研究生: |
汪威廷 Wang, Wei-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
從制度同形理論探討企業社會責任之策略以台灣半導體公司企業社會責任報告書為例 A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy from the Institutional Isomorphism Theory - Taiwan Semiconductor Company Corporate Social Responsibility Report as an Example |
指導教授: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 44 |
中文關鍵詞: | 制度同形 、企業社會責任 、半導體供應鏈 、集群分析 |
英文關鍵詞: | Institutional Isomorphism Theory, Taiwanese Semiconductor |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202569 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:109 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
企業社會責任逐漸成為全球議題,過往企業的經營目標僅需要替股東謀取最大利潤即可。但隨著企業社會責任意識抬頭,大多數的企業也慢慢將企業社會責任列為企業內的重要決策之一。現今學術圈內對於企業社會責任有著正反兩面不同的看法,正方認為企業社會責任有助於企業形象之提昇增加客戶並提升利潤;反方則是認為進行非本業的企業社會責任投資將會造成浪費使股東利益降低。本研究認同正方的看法,並藉此研究台灣半導體企業內對於企業社會責任活動與政策之異同。
本研究透過制度同形理論探討台灣半導體企業進行企業社會責任之同形原因,也透過各家企業公布之企業社會責任報告書來推定各組內同形的形貌與組間相異的部分。最終得知台灣半導體產業內存在兩種以上的同形原因,包含供應鏈客戶要求之強制同形與行業間規範之模仿同形。也發現強制同形所造成的同形化對於企業在進行企業社會責任活動時會有較佳的表現。
Corporate social responsibility becomes a global issue. In the past, managers only need to seek the greatest profits for shareholders. But with the rise of corporate social responsibility, most companies see corporate social responsibility as one of the most important decisions. In the academic circles, there are positive and negative views on corporate social responsibility. The positive side thinks that corporate social responsibility helps to enhance the image of the enterprise and increase the profit. The other party thinks that the investment in corporate social responsibility will cause waste. This study recognizes the views of the parties and studies the similarities and differences between corporate social responsibility activities and policies in Taiwan's semiconductor companies.
This study explores the same cause of corporate social responsibility in Taiwanese semiconductor company through Institutional Isomorphism Theory. It also deduces the similarities and differences between the shapes and groups in each group through the corporate social responsibility report published by each enterprise. And finally learned that there are two or more isomorphic in the semiconductor industry in Taiwan, including the imitation of the coercive isomorphism of the supply chain customer requirements and the inter-industry norms. Also found that the same shape caused by the same shape for enterprises in the corporate social responsibility activities will have a better performance.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of management review, 11(3), 656-665.
Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman: Harper.
Bowman, E. (1985). Generalizing about strategic change: methodological pitfalls and promising solutions'. Organizational Strategy and Change, 319-335.
Buchholz, R. A. (1986). Business environment and public policy: implications for management and strategy formulation: Prentice-Hall.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long range planning, 34(5), 585-604.
Friedman, M. (1971). Does business have a social responsibility. Bank Administration, 47(4), 13-14.
Hansen, U. (2004). Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Business Case. 2004): Betriebswirtschaftslehre und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung. Mit Corporate Social Responsibility zu mehr Engagement. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 59-83.
Heslin, P. A., & Ochoa, J. D. (2008). Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility.
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1985). Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative science quarterly, 336-349.
Nielinger, O. (2003). Wirtschaft und nichtregierungsorganisationen: Eine Liaison mit Zukunft. Nord-Süd aktuell, 17(1), 126-136.
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporate sustainability. Edward Elgar.
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California management review, 17(3), 58-64.
Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324.
沈中華, & 張元. (2008). 企業的社會責任為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例. 經濟論文, 36(3), 339-385.
高希均. (2008). 企業社會責任 (CSR)—雄心與良心的地圖: 哈佛商業評論.
康峰菁. (2010). 企業社會責任的整體認知與實際作為之研究: 以台灣服務業為例. 企業管理學報(86), 75-114.
許淑雅. (2008). 企業社會責任對組織認同之相關性研究, 中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文.
黃正忠. (2001). 企業社會責任-從理念到行動. 台北: 中華民國企業永續發展委員會.
蕭健治. (2016). 企業社會責任、消費者信任度及消費者忠誠度關係探究-以金控業為例. (博士), 國立彰化師範大學, 彰化縣.