在面對全球跨國際、跨組織、跨團隊及跨專長等的競爭環境，知識的分享不僅是個人知識的分享與傳遞，更要能有跨領域的融合，從多方面的層次來找出促進知識分享的因素，過往的實徵研究幾乎皆採取單一層次的分析邏輯，大部份著重在個體層次的分析，而研究者應該正視不只有單一層次會影響組織成員的行為因素，應以跨層次的觀點來探討。
本研究採問卷調查法蒐集資料，以台灣上市的金融保險公司為研究對象，共計37家公司，透過電話逐一聯繫，洽詢有意願協助研究者為33家，每家公司以5~25份為主，實際回收為430份，其中有效問卷為403份，有效問卷率為93.72%。
研究結果發現：（1）組織動態能力對組織創新氣候、創新行為有正向影響。（2）組織創新氣候對創新行為有正向影響。（3）預應人格特質對知識分享、創新行為有正向影響。（4）知識分享對創新行為有正向影響。（5）預應人格特質對創新行為的關係，知識分享能發揮中介效果。（6）組織動態能力對創新行為的關係，組織創新氣候能發揮中介效果。（7）預應人格特質對創新行為之影響，組織動態能力能發揮調節效果。（8）知識分享對創新行為之影響，組織動態能力能發揮調節效果。

Facing the competitive environment with transnational, trans-organizational, trans-team and trans-specialty characteristics, knowledge sharing should aim at achieving trans-disciplinary integration and figuring out the factors promoting knowledge sharing at multiple levels instead of only focusing on sharing and transfer itself. The previous empirical studies mostly adopted single-level analysis and logic. Those studies were mainly carried out based on individual-level analysis. However, researchers should make discussions from a cross-level perspective surpassing the focus on the effect of single-level factors on members’behavior in an organization. Innovation is one of the elements determining the survival of an organization.
In this study, a questionnaire survey was made to collect information. A total of 37 public financial and insurance companies in Taiwan were invited through phone calls to take part in the research. 33 companies agreed to assist the researcher in carrying out the study. 5 to 25 copies of the questionnaire were distributed to each of the 33 companies. 430 copies were collected in which 403 copies are valid with an effective response rate of 93.72%.
These results of the study are followed: (1) Organizational dynamic capabilities have positive impact on organizational innovation climate and innovative behavior. (2) Organizational innovation climate has a positive impact on innovative behavior. (3) Proactive personality have positive impact on knowledge sharing and innovative behavior. (4) Knowledge sharing has a positive impact on innovative behavior. (5) Knowledge sharing mediate the impact of proactive personality on innovative behavior. (6) Organizational innovation climate mediate the impact of Organizational dynamic capabilities on innovative behavior. (7) Organizational dynamic capabilities moderate the impact of proactive personality on innovative behavior. (8) Organizational dynamic capabilities moderate the impact of knowledge sharing on innovative behavior.

一、中文部分
司徒達賢（1985）。經營理念與創新。工商雜誌，33，14-46。
田新民、解志韜、祝金龍（2009）。員工主動性人格對組織公民行為和團隊績效的影響-檢測一個路徑模型。人力資源管理學報，9（2），19-32。
江錦樺（2001）。人格特質與組織文化之適配性對工作績效之影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，中歷市。
吳建明（2009）。以動態能力觀點探討企業經營流程變革與網路地位重塑關係之研究。管理學報，26（2），145-166。
吳盛、林東清（2007）。以計劃行為理論探討資訊人員的知識分享行為。資訊管理學報，14（2），75-110。
巫立宇（2006）。資源、社會資本、路徑相依與動態能力之研究。管理評論，25（1），121-140。
李朱慧、林孟鋒（2008）。以人格特質與組織文化探討高科技產業內知識分享與組織績效之研究。致遠管理論叢，3（1），18-37。
李政穎（2012）。國民小學校長變革領導與學校經營績效之研究-以動態能力為干擾變項。國立臺南大學教育學系教育經營與管理博士論文，未出版，台南市。
汪美香、楊堂堯、劉柏均（2010）。知識分享與專案複雜化對團隊創造力之影響-以資訊系統開發為例。電子商務學報，12（1），73-102。
林秀芬、李國光、褚麗娟（2006）。知識分享影響因素評估模式建構之研究。國立空中大學管理與資訊學系管理與資訊學報，11，195-224。
林明杰、洪秀婉、陳至柔（2009）。供應鏈關係品質對知識分享、動態能力與創新能力影響之實證研究。電子商務學報，11（2），339-366。
林偉文（2002）。教師創意教學潛能與教師創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
林鉦棽（2005）。組織公民行為之跨層次分析-層級線性模式的應用，管理學報，22（4），503-524。
林鉦棽（2007）。跨層次觀點下印象管理動機與主管導向之組織公民行為的關係：社會互動與組織政治氣候的調節角色。管理學報，24（1），93-111。
林鉦棽、王政智（2005）。從社會交換理論與交易成本理論分析組織內之知識分享行為。人力資源管理學報，5（2），95-119。
林鉦棽、彭台光（2006）。多層次管理研究：分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報，23（6），649-675。
林鉦棽、蕭淑月（2005）。社會支持、信任、關係品質與組織知識分享行為之關係研究。商管科技季刊，6（3），373-400。
邱皓政、溫福星（2007）。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析：以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。國立政治大學教育與心理研究，30（1），1-35。
唐永泰（2006）。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報，6（4），47-66。
唐永泰（2009）。員工之主管情緒智力知覺對其創新行為之影響。品質學報，16（6），461-478。

張火燦、紀乃文、劉嘉雯、林夢倫（2009）。積極人格、社會價值傾向與顧客正義知覺對個人社會資本的影響。臺大管理論叢，20（1），99-130。
許翡珊（2001）。知識類型、角色衝突與個人創新性。銘傳大學管理科學所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
郭純真(2004)。組織創新氣候、研發人員創造力與組織創新能力關聯性之研究-以台灣生物科技產業為例。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南縣。
陳玉樹、胡夢鯨（2008）。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響：階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報。40（2），179-198。
陳俊儒（2006）。個人特性、人力資源管理活動與創新績效關係之多層級探討。國立成功大學國際企業研究所，未出版，碩士論文，台南市。
陳淑玲（2006）。創新行為與創新績效跨層次分析-資源基礎理論觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
傅心怡（2003）。企業組織線上虛擬專業知識社群知識分享與知識創新之相關性及影響因素研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
黃家齊、王思峰（2008）。團隊知識轉換能力組合與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效-知識螺旋理論的新觀點驗證。組織與管理，1（1），39-72。
黃家齊、許雅婷（2006）。團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響－個人與團隊層次的分析。管理學報，23（2）。149-170。
楊亨利、吳俊德（2009）。群體能力、社會網絡與激勵政策對組織成員間知識分享的影響。資訊管理學報，16（1），21-55。
溫福星、邱皓政（2009）。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26（2），189-211。
溫瑶、甘怡群（2008）。主動性人格與工作績效：個體一組織匹配的調節作用。應用心理學，14（2），118-128。
廖國鋒、吳建平（2007）。個體工作滿足、知識分享與組織創新能力之關聯性研究。科學管理學刊，12（4），1-34。
劉 靜、司有和、李 憶（2010）。知識結構、知識流與中層經理創新行為的關係研究。科技進步與對策，27（4），147-150。
劉敏熙（2007）。知識治理機制對個人知識管理行為的影響--從所有權觀點探討。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
劉維寧（2004）。企球化知識管理能耐、企業動態能力與競爭優勢間關係之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
蔡啟通、高泉豐（2004）。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係：Amabile 動機綜效模式之驗證。管理學報，21（5），571-592 。
蔡淳如（2009）。師徒制與師徒功能對員工創新行為之影響-以知識分享為中介變數。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。

鄭伯壎、林姿葶、鄭弘岳、周麗芳、任金剛、樊景立（2010）。家長式領導與部屬效能：多層次分析觀點。中華心理學刊，52（1），1-23。
蕭婉鎔（2008）。影響個人知識分享行為之探討：跨層次分析驗證模式。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
簡文娟（1999）。組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立－以高科技產業為實證研究對象。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
簡淑華（2006）。動態能力、環境、競爭策略與績效---會計師事務所之探討。國立雲林科技大學管理研究所博士論文，未出版，雲林縣。
 
二、外文部分
Aaker, D. A. (1989). Managing assets and skills: The key to a sustainable competitive advantage. California Management Review, 31(2), 91-106.
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management system: Issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(7), 1-37.
Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980-990.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw. & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: West View Press.
Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
Armbrecht, F. M. R., Chapas, R. B., Chappelow, C. C., & Farris, G. F. (2001). Knowledge management in research and development. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 28-48.
Augier, M. & Teece, D. J. (2006). Understanding complex organization: The role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 395-416.

Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G., L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
Bartol, K. M. & Strivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-77.
Bateman, T. S. & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
Bock, G. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards, an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Bouthillier, D., Julien, D., Dube´, M., Be´langer, I., & Hamelin, M. (2002). Predictive validity of adult attachment measures in relation to emotion regulation behaviors in marital interactions. Journal of Adult Development, 9(4), 291-305.
Brief, A. P. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review,11(4), 710-725.
Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
Burpitt, W. J. & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams. Small Group Research, 28(3), 414-423.
Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
Cabrera, E. F. & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(2), 720-735.
Cappelli, P. & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. In B. M. Staw. & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp.55-110). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Carmeli, A. (2001). High-and low-performance firms: Do they have different profiles of perceived core intangible resources and business environment. Technovation, 21(10), 661-671.
Chan, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 475-481.
Chandran, J. P. (2004). Managing new industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technology, academy of management. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 303.
Cheng, J. W. & Li, S. C. (2001). The relationships of organization justice, trust and knowledge sharing behaviors. Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(2), 69-93。
Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1995). Marketing research: Methodological foundations (6nd ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Conneily, C. & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal , 24 (5), 294-301.

Costa, P. T., McCrae R. R., & Busch, C. M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality system：The california q-set and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 54(2), 430-446.
Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42-49.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Thoughts about education. In D. Dickinson, (Ed.), Creating the future: Perspectives on educational change (pp. 1-6). Seattle, WA: New Horizons for Learning.
Currie, G. & Kerrin, M. (2003). Human resource management and knowledge management: Enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(6), 1027-1045.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
David V. D. & B. S. Stanley (1989). Personality and job performance: evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Dietzenbacher, E. (2000). Spillovers of innovation effects. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(1), 27-42.
Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post-capitalist society. New York: Harper Business.
Dyer, J. H. & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 345-367.

Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10), 1105-1121.
Eunmi, C. (2006). Individual pay for performance and commitment HR practices in south korea. Journal of World Business, 41(4), 368-381.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Frank, T. R. & Andrew, M. H. (2007). Buildsing dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual, firm, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898-921.
Friedman, M. & Roseman, R. H. (1974). Type a behavior and your heart. New York: Knopt.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. New York: Macmillan.
Gilson, L. L. & Shally, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of team’s engagement in creative process. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 453-470.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601-616.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398-1405.
Guielford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th ed). New York: McGarw-Hill.

Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-52.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why Shared Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge and Process Management, 6, 91-100.
Hidding, G. & Shireen, M. C. (1998). Anatomy of a learning organization: Turning knowledge into capital at anderson consulting. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(1), 3-13.
Hislop, D. (2005). Knowledge management in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University.
Hofmann, D. A. & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(6), 623-641.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723-74.
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170-178.
Holub, S. F. (2003). Knowledge sharing is a change-management exercise. Tax Practice Management, 34(6), 361-363.

Hsiao, R. L., Tsai, D. H., & Lee, C. F. (2006). The problems of embeddedness: Knowledge transfer, coordination and reuse in information systems. Organization Studies, 27(6), 1-30.
Huang, J. M. & Shen, T. Y.（2003）. Validity of the five-factor model of personality in predicting sales performance: Inspection and application of the NEO-PI-R. Journal of Management, 20(3), 457-481.
Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, maker orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
James, L. R. & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307-321.
Janssen, O. (2000). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039-1050.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perception of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kickul, J. & Gundry, L. K. (2002). Prospecting for strategic advantage: The proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation, Journal of Small Business Management, 40(2), 85-97.
Kim, S. & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities, Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370-385.

King, N. & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 81-100). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for. research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3), 607-610.
Lambert, T. A., Eby, L. T., & Reeves, M. P., (2006). Predictors of networking intensity and network quality among white-collar job seekers. Journal of Career Development, 32(4), 351-365.
Lee, C., Lee, K. & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 615-640.
LePine, J. A. & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-337.
Liao, H. & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer coutcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41-58.

Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: An empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), 1-6.
Liebowitz, J. (2004). A knowledge management strategy for the jason organization: A case study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 1-5.
Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). Ant input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(5), 877-889.
Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
Maglio, P. P. (2010). Resources, capabilities, and service: Commentary on dynamic capabilities and e-Service. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27(1), 76-77.
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927-935.
Mandel, M. (1988). You ain’t seen nothing yet. Business Week, 8(31), 60-61.
Martin, B. (2000). Knowledge management within the context of management: An evolving relationship. Singapore Management Review, 22(2), 17-36.
Mass, C. J. M. & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling.Methodology, 1(3), 85-91.

Mathieu, E. & Schulze.W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 605-619.
Mei, Y. M., Lee, S. T., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2004). Formulating a communication strategy for effective knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science, 30(1), 12-22.
Mom, T. J. M, Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top–down, bottom–up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910-931.
Montes, F. J. L., Moreno, A. R., & Fernandez, L. M. M. (2003). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 167-180.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313-352.
Neidorf, R. (2002). Knowledge management: Changing cultures, changing attitude. Online, 26(5), 60-62.
Neuman, G. A. & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 376-389.
Nielsen, A. P. (2006). Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 59 -71.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2-10.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York：McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). New York：McGraw-Hill.
Organ, D. & Linge, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(3), 339.
Organ, D.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 43-72.
Paul, P. M. (2010). Resoureces, capabilities, and service: Commentary on dynamic capabilities and e-service. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 27(3), 76-77.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Barsil Blackwell.
Pitt, L. F., Ewing, M. T., & Beerthon, P. R. (2002). Proactive behavior and industrial salesforce performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(8), 639-644.
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262-270.
Prahalad, C. K. & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). The new age of innovation: Driving co-created value through global networks. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Real, J. C., Leal, A., & Rolda’n, J. L. (2006). Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 505-521.
Reid, F. (2003). Creating a knowledge sharing culture among diverse business units. Employment Relations Today, 30(3), 43-49.
Rindova, V. P. & Kotha, S. (2001) Continuous morphing: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-80.
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351-357.
Rolland, E., Patterson. A. R., & Ward. F. K. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and e-Service. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(4), 301-315.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph, 80(1), 1-28.
Ryu, S., Ho, S. H., & Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(1), 113-122.
Schonstrom, M. (2005). Creating knowledge networks: lessons from practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 17-30.
Schumpeter J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, S. G. & Burce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. I., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
Seibert, S. E., Silver S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 215-223.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham G. R. (2004). The effect of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(1), 553-562.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Teece., D. J. (2000). Strategies for management knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 35-54.
Thompson, J. A., (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011-1017.
Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in self-managed work groups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 349-362.
Thorndike, E. L. (1939). On the fallacy of imputing the correlations found for groups to the individuals or smaller groups composing them. American Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 122-124.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Pshchological Views (pp. 43-75). Cambridge, England: University Press.
Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intra-organizatioinal networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

West, M. A. & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
West, M. A. (1987). A measure of role innovation at work. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 83-85.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355-387.
West, M. A., Tjosvold, D., & Smith, K. G. (Eds.). (2003). International handbook of teamwork and cooperative working. Chichester: Wiley.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
Wilpert, B. (1995). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 59-90.
Wolfe, M. E. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
Z’arraga, C. & Bonache, J. (2003). Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1227-1245.
Zack, M. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zollo & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97-125.