簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 溫瑞烘
論文名稱: 植基於本體論之語意式工作媒合系統之研究
A Study of Ontology-based Semantic Job Matching System
指導教授: 莊謙本
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 289
中文關鍵詞: 本體論工作媒合語意相似度
英文關鍵詞: Ontology, Job Matching, Semantic Similarity
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:121下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究植基於本體理論、人力資源理論與系統發展理論,旨在發展不同型式的工作媒合系統,並進行媒合效能的比較。首先藉由探討國內外有關本體理論的相關文獻,主要在瞭解本體建構的方法。接著進行了一個先導研究,由國內外人力資源網站上蒐集了當前企業界所需要的軟體開發技能,配合本體理論文獻探討的結果,建構了一個軟體開發者所需要的資訊能力本體。本研究繼續探討了工作媒合系統的媒合方式與當前人力資源網站的搜尋缺點,並使用開放源碼的LAMP (Linux、Apache、MySQL與PHP)環境,發展了七種型式的工作媒合系統:單純關鍵字工作媒合系統、結構化關鍵字工作媒合系統、補償式工作媒合系統、比例式工作媒合系統、加權補償式工作媒合系統、里程碑式工作媒合系統與綜合式工作媒合系統。再藉由實際資料媒合的結果,分析不同媒合方式其媒合結果的差異,以及不使用本體作單純的媒合與使用本體作語意相似度式的媒合,其媒合結果的差異。研究結果發現,在單純關鍵字工作媒合系統與結構化關鍵字工作媒合系統中,可以使用本研究提出的技能重要性指標值,來達成篩選的功能。同時在一個工作媒合系統中,使用本體作語意式的延伸查詢,可以提升工作媒合的回覆率與相似度總分。在此七種工作媒合系統中,以里程碑式工作媒合系統有最高的媒合回覆率與最高的相似度總分。

    The aim of the study was to develop different types of job matching systems based on Ontology Theory, human resource theory and system development theory. First, the study explored the literature related to Ontology to understand methodologies of ontology development. Then a pilot study was conducted to gather the skill requirements for software developers needed by current enterprises from human resource web sites nationwide and abroad. Based on the ontology development methodology and the result of the pilot study, an information competency ontology was built. The study continued to review the different types of job matching methods and their deficiencies. Using open source development platform LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP), the study implemented seven different types of job matching systems: simple keyword matching, structured keyword matching, compensated matching, proportional matching, weighted compensated matching, milestone matching and comprehensive matching system. The study analyzed the differences of matching results among job matching systems and the differences of matching results in a job matching system by using and not using ontologies. The result shows that using ontology for semantic searching can upgrade the recall and the similarity score within a job matching system. Among seven systems, the milestone job matching system has the highest recall and similarity score.

    中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 V 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XV 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 13 第三節 研究範圍 15 第四節 研究限制 16 第五節 名詞釋義 16 第二章 本體論的探討 第一節 本體論與本體 19 一、本體論Ontology 19 二、本體ontology 20 第二節 本體的定義 21 一、分歧的本體定義 21 二、本體的認定標準 24 三、本體的成份 29 第三節 本體的應用 30 一、本體在溝通上的應用 30 二、本體在知識工程上的應用 32 三、本體在全球資訊網的應用 33 四、本體在生物資訊界的應用 33 五、本體在軟體工程的應用 35 六、本體在語意網的應用 36 七、本體在知識管理的應用 38 八、大型本體的應用範例 40 第四節 本體的分類 41 一、以資訊處理觀點來做本體分類 41 二、以主題觀點來做本體分類 41 三、以知識重複使用的觀點來做本體分類 42 四、以普遍性的觀點來做本體分類 43 五、以知識工程的觀點來做本體分類 44 六、以本體和應用系統之間相依的關係來做本體分類 44 七、以正規化的程度來做本體分類 46 八、以本體在知識庫系統中扮演的角色來做本體分類 47 九、以使用性與再用性來做本體分類 47 十、以本體的共享性來做本體分類 48 十一、本體分類方式的彙總 49 第五節 本體的發展 51 一、本體發展的原則 51 二、發展本體需要克服的困難 54 三、IDEF5本體發展方法論 55 四、TOVE本體發展方法論 56 五、骨架式本體發展方法論 58 六、軟體開發生命週期本體發展方法論 60 七、Methontology本體發展方法論 61 八、SEAL本體發展方法論 62 九、KIS/OBM本體發展方法論 62 十、知識工程本體發展方法論 63 十一、本體發展方法論的彙總 67 第六節 本體的表徵 69 一、本體表徵的層次 69 二、本體語言的層次 70 三、本體語言的需求 72 第七節 本體的評鑑 75 一、本體評鑑的5W1H 75 二、本體評鑑的項目 76 三、本體評鑑的技巧 81 第八節 本體的整合 84 一、發現本體的方法 84 二、本體整合的方法 86 第九節 本章小結 88 第三章 工作媒合系統的探討 第一節 工作媒合系統 91 一、國外的經驗 91 二、國內的情況 94 三、工作媒合系統的功能 96 四、工作媒合系統的問題 97 第二節 語意相似度 99 一、語意相似度的定義 99 二、語意相似度的應用 100 三、語意相似度的理論基礎 103 第三節 工作媒合的方式 107 一、基於能力註解比對的工作媒合 107 二、基於能力陳述比對的工作媒合 109 三、基於WordNet比對的工作媒合 112 四、基於結構模式比對的工作媒合 114 五、基於補償式比對的工作媒合 117 六、基於多重技能比對的工作媒合 121 七、基於最短途徑矩陣比對的工作媒合 127 八、基於整合四種模式比對的工作媒合 132 九、基於能力模式比對的工作媒合 137 十、基於milestone比對的工作媒合 144 十一、基於關聯式資料庫比對的工作媒合 146 十二、工作媒合系統的彙總 151 第四節 本章小結 153 第四章 研究設計 第一節 先導研究 157 一、先導研究的目的 157 二、先導研究的資料蒐集 158 三、基於能力本體的內容分析 160 四、統計分析 161 五、先導研究的結果 162 第二節 研究架構 163 第三節 研究方法 165 第四節 研究工具 165 第五節 研究步驟 167 第六節 建立資料庫 169 一、發展本體儲存庫綱要 169 二、建立本體資料庫 170 三、本體儲存的範例 173 四、發展資訊能力本體 176 五、發展職務名稱本體 178 六、導入本體資料到本體儲存庫 180 七、準備測試資料集 180 第七節 本章小結 181 第五章 研究實施 第一節 單純關鍵字工作媒合系統的發展 183 一、發展工作需求的資料庫綱要 183 二、發展單純關鍵字工作媒合系統 185 第二節 結構化關鍵字工作媒合系統的發展 188 一、發展結構化關鍵字工作媒合所需的資料庫綱要 188 二、發展結構化關鍵字工作媒合系統 190 第三節 補償式工作媒合系統的發展 191 一、補償相似度的計算方式 191 二、發展補償式工作媒合系統 193 第四節 比例式工作媒合系統的發展 196 一、比例相似度的計算方式 196 二、發展比例式工作媒合系統 197 第五節 加權補償式工作媒合系統的發展 199 一、發展加權補償式工作媒合系統所需的資料庫綱要 199 二、加權補償式相似度的計算方式 201 三、發展加權補償式工作媒合系統 202 第六節 里程碑式工作媒合系統的發展 205 一、里程碑式相似度的計算方式 205 二、發展里程碑式工作媒合系統 209 第七節 綜合式工作媒合系統的發展 212 一、數值之間相似度的計算 212 二、職務名稱之間相似度的計算 214 三、發展綜合式工作媒合系統 215 第八節 本章小結 216 第六章 研究結果 第一節 職務名稱本體 217 第二節 資訊能力本體 219 第三節 單純關鍵字工作媒合的結果 222 第四節 結構化關鍵字工作媒合的結果 226 第五節 補償式工作媒合的結果 227 第六節 比例式工作媒合的結果 234 第七節 加權補償式工作媒合的結果 240 第八節 里程碑式工作媒合的結果 242 第九節 綜合式工作媒合的結果 244 第十節 工作媒合系統的比較 248 第十一節 結論與建議 254 一、結論 254 二、建議 256 參考文獻 中文部份 258 英文部份 259 附錄 附錄一 部份測試資料集 275 附錄二 部份程式碼 285

    壹、中文部份

    104人力銀行 (2007)。求職者的查詢功能。Retrieved June 30, 2007 from http://www.104.com.tw/.
    1111人力銀行 (2007). 求才資料。民96年2月26日,取自: http://www.1111.com.tw/.
    工作大贏家 (民95)。就業服務人員-求職路上的一盞明燈。工作大贏家,95年11月號,32-34。
    中研院 (2007)。中央研究院中英雙語知識本體詞網。民96年7月14日,取自:http://bow.sinica.edu.tw/ont/。
    全國就業e網 (2007)。全國公立就業服務機構 96年4月份求職求才統計資料分析。民96年7月4日,取自: http://php.ejob.gov.tw/
    anemoscope/anemoscope200704.htm
    行政院勞工委員會 (民89)。中華民國職業分類典。行政院勞工委員,台北市。
    行政院主計處(2006)。政府機構軟體開發環境調查報告。行政院主計處,台北。
    阮明淑、溫達茂(民91)。ontology應用於知識組織之初探。佛教圖書館館訊,32,6-17。
    國家圖書館 (2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網。民96年7月5日,取自:http://etds.ncl.edu.tw/theabs/index.jsp.
    溫瑞烘、莊謙本 (2004)。本體論之探討。第十屆資訊管理暨實務研討會論文集。
    溫瑞烘、莊謙本 (2007)。當前企業界所需要的軟體開發技能之分析研究。Journal of China Institute of Technology Vol.36-2007.6。
    楊學功(2002)。從Ontology的譯名之爭看哲學術語的翻譯原則。四川大學倫理學研究中心,思問。民96年7月4 日,取自: http://www.siwen.org。
    資策會 (2007)。資訊軟體人才能力架構。民96年9月24 日,取自:http://life.iiietc.ncu.edu.tw/xms/content/show.php?id=7762。
    TWNIC (2007)。九十六年度台灣寬頻網路使用狀況調查摘要分析。民96年7月4 日,取自:http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/
    200307/96305a.doc.
    劉群,李素建 (2002)。基於知網的辭彙語義相似度計算。 Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing,7(2) ,59-76。

    貳、英文部份

    Abecker, A., & van Elst, L. (2004). Ontologies for Knowledge Management. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), HANDBOOK ON ONTOLOGIES, International Handbooks on Information Systems (pp. 435-454), Springer.
    Acacia-Corese (2007). Corese Semantic Web Factory: a semantic Web search engine based on Conceptual Graphs. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/corese/
    Agirre, E., & Rigau, G. (1995). A proposal for Word Sense Disambiguation Using Conceptual Distance. In the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Recent Advanced in NLP, Bulgaria.
    Alani, H., Kim, S., Millard, D., Weal, M., Hall, W., Lewis, P., & Shadbolt, N. (2003) . Automatic Ontology-Based Knowledge Extraction from Web Documents. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(1), 14-21.
    Alberts, L. K. (1993). YMIR: an Ontology for Engineering Design. University of Twente, Enschede.
    Aleman-Meza, B., Haschek-Wiener, C., Sahoo, S. S., Sheth, A., & Arpinar, I. B. (2005). Template Based Semantic Similarity for Security Applications. In the Proceedings of International. Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics.
    Apache (2007). The Apache Software Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.apache.org/.
    Biesalski, E., Breiter, M., & Abecker, A. (2005). Towards Integrated, Intelligent Human Resource Management. 1st workshop FOMI 2005, Formal Ontologies Meet Industry.
    Bizer, C., Heese, R., Mochol, M., Oldakowski, R., Tolksdorf, R., & Eckstein, R. (2005). The Impact of Semantic Web Technologies on Job Recruitment Processes. In the Proceedings of International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI’05).
    Borgo, S., Guarino, N., and Masolo, C. (1996). Stratified ontologies: the case of physical objects. Proceedins of the ECAI-96 Workshop on Ontological Engineering, 5-15, Budapest.
    Botterbusch, K. F. (1986). A Comparison of Computerized Job Matching Systems. Eric #: ED289084. Retrieved September 18, 2007 from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1c/2c/52.pdf
    Bourse, M., Harzallah, M., Leclère, M. & Trichet, F. (2002). COMMONCV: modeling the competencies underlying a Curriculum Vitae. Knowledge Engineering Research Report No. 02.2. Retrieved Autust 30, 2007 from http://lina.atlanstic.net/documents/RR_pdfs/
    RR-IRIN-0202.pdf.
    Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., & Mladenic, D. (2005). A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In Proceedings of the 8th International multi-conference Information Society (IS-2005).
    Brank, J., Mladenic, D., & Grobelnik, M. (2006). Golden Standard Based Ontology Evaluation Using Instance Assignment. In the Proceedings of 4th International EON Workshop 2006, Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web.
    Brickley, D., and Guha, R. V. (2000). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation 27 March 2000, World Wide Web Consortium, Cambridge(MA); Retrieved Sep. 17, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
    CYC-CycL (2007). The syntax of CycL, Cycorp. Retrieved July 23, 2007 from http://www.cyc.com/cycdoc/ref/cycl-syntax.html.
    Canadian Common CV (2007). Common CV. Retrieved September 10, 2007 from http://www.commoncv.net/index_e.html.
    Careeronetop (2007). Find your state job bank. Retrieved September 23, 2007 from http://www.jobbankinfo.org/.
    Ceusters, W., Smith, B., Kumar, A., & Dhaen, C. (2004). Ontology-Based Error Detection in SNOMED-CT. In the Proceedings of MEDINFO, 482,486.
    Cimano, P., Handschuh, S., & Staab, S. (2004). Towards the self-annotating web. In the Proceedings of 13th WWW.
    CiteULike (2007). XSEarch: A semantic search engine for XML. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.citeulike.org/user/
    ianturton/article/593447.
    Cohen, S., Mamou, J., Kanza, Y., & Sagiv, Y. (2003). A semantic search engine for XML. In the Proceedings of VLDB 2003, 45–56.
    Corazzon, R. (2007). Ontology. A Resource Guide for Philosophers. Retrieved July, 8, 2007, from http://www.formalontology.it/.
    Crispin, G., & Mehler, M. (2006). CAREERXROADS 5TH Annual Sources of Hire Survey. Retrieved July, 2, 2007 from http://www.
    careerxroads.com/news/SourcesOfHire05.pdf.
    Cyc (2007). the Cyc knowledge server. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://www.opencyc.org/.
    DAML (2007). DAML Ontology Library. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://www.daml.org/ontologies/.
    Das, S., Chong, E. I., Eadon, G., & Sriniasan, J. (2004). Supporting Ontology-based Semantic Matching in RDBMS. In Proceedings of the 30th VLDB Conference, 1054-1065, Toronto, Canada.
    Dice (2007). Keyword Search Screenshots. Retrieved January 30, 2007 from http://www.dice.com/.
    Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Duarte, K.C., Natali, A.C.C. (2002). Developing Software for and with Reuse: An Ontological Approach. ACIS International Conference on Computer Science, Software Engineering, Information Technology, e-Business, and Applications (CSITeA-02), Brazil.
    Genesereth, M. R., & Nilsson, N. (1987). Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
    Giunchiglia, F., & Shvaiko, P. (2003). Semantic Matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal, 18 (3), 265 – 280.
    Gomez-Perez, A.(1995). Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. Proceedings of 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, 299 -305.
    Gómez-Pérez, A. (2003). Ontology Evaluation. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), HANDBOOK ON ONTOLOGIES, International Handbooks on Information Systems(pp. 251-274), Springer.
    Gomez-Perez, A., & Benjamins, R. (1999). Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. http://sunsite.informatik.
    rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-18/.
    Gomez-Perez, A., & Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 54-60.
    Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez, M. and de Vicente, A.J. (1996). Towards a Method to Conceptualize Domain Ontologies, ECAI-96 Workshop on Ontological Engineering, Budapest.
    Gruber, T. R. (1993). A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199-220.
    Gruninger, M., and Fox, M.S. (1995). Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, Montreal.
    Guarino, N. (1995). Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 43(5), 625-640.
    Guarino, N. (1997). Understanding, building, and using ontologies: A commentary to using explicit ontologies in kbs development, by van Heijst, Schreiber, and Wielinga. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 46, 293-310.
    Guarino, N., & Giaretta, P. (1995). Ontologies and knowledge bases: Towards a terminological clarification. In Mars, N., (ed), Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, 25-32, Amsterdam, NL. IOS Press.
    Hendler, J., and McGuinness, D. (2000). The DARPA Agent Markup Language. Retrieved September 17, 2007 from http://www.ksl.
    stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ieee-daml01-abstract.html.
    IEEE (1996). IEEE Standardsonline-IEEE1074-1995. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://standards.ieee.org/catalog/
    olis/arch_se.html.
    IHTSDO (2007). International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization. Retrieved September, 24, 2007 from http://www.ihtsdo.org/.
    Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (1994). Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering IDEF5 Method Report (IICE). Retrieved July, 12, 2007 from http://www.idef.com/pdf/Idef5.pdf.
    Kiryakov, A. K., Dimitrov, M., & Simov, K. I. (2001). OntoMap - the Guide to the Upper-Level Ontologies, In the Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), Stanford University.
    KSL (2007). Ontolingua. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/software/ontolingua/.
    Jacob, E. K. (2003). Ontologies and the semantic web. Bulletin of the American Society for International Science and Technology, Silver Spring, 29 (4), 19-22.
    Klinker, G., Bhola, C., Dallemagne, G., Marques, D., & McDermott, J. (1991). Usable and reusable programming constructs. Knowledge Acquisition, 3(2), 117–135.
    Lassila, O.(1998). Web Metadata: A Matter of Semantics. IEEE Internet Computing 2(4), 30-37.
    Lassila, O., and Swick, R. (1999). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. W3C Recommendation 22 February 1999, World Wide Web Consortium, Cambridge (MA); Retrieved July, 13, 2007, from http://www.w3.org/TR/
    REC-rdf-syntax/.
    Lin, D. (1998). An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, 296-304, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
    Linux (2007). Linux Online. Retrieved from http://www.linux.org/.
    Lopez, F. (1999). Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. CEUR Publications, Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 26-34.
    Lozano-Tello, A., & A. Gómez-Pérez, A. (2004).ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), 1-18.
    Lv, H., & Zhu, B. (2006). Skill ontology-based semantic model and its matching algorithm In the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design (CAIDCD '06).
    Maedche, A., & Staab, S. (2002). Ontologies: Representation, Engineering, Learning and Applications. In the Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence - ECAI-2002.
    Maedche, A., Staab, S., Stojanovic, N., Studer, R., & Sure, Y.(2001). SEmantic PortAL - The SEAL approach. In Creating the Semantic Web. D. Fensel, J. Hendler, H. Lieberman, W. Wahlster (eds.) MIT Press, MA, Cambridge.
    Mansfield, B., and Mitchell, L. Towards a competent workforce. Gower Publishing Ltd, England, 1996.
    McGuinness, D.L.(2002). Ontologies Come of Age. In Fensel, D., Hendler, J, Lieberman, J., and Wahlster, W. (ed.) Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, 2002.
    Meisel, H. (2005). Ontology Representation and Reasoning- A Conceptual Level Approach. A dissertation of the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. Retrieved July 23, 2007 from http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/publications/theses/downloads/meisel/meiselthesis.pdf.
    Michelin Career Center (2004). Educational Career Services Orientation Manual, Clemson University. Retrieved August 31, 2007 from http://career.clemson.edu/pdf_docs/EdCareerGuide.pdf.
    Mika, P., Iosif, V., Sure, Y., & Akkermans, H. (2004). Ontology-based Content Management in a Virtual Organization. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), HANDBOOK ON ONTOLOGIES, International Handbooks on Information Systems (pp. 455-475), Springer.
    Mizoguchi, R. (1998). A Step Towards Ontological Engineering. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on AI of JSAI, 22-31.
    Mizoguchi, R., & Ikeda, M. (1996). Towards ontology engineering. Technical Report No. AI-TR-96-1, Osaka University: ISIR.
    Mohaghegh, S., & Reza Razzazi, M. (2004). An ontology driven matchmaking process. In the Proceedings of World Automation Congress, 16, 248 – 253.
    Monster (2007). Screenshots. Retrieved September 11, 2007 from http://www.monster.com/.
    Musen, M. A. (1992). Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse. Computers and Biomedical Research, 25, 435-467.
    MySQL (2007). MySQL 5.0 Reference Manual. Retrieved from http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/.
    NAICS (2007). North American Industry Classification System. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/
    naics.html.
    NAS (2006). Internet Recruitment Report. NAS Insights. Retrieved July, 2, 2007 from http://www.nasrecruitment.com/TalentTips/
    NASinsights/InternetRecruitingReport06.pdf
    Nathanson, S. N. (1975). Evaluation and Analysis of the Cleff Job Matching System. Eric #: ED121802. Retrieved Sep. 19, 2007 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
    Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., & Swartout, W. R. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine, 12(3), 36-56.
    NLM (2007). United States National Library of Medcine. Retrieved July, 14, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/nlmhome.html.
    Noy, N., Fergerson, R., & Musen, M. (2000). The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility, Proceedings of the2nd International. Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW'2000).
    Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Knowledge Systems Laboratory Tech Report KSL-01-05 Stanford University.
    Oberle, D., & Spyns, P. (2004). The Knowledge Portal “OntoWeb.” In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), HANDBOOK ON ONTOLOGIES, International Handbooks on Information Systems (pp. 499-516), Springer.
    Onthology (2007). Anthology of ontologies. Retrieved July 30, 2007 from http://www.onthology.org/.
    OntoPortal (2007). OntoSeek - Content-Based Access to the Web. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.ontoportal.org.uk/
    snapshot/explore/themes/3/literature/89.html.
    OntoSelect (2007). OntoSelect Ontology Library. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://olp.dfki.de/ontoselect/.
    OntoWeb (2007). OntoWeb. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://www.ontoweb.org
    PHP (2007). PHP Manual. Retrieved from http://www.phpbuilder.com/
    manual/.
    Pan, F., & Farrell, R. G. (2007). Computing Semantic Similarity between Skill Statements for Approximate Matching. In the Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2007, 572–579, Rochester, NY, April 2007.
    Pinto, H. S., & Martins, J. P. (2001). A methodology for ontology integration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture K-CAP2001, 131–138, ACM Press.
    Poli, R. (2002). Ontological methodology. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 56, 639-664.
    Porzel, R, & Malaka, R. (2004). A task-based approach for ontology evaluation, ECAI 2004 Workshop Ontology Learning and Population.
    Potok, T. E., Elmore, M. T., Reed, J. W., & Samatova, N., (2002). An Ontology-Based HTML to XML Conversion Using Intelligent Agents. Proceedings of 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 4, IEEE.
    Protege (2007). Protege Ontologies Library. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?
    ProtegeOntologiesLibrary.
    Rajaraman, V. (1998). Programming Languages: A Brief Review. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from http://www.iisc.ernet.in/academy/
    resonance/Dec1998/pdf/Dec1998p43-54.pdf
    RosettaNet (2007). RosettaNet Standards. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://portal.rosettanet.org/cms/sites/RosettaNet/Standards/RStandards/index.html.
    SchemaWeb (2007). SchemaWeb. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://www.schemaweb.info/.
    Schulze-Kremer, S. (2002). Ontologies for Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics. Silio Biology, 2, 179-193.
    SHOE (2007). Semantic Search - The SHOE Search Engine. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/
    search/.
    Stevens, R., Wroe, C., Lord, P. , & Goble, C. (2004). Ontologies in Bioinformatics. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), HANDBOOK ON ONTOLOGIES, International Handbooks on Information Systems (pp.635-657), Springer.
    Studer, R., Fensel, D., Decker, S. & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). Knowledge Engineering: Survey and Future Directions. In the Proceedings of the 5th German Conference on Knowledge-Based Systems (XPS'99), 1-23.
    Surakka, S. (2005). Analysis of technical skills in job advertisements targeted at software developers. Informatics in Education, 4(1), 101-122.
    Sure, Y., Maedche, A., & Staab, S. (2000). Leveraging Corporate Skill Knowledge - From ProPer to OntoProper. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management.
    Swoogle (2007). Semantic web search. Retrieved July 26, 2007 from http://swoogle.umbc.edu/.
    Takeda, H., Iino, K., & Nishida, T.(1995). Agent organization and communication with multiple ontologies. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 4(4), 321-337.
    Tolksdorf, R. (2007). A contextual approach to ontology reuse: methodology, methods and tools for the Semantic Web. Berlin, Freie University, Dissertation. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/2007/230/.
    UNSPC (2007). The United Nations Standard Products and Services Codes Ontology. Retrieved July 25, 2007 from http://www.unspsc.
    org/.
    UNSPSC (1998). United Nations Standard Products and Services Code, UNSPSC. Retrieved July 22, 2007, from http://www.unspsc.org.
    Uschold, M. (1996). Building ontologies: Towards a unified methodology. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert System, Cambridge, UK.
    Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Reviews, 11(2), 93-137.
    van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A., and Wielinga, B. (1997). Using explicit ontologies for KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46 (2/3), 183-192.
    Ven, J.-H., & Chuang, C.-P. (2007). The Development of a Competency Ontology. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(1), 275-279.
    Ven, J. H., & Chuang, C. P. (2008) (in press). Skill Requirements for Software Developers: Comparisons between U. S. and Taiwan. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 12(2).
    Vlez, B., Wiess, R., Sheldon, M., & Gifford, D. (1997). Fast and effective query refinement. In the Proceedings of 20th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 6-15.
    W3C (1999). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, W3C Recommendation 22, Retrieved July, 13, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/.
    W3C (2004). OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation 10, Retrieved July 13, 2007, from http://www.
    w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
    W3C (2007). Semantic Web. Retrieved September 5, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
    WHO-ICD, 1992. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. World Health Organization. Retrieved July 22, 2007, from http://www.who.int/whosis/icd10/.
    Wang; N., & Xu, X. (2000). A method to build ontology. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference/Exhibition on High Performance Computing in the Asia-Pacific Region, 2, 672 -673.
    Wang, T., Su, X., Wang, Y., Ma, P. (2007). Semantic similarity-based grading of student programs. Information and Software Technology, 49 (2), 99-107.
    Wicaksana, I. W. S., & Yetongnon, K. (2006). A Peer-to-Peer Based Semantic Agreement Approach for Information System Interoperability. In the International Proceedings of OM-2006 ISWC-2006.
    Wong, D. W. (1992). Toward the development of a second generation computerized job-matching system for persons with disabilities: a conceptual framework. Journal of Rehabilitation.
    XML(2000). Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., and Maler, E. (ed) Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition). W3C Recommendation 6 October 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR/
    2000/REC-xml-20001006.
    Yahiaoui, L., Boufaïda, Z., & Prié, Y. (2006). Semantic annotation of documents Applied to E-Recruitment. In Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP 2006), the 3rd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, Pisa, Italy.
    Yi, X., Allan, J., Croft, W. B. (2007). Matching Resumes and Jobs Based on Relevance Models. In the Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, 809-810.
    Zajac, R. (2001). Engineering Ontologies vs. Linguistic Ontologies for Web Applications, in the Proceedings of MAA Conference, Tokyo.
    Zhong, J., Zhu, H., Li, J., & Yu, Y. (2002). Conceptual Graph Matching for Semantic Search. In the Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Iccs 2002.

    QR CODE