簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉若蘭
Ruo-Lan Liu
論文名稱: 大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之建構與驗證-以北部某多元族群技術學院為例
The construction and the confirmation of learning success models for the aboriginal and the Han's college students-Based on a multiracial institute of technology in northern Taiwan
指導教授: 黃玉
Huang, Yu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 公民教育與活動領導學系
Department of Civic Education and Leadership
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 345
中文關鍵詞: 大專原住民族學生大專漢族學生成功學習家庭社經水準家庭支持自我概念校園經驗學術投入人際投入族群認同發展心理社會發展認知發展學業成就
英文關鍵詞: aboriginal college student, Han’s college student, learning success, family socioeconomic status, family support, self-concept, campus experience, academic involvement, social involvement, racial identity development, psychosocial development, cognitive development, academic performance
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:355下載:214
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    本研究旨在建構並驗證大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習之影響模式,研究問題包括:(一)大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習的指標與重要影響因素為何?族群之間是否有差異?(二)大專原住民族與漢族學生個人因素、學術投入因素、人際投入因素,影響成功學習之模式為何?最後,提出未來在高等教育校園中促進多元族群學生成功學習的建議,以提供大學教師及學生事務工作者規劃活動與方案之參考。

    為達研究目的,本研究基於Astin (1984)、 Tinto (1975, 1993)、Pascarelle(1985)、Weidman(1989)、Terenzini(1996)、Chickering(1969, 1993)、Perry(1968, 1981)等理論與研究,以及ACPA與NASPA(2004)提出的學習之交互關聯性,建構大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式,其中個人因素包括:家庭社經水準、家庭支持、自我概念、一年級成績,校園經驗包括:學術投入、人際投入,成功學習指標包括:族群認同、認知發展、心理社會發展、學業成就。

    研究對象為北部某多元族群技術學院五年制護理系四年級學生,取樣原住民族學生215名與漢族學生360名,該校目前原住民學生約占全校學生人數五分之ㄧ,全體學生住校,校園中多元族群互動密切,符合本研究之所需。

    研究方法以量化為主,質化為輔。量化研究問卷調查部分,依據國內外相關量表,由研究者自行設計,並分別以內部一致性係數建立信度,以及專家評定內容效度與建構效度,內容包括個人因素量表、校園經驗量表、成功學習量表,與三項關於成功學習的開放式問題。問卷資料以結構方程模式統計分析,驗證本研究建構之成功學習模式的適配性。質化研究則針對量化研究發現的問題,從下列四大方面,透過訪談加以釐清。一、原住民族與漢族學生家庭背景與家庭關係的內涵為何?與學習的關係為何?二、原住民族與漢族學生人際投入的經驗內涵如何,影響歷程為何?三、原住民族與漢族學生學術投入與課業學習經驗為何?四、原住民族與漢族學生族群互動與族群認同的經驗為何?訪談對象乃依據問卷調查結果,分由學術投入低、人際投入低,學術投入低、人際投入高,學術投入高、人際投入低,學術投入高、人際投入高四組,選取9名原住民族學生及11名漢族學生訪談,訪談資料則以內容分析方式,以補足或解釋量化研究無法探究的內涵。

    本研究結果發現:

    一、 成功學習的指標包括:族群認同、心理社會發展、認知發展、學業成就。
    而影響大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習之重要影響因素有:家庭社經水準、一年級成績、自我概念、家庭支持、參與互動、人際整合、學術投入。

    二、 各項因素的差異分析中,大專漢族學生顯著高於原住民族學生的變項有:
    一年級上學期成績、家庭社經地位、學術投入、學業成就、認知發展的抉擇實踐階段、與漢族同學互動;而原住民族學生只有與原住民同學互動方面顯著高於漢族學生。

    三、 大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式的模式適配性均可稱為理想。

    四、 大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式直接效果方面
    (一)兩個模式均達顯著水準的直接效果有:
    一年級第一學期成績對目前學業成就;參與互動對族群認同;人際整合對心理社會發展;學術投入對認知發展、學業成就;家庭支持對參與互動、人際整合、自我概念;自我概念對參與互動、人際整合、心理社會發展、認知發展。
    (二)原住民族學生模式中顯著,而漢族學生模式中不顯著的直接效果有:
    參與互動對認知發展;家庭支持對學術投入;人際整合對學術投入。
    (三)漢族學生模式中顯著,而原住民族學生模式中不顯著的直接效果有:
    社經水準對參與互動;自我概念對學術投入;一年級第一學期成績對自我概念、學術投入;學術投入對心理社會發展。

    五、質性訪談結果方面
    (一)不同族群學生獲得家庭支持的來源與方式有所不同,漢族學生的父母可能期望較高,提供資源較多,但是家庭生活與關係是否穩定,對於不同族群學生的學習,均有重要影響。
    (二)人際投入方面,原住民族學生歸屬來源,主要是同族群同儕團體,較少參加社團活動,漢族學生則涉入社團活動較多。
    (三)學術投入與課業學習方面,原住民族學生師生互動較少,某些學科基礎較弱,漢族學生與教師互動收穫較多,國中學習基礎對學習有助益。
    (四)族群互動與族群認同方面,原住民族學生有被歧視經驗,雖然多數肯定族群身分,仍然會害怕不被接受,漢族學生對原住民文化有刻板印象,其中部分學生對於原住民優惠待遇有所排斥。

    Abstract

    The purpose of the study was to construct and confirm the learning success models for the aboriginal and the Han’s college students. The research questions included:
    1. What was the learning success indicators and the influential factors for the aboriginal and the Han’s college students? Was there significant differences between different racial groups ?
    2. What was the influential learning success models for the aboriginal and the Han’s college students by the personal, academic involvement and social involvement factors?

    Based on the theories and researches of Astin (1984)、Tinto (1975, 1993)、Pascarelle (1985)、Weidman (1989)、Terenzini (1996)、Chickering (1969, 1993)、Perry (1968, 1981) and the interconnectedness of student learning (ACPA & NASPA, 2004) , the model was developed. The model consisted the personal factors which included family socioeconomic status, family support, self-concept and the grade of first semester in freshmen ; the campus experiences which included academic and social involvement; the learning success outcomes which included racial identity development, psychosocial development, cognitive development and academic performance.

    The sample of the research were 215 aboriginal students and 360 Han’s students, who were the forth grade female students of the five years nursing program in a multiracial dormitory institute of technology. Since 20 percent of students were aborigines in the college, there were a lot of interracial interactions in the campus.

    By using both quantitative and qualitative methods, the research data was collected. All study participants completed a self-developed questionnaire for the college student learning success study which consisted the demographic background survey, the self-concept scale, the family support scale, the academic involvement

    scale, the activity participation scale, the peer interaction scale, the social
    integration scale, the racial identity development scale, the psychosocial development scale, the cognitive development scale. The reliabilities of all the scales conducted with internal consistency (Cronbach’sα) and the validities which included content validity and construct validity were reasonable. Pearson’s r and t-test were used to analyze the correlations and differences among all the factors. For the goodness of the model-fit, the structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to confirm for the aboriginal college students’ and the Han’s college students’ models.

    After analyzing the quantitative data, a qualitative interview was conducted with the nine aboriginal students and eleven Han’s students who were selected based on the high and low degree of their academic and social involvement. The questions needed to be supplemented and explained that the results of the quantitative survey could not answer were: 1. What was the relationship between family background and family support in different racial groups? And how these factors related to learning? 2. What were the social involvement experiences of different racial groups? 3. What were the academic involvement experiences of different racial groups? 4. What were the experiences of the intra and inter racial group’s peer interactions and the racial identity development?

    The findings of the research are:
    1. The indicators of learning success are: racial identity development, psychosocial development, cognitive development and academic performance. And the influential factors which affect aboriginal and Han’s college students’ learning success are: family socioeconomic status, family support, self –concept, the grade of first semester in freshmen, activities participation and peer interaction, social integration and academic involvement.
    2. The variables that the Han’s college students’ are significantly higher than the aboriginal college students’ are: The grade of first semester in freshmen, family socioeconomic status, academic involvement, academic performance, the commitment stage’s development of cognitive development, interactions with Han’s college students. And the only one variable that the aboriginal college students’ is significantly higher than the Han’s college students’ is the interactions with aboriginal college students.
    3. The goodness of model-fit for the aboriginal college students’ and Han’s college students’ learning success models are reasonable.

    4. The direct effects in both the aboriginal college students’ and the Han’s college students’ learning success models are as follows:

    (1) The significant direct effects in both two models are: the grade of first semester in freshmen to the academic performance; the activities participations and peer interactions to the aboriginal college student racial identity development; the social integration to the psychosocial development; the academic involvement to the cognitive development, academic performance; the family support to the activities participations and peer interactions, the social integration, the self-concept; the self-concept to the activities participations and peer interactions, the social integration, the psychosocial development, the cognitive development.
    (2) The direct effects which are significant in the aboriginal college students’ model but not in the Han’s college students’ model are : the family support to the academic involvement; the activities participations and peer interactions to the cognitive development; the social integration to the academic involvement.
    (3) The direct effects which are significant in the Han’s college students’ model but not in the aboriginal college students’ model are : the family socioeconomic status to the activities participations and peer interactions; the grade of first semester in freshmen to the self-concept and the academic involvement; the self-concept to the academic involvement; the academic involvement to the psychosocial development.
    5. The qualitative findings are:
    (1) In the family support aspect, the level of expectation and the resources provided form the parents of Han’s students are likely more than those from the parents of aboriginal students. But the stability of family life and relations are significant to both the two groups.
    (2) In the social involvement aspect, the experiences of joining clubs for the aboriginal students in the college are less than that for Han’s students. And the sense of belonging mostly comes from the same racial peer group for the aboriginal students.
    (3) In the academic involvement aspect, the interactions with faculties for aboriginal students are more less than that for Han’s students. And the academic experiences of high schools are influential to both two groups.
    (4) In the interracial interactions and the racial identity development aspect, although most aboriginal students feel assertive with their racial identity,

    yet they are still afraid of being excluded from the majority group, since the
    discrimination continually exist. Besides, most Han’s students have stereotype towards aboriginal culture and some of them possess prejudice against the preferential treatments for the aboriginal students.

    Based on the quantitative and qualitative findings, two revised learning success models are developed. And recommendations for practice and for further research are presented.

    Key words: aboriginal college student, Han’s college student, learning success, family socioeconomic status, family support, self-concept, campus experience, academic involvement, social involvement, racial identity development, psychosocial development, cognitive development, academic performance.

    目 次 謝誌-------------------------------------------------------I 中文摘要-------------------------------------------------III英文摘要---------------------------------------------------V 目次----------------------------------------------------VIII表次------------------------------------------------------XI 圖次----------------------------------------------------XIII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機-----------------------------------------------------------1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題-----------------------------------------------------11 第三節 名詞釋義--------------------------------------------------------------------14 第四節 研究限制--------------------------------------------------------------------22 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 成功學習的意義-----------------------------------------------------------24 第二節 成功學習的相關理論-----------------------------------------------------33 第三節 影響成功學習重要變項之相關研究-----------------------------------60 第四節 建構與驗證成功學習模式之方法論題--------------------------------74 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 學生成功學習模式架構圖----------------------------------------------78 第二節 研究對象-------------------------------------------------------------------81 第三節 研究工具-------------------------------------------------------------------84 第四節 實施程序-------------------------------------------------------------------115 第五節 資料分析方法-------------------------------------------------------------117 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習指標與重要影響因素分析-121 第二節 大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之分析…………46 第三節 質性訪談分析………………………………………………61 第四節 綜合討論………………………………………………201 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………225 第二節 建議……………………………………………………233 參考文獻 中文部分……………………………………………………………241 西文部分……………………………………………………………245 附錄 附錄一 「專家評定」專家學者名單即修正意見與建議彙整表…264 附錄二 大專學生校園經驗與學習發展問卷(預試)…………279 附錄三 自我概念預試量表項目分析結果………………………289 附錄四 家庭支持預試量表項目分析結果………………………289 附錄五 大專學生校園經驗與學習發展問卷(正式)…………290 附錄六 學術投入預試量表項目分析結果………………………302 附錄七 人際整合預試量表項目分析結果………………………303 附錄八 課外活動參與預試量表項目分析結果…………………304 附錄九 與原住民同學互動預試量表項目分析結果……………304 附錄十 與平地生互動預試量表項目分析結果…………………305 附錄十一 認知發展預試量表項目分析結果………………………306 附錄十二 心理社會發展預試量表項目分析結果…………………308 附錄十三 漢族大專學生族群認同預試量表項目分析結果………310 附錄十四 原住民大專學生族群認同預試量表項目分析結果……312 附錄十五 研究對象同意書…………………………………………315 附錄十六 訪談同意函………………………………………………316 附錄十七 研究參與者P生訪談詮釋文(範例一)………………317 附錄十八 研究參與者O生訪談詮釋文(範例二)………………318 附錄十九 開放式問題回答整理…………………………………319 附錄二十 少數族群學生方案工作準則…………………………323

    參考文獻
    中文部分
    內政部(2001)。原住民身分法。2003年11月25日,取自:http://home.com.tw/ry8203/b003/b0030401.htm
    王慶齡(1992)。少數族群青少年學校生活適應之相關因素探討。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    王淑美(1995)。花蓮縣原住民校長在主流文化中的學校適應。國立花蓮師範學校國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    王天佑(1999)。家庭背景與台灣原住民教育地位取得。載於洪泉湖、吳學燕主編台灣原住民教育(頁31-53)。台北市:師苑。
    古慧貞(2004)。原住民與漢族大學生個人背景與校園互動經驗對其族群認同發展之影響-以國立台東大學私立輔仁大學為例。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    李亦園、歐用生(1992)。我國山胞教育之方向定位與課程內容設計研究。教育部教育委員會。
    朱進財(1991)。高屏地區山地與平地國中學生學習與思考方式、創造性、認知與自我統整發展之研究。載於高敬文所編,高屏地區與平地國中實施九年國教成效差異研究(頁445-130)。屏東,屏東師院。
    沈六(1993)。多元文化教育的意識型態與理論。載於中國教育學會主編,多元文化教育(頁47-70)。台北市:台灣書店。
    汪其楣(1999)。傾聽,向少數學習。張老師月刊,五月號,15-22。
    汪桂枝、孫惠玲、李美玉(2002)。護專學生入學在學成績與專技護理師高考相關性之初探。馬偕護理專科學校學報,2,1-10。
    林清山(1984)。「結構方程式關係」(LISREL)電腦程式的理論與應用。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,31,149-164。
    林思妙(1994)。從認知評估、因應策略看國中教師工作壓力。國立師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    林義男(1983)。大學師生非正式互動與學生學習成果的關係,台灣教育學院輔導學院輔導學報,6,125-148。
    林義男(1988)。大學生的學習參與及學習成果-參與理論的證驗性研究。高雄:復文。
    林義男(1990)。大學生的學習參與學習型態與學習成果的關係。國立彰化師範大學輔導學報,13,79-128。
    林淑媛(1998)。台灣原住民學術菁英的教育歷程與族群適應。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    林生傳(1976)。影響學業成就的社會環境因素分析與探討。高師學報,4,167-222。
    林繼盛(1982)。影響國小兒童學業成就的家庭因素。台北:台灣省國民學校教育研習會。
    邱怡薇(1997)。都巿原住民青少年之社會支持與學習適應-以台北縣巿阿美族為例。國立台灣大學社會學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
    邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式-LISREL的理論技術與應用。台北:雙葉。
    胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?載於胡幼慧主編。質化研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯)(2001)。Strauss & Corbin著。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures theory procedures and techniques)。嘉義市:濤石文化。
    吳景雲(2003)。高等教育原住民學生學校適應之研究。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    吳慧珠(1996)。台灣南部傳統大學生與成人學生認知與道德發展之比較-以
    Perry的架構為基礎。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,
    高雄。
    吳天泰(1996)。泰雅父母對子女教育的看法。原住民教育季刊,4,22-34。
    洪寶蓮(1992)。我國大學生學習狀況之調查研究。測驗與輔導,115,2335-2341。
    卓石能(2002)。都市原住民學童族群認同與其自我概念生活適應之關係研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
    徐宗國(1996)。紮根理論研究法:淵源原則技術與涵義,載於胡幼慧主編。質化研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    徐玫綺(1998)。弱勢族群與學校教育-長庚護專的原住民少女。國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    馬信行(1999)。結構方程式模式在教育上的應用及所遭遇的問題。教育與心理研究,22,1-14。
    施正鋒(1998)。族群與民族主義-集體認同的政治分析。台北:前衛。
    郭洪紀(1997)。文化民族主義=Cultural Nationalism。台北:揚智文化
    高雅雪(2000)。族群認同與生命的交織-四位原住民青年族群認同之生命經驗與民族誌電影。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    莊耀嘉(1980)。國中生的人格特質、學業成就歸因及其學習行為。台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    教育部(2004)。教育統計。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(2005)。大學生學習及生活意向調查報告。台北市:教育部。

    許文忠(1999)。山地布農族學童族群認同與自尊之研究。台北巿師範學院國民教育研究所,碩士論文。
    許木柱(1989)。台灣原住民的族群認同的運動。載於徐文光、宋文里合編,台灣新興社會運動,127-156。台北:巨流。
    許藤繼(2005)。家庭社經背景對大專學生就學影響之調查研究。論文發表於清華大學高等教育研究中心舉辦之國科會整合型計劃「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」第一階段成果報告研討會,清大。
    曾潤梅(2002)。台灣高教改革風雲錄。取自http://202.130.245.40/chinese/202/Mar/120864.htm
    黃玉(1999)。Student involvement and involving college –the theory and implementation,公民訓育學報,第八輯,605-622頁。
    黃玉(2000)。大學學生事務的理論基礎—台灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報,9,161-200。
    黃玉 (2002a)。e世代多元背景大學生校園經驗心理社會發展與認知發展歷程之縱貫研究(I)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。編號:NSC91-2413-H-003-015。台北市:師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
    黃玉(2002b)。另類聲音-大學女生校園經驗與心裡社會發展歷程之質性探究.。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。NSC90-2413-H-003-038。台北市:師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
    黃玉 (2004)。e世代多元背景大學生校園經驗心理社會發展與認知發展歷程之縱貫研究(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。編號:NSC92-2413-H-003-008。台北市:師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
    黃光雄(1993)。多元文化教育-序,載於中國教育學會主編,多元文化教育,(頁3-4)。台北:東華。
    黃志賢(2000)。技職學校原住民學生學校生活適應及其相關因素之研究-以明志技術學院為例。明志技術學院學報,32,203-225。
    黃森泉(1999)。台灣中部地區原住民國小學生之族群文化學習與族群認同。台灣原住民教育,2,235-275。
    黃森泉(2000)。原住民教育之理論與實際。台北:揚智文化。
    黃冠盈(2001)。從文化差異面向探討原住民國中新生之學校適應-以三位泰雅族學生為例。國立花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    黃靜薇(2000)。都巿原住民青少年的生涯規劃-以大台北地區阿美族青少年為例。國立台灣大學社會系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    黃政傑(2001)。高等教育的發展。師友,409,6-10。
    黃茂夫、高淑芳(1995)‧原住民學生在山地或平地就讀之學習成效差異研究‧臺灣省政府教育廳委託專題研究報告。

    陳金貴(2001)。學生涉入理論運用在學生事務的探討。載於何進財等著:學生事務與社團輔導(頁81-98)。台北市:東吳課外活動組。
    陳美如(2000)。多元文化課程的理念與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。
    陳麗華(1996)。從兒童的族群社會化談班級的族群關係經營。原住民教育季刊,2,53-77。
    陳麗華(1997)。族群意向與族群隔離:都市小學班級裡的原漢族群關係探討。初等教育學刊,6,81-110。
    陳麗華、劉美慧(1999)。花蓮縣阿美族兒童的族群認同發展之研究。花蓮師院學報,9,177-226。
    陳麗華(2000)。族群關係課程發展研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    陳正昌、程炳林。(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南。
    陳瑞芸(1990)。族群關係、族群認同與台灣原住民基本政策。國立政治大學三民主義研究所,碩士論文。
    陳建州(2000)。家庭社經地位高低與學業成就差異之因果關係。教育社會學通訊,26,20-23。
    陳舜芬(2004)。松竹楊梅四校大學生校園經驗與學習成果之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。計劃編號:NSC91-2413-H-007-003。
    陳舜芬、陳素燕、曾正宜(2005)。我國高等教育學府大學部學生教育成果及其相關因素之研究。載於清華大學高等教育研究中心舉辦之國科會整合型計劃「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」第一階段成果報告研討會會議論文集(頁44-51),清大。
    葉志誠(2000)。社會科學概論。台北:揚智。
    彭森明(2003)。大一新生問卷。台灣清華大學高等教育研究中心。
    楊少強(2002)。63﹪教授:台灣大學生比十年前差。取自http://mmm.businessweekly.com.tw/bwnet/bcontent/2002/788/788t102cs.htm
    楊少璇(2003)。高等教育的競爭策略-以四所大學為例。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。未發表。
    楊思偉(1999)。高等教育普及化發展模式初探。教育研究資訊,8(4),17-32。
    楊淑玲(2001)‧五位日出師院原住民女學生的教育經驗‧花蓮師院學報,13,105-127。
    梁金盛(2002)。轉型與整併-師範院校何去何從。中華民國比較教育學會「推動高等教育整合與提昇高等教育競爭力」學術研討會,台灣南投:國際暨南大學。
    張建邦譯(1987)。Kerr, C.(1982).The uses of the university. 大學的功能。台北市:淡江大學。
    張春興(1989)。張氏心理辭典。台北:東華。

    張琇喬(2000)。台灣布農族學生族群認同之相關研究。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利系,碩士論文。
    張錦裕(2002)。學校情境中影響台灣原住民族國中生族群認同因素之探究-以花蓮地區阿美族為例。國立台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    張慧如(2002)。民族與性別之潛在課程-以原住民女學生為例。台北:師大書苑。
    張雪梅(1996)。學生發展:學生事務工作的理論與實踐。台北市:張老師。
    張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊:我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實證研究。台北市:張老師。
    張秀敏(1991)。從學習行為和生活適應觀點評估高屏地區與平地國中九年國教之成效。載於高敬文所編,高屏地區與平地國中實施九年國教成效差異研究(頁131-149)。屏東,屏東師院。
    賴明政(2003)。技職校院在職進修學生背景資料、入學成績與學業成就關係之研究。國立台北商業技術學院學報,4,52-73。
    蔡永強(2002)。山海的女兒-五位原住民女性教育菁英的生命史研究。台北巿立師範學院國民教育研究所,碩士論文。
    蔡慧君(2003)。原住民知識精英之學校經驗與族群認同。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所,碩士論文,未出版。
    鄒浮安(1994)。家庭社經地位與學業成就之關係:後設分析。教育研究資訊,2(3),38-47。
    廖張京棣、劉若蘭、曹麗英(1999)‧護專原住民新生學校適應行為之探討‧技術學刊,14(4),619-626。
    劉美慧(1999)。多元文化取向的社會科學教學研究。高雄:復文。
    劉慶中、藍瑞霓(1991)。從教育行政觀點評估高屏地區山地與平地國中九年國教成效之差異。載於高敬文所編,高屏地區與平地國中實施九年國教成效差異研究(頁13-44)。屏東,屏東師院。
    劉若蘭(1998)。原住民學生身心適應追蹤研究。學生輔導通訊,55,130-140。
    劉若蘭、周富美(2003)。技職院校原住民學生社團次文化初探-以北部兩所技術學院為例。學生事務與社團輔導,第四輯,427-446頁。
    劉若蘭、陳迺葒、曹麗英、李可珊(2004)。從文化差異面向探討原住民新生入學之適應歷程。長庚科技學刊,3,177-196。
    劉惠琴(1994)。台北地區大學生參與課外活動對通識教育相關之研究,國科會八十三年度「科學教育專題研究計劃」成果討論會,計劃編號:NAC-8209364-5200。
    劉奕蘭(2005)。大一學生心理社會發展與生活適應的關係:性別學校與科系類型的差異比較。載於清華大學高等教育研究中心舉辦之國科會整合型計劃「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」第一階段成果報告研討會會議論文集(頁8-11),清大。
    謝世忠(1987)。認同的污名-台灣原住民的族群變遷。台北:自立晚報社。
    譚光鼎(1998)。原住民教育研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(2001)。多元文化教育。台北:空大。
    戴嘉南(1996)。高壓力青少年所知覺的家庭社會支持及其因應效能之研究。教育部獎助心理輔導專案研究。
    蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑理論與實際。台北:五南。

    西文部分

    Allen, W. R. (1986). Gender and campus race differences in Black student academic performance, racial attitudes and college satisfaction. Georgia: Southern Education Foundation.
    Allen, W.R. (1992). The color of success: African American college students’ outcomes at predominately white and historically Black public college and universities. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 26-44.
    Allen, W. R. & Haniff, N. Z. (1991). Race, gender and academic performance in U.S. higher education. In W. R. Allen, E. G. Epps. & N.Z. Haniff (Eds.), College in black and white: African American students in Predominately White and in Historically Black Public Universities (pp.95-109). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Alwin, D., & Thorton, A. (1984). Family orgins and schooling processes: Early versus late influence of parental characteristics. American Sociological Review, 49, 784-802.
    American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. From the World
    Wide Web: http://www.aahe.org/teaching/tsk frce.htm
    American Association of Higher Education. (1992). Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning. Washington, D.C.: AAHE.
    American College Personnel Association. (1996). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Retrieved September 23, 2002 from http://acpa.nche.edu/sli/sli.htm.
    American College Personnel Association & National association of student Personnel Administrators. (1997). Principles of good practice for student affairs. Retrieved October 29, 2003 from http://acpa.nche.edu/pgp/principle.htm.

    American College Personnel Association & National association of student Personnel Administrators (ACPA & NASPA) (2004). Learning Reconsidered: A Campus-Wide Focus on the Student Experience. Washington, DC: author.
    Anderson, K. L. (1987). Persistence, student background, and integration/commitment: Variation by definition of persistence and institutional type. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for the study of Higher Education, Baltimore, November.
    Antonio, A. L. (2001). Diversity and influence of friendship groups in college. The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 63-89.
    Aspinwall, L., & Taylor, S. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 989-1003.
    Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U)(2002). Greater expectations. Washington, DC: author.
    Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
    Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? : Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Astin, A. W. (1991). What really matters in general education: Provocative findings from a national study of student outcomes. Address presented at the Association of General and liberal Studies Meeting, Seattle.
    Atkinson,D.,Morten,G.,&Sue,D.(1983).Counseling American Minorities. Dubuque, IA:Wm.C.Brown.
    Attinasi, L.C., Jr. (1989). Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perception of university attendence and the implications for freshman year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 247-277.
    Attinasi, L.C., Jr. (1992). Rethinking the study of the outcomes of college attendance. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 61-70.
    Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman& Co.
    Banks, J A. (1993). Multicultural education: characteristics and goals. In J.A. Banks & C.A.M. Banks (eds.) Multicultural education: issue and perspectives (2nd ed.), 2-26. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Banks, J A. (1994). A Introduction to multicultural education. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
    Banks, J A. (1996). Multicultural education transformative knowledge & action historical and contemporary perspective. N.Y.: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education. PA: SRHE and Open University Press. pp.113.
    Barr, R. & Tagg,J. (1995, November-December). From teaching to learning: Anew paradigm for higher education. Change, pp.13-25.
    Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1999). Defining and redefining student learning. In E. Whitt(Ed.) Student learning as student affairs work. NASPA Monograph Series no. 23, pp.35-49. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Bean, J. P. & Hull, D. F. Jr. (1984). The determinants of Black and White student attrition at a major southern state university. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
    Bean, J. P. and Vespe, N. (1992). Student dependence theory: A explanation of student retention in college. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the study of Higher Education. Minneapolis, October.
    Bean, J. P. and Eaton, S. B. (2000). A psychological model of college student retention. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Bennett, C. (1984). Interracial contact experience and attrition among Black undergraduates at a predominantly white university. Theory and Research in Social Education, 12(2), 19-47.
    Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. Intercultural Relations, 10, 179-196.
    Berger, J. B. (1997). Students’ sense of community in residence hall, social integration, and first-year persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 441-452.
    Berger, J. B., and Braxton, J. M. (1998). Revising Tinto’s interactionalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 39, 103-119.
    Berger, J. B., and Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641-664.

    Biggs, S., Torres, S., & Washington, N. (1998). Minority student retention: A framework for discussion and dicision making. Negro Educational Review, 49, 71-82.
    Blimling, G. S., & Whitt, E. J. (1999). Identifying the principles that guide student affairs practice. In G. S. Blimling, E. J. Whitt & Associates, Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning (pp.1-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Blimling, G. S. (2001). Diversity makes you smarter. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 517-519.
    Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristicsand school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Bowen, H. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social values of American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A.S., and Johnson, R. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 12pp. 107-164). New York: Agathon.
    Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. E., and Sullivan, A.S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569-590.
    Braxton, J. M., and Lien, L. A. (2000). The viability of academic integration as a central construct in Tinto’s interactionalist theory of student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 11-28). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A.S., and McClendon, S.A. (2004). Understanding and Reducing College Student Development. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report: Volume 30, Number 3.
    Byrne, B. M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 427-456.
    Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J. O., and Hansen, W. l. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. Review of Higher Education, 13, 303-336.
    Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., and Castanda, M. B. (1992). The role of finances in the persistence process: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 33(5), 571-593.
    Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A. (1994). College students’ perceptions of prejudice and discrimination and their feelings of alienation: A construct validation approach. Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 16, 387-409.
    Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Terenzini, P., Pascarella, E., & Hagedorn, L. (1998). Campus racial climate and adjustmant of students to college: A comparison between White students and African-American students. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 134-160.
    Camp, W. G. (1990). Participation in student activities and achievement: A covariance structural analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 272-278.
    Chacon, M. A., Cohen, E. G., and Strover, S. (1986). Chicanas and Chicanos: Barriers to progress in higher education. In M. Olivas (ed.), Latino college students, pp. 296-324. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Chapman, D.W. And Pascrella, E. (1983). Predictors of academic and social integration of college students. Research in Higher Education, 19(3), 295-322.
    Chavous, T., Rivas, D., Green, L., & Helaire, L. (2002). Role of student background, perception of ethnic fit, and racial identification in the academic adjustment of African American students at a predominately white university. Journal of Black Psychology. 28(3), 234-260.
    Cheatham, H. E. and others. (1991). Cultural pluralism on campus. Washington, D.C.: American College Personnel Association.
    Chickering, A. W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Chickering A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Christie, N. G., and Dinham, S. M. (1991). Institutional and external influences on social integration in the freshman year. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 412-436.
    Churchill, W. and Iwai, S. (1981). College attrition, student use of campus facilities., and a consideration of self-reported personal problem. Research in Higher Education, 14, 353-365.
    Cibik, M. A., and Chambers, S. L. (1991). Similarities and differences among Native Americans, Hispanics, Blacks, and Anglos. NASPA Journal, 28, 129-139.
    Cosgrove, T. J. (1986). The effects of participation in a mentoring –transcript program on freshmen. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 119-124.
    Cross, W.E., Jr. (1971). Toward a psychology of black liberation: The Negro-to-black conversion experience. Black World, 20(9), 13-27.
    Cross, W. E. (1987). A Two Factor Theory of Black Identity:Implications for the Study of Identity Development in Minority Chileren, in M. J. Rotheram & J. S. Phinney Childrens Ethnic Socialization. Ed. London: Sage.
    Cross, W. E., Jr. (1995). The psychology of Nigrescence: Revising the Cross model. In J.G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alessander(Eds.),Handbook of multicultural counseling(pp. 93-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Davis, R.B. (1991). Social support networks and undergraduate student academic-success related outcomes: A comparison of Black students on Black and White campus. In W.R. Allen., E. G. Epps., & N. Z. Haniff (Eds.), College in Balck and White: African American Students in Predominately White and in Historically Black Public Universities (pp. 143-157). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Davis, J. E. (1995). College in Black and White: Campus environment and academic achievement of African American males. Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 620-633.
    DeSousa, D. J. & King, P. M. (1992). Are white students really more involved in collegiate experiences than black students? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 363-369.
    De Vos, G. & Romanucci-Ross, L. (1982). Ethnicity: Vessel of meaning and emblem of contrast. In G. De Vos, & L, Romanucci-Ross(Eds).Ethnic identity: Cultural continuities and change. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Diamond, R. M. & Adam, B. (2002). Field guide to academic leadership. San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass Diamond, R. M. & Adam, B. (2002). Field guide to academic leadership. San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Domjan, M. (1993). The principles of learning and behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Duval, T.S., & Silvia, P. J. (2002). Self-awareness, probability of improvement and the self-serving bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 49-61.
    Downey, D. B. (1992). Family structure, the transfer of parental resources and educational performance. Ph.D. diss.
    Downey, D. B. and Powell, B. (1993). Do children in single-parent households fare better living with same-sex parents? Journal of Marriage and Family, 455,55-71.
    Eaton, S. B., and Bean, J. P. (1995). An approach/avoidance behavioral model of college student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 36, 617-645.
    Eimers, M. T., & Pike, G.R. (1997). Minority adjustment to college: differences or similarities? Research in Higher Education, 38, 77-97.
    Endo,J. J. and Harpel, R. L. (1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students’ educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16, 115-135.
    Erikson, E. (1946). Ego development and historical change. Psychoanalytic Study of Child, 2, 359-396.
    Erikson, E. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, 56-121.
    Erwin, T. D. (1981). Manual for the scale of intellectual development developmental analysis. Harrisonburg, Virginia.
    Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-Dibrito, F. (1998). Student Development in College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Feenstra, J. S., Banyard, V. L., Rines, E. N., & Hopkins, K. R. (2001). First-year students’ adaptation to college: The role of family variables and individual coping. Journal of College Student Development, 42(2), 106-113.
    Felner, R. D. (1984). Vulnerability in childhood: A preventative framework for understanding children’s efforts to cope with life stress and transitions. Prevention of problems in childhood (pp. 133-169). New york: Wiley.
    Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
    Fleming, J. (1985). Blacks in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Forsyth, D., and McMillan, J. (1991). Practical proposal for motivating students. In R.Menges and M.Svinicki (eds.), College teaching: From theory to practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Francis, K., & Kelly, R. (1990). Environmental fit and the success or failure of high-risk college students. Educational Policy, 4, 233-243.
    Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the School, 30, 79-90.
    Gossett, B. J., Cuyjet, M. J., & Cockriel, I.(1998). African Americans' Perception of Marginality in the Campus Culture. College Student Journal. 32(1), 22-29.
    Grant-Thompson, S. K., & Atkinson, D. R. (1997). Cross-cultural mentor effectiveness and African American male students. Journal of Black Psychology, 23(2), 120-134.
    Graham, C. (1997). Social support, prior interracial experiences, and network orientation: Factors related to later adjustment among Black freshmen at a predominately White university. (Doctoral Dissertation, old Dominion University, 1997). Dissertation Abstrats International, 57(7-A), 2855.
    Green, P. J., Dugoni, B. L., Ingels, S. J., & Camburn, E. (1995). A profile of the American high school senior in 1992. National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Statistical Analysis Report. National Opinion Research Center. (ERIC Document, Chicago Reproduction Service No. ED386502)

    Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. Fetterman (Ed.). Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education (pp. 215-246.).
    Gurin, P., Peng, T., Lopez, G., and Nagda, B.A. (1999). Context, identity, and intergroup relations. In D.A. Prentice and D.T. Miller (eds.), Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict. New York: Russell Sage.
    Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., and Gurin, G. (2002). Diversuty and Higher Education Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes, Harvard Educational Review.
    Hackett, G., Betz, N., Casas, and Rocha,-Singh. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement fo students in engineering. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4),527-538.
    Hamachek, D. (1995). Self-concept and school achievement: Interaction dynamics and a tool for assessing the self-concept component. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 419-425.
    Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123-142.
    Hanhs-Vaughn, D. (2004). The impact of parents’ education level on college students: An analysis using the beginning post-secondary students longitudinal study 1990-92/94. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 483-500.
    Helms,J.E. (1990). Black and White racial identity: theory, research, and practice. New York: Greenwood Press.
    Helms, J. E. (1992). A race is a nice thing to have: A guide go being a White person, or understanding the White person in your life. Topeka, KS: Content Communicatios.
    Helms, J. E. & Parham, T. A. (1990). The relationship between black racial identity attitudes and cognitive styles. In J. E. Helms (Ed.), Black and White racial identity-theory, reseach, and practice. (pp. 119-131). Westport, CT: Praceger.
    Hendricks, A., Smith, K., Caplow, J., Donaldson, J. (1996). A grounded approach to determining the factors related to the persistence of minority students in professional programs. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 113-126.
    Hood, D. W. (1992). Academic and noncognitive factors affecting the retention of black men at a predominantly white university. Journal of Negro Education, 61(1),12-23.
    House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or dogmas die hard. Educational Research, 17(8), 10-16.
    Hurtado, S., Dey, E. L., and Trevino, J. G. (1994). Exclusion or self-segregation? Interaction across racial/ethnic groups on campus. American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, April 1994.
    Hurtado, S. and Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70, 324-345.
    Hurtado, S., Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pederson, A., and Allen, W. A. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. Review of Higher Education, 21(3), 279-302.
    Hurtado, S. (2000). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How the diversity of the faculty and the student body impacts the classtoom environment and student development. In Orfield, G. (ed.), Diversity Challenge: Legal Crisis and New Evidence. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Publishing Group.
    Kaufman, M. A. and Creamer, D. G. (1991). Influences of students goals for college on freshman year quality of effect and growth. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 197-206.
    Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Keith, T. Z., & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement, School Psychology quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.
    King, P. M. (2003). Student learning in higher education. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Woodard, Jr., & Associates, Student service: A handbook for the profession (4th ed.)(pp. 234-268). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    King, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. (1996). A developmental perspective on learning. Journal of College Development, 37, 163-173.
    Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
    Kobrak, P. (1992). Black student retention in predominantly white regional universities: The politics of faculty involvement. Journal of Negro Education, 61,509-530.
    Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Kreamer, B. A. (1997). The academic and social integration of Hispanic students into college. Review of Higher Education,20(2), 163-179.

    Kuh, G. D. (1993).In their own words: What students learn outside of the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 277-304.
    Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. Change. New Rochelle: May/Jun. Vol.33, lss. 3; pg. 10, 9 pgs.
    Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change. New Rochelle: Mar/Apr. Vol.35, lss. 2; pg. 24.
    Kuh, G.D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J. and Associates. (1991). Involving colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. S., Whitt, E. J., Andress, R.E., Lyons, J. W., Strange, C.C., Krehbiel, L. E., and MacKay, K.A. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful Approaches to Fostering Student Learning and Personal Development Outside of the Classroom. San Francisco: Josset-Bass.
    Kuh, G. D, and Love, P. G. (2000). A cultural perspective on student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 196-212). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago press
    Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 6, 505-532.
    Janes, S. (1997). Experiences of African-American baccalaureate nursing students examinated through the lenses of Tinto’s Student Retention Theory and Astin’s Student Involvement Theory. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Albuquerque, NM.
    Lacy, W. (1978). Interpersonal relationships as mediators of strucral effects: College student socialization in a traditional and an experimental university environment. Sociology of Education, 51, 201-211.
    Lai, J. C. L., Chan, J. Y. T., Cheung, R. W. l. & Law, S. Y. (2001). Psychosocial development and self-esteem among traditional- aged university students in Hong Kong. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 68-78.
    Langin-Ealey, B.H. (2001). A study of racial identity, institutional integration, and attrition among African freshmen attending the University of Mississippi. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Mississippi, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(04A), p. 1342.
    Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. and Opton, E. (1974). The psychology of coping: Issues of research and assessment. In G. V. Coehlo, D. A. Hamburg, and J. E. Adams (eds.), Coping and adaptation, pp. 249-315. New York: Basic Books.

    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Sringer Pub. Co.
    Lewis T. (2000). Academic integration, social integration, and satisfaction with the environment: Factors related to learning gains among urban community college students (Doctoral dissertation, Morgan State University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(12), 4654.
    Lincoln, Y. & Guba, Egon. (1999). Establishing trustworthiness. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess(Eds.), Qualitative Research (Vol. III)( pp.397-445). London: SAGE.
    Liu, R. & Liu, E. (2000). Institutional integration: An analysis of Tinto’s theory. Paper presented at Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. Cincinnati, OH.
    Lisella, L. C. and Serwatka, T. S. (1996). Extracurricular participation and academic achievement in minority students in urban school. Urban Review, 28(1),63-80.
    Lopez, J. D. (2002). Stress and coping among Latino freshmen during their transition to an elite university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
    Lucas, A. E. (1990). Using psychological models to understand student motivation. In M. Svinicki (ed.), New directions for teaching and learning, no.42.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Mackinnon-Slaney, F. (1994). The adult persistence in learning model: A road map to counseling services for adult learners. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 268-275.
    Mallette, B. I., and A. F. Cabrera. (1991). Determinations of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study. Research in Higher Education, 32(2): 179-194.
    Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelsen model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623-636.
    Marsh, H. W. (1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals? Journal of Educational Psychology,84(4), 553-562.
    McCrae, R. R. (1984). Situational determinants of coping responses : Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 919-928.
    McCarthy, M. E. , Pretty, G. M., and Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 211-216.
    McConaughy, S. H. (1986). Social competence and behavioral problems of learning disabled boys ages 12-16. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19,2.
    McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing college: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Milem, J. F., and Berger, J. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 387-400.
    Miller, S., & Frederick, M. (1991). Postpositivistic assumptions and educational research: Another view. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 2-8.
    Miller, H. J. (1993). The factors that Black college freshmen perceive as contributing to their social and academic integration within a predominately White university. (Doctoral Dissertation, Syracuse University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(08A), 2912.
    Miller, G. D. (1994). Predicting freshmen persistence and voluntary withdrawal from Heath’s model of maturing. Unpublished dissertation, Syracuse University.
    Mueller, C., and Kebow, D. (1993). Parent involvement in the home, school, and community. In B. Schneider & J. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools( pp.13-42). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Murguia, E., Padilla, R. V., Pavel, M. (1991). Ethnicity and the concept of social integration in Tinto’s model of institutional departure. Journal of College Student Development, 32(5), 433-439.
    Neumann, Y. and Neumann, E. F. (1989). Predicting juniors’ and seniors’ persistence and attrition: A quality of learning experience approach. The Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 129-140.
    Nora, A. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicago college students: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 31-59.
    Nora, A. and Cabrera, A. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. Journal of Higher Education, 67(March/April), 119-148.
    Nora, A., Attinasi, L. C., and Matonak, A. (1990). Testing qualitative indicatiors of precollege factors in Tinto’s attrition model: A community college perspective. Review of Higher Education, 13, 337-356.
    Nora, A., & Cabrera, A. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 119-148.
    Ogbu, J. U. (1991). Immigrant and involuntary minorities in comparative perspective. In M. A. Gibson and J. Ogbu(Eds.). Minority Status and Schooling: A Comparative Study of Immigrant and Involuntary Minorities(pp.3-33). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
    Oliver, M. L., Rodriguez, C. J., & Mickelson, R. A (1985). Brown and Black students in a predominately White University. The Urban Review, 17(1), 3-24.
    Ory, J. C. and Braskamp, L. A. (1988). Involvement and growth of students in three academic programs. Research in Higher Education, 28 116-129.
    Ostrow, E., Paul, S., Dark, V. ,and Berhman, J. (1986). Adjustment of women on campus: Effects of Stressful life events, social support, and personal competencies. In S. E. Hobfoll, ed., Stress, social support, and women. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
    Pace, C. (1979). Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pace, C. (1984). Measuring the quality of college students experience. University of California, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
    Pace, C. (1988). CSEQ: Test manual & norms. University of California, Los Angeles: Center for the study of evaluation.
    Pascrella, E. and Terenzini, P. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decision from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60-75.
    Pascrella, E. and Terenzini, P. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: a path analytic validation of Tinto’s model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(April), 215-226.
    Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Racial differences in factors associated with bachelor’s degree completion: A nine-year follow up. Research in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-373.
    Pascrella, E., Smart, J., and Ethington, C. (1986). Long term persistence of two-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 24,47-71.
    Pascarella, E. T. (1989). The development of critical thinking: Does college make a difference? Journal of College Student Development, 30, 10-26.
    Pascarella, E. T., Ethington, C. A. and Smart, J. C. (1988). The influence of college on humanitarian/civic involvement variables. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 412-437.
    Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students(vol.2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pascrella, E. T., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., and Terenzini, P.T. (1996). Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 174-195.

    Payne, R. L. & Jones, J. G. (1987). Measurement and methodological issues in social support, in stress and health : Issues in Research Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Pearson, R. E. (1990). Counselling and social support: Perspectives and practices. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.
    Perry, W. G., Jr. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Perry, W. G., Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A.W. Chickering & Associate, The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society (pp. 76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Peterson, M. W. & Spencer, M. G.(1990).Understanding academic cultures and climate. In W. G. Tierney(ed.).Assessing academic climates and cultures (pp.3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pettigrew, T. F. (1991). Normative theory in intergroup relations: Explaining both harmony and conflict. Psychology and Developing Societies, 3, 3-16.
    Phelan, P., Davidson, A.L. & Cao Yu H. (1996). Adolescents’ worlds-negotiating, family. Peer amd school. N.Y.: Columbia University Teacher College.
    Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499-514.
    Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, and G. B. Flamer (eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp.1-11.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Piaget, J. (1975/1985). The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original word published 1975).
    Poindexter-Cameron, J. M. & Robinson, T. L. (1997). Relationships among racial identity attitudes, womanist identity attitudes, and self-esteem in African American College Women. Journal of College Student Development, 38(3),288-296.
    Pope, R. L. (1995). Multicultural organizational development: Implications and applications in Student Affairs. In J. Fried (ed.), Shifting Paradigms in Student Affairs: A Cultural perspective. Washington, D.C.: ACPA Media.
    Rendon, L., Jalomo, R., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. Braxton (Ed.), Rethinking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention (pp. 127-156). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Renn, K. R. (2000). Patterns of situational identity among biracial and multiracial college students. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 399-420.
    Robinson, T. (1990). Understanding the gap between entry and exit: A cohort analysis of African American students’ persistence. Journal of Negro Education, 59,2107-218.
    Sailes, G. (1990). An integration of black student attrition at Indiana University. ERIC Document, ED338747.
    Sarason, I. G. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127-139.
    Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educatrional Psychology, 84(4), 435-443.
    Schuh, J. H. (1994). Review of education and identity (2nd ed.). Journal of college student Development, 35, 310-312.
    Scott, E.S. and Damico, S. B. (1982). Predictors of interracial contact for high school and university students. ED 216 091. 15 pp. MF-01; PC-01.
    Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 597-622. New York: Macmillan.
    Sedokides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To think own self be good, to think own self be true, to think own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 206-269.
    Sexton, T. L. and Tuckman, B. W. (1991). Self-beliefs and behavior: The role of self-efficacy and outcome expectation over time. Personality and Individual Difference, 12(7),725-736.
    Sheilds, N. (2001). Stress, active coping, and academic performance among persisting and nonpersisting college students. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 6(2), 65-81.
    Simmons, A. B. (1996). Beliefs and academic performance of low –achieving college students. Ph.D. diss. Indiana University, Bloomington.
    Spanard, J. (1990). Beyond intent: Reentering college to complete the degree. Review of Educational Research, 60, 309-344.
    Smith, E. J. (1991). Ethnic identity development: Toward the development of a theory within the context of majority/minority status. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70,181-188.

    Smith, T. R. (2002). High achieving African American students: academic and social integration experiences at a private, predominately white and highly selective university. (Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(08A), 2912.
    Smith, J., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquiries. Educational Research, 15(1), 4-12.
    Stage, F. (1989). Motivation, academic and social integration and the early dropout. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 385-402.
    Stage, F. K. and Manning, K. (1992). Enhancing the multicultural campus environment: a cultural brokering approach. New Directions for Student Services, No. 60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Stage, F. K. and N. Milne. (1996). The experience of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Higher Education, 67(4), 426-445.
    Stage, F. K. and Hossler, D. (2000).Linking student behaviors, college choice, and college persistence. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Stahl, V.V. and Pavel, M. D. (1992). Assessing the Bean and Metzner model with community college student data. ERIC Document ED 344639.
    Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., Fitzgerald, D. C., & Bylsma, W. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(1), 38-67.
    Stoecker, J., Pascrella, E. & Wolfe. (1988). Persistence in higher education: A 9 Year test of a theoretical model. Journal of College Student Development, 29(3), 196-209.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
    Tanaka, G. (2002). Higher education’s self-reflexive turn: Toward an international theory of student development. The Journal of Higher Education. 73(2), 263-296.
    Taub, D. J., & McEwen, M.K. (1992). The relationship of racial identity attitudes to Autonomy and mature interpersonal relationships in black and white undergraduate women. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 439-446.
    Terenzini, P.T. and Wright, T. (1987a). Influences on students’ academic growth during four years of college. Research in Higher Education, 26, 161-179.
    Terenzini, P.T. and Wright, T. (1987b). Students’ personal growth during the first two years of college. Review of Higher Education,10, 259-271.
    Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascrella, E. T. ,and Nora, A. (1995). Academic and out-of-class influences on students’ intellectual orientations. Review of Higher Education, 19(1), 23-44.
    Terenzini, P. T., Pascrella, E. T., and Biliming, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 149-162.
    Thompson, C. E., & Fretz, B. R. (1991). Predicting the adjustment of Black students at predominately White institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 62(4), 437-450.
    Tierney, W.G. (1996). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. In C.S.V. Turner, M. Garcia, A. Nora, & L.I. Rendon. (Eds.), Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Higher Education, (pp. 624-634). Needham Heights, MA: Simon and Schuster Custom Publishing.
    Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45,89-125.
    Tinto, V. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 359-384). New York: Agathon.
    Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Tinto, V., A. Goodsell. And P. Russo. (1993). Gaining a voice: The impact of collaborative learning on student experience in the first year of college. Unpublishd manuscript. New York: Syracuse University
    Tinto, V. (1998). College as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21,167-177.
    Tinto, V. (2000). Linking learning and leaving. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp.81-94). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Torres, V. (2003). Influences on ethnic identity development of Latino college students in the first 2 years of college. Journal of College Student Development, 44(4), 532-547.
    Trope, Y., & Pomerantz, E. M. (1998). Resolving conflicts among self-evaluative motives: Positive experiences as a re source for overcoming defensiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 53-72.
    Turner, C. S. V. (1994). Guests in someone else’s house: Students of color. Review of Higher Education, 17, 355-370.
    Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relaytionship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 763-83.
    Ward, C., Bochner, S. & Furrnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd). PA: Routledge.
    Watson, L. W. (1994). An analysis of Black and White student’ perception, involvement, and educational gains in private historically Black and White liberal arts institutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
    Watson, L. W. (1996). A collaborative approach to student learning:A model for administrators in higher education. Planning and changing: An Educational Leadership and Policy Journal.
    Weidman, J. (1984). Impacts of campus experiences and parental socialization on undergraduates’ career choices. Research in Higher Education, 20, 445-476.
    Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart(Ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 5). New York: Agathon.
    Weiner, B. (1986). An attribution theory of motivation and emotion, New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Wilson, R., Gaff, J., Dienst, R., Wood, L. and Bavy, J. (1975). College professors and their impact on students. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
    White, L. (1995). Hanging Black: Social and Psychological factors influencing Black student participation in Black campus organizations at historically White university. ( Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University,1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10A), 3909.
    Whitt, E. T., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Nora, A. (2001). Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the second and third years of college. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 172-204.
    Williamson, D.R., and Creamer, D. G. (1988). Student attrtion in 2-and 4-year colleges: Application of a theoretical model. Journal of College Student Development, 29(3),210-217.
    Wylie, R. C. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 345-387.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
    Zimmerman, B. J. and Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845—862.

    QR CODE