在後疫情時代，因防疫而減少實體接觸是普遍共識，但在市場劇變之時，企業比以往更渴求人才。該如何透過科技工具來滿足防疫與求才需求，若只為了防疫，視訊面試足以取代實體接觸之需求，但真人面試官能負荷的量能有限，企業如何透過科技工具，在這場人才爭奪戰中取得先機，提升招募效率，人工智慧視訊面試成為越來越多企業的選擇。但對求職者來說，人工智慧視訊面試多採取錄影面試的方式進行，除了缺乏與人的互動，更因對人工智慧評估與決策過程的不確定感，對其的科技信任亦不高，最終降低求職者使用視訊面試的意願。其中，透明度常被認為是人工智慧與現實世界連結的關鍵，當求職者不清楚人工智慧的評估過程時，會擔憂其面試表現是否能正確反映自身真實潛力，進而減少對人工智慧評估的信任度；故當求職者缺乏對人工智慧的信任時，可能會拒絕參與面試或面試表現劣於其真實水平。
　　本研究分為二個階段，第一階段為前導測試，邀請參與者進行模擬錄影面試，並藉由問卷以及非結構訪談收斂出最具透明度之呈現方式；第二階段正式實驗，邀請 73 位求職者，在進行人工智慧錄影面試後填寫科技信任量表，並進行統計分析。本研究發現具透明度的人工智慧視訊面試對情感科技信任度有正向影響，研究結果亦可提供人工智慧錄影面試系統供應商與雇主，開發與挑選更有效的AI面試介面。

In the Post-COVID-19 pandemic era, it is a consensus to reduce physical contact due to epidemic prevention, but companies are more eager for talent than ever, when the market quickly pursues recovery. How to use technological tools to deal with the needs of epidemic prevention and talent seeking? If it is only for epidemic prevention, video interviews are enough to replace the need for physical contact, but it’s not good enough if companies compete for talents with other companies. Artificial Intelligence (AI) video interviews have become the choice of more and more companies. For job seekers, AI video interviews have no interaction with people, and the uncertainty about the AI interviewers and lack of technological trust in the AI interview could reduce job seekers’ willingness to use. For enterprises, it may miss the entry of key talents.
　　Transparency is often considered to be the key to connecting AI with the real world. When job seekers are unclear about the evaluation process of AI, they are often worried about whether its performance can correctly reflect future job potential, thereby reducing their trust in AI. When job seekers lack trust in AI, they may simply refuse to participate in interviews or their interview performance is worse than their real level. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether AI video interviews with transparency have an impact on trust in AI? Is it possible to increase the transparency of AI-based video interviews, thereby increasing the AI trust of job seekers in the tool?
　　This research will be divided into two stages. The first stage is a pilot test. Participants will be invited to conduct supposed video interviews, and the most effective presentation of transparency will be converged through questionnaires and unstructured interviews. And in the second stage, 60 participants were invited to fill in the technology trust scale after the AI video interview. This study expects that AI video interviews with transparency have a positive impact on AI trust. The results of the study can provide AI video interview system suppliers and employer to develop and choice more effective interface embedded with AI video interview .

陳怡靜、錢國倫（2015）。從功能與象徵性架構探 討雇主形象對組織人才吸引力的影響。中山管理評論，23（4）， 1125-1154。http://dx.doi.org/10.5297%2fser.1201.002
Acikgoz, Y., Davison, K. H., Compagnone, M., & Laske, M. (2020). Justice perceptions of artificial intelligence in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(4), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12306
Albu, O. B., & Flyverbom, M. (2019). Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences. Business & Society, 58(2), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316659851
Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(6), e15154. https://doi.org/10.2196/15154
Basch, J.M., Melchers, K.G., Kegelmann, J. & Lieb, L. (2020). Smile for the camera! The role of social presence and impression management in perceptions of technology-mediated interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(4), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0398
Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2021). AI-enabled recruiting in the war for talent. Business Horizons, 64(4), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.015
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016). Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(21), 2652-2671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296
Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
Charalambous, G., Fletcher, S., & Webb, P. (2016). The Development of a Scale to Evaluate Trust in Industrial Human-robot Collaboration. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8, 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0333-8
Chen, C. C., Lee, Y. H., Huang, T. C., & Ko, S. F. (2019). Effects of stress interviews on selection/recruitment function of employment interviews. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12170
Felzmann, H., Villaronga, E. F., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2019). Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951719860542. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. (2020). Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 14, 627-660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Grover, S., Sahoo, S., Mehra, A., Avasthi, A., Tripathi, A., Subramanyan, A., Pattojoshi, A., Rao, G. P., Saha, G., Mishra, K. K., Chakraborty, K., Rao, N. P., Vaishnav, M., Singh, O. P., Dalal, P. K., Chadda, R. K., Gupta, R., Gautam, S., Sarkar, S., Sathyanarayana Rao, T. S., … Janardran Reddy, Y. C. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown: An online survey from India. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(4), 354–362. http://DOI:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_427_20
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
HRDA (n.d.). https://hrda.pro
Ingold, P.V., Kleinmann, M., König, C.J., & Melchers, K.G. (2016). Transparency of Assessment Centers: Lower Criterion‐related Validity but Greater Opportunity to Perform? Personnel Psychology, 69, 467-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12105
Johnson, D.G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). Reframing AI Discourse. Minds and Machines, 27, 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6
Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2021). Formalizing trust in artificial intelligence: Prerequisites, causes and goals of human trust in ai. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 624-635). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445923
Komiak, S. Y., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 941-960. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760
Kwak, S. G., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Algorithmic bias? An empirical study into apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Science, 65, 2966-2981. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3093
Lin, J., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Wei, K. K. (2011). The role of inter-channel trust transfer in establishing mobile commerce trust. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(6), 615-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.008
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Langer, M., & König, C. (2021). Introducing a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Opacity, Transparency and Strategies to Reduce Opacity in Algorithm-Based Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review, 10. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100881
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8(4), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500337708
Oldeweme, A., Märtins, J., Westmattelmann, D., & Schewe, G. (2021). The role of transparency, trust, and social influence on uncertainty reduction in times of pandemics: empirical study on the adoption of COVID-19 tracing apps. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e25893. https://doi.org/10.2196/25893
Ore, O., & Sposato, M. (2021). Opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence in recruitment and selection. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2291
Ötting, S. K., & Maier, G. W. (2018). The importance of procedural justice in Human–Machine Interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.022
Punyatoya, P. (2019). Effects of cognitive and affective trust on online customer behavior. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37, 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2018-0058
Rana, G., & Sharma, R. (2019). Emerging human resource management practices in Industry 4.0. Strategic HR Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-01-2019-0003
Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
Samek, W., Müller, KR. (2019). Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence. In Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning(pp. 5-22). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_1
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_1
Sivathanu, B., & Pillai, R. (2018). Smart HR 4.0–how industry 4.0 is disrupting HR. Human Resource Management International Digest. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-04-2018-0059
Suen, H. Y., Chen, M. Y. C., & Lu, S. H. (2019). Does the use of synchrony and artificial intelligence in video interviews affect interview ratings and applicant attitudes? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.012
Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2014). A theory of creepy: Technology, privacy, and shifting social norms. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 16(1), 2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2326830
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53. https://dx.doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd
Wang, N., Shen, X. L., & Sun, Y. (2013). Transition of electronic word-of-mouth services from web to mobile context: A trust transfer perspective. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1394-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.015
Wang, W., Qiu, L., Kim, D., & Benbasat, I. (2016). Effects of rational and social appeals of online recommendation agents on cognition- and affect-based trust. Decision Support Systems, 86, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.03.007
Wang, W., & Siau, K. (2018). Trusting Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Medicine, 31(2), 89-99.
Wortham, R. H., Theodorou, A., & Bryson, J. J. (2016). What Does the Robot Think? Transparency as a Fundamental Design Requirement for Intelligent Systems. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Ethics for Artificial Intelligence : International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Wortham, R. H., & Theodorou, A. (2017). Robot transparency, trust and utility. Connection Science, 29(3), 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2017.1313816
Verma, A., Bansal, M., & Verma, J. (2020). Industry 4.0: reshaping the future of HR. Strategic Direction, 36(5), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-12-2019-0235