本研究旨在瞭解高中生活科技教師教法取向、教學領導和自我效能感的關係模式。採用調查研究法，本研究以臺灣地區之公私立高中生活科技教師作為調查對象，針對臺灣地區340所公、私立高級中學之生活科技教師進行普查，共發出420份問卷，有效回收問卷為313份(回收率為74.5%)。所蒐集資料以描述性統計與結構方程式等進行統計分析，研究結論顯示高中生活科技教師：(1)教法無論是學生取向或教師取向，教師投注程度愈高，自我效能感愈高。(2)教法無論是學生取向，教師投注程度愈高，教學領導愈高。(3)教學領導愈佳，其自我效能感愈高。(4)學生取向或教師取向教法和教學領導及自我效能感兩種關係模式，均可用以明辨提升教師自我效能感的手段和目的。(5)可積極做好教學和領導角色，以提升自我效能感。

王受榮（1992），我國國民中小學教師效能感感及其影響因素之研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
王雅玲（2010），臺北縣國民小學學年主任之角色知覺與教學領導行為關係之研究，淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
王淑怡（2002），國民小學教師教師效能感指標之建構，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
朱耀明、莊淑芬（2009），MST 教學策略在科技教育之應用－以「有趣的吹泡泡遊戲」教學活動為例，生活科技教育月刊，42（2），61-77。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（1995），第一期諮議報告書，台北市：作者。
李玉林（2001），桃園縣國民小學校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李雲漳（2002），國民小學校長教學領導與教師教師效能感之研究，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李雯智（2010），國小教師自我效能、工作特性、工作滿足、工作倦怠與組織公民行為之關係，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
李新寶（2001），國民小學校長教學領導行為與教師教師效能感之研究，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文（未出版）。
李隆盛（1999），科技與職業教育的展望，台北市：師大書苑。
李隆盛（2003），學習領域召集人的教學領導，師友，427，1-3。
李隆盛（2005），科技與生活科技，載於李隆盛主編，生活科技概論。台北市：心理。
李隆盛（2013），學生能力當教、學、評、用的共通語言，評鑑，44，1。
吳雨錫（2002），國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長關係之研究，國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
吳清山（1992），學校效能感研究，臺北：心理。
周惠民（1999），原住民地區國小教師自我效能感感與工作投入之研究，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
邱惜玄（2001），學校革新之要務-落實校長教學領導，研習資訊，18(6)，15-21。
林明地 (2000)，校長課程領導與學校本位課程發展，載於蘇永明等著：九年一貫課程：從理論、政策到執行（頁155-183），高雄：復文。
林海清（1994），高中教師激勵模式與其工作滿意服務士氣教師效能感之研究，國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
高博銓（2002），析論校長的教學領導，師友，406，50-53。
郭小蘋（2011），校長教學領導與教師教師效能感關係之後設分析，國立中興大學教師專業發展研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
郭生玉（1999），心理與教育研究法。台北：精華書局。
徐吉盛（2006），高高屏地區國民小學校長教學領導風格與教師教師效能感關係之研究，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
徐超聖、李明芸（2005），課程領導與教學領導關係之研究，教育研究與發展，1(1)，129-154。
徐善德（1997），高職教師工作價值觀、組織承諾與教師效能感關係之研究，國立政治大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
莊筱玉（2005），教師專業知識建構、轉化及發展之研究-一位技術學院英文教師的個案研究，國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文（未出版）。
孫志麟（1991），國民小學教師自我效能感及其相關因素之研究，國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
梁茂森（1992），高級職業學校教師教學成敗歸因及其相關因素之研究，國立政治大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
張志豪（2004），國中自然與生活科技學習領域召集人角色與職責之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
張素花（2012），國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教師效能感影響之研究，國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系博士論文（未出版）。
張鈿富、鄧進權、林孟潔（2010），臺灣高中教育資源管理均等性之評估，教育科學研究期刊，55(3)，151-176。
張碧娟 (1999)，國民中學校長教學領導、學校教學氣氛與教師效能感之研究，國立政治大學教育系博士論文（未出版）。
張瑞村（1998），高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能感關係之研究，國立政治大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
張慈娟（1997），國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能感之研究，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
黃乃熒（1996），從「教學領導」談學校教育革新，中等教育，47(6)，50-57。
黃政傑（1993），課程教學之變革。臺北：師大書苑。
黃進和（2005），準工程學習對綜合高中學生工程與科技學程選擇影響之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
陳木金（1997），國民小學教師教室領導技巧、班級經營策略與教師效能感關係之研究，國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
陳木金（1998），國民小學教師教師效能感評鑑量表編製之研究。國立臺灣藝術學院學報，61，221-253。
陳玫良（2009），國中自然與生活科技教師課程領導、組織承諾和教師效能感關係之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
陳美言（1998），國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能感關係之研究，台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
陳淑君（2010），臺北市國民中學學習領域召集人教師領導之研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
教育部（2006），試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑宣導手冊，台北市：作者。
教育部（2012a），高級中學校數—按設立別與學校所在地分。2012年5月23日，取自http://www.edu.tw/files/publication/B0013/100highprint.xls
教育部（2012b），高級中學教學科目及每週節數表。2012年5月23日，取自http://www.edu.tw/high-school/bbs/42.doc。
教育部（2013），高級中等學校科別資料(班級、學生、畢業生)。2013年3月23日，取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1729&Page=15300&Index=6&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
曾增福（2003），桃園縣國民中學校長教學領導與學校效能關係之研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
楊玲珠（2010），臺北市中小學教務主任教學領導行為與教師專業學習社群關係之研究，臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
楊榮仁（2008），提昇科技教師專業成長的具體作為，全國教師在職進修資訊網電子報第三期，台北市：教育部。
葉佳文（2007），臺灣地區公立高中校長教學領導、教師組織承諾與教師教師效能感關係之研究，國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
鄭進丁（1986），國民小學校長角色之分析，高雄市：復文。
鄭詩釧（2005），國民中小學組織文化與教師專業發展關係之研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
鄭素芬（2009），國小社會領域教師教學領導與學生學習滿意度之研究，國立屏東教育大學社會科教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
錢玉玲（2010），國中生班級氣氛、學習滿意度、導師領導行為與班級生活幸福感之相關研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文（未出版）。
蔡玲玲（民92），國民小學校長教學領導之研究--一位國小校長的個案分析，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
蔡進雄（2007），國民中學教師教學領導之建構與發展-以學習領域召集人為例，學校行政，52，20-43。
劉威德（1994），教師教學信念系統之分析及其與教學行為關係之研究，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
謝元（2002），國小校長提升教師效能感的教學領導研究---以實施九年一貫課程的台南市國小為例，國立臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
謝百亮（2006），後現代脈絡下國民中學校長課程領導與教師教學效能關係之研究，國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
謝建成（2001），台北縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長之調查研究，國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
Anderson, K. D. (2004). The nature of teacher leadership in school as reciprocal influences between teacher leaders and principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 97-113.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc. 531-551.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988), On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A.(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theoryof behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, pp.191-215.
Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Barth, R. S. (2001). Learning by heart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review. International Journal of Research in Marketing,13 ,139-161.
Bayraktar, S. (2011). Turkish preservice primary school teachers' science teaching efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward science: The effect of a primary teacher education program. School Science and Mathematics,111, 83-92.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham.
Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Borich, G. D. (1994）. Observation skills for effective teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Cementina-Olpoc, R. (2012). ABCs of Change: The Journey of Miriam College. In M.R. Hechanova and E.P. Franco (Eds). Reinvention and Rebirth: Transforming Philippine Organizations. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University.
Chen, J., Brown, G. T. L., Hattie, J. A. C.&Millward, P. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions of excellent teaching and its relationships to self-reported teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28 , 936-947.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Cuban, L.(1993).How teachers taught : constancy and change inAmerican classroom 1880-1890. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge,Massachusetts: Harvard University press.
Danielson, C.(2007).The many faces of leadership.Educational Leadership,65(1),14-19.
Daugherty, J. L. (2009). Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 10-24.
DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader.Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14-20.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 357–369.
Donaldson, G. A. (2001). Cultivating Leadership in schools:Connecting people,purpose,and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Efron, B., & R. J. Tibshirani(1986). Bootstrap method for standard errors, confidence intervals and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1, pp.54-77.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1997). Educational psychology: Windows on classroom(3rd.).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Evans, B. R. (2011). Content knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy in the mathematics New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) Program. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 225-235.
Federici, R. A. & Skaalvik, E. M. (2012). Principal self-efficacy: relations with burnout, job satisfaction and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 295–320.
Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 514-525.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unbervables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003). Teacher leadership: Rationale, strategy and impact. School Leadership Management, 23(2),173-186.
Fullan, M.,Hill, P.,&Cr’evola, C.(2006).Breakthrough.Thousand Oaks,CA:Corw in Press.
Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Gordon, W. C., & Roger, B. R (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
Gorham, D., Newberry, P. B., & Bickart, T. A. (2003). Engineering accreditation and standards for technological literacy. Journal of Engineering Education,92(1),95-99.
Gunter, H. M. (2003). Teacher Leadership: Prospects and possibilities. In M. Brundrett, N. Burton, R. Smith (Eds.) Leadership in education (pp.118-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hair, J. F., William, C. B., Barry, J. B., &Rolph, E. A. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7 nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.
Hansen, R, E.（1993）.A technological teacher education program planning model.Journal of Technology Education.5（1）.21-28.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris,et al., Effective leadership for school improvement (pp.72-83). London: Routledge Falmer.
Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (2), 169-188.
Healey, M. (2003). Prooting lifelong professional development in Geography education: International perspectives on developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education in the Twenty-first century. The Professional Geographer, 55 (1), 1-17.
Hechanova, M. R. (2012). Transforming the academe: The ateneo way. In M. R. Hechanova & E. P. Franco (Eds.), Reinvention and rebirth: Transforming Philippine organizations. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.
Hechanova, R. M. & Cementina-Olpoc, R.(2013). Transformational Leadership, Change Management, and Commitment to Change: A Comparison of Academic and Business Organizations. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,22(1), 11-19.
Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2007). Self-regulated through transactional strategies instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 51-75.
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 356-372.
International Technology Education Association（2003）. Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy:Student Assessment,Professional Development,and Program Standards. Available: http://www.iteawww.org.
Jones, A.&Moreland, J.(2004). Enhancing Practicing Primary School Teachers’Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education ,14, 121–140.
Kaiser, H. F.(1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kieffer, K. M., & Henson, R. K. (2000). Development and validation of the sources of self-efficacy inventory(SOSI): exploring a new measure of teacher efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED445061)
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structure equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The Leadership Challenge ( 3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kreber, C. (2001). The scholarship of teaching and its implementation in faculty developmentand graduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 86(Summer), 79-88.
Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: the mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 457-469.
Lau, K. L. (2013). Chinese language teachers’ perception and implementation of self-regulated learning-based instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 31. 56-66.
Leithwood, K. (2003). Teacher leadership: Its nature, development, and impact on schools and students. In M, Brundrett, N. Burton, & R. Smith (Eds.), Leadership in education (pp.103-117). Thousand Oaks, CA :Sage.
Lombaerts, K., Engels, N., & van Braak, J. (2009). Determinants to teachers’ recognitions of self-regulated learning practices in elementary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 163-173.
Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education:A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2), 213-228.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fritz, M. S., Williams, J., & Lockwood, C. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program prodclin. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384-389.
Martin, G., & Ritz, J. (2012). Research needs for technology education: A U.S. perspective. Journal of Technology Education, 23(2), 25-43.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. (2002). Principles and practice in
reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7 (1),64-82.
McEwan, E. K. (1998). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McHaney,J.H., & Impey,W.D.(1992).Strategies for analyzing and evaluating teaching effectiveness using a clinical supervision model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association . Georiga: Geographic srce./country of publication. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 268).
Meyer, H. (2005). Unterrichtsmethoden II:Praxisband. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Molenda, M. (1991). A philosophical critique on the claims of“constructivism.” Educational Technology,31(9),44-48.
Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,10(2), 117-139.
Murphy¸ J. (1990). Principal instruction leadership. In P. W. Thurston & L. S. Lotto (Eds), Advances in educational administration. Volume 1, Part B; Changing perspectives on the school, (pp163-200). Greenwich¸CT.﹕JAI Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.) NY: McGraw-Hill.
Opfer, V. D., Pedder, D. G., & Lavicza, A. (2011). The role of teachers’ orientation to learning in professional development and change: a national study of teachers in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 443-453.
Ozgen, K., & Bindak, R. (2012). Examining student opinions on computer use based on the learning styles in mathematics education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 79–93.
Ozgen, K.(2013). An Analysis of High School Students’ Mathematical Literacy Self-efficacy Beliefs in Relation to Their Learning Styles. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 91–100.
Ozyurt, O.,Ozyurt, H., Baki, A., Guven, B. (2013) Integration into mathematics classrooms of an adaptive and intelligent individualized e-learning environment: Implementation and evaluation of UZWEBMAT. Computers in Human Behavior ,29,726–738.
Ozyurt, O., Ozyurt, H., Baki, A. (2013). Design and development of an innovative individualized adaptive and intelligent e-learning system for teaching–learning of probability unit: Details of UZWEBMAT. Expert Systems with Applications ,40, 2914–2940.
Pantelides, J. R. (1991). An exploration of relationship between specific instructional leadership behaviors of elementary principal and student achievement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Peters-Burton, E. E. & Hiller, E. S. (2013). Fun Science: The Use of Variable Manipulation to Avoid Content Instruction. Science Teacher Educatio, 24, 199–217.
Petrina, S.(2006). Advanced Teaching Methods for the Technology Classroom. Canada: UBC Press.
Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching in Adult and Higher Education, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida.
Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405-419.
Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K. & Ramsden, P. (2005). Academics' experiences of understanding of their subject matter and the relationship of this to their experiences of teaching and learning, Instructional Science, 33, 137-157.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Raudebaugh, R. A.(2000).One university's approach to an outcome-based teacher education program.The Journal of Technology Studies.30(2).
Sandbakken, D. A.(2004).The Factor Structure of the Kouzes and Posner Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) Revisited in a Norwegian Context.UK: Henley Management College.
Sandholtz, J. M., Rinstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching and technology: creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.82.
Sfard, A.(1998). One-two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Shulman, L. S. (2004). Visions of the possible:Models for campus support of the scholarship of teaching and learning. In W. E.Becker & M. L. Andrews (eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: Contributions of research universities (pp.9-23). Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
Smith, L. K.& Southerland, S. A.(2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? : Elementary teachers' response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 396-423.
Snyder, K. J. (1983). Instructional leadership for productive schools. Educational Leadership, 40(5), 32-37.
Soyturk, I. (2011). An investigation of classroom teacher candidates’ self-efficacy about mathematical literacy and their beliefs about mathematical problem solving. M.D. Dissertation, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
Tang,L.P.(1994). Teaching evaluation in the college of business: factors related to the overall teaching effectiveness. Tennessee:Geographic scre./country of publication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 716).
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X.,& Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 16, 241-252.
Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., &Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching:A model, Higher Education Research& Development, 19 (2), 155-168.
Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design Commun. Higher Educ. 1: 69–80.
Trigwell, K.& Prosser, M.(2004). Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review,16(4),409-424. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
Tschannen-Moran, M.,Woolfolk, R. A.,& Roy, W. K.(1998).Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Educational Research. 68, pp.202-248.
Wicklein , R. C.(1997).Curriculum focus for technology education.Journal of technology education,8(2),71-78.
Williams, P. J.& Gumbo, M.(2011), Discovering New Zealand Technology Teacher’s PCK.The Journal of technologystudies,37(1),50-60.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Finding from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research,74(3), 255-316.
Zheng, H. Y. (1996). School context, principal characteristics, and instructional leadership effectiveness: A statistical analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New York, Apr. 8-12, 1996. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 396 408)
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 58-72.