隨著網際網路的快速發展，學習內容的傳遞速度已不可同日而語，影響所及，傳統的學校教育方式也興起了重大變革。因此，具有跨越時空學習限制的數位學習儼然已成為新興的學習管道；透過數位學習，不僅學習內容的來源更多元與快速，並能節省教育成本、提升教育品質、增加學習效率，進而達到終身學習的目的。
數位學習確實在學習科技上扮演重要角色，從研究者的角度，認為有必要探討其背後的知識本體，包含數位學習發展演進等，並且從國內數位學習發展計畫、數位學習人才培育及數位學習產業發展等，都引發研究者的研究動機。深思數位學習發展的知識基礎為何？這些知識是否可以構成一個知識本體？對現在與未來的數位學習發展又有何益處？因此，本研究之目的是在建構一個數位學習知識本體。
本研究經過完整的知識建構過程，即溝通分享、塑模、本體化及應用四個階段。建構出數位學習的知識本體，並將此知識本體應用於三家廠商，藉此提升本研究的實用性。
本研究所發展的數位學習知識本體的領域與範圍，在第一層有三個領域知識分別是內容、服務及技術。而第二層的領域知識分別是，內容的部分是：商業管理類(有10 項次層知識)、語言學習類( 5項次層知識)、電腦技能類( 5項次層知識)、生活百科類( 5項次層知識)、學校課程類( 5項次層知識)；技術的範圍是：學習平臺( 7項次層知識)、產業標準( 3項次層知識)、協同工具( 7項次層知識)、編輯工具( 8項次層知識)；服務的範圍是：學習入口( 8項次層知識)、代管服務( 8項次層知識)、企業顧問( 7項次層知識)、課程代製( 3項次層知識)。
最後本研究邀請三家廠商實際應用此數位學習知識本體工具，所獲得的結果是：數位內容廠商應用於本身已發展的數位教材知識結構分析上及數位學習專業人才培育課程規劃上。數位技術應用於本身已開發軟體工具的歸納與功能分析上。數位服務廠商應用於本身已應用服務領域上。三家廠商確定本研究所發展的工具具有實用性之外更發現該企業未來發展的方向。

The fast development of Internet has accelerated the speed of transmission of learning content, which is beyond that in the past. Also, by the influence of Internet, traditional academic education has been in revolution, e Learning has become a popular learning method due to the growth of the information technology and Internet. Not only e Learning can provide a variety source of information quickly but also can provide a better educational quality with less expense. Furthermore, e- Learning improves the learning efficiency, which may help to lifelong learning.
In this study ,we have four session of the ontology building process .There are 1、sharing ;2、Modeling ;3、anthologize and 4、Appling after the e-learning ontology had been constructor we send it to three e-learning business organize for using the e-learning ontology in their products final we modify the e-earning ontology and make it more useful . In this study, we develop the e-Learning Ontology. There are three Domain Knowledge in the ontology structure, which is content、skill and service. The Content domain has 5 sub-domains :Business( has 10 Items Sub-knowledge )、Language( has 5 Items Sub-knowledge )、Computer Skill( has 5 Items Sub-knowledge )、Life Style( has 5 Items Sub-knowledge )、Academy( has 5 Items Sub-knowledge ). The Skill domain has4 sub-domains :Learning Platform、e-Learning Standard、Collaboration Tools and Authoring Tools. The Service domain has 4 sub-domains : e-learning portal、Hosting、Consultant、Custom Content .
Finally, We send the e-learning ontology platform to three e-learning Businesses organizes for test it. The 3 Business organizes are master in the different domain of e-learning products. The first organize (master in e-learning contents) use the e-learning ontology platform to organize their e-earning content product, and make it to be an e-earning content ontology on their own. The second organize (master in e-learning skill tools) use the e-learning ontology platform to explain all their e-learning skill tools’ function and characteristic .The last organize (master in e-learning services) uses the e-learning ontology platform to explain the service items. The result is, we can make sure that the e-learning ontology may use in the e-learning organize and they can find their some other way in the future through the e-learning ontology.

中文部分
天下趨勢(2002)知識網路。E-Learning 的優勢。2004年10月2日﹐取自http://www.learntrend.com
旭聯科技(2005)。2004年11月3日﹐取自http://anicam.elearn.com.tw/new_page/index.html.
江姿慧(2000)。使用者參與虛擬社群之行為研究。國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系。
吳志偉(2001)。結合規則挖掘與行為預測來強化網路資訊查詢處理。國立台灣科技大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
呂理平(2002)。串流教材製作導論。資策會教育訓練處教材組教學光碟出版品。
李建中(2002)。本體論為基礎之電子化知識管理模式。國防管理學院國防資訊研究所碩士論文。
李英明(2000)。網路社會學。台北：揚智文化。
李進寶(1999)。資訊網教育訓練的現況與趨勢。教學科技與教育革新。台北：師大書苑。
李進寶(2000)。 學習產業的發展趨勢。新世紀企業e-Learning 趨勢與前瞻應用研討會 。7月21日。 台北：台北國際會議中心。
李進寶(2001)。 e-Learning的發展趨勢。網路學習與繼續專業教育研討會。10月25日 。 嘉義：中正大學大禮堂。
李進寶(2003)。 數位學習與撰寫RFP方法。 數位學習計劃推動研習會。6月19、20日。台北：台灣師範大學。
李隆興 (2002)。淺談數位學習技術之演進。通訊雜誌,107卷﹐28-33。
林榮斌(2001)。影響企業建構網路化訓練相關因素之探討。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
胡正亨(2001)。 LCMS (Learning Content Management System)簡介。 台北:資策會教育訓練處。2004年11月 6日﹐取自http://www.iiiedu.org.tw/knowledge/knowledge20021231_3.htm.
徐新逸（1995）。網路教材開發步驟與專業人員分工。終身學習網路教材（Web-Title）使用調查評估研究。教育資料與圖書館學，卷33，68-78。
國科會(2003)。e-Learning共享教材元件參考模式(SCORM)研習會演講資料檔案。2004年2月6日﹐取自 http://www.nsc.gov.tw/sci/index_workshop2.html.
國科會(2003)。e-Learning共享教材元件參考模式(SCORM)研習會演講資料檔案。2004年2月6日。取自http://www.nsc.gov.tw/sci/index_workshop2.html.
國科會(2003)。網路教學系統平台與內容標準化計畫。2004年2月6日﹐取自http://tpcs.cis.nctu.edu.tw.
國科會(2003)。數位學習國家型科技計畫。 2004年2月6日。取自http://elnp.ncu.edu.tw/.
張君豪、楊淑卿、劉ㄧ凡(2004)。行動學習輔具融入教學情境之應用概況。資訊科技與實務研討會。桃園：銘傳大學資訊學院。
莊啟國(2002)。學習平台的現況與趨勢。台北：資策會教育訓練處教材組教學光碟出版品。
陳人豪（2004）20004年我國數位學習產業發展現況。台北：資策會教育訓練處，數位學習技術中心。
陳佳賢(2002)。百家爭鳴的國內線上學習。網路通訊，19-22。
黃錦祥(2003)。成員的倫理敏感度：考量個人特質、群體認知與網路媒體特性(頁2)。國科會計畫(NSC91-2416-H-130-006)。
楊中旗(2002)。e-Learning最新發展趨勢面面觀。美國e-Learning Conference & Expo 2002 心得分享。

經濟部(1999)。協助國內傳統工業技術升級計劃書。台北：經濟部工業司。
經濟部工業局(2003)。2003年數位內容產業白皮書。2004年1月15日﹐取自http://www.digitalcontent.org.tw/white/book.htm
經濟部工業局(2003)。數位學習產業推動與發展計畫網站－數位學習產業推動與發展計畫。2004年1月15日﹐取自http://www.elearn.org.tw/eLearn/Policy/Introduce/
經濟部工業局(2003)。核心關鍵人才培訓計畫。2004年1月15日﹐取自http://www.iiiedu.org.tw/
經濟部工業局。數位內容推動計畫。2004年1月15日﹐取自http://www.digitalcontent.org.tw/
經濟部工業局(2003)。數位學習產業推動與發展計畫網站。2004年1月15日﹐取自http://www.elearn.org.tw/
經濟部技術處 (2002) 。網際網路應用及發展2002年鑑。
經濟部商業司(2001)。商業電子化策略規劃。台北：經濟部商業司。
資訊傳真網(2002)。導入門檻高築-策略推動為上策。2004年3月2日﹐取自http://www.infopro.com/
資策會(2001)。2001 e-Learning 技術報告手冊。台北:資策會教育訓練處。
資策會(2002)。2002 e-Learning 技術報告手冊。台北:資策會教育訓練處。
資策會。ECRC-FIND(2004)。2003年12月30日﹐取自http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/index.asp
鄒景平(2000)。全球電子學習市場蓄勢待發。管理雜誌﹐312。
鄒景平(2002)。宏觀e-Learning標準。網路通訊﹐137﹐62~67。
鄒景平(2002)。e-Learning的優缺點。2004年1月6日﹐取自http://www.online-edu.org/
廖致凱(2004)。我國企業數位學習市場的回顧與展望。經濟部工業局數位學習產業推動與發展計畫。2004年4月8日，取自http://www.elearn.org.tw
廖肇弘(2001)。建置有效的線上學習系統。管理雜誌，112-115。
廖肇弘、范瓊文(2001)。E-Learning產業標準－ SCORM。資訊傳真週刊,26,90~93。
劉常勇(1999)。對於知識管理的基本認識。2003年12月21日﹐取自http://www.cme.org.tw/know
劉璁翰(2002)。企業導入ERP系統階段性關鍵成功因素之研究。國立台灣科技大學工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
數位典藏國家型科技計畫(2002)。數位典藏國家型科技計畫簡介。2003年12月14日﹐ 取自：http://www.ndap.org.tw
數位學習國家型科技計畫(2004)。計畫定義。2004年1月6日﹐取自http://elnp.ncu.edu.tw/start.php
數位學習國家型科技計畫辦公室(2002)。2004年1月6日﹐取自http://elnp.ncu.edu.tw/
數位學習國家型科技計畫總體規劃書(2002)。2004年1月6日﹐取自http://nationalproject.src.ncu.edu./
蔡德祿(2002)。淺談E-Learning與SCORM標準。台北：資策會教育訓練處。
鍾宜智(2001)。推展與落實網路學習之探討。文教新潮,6(2)﹐24~ 27。
魏志強(2002)。數位內容經營者業態分析與展望。通訊雜誌﹐105﹐46-49。
英文部分
ADL (2002). Advanced Distributed Learning. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.adlnet.org
ADL (2003). Advanced Distributed Learning Emerging and Enabling Technologies for the Design of Learning Object Repositories. Report. Retrieved March 13, 2003,from http://www.adlnet.org/
Armbrecht, F. M. Ross, Jr., Richard B., Chapas, Cecil C. Chappelow, Farris, Georage F., Friga, Paul N., Hartz, Cynthia A., Mcilvaine, McIlvaine, M. Elizabeth, Postle, Stephen R., and Whitwell, George E. (2001). “Knowledge Management in Research and Development,” Research Technology Management, July- August.
ASTD (2001). E-learning Glossary. Retrieved December 8, 2002, http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary.html.
Badaracco, J.（1991）. The Knowledge Link： How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
Bowman, B. J. (2002). “Building Knowledge Management Systems,” Information Systems Management, Summer, pp. 32-40.
Bryan Chapman and Brandon Hall, Ph.D.,（2001）. Learning Content Management Systems (LCMS) are fast becoming the new, “must-have” tool in e-learning, combining elements of Learning Management Systems (LMS), Authoring tools and knowledge management, brandon-hall.com, September.
Bryan Chapman, Bandon-Hall(2001).Learning Content Management Systems (LCMS) Presentation at Online Learning Conference.
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 20–26.
Cisco (2001). E-Learning at Cisco. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.cisco.com/
Cisco (2001).“Internet learning solutions group e-learning glossary”, Retrieved October 20,2001， http://www.cisco.com/
Cisco(2000). Learning Object Strategy Definition, Creation Process, and Guidelines for Building. Version 3.1 April 22,2000,Cisco Systems, Inc.。
D. Fensel ,(2002).“Ontology-Based Knowledge Management,” IEEE Computer, Vol.35, No.11, 2002, pp.56-59.
Davenport , Thomas H., and Presoak , Laurence,(1998).”Working Knowledge : How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business.
David A. Wiley. II(2001).Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor , and a taxonomy, Utah State University.
Decker ,S .et al.(2000).The semantic web -on the roles of XML and RDF.IEEE Internet Computing , September/October.
Dick ,W.,& Carey ,L.(1996).The systematic design of instruction.(4th ed.).NY:Harper Collins College Publishers.
Dieter Fensel (2001).”Ontologism and Electronic Commerce”，IEEE Intelligent System，pp8-14，vol. 16，no. 1，Jan/Feb 2001.
Dieter Fensel, Framk van Jarmelen, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness & Peter F. Patel-Schneider(2001). An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent System, vol.16, no.2, March/April 2001,pp38-45.
Dodds, P., et al.(2001). “SCORM Overview Version1.2,” Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative, Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.adlnet.org/.
Fensel, D., Stuckenschmidt, H. and Harmelen, F.（2001）."Ontology-based Metadata Generation from Semi-Structured Information. " In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Morgan Kaufmann.
Fikes,R.&Rice,J.(1997).Tools for assembling modular ontologies inOntolingua.In Proc.of Fourteenth American Association for Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI-97),Menlo Park,CA,AAAI/MIT Press,436–441.
Gagne´, R. M.(1985).The conditions of learning(4th ed.).New York: Holt ,Rinehart, and Winston.
Galup, Stuart D., Dattero, Ronald, and Hicks, Richard C. (2002). “ Knowledge Management Systems: An Architecture for Active and Passive Knowledge, ” Information Resources Management Journal, Jan-Mar, pp. 22-27.
Guarino ,N. & Wetly ,C.(2000).A Formal Ontology of Properties. In Rose Ding (ed.),Proceedings of 12th Int. Conf. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management.
Guarino,N.&Welty,C.(2001).Supporting Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering39(1),51-74.
Heflin ,J.D.(2001).Towards the Semantic Web: Knowledge Representation in a Dynamic, Distributed Environment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation ,University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science.
Hendler, J.,（2001）.“Agents and the Semantic Web”, IEEE Intelligent Systems , 16( 2), 2001, pp. 30-37.
Hodgins, H. Wayne,(2001). "The Future of Learning Objects," in D. A. Wiley, ed., The Instructional Use of Learning Objects.
Hodgins, Wayne with Marcia Conner. (2001). "Everything you ever wanted to know about learning standards but were afraid to ask." Learning in the New Economy Magazine , Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/wheyewtkls.htm
Hodigins H. W. (2002). The future of learning objects. The Instructional Use of Learning Objects.
Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Horton. W. (2001). Evaluating E-Learning. Alexandris, VA: American Society for Training & Development.
Howell D.(2000). Elements of effective E-Learning :three design methods to minimize side effects of online courses .College Teaching; Washington,vo49,pp87~90
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. IEEE LOM Working Draft 6. 1. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/index.html
IMS (2002). IMS Digital Repositories Specification. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/index.cfm
Kaplan Leiserson, E. (2002), E-Learning Glossary, American Society for Training and Development (ASTD)’online magazine, NOV,16 2002.
Kay Chitwood,Carol MayDavid Bunnow & Terri Langan (2001)Wisconsin Online Resource Center Learning Objects Project, A Primer on Learning Objects.
Learning Object Metadata Working Group of the IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM1484121v1FinalDraft.pdf
Natalya F. Noy & Deborah L.McGuinness（2000）.Ontology Development 101 ：A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology,Standford University.
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1995). “The Knowledge-creating Company,” Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford.
Nonaka,Toyama and Konno(2001). “SECI, Ba and Leadership：a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
Noy, N. F., Fergerson, R. W. & Musen, M. A. (2000). “The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility”, Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW''2000), France.
Oberle .D, R. Volz, B. Motik, S. Staab.（2002）.“KAON Server Prototype”, Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://kaon.semanticweb.org/
Pim Borst & Hans Ackerman（1997）.”Engineering Ontologism ”International Journal of Human- Computer Studies , 44 , pp . 365 - 406.
Protege (2000). The Protege Project. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://protege.stanford.edu
Protege-2000 User’s Guide, Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://protege.stanford.edu.
Purser, R. E. & Pasmore, W. A. (1992). Organization for Learning. Research in Organizational Change and Development, London.
Rosenberg J. Marc,(2000). Building a Successful and Sustainable E learning Strategy. Online learning 2000 conference and exposition.
Rosenberg, J. Marc(2002),“E-learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age”, McGraw-Hill
Rothenfluh, T.R., Gennari, J.H., Eriksson, H., Puerta, A.R., Tu, S.W. and Musen, M.A.(1996). Reusable ontologies, knowledge-acquisition tools, and performance systems
SmartForce (2002). A Field Guide to Learning Objects.
Spohrer, J.Sunmer, T. & Shum, S. B.(1998). Educational Authoring Tools and the Educational Object Economy :Introduction to the Special Issue from the East/West Group, Journal of Interactive Media In Education. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/
Tamer Cavusgil 、 Tunga Kiyak 、 Irem Kiyak (2002). Expanding Horizons With e-Learning , Michigan State University.
Tennysom, R., Schott, F., Seel, N., & Dijkstra, D. (1997). Instructional design: international perspectives. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Thomas, J.W., ( 2000). A review of research of project-based learning. Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.autodesk.com/
Uschold, M. & King, M. (1995). “Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologism”, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-95), Canada.
Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologism: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2).
W. Hodgins.（2001）. "Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata (LOM) Specification". Proposed Draft 6.1， Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers， Inc.， at http://ltsc.ieee.org/
Wiley, D. A. (2000). "Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy," in D. A. Wiley, ed., The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved May 18, 2001, http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
Wiley, D.A. （2000） Learning Object Design and Sequencing Theory. Retrieved May 18, 2001, http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/dissertation.pdf
Williams, D. D. (2000). "Evaluation of learning objects and instruction using learning objects." In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved June 7, 2002.from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/williams.doc
Wisconsin Online Resource Center, Retrieved December 8, 2002,from http://www.wisc-online.com/index.htm
Yair and Webber（1996）.”Ontology as a foundation for meta-modeling and method engineering ,”Information and Software Technology , Vol .38, Issue.4,pp 281-287.
Zack, Michael H.（1999）. “Developing a Knowledge Strategy,” California management Review, Spring, pp.125-145.