea, D., & Hoque, M. E. (2018). Automated Analysis and Prediction of Job Interview Performance. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 9(2), 191-204.
Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2018). The importance of procedural justice in Human-Machine Interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 27-39.
Peterson, M. (1997). Personnel interviewers’ perceptions of the importance and adequacy of applicants’ communication skills. Communication Education, 46, 287-291.
Paulhus, D.L. & John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890-904.
Pickard, M. D., Roster, C. A., & Y. Chen. (2016). Revealing sensitive information in personal interviews: Is self-disclosure easier with humans or avatars and under what conditions? Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 23-30.
Raymark, P.H., Schmit, M.J. & Guion, R.M. (1997). Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 50, 723-736.
Robins, R. W., & John, O. P. (1997). Effects of visual perspective and narcissism on self-perception: Is seeing believing? Psychological Science, 8, 37-42.
Roulin, N. A. Bangerter, & Levashina, J (2014). Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 141-163
Roulin, N., Bangerter, A. & Levashina, J (2015). Honest and deceptive impression management in the employment interview: Can it be detected and how does it impact evaluations?. Personnel Psychology, 68, 395-444.
Rasipuram, S., Rao, S. B. P., & Jayagopi, D. B. (2016). Asynchronous video interviews vs. face-to-face interviews for communication skill measurement: A systematic study. Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 370-377). Tokyo, Japan: ACM.
Rao, S. B. P., Rasipuram, S., Das, R., & Jayagopi, D. B. (2017). Automatic assessment of communication skill in non-conventional interview settings: A comparative study. Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (pp. 221-229). Glasgow, UK: ACM.
Rachel Metz. (2020, January 15). There's a new obstacle to landing a job after college: Getting approved by AI. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/15/tech/ai-job-interview/index.html.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-Concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Stevens, C.K. & Kristof, A.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587-606.
Swider, B. W., Barrick, M. R., & Harris, T. B. (2016). Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 625-638.
Suen, H. Y., Chen, M. Y. C., & Lu, S. H (2019). Does the use of synchrony and artificial intelligence in video interviews affect interview ratings and applicant attitudes? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 93-101.
Suen, H.-Y., Hung, K.-E., & Lin, C.-L. (2019). TensorFlow-Based Automatic Personality Recognition Used in Asynchronous Video Interviews. IEEE Access, 7, 61018-61023.
Tedeschi, J. T. (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic press, Inc.
Tedeschi, J.T., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the organization. In S. Bacharach & E.J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 31-58). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 25-29.
Truxillo D. M., Bodner T. E., Bertolino M., Bauer T. N., & Yonce C. A. (2009). Effects of explanations on applicant reactions: a meta-analytic review. Int. J. Select. Assess, 17, 346-361.
Torres, E. N., & Gregory, A. (2018). Hiring manager's evaluations of asynchronous video interviews: The role of candidate competencies, aesthetics, and resume placement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 86-93.
Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232-260.