研究生: |
盧蘇檠 Su-Ching, Lu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中化學教師參與虛擬社群對其專業成長之研究–以Facebook平台為例 The research of high school chemistry teachers participated in virtual community and teachers’ professional growth: A study of Facebook |
指導教授: | 林如章 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
化學系 Department of Chemistry |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 106 |
中文關鍵詞: | 化學 、專業成長 、虛擬社群 、互動分享 、輔助備課 |
英文關鍵詞: | chemistry, professional development, virtual community, interactive sharing, promotes to prepare and design the teaching materials |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:120 下載:3 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以Facebook平台為例,探討高中化學教師參加虛擬社群對其專業成長之影響。
本研究採問卷法及訪談法來進行研究資料的收集,研究對象為台北市、新北市、桃園縣、新竹市、高雄市及花蓮市等21位高中化學教師。回收問卷後,統計每一個層面總數,然後取其百分比,畫長條圖容易比較老師對各層面的評價。另外從問卷對象挑選8位老師進行訪談,訪談採半結構式的方式進行,將受訪者的意見依各題摘要加以彙整,再予以綜合歸納、分析與討論。
在專業成長方面,本研究著重於討論Facebook平台是否能促進教師間教學經驗與知識的分享,是否有助於教師的備課與教材設計,操作使用是否較其他社群方便以及是否可成為提昇教師教學品質的平台等四大主題。
根據資料分析,主要的研究結論略述如下:
1.Facebook是一個可以促進互動分享與交流的平台。但有些學校會封鎖Facebook。
2.Facebook連線和討論很方便且收取訊息的速度很快,利於使用者操作。
3.大部分教師認為此平台是有助於輔助備課與強化教材設計。
4.Facebook在操作討論上較其他社群(部落格和BBS討論版)方便。
5.Facebook有潛力可以成為強化自我化學專業知識的平台。
6.目前參與人數少,教師期望有更多的人可以加入此平台以提供更廣的議題及更多的資料。
綜合以上結論,提出建議供教育行政機關、高級中學、化學教師參考並對未來發展的展望有所期許,略述如下:
1.建議教育行政機構認可教師的Facebook社群活動,讓他們蓬勃發展。
2.建議學校應保持開放的心胸,鼓勵教師參加網路社群以隨時提昇專業。
3.建議教師參加各專業領域的Facebook社群,並常上網互動交流,以提昇自己的專業。
4.期許經過一段時間運作且教師反應良好後,吸引更多教師加入,讓平台的討論更活絡,討論的深度及廣度增加,以利化學教師的自我專業成長。
5.期許可再針對專業成長的不同層面進行交流互動,以增加Facebook平台互動交流的內涵。
This study explored the effects of high school chemistry teachers participated in virtual community by Facebook and their professional growth.
The samples was were collected from 21 twenty-one chemistry high school teachers in 6 six different cities in Taiwan (Taipei City, New Taipei City, Taoyuan County, Hsinchu City, Hualien City and Kaohsiung City) by questionnaires. The collected responses were summed up by each aspect and expressed in percentages. Bar charts are used to compare the evaluation of each aspect by these teachers. We also interviewed eight of the teachers by semi-structured interviewed interviews and collected the data.
The questionnaires content included the teachers’ professional growth, which was determined by asking “Can the Facebook promote teachers to share their teaching experience and information?” “Can Facebook promote teachers to prepare and design their teaching materials?” “Is Facebook more convenient to operate than others virtual community platform?” “Can Facebook advance the teachers’ teaching quality?”
The findings in this study are as follows:
1. Facebook was is a platform which people can share their information. However, some schools block Facebook.
2. Facebook was is very convenient for discussion and obtaining information.
3. Most of the teachers thought Facebook promotes to prepare and design the teaching materials.
4. Facebook was is more convenient to operate than others virtual community (e.g., blog, BBS.) platform
5. Facebook was can potentially to be the self-learning professional information growth platform in the future.
6. With low participation at present, teachers expect to have more people joining this platform to provide deeper issues and further information.
Summarizing Base on the above conclusions, specific suggestions are made for the educational administrations, the high schools, and the chemistry teachers, and the outlook for the future development outlined as follows: the above discussion, suggestions are offered to administration s, high schools, and chemistry teachers with expectations in future development:
1. Academic administrations should approve Facebook social activities of teachers, allowing them to prosper and develope.
2. Schools should hold an open attitude and encourage teachers to participate in social networks to improve their professions anytime.
3. Teachers are advised to join Facebook societies of various fields, connecting and sharing professions with others to self-improve.
4. We expect after After being launched for a period of time, with we expect positive responses from teachers, more participator will be attracted to join this platform. With the lively discussions on the platform, both the depth and extent of the discussing issue can increase, benefiting self-improvement in professions of Chemistry teachers.
5. We expect interactions regarding different levels of professional improvement development be held to strengthen the content of Facebook social network interactions.
英文部分:
Anderson, C. (1987). The role of education in the academic disciplines in teacher preparation. Paper presented at the Rutgers Invitational Symposium on Education: The Graduate Preparation of Teachers, New Brunswick, NJ.
Bailey, D. S., & Zanders, E. D. (2008). Drug discovery in the era of Facebook—new tools for scientific networking. Drug Discovery Today, 13.
Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & Team, T. I. D. (2001). Designing and Building an On-line Community:The Struggle to Support Sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96.
Benedict, L., & Pence, H. E. (2012). Teaching Chemistry Using Student-Created Videos and Photo Blogs Accessed with Smartphones and Two-Dimensional Barcodes. Journal of Chemical Education, 89.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Mclaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L., WEI, R. C., ANDREE, A., RICHARDSON, N., & ORPHANOS, S. (2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A status report on teacher development in the United states and abroad. Dallas, TX: NATIONAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL.
Facebook. (2010). Facebook 公司簡介, Retrieved January 27, 2010, from http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2004). 教育研究法:規劃與評鑑 (卯靜儒, 李奉儒, 林麗菊, 洪志成, 曾玉村 & 蔡清田, Trans.). 臺北市: 麥格羅希爾.
Guskey, T. R. (Ed.). (2000). Evalusting Professional Development. California: Corwin Press.
Hirsh, S. (2004). Putting comprehensive staff development on target. Journal of Staff Development, 25(1), 12-15.
Hou, H.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2009). Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4).
Jacobsen, E. K., & Groat, R. K. (2010). Support Your Favorite Element on Facebook:A Post-National Chemistry Week Update. Journal of Chemical Education, 87.
Kadushin, A. (1972). The Social work interview. New York Columbia University Press.
Minichiello, V. (1995). In-depth Interviewing (Second Edition ed.). South Melbourne: Longman.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing : context and narrative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
NBPTS. (2010). What is the basis for the NBPTS standards? Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.nbpts.org/help_and_faqs/standards
Petzko, V. N. (2004). Tailoring professional development for a better fit. Principal Leadership, 5(3), 16-21.
Rutherford, C. (2010). Facebook as a Source of Informal Teacher Professional Development. in education, 16(1).
Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2009). The Chemistry of Facebook: Using Social Networking to Create an Online Community for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Innovate, 5(4).
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Vockley, & Lang. (2007). Creating & connecting: Research and guidelines on online social—and educational—networking. . Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://www.nsba.org/site/view.asp?CID=63&DID=41340
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system:An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 428–438.
Warren-Little, J. (2006). Professional Community and Professional Development in the Learning Centered School. Alphareta, GA: National Educational Association.
Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469-479.
中文部分:
呂永財 (2005)。「國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標」應用於專業發展。碩士,臺灣師範大學:教育學系在職進修碩士班。
辛莉萍 (2010)。以網路社群使用者的知覺價值探討持續使用行為意向:以Facebook為。碩士,中華大學。
周穎君 (民95)。從虛擬到實用──您不可不知的教師「部落格」世界。西元2012年5月25日,取自:http://dp.tsh.ttu.edu.tw/tshweblog/post/82/368。
彼得.聖吉 (1994)。第五項修練。台灣: 天下文化。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2)。
洪世芳 (2011)。應用Facebook社群網站進行學校圖書館活動推廣效益之研究-以北台灣科技學院為例。碩士,銘傳大學。
張素馨 (2012)。國民中學英語教師使用社群網站於英語教學態度之研究:以Facebook 應用為例。 碩士,亞洲大學。
張德銳、吳武雄、許籐繼、李俊達、洪寶蓮、王美霞、陳偉泓、曾美蕙、常月如、曾政清、黃春木、白師舜、曾燦金 (民93)。 中學教師教學專業發展系統: 臺北 : 五南圖書。
陳昱甫 (民98)。網路社群應用,西元2012年5月25日,取自:www.itc.ntnu.edu.tw/download/class/981028_group.pdf。
單文經 (2001)。教學引論。臺北市: 學富文化。
廖怡茹 (2012)。大學生學習風格與英語字彙學習策略在Facebook上之應用研究。 碩士,國立臺灣科技大學。
管倖生、阮綠茵、王明堂、王藍亭、李佩玲、高新發、盧麗淑 (2006)。設計研究方法。 台北市: 全華科技圖書股份有限公司。
劉仲成 (2005)。教師專業發展的重要性與內容之分析。南投文教,23,6-9.
歐用生 (1996)。教師專業成長。台北市: 師大書苑。
蔡麗華 (2010)。迎接加速學習的新世紀,西元2012年5月25日,取自:http://163.20.121.100/Teaching2/edu9/monthly/13/13-5.htm。
盧秀琴 (2005)。教學模組設計的特質及其功能的分析以一個另有概念改變的教學模組發展為例,西元2012年7月2日,取自:http//:www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/pdf/book6/02.pdf。
謝明倫 (2006)。運用教學影片促進線上教師專業社群知識分享。碩士,臺灣師範大學:資訊教育學系。
蘇漢哲 (2008)。部落格卷宗在教師專業發展的應用。碩士,臺灣師範大學:資訊教育學系。