簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王懿
Yi Wang
論文名稱: 以中文為母語的兒童承諾概念發展之實證研究
The Pragmatic Development of Understanding of the Speech Act of Promising among Chinese-Speaking Children
指導教授: 陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 113
中文關鍵詞: 母語習得言語行為承諾
英文關鍵詞: first language acquisition, speech act, promise
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:294下載:75
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討以中文為母語之兒童對承諾的理解,並驗證不同操縱變因(如:被承諾者的社會地位、承諾的結果、承諾者的誠意、承諾的明確性)對兒童承諾概念的影響。研究方法包含在不同情境下的承諾判斷及承諾表達兩種實驗題型。研究對象分為五組,每組二十人,由平均年齡為六歲至九歲的兒童與成人共一百位所組成。
    研究發現如下:承諾判斷結果顯示,較年長的受試者與控制組皆認為對長輩做的承諾才算數,而較年幼的受試者對承諾的判斷則不會受到被承諾者不同社會地位的影響。兒童受承諾結果的影響較深,與成人達顯著差異,相較於未實踐的諾言,兒童較認可確實完成的承諾,顯示出在兒童的承諾概念中,承諾的結果與承諾本身是密不可分的。然而,所有受試者對承諾的判斷並未受到承諾者誠意的影響,顯示無誠意的承諾仍被認為是一個承諾。此外,所有組別的受試者均較容易認可清楚表達出內容的承諾。
    在承諾表達結果中發現,以中文為母語的兒童於六歲左右便可做出承諾。在策略上,受試者傾向做出內容清楚呈現的承諾。較年長的兒童在表達明確性上較接近成人。施為動詞(performative verb)「答應」在整體的使用上並不明顯,顯然不構成承諾的形成要素。

    The present study aims to investigate the pragmatic development of Chinese-speaking children‘s understanding of the speech act of promising by examining four factors which affect their promise judgments and production of promises: the promisee‘s social status, the outcome of the promise, the promiser‘s sincerity, and the explicitness of making the promise. Two comprehension tasks and one production task were conducted using a total of one hundred subjects. The subjects were divided into five groups of twenty: four experimental groups (consisting of children aged 6 to 9) and one control group (adults).
    With regard to the comprehension tasks, the study found that the older subjects and the control group were more likely to recognize a promise made to a promisee of superior social status as an actual promise than a promise made to a promisee of inferior social status. On the other hand, the younger subjects did not exhibit sensitivity to the social status of the promisee. In addition, the younger subjects were more greatly affected by the outcome of a promise than the other groups, and it was also found that they had a greater difficulty distinguishing words from deeds; that is to say, younger children could not distinguish a promise as it exists as a speech act from the actual action associated with the promise. However, in terms of what role sincerity plays in the judging of promises, it was discovered that a promiser‘s sincerity had no effect whatsoever on the promise judgment of any of the participants. This indicates that an insincere promise was still considered to be a promise by all groups. Furthermore, a promise made explicitly with a clear statement of a future act was more likely to be considered as an effective promise by all participants.
    Finally, the results of the production task revealed that Chinese-speaking children are readily capable of making a commitment by the age of six. The promising strategy most frequently adopted among all groups was to state the future act explicitly. The younger children participating in the study showed greater difficulty in making a promise as explicitly as the older children and adults. In all of the groups, the performative verb daying ‗promise‘ was rarely found in our data. This definitively proves that daying ‗promise‘ does not constitute a significant element of the speech act of promising.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT ........................................ i ENGLISH ABSTRACT ....................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ......................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ........................................ xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................. xii Chapter One Introduction .................................1 1.1 Motivation .........................................1 1.2 Theoretical Framework ..............................3 1.3 Research Questions .................................5 1.4 Significance of the Study ..........................6 1.5 Organization of the Thesis .........................7 Chapter Two Literature Review ............................8 2.1 Austin‘s (1962) Speech Act Theory .................8 2.2 Theoretical Studies of Promise ................... 11 2.2.1 Searle (1969) .............................. 11 2.2.2 Mey (1993) ................................. 13 2.2.3 Summary .................................... 16 2.3 Major Components of Promise ...................... 16 2.3.1 Propositional Content Condition ............ 17 2.3.2 Preparatory Condition ...................... 20 2.3.3 Sincerity Condition ........................ 23 2.3.4 Essential Condition ........................ 24 2.3.5 Summary .................................... 26 2.4 Previous Empirical Studies of Children‘s Understanding of Promise ............................... 27 2.4.1 Astington (1988a) .......................... 27 2.4.2 Maas and Abbeduto (2001) ................... 29 2.4.3 Maas (2008) ................................ 31 2.4.4 Wang (2009) ................................ 32 2.4.5 Summary .................................... 34 2.5 Summary of Chapter Two ........................... 36 Chapter Three Research Design and Expected Findings..... 38 3.1 Subjects ......................................... 38 3.2 Methods and Materials ............................ 39 3.2.1 The Production Task ........................ 42 3.2.2 The First Comprehension Task ............... 44 3.2.3 The Second Comprehension Task .............. 46 3.3 Procedures ....................................... 48 3.3.1 Pilot Study ................................ 49 3.3.2 Formal Study................................ 50 3.3.3 Scoring and Statistical Analysis............ 52 3.4 Summary of Chapter Three ......................... 54 Chapter Four Results and Discussion .................... 55 4.1 Effects of Social Status ......................... 55 4.1.1 Effects of Social Status on Promise Judgment .................................... 55 4.1.2 Interaction between Social Status and Other Factors ........................... 56 4.1.3 General Discussion on Effects of Social Status ................................. 58 4.2 Effects of Outcome ............................... 60 4.2.1 Effects of Outcome on Promise judgment ..... 61 4.2.2 Interaction between Outcome and Other Factors ................................. 62 4.2.3 General Discussion on Effects of Outcome ... 64 4.3 Effects of Sincerity ............................. 68 4.3.1 Effects of Sincerity on Promise Judgment ... 69 4.3.2 Interaction between Sincerity and Other Factors ................................. 69 4.3.3 General Discussion on Effects of Sincerity . 71 4.4 Effects of Explicitness .......................... 73 4.4.1 Effects of Explicitness on Promise Judgment ..................................... 73 4.4.2 Interaction between Explicitness and Other Factors ............................ 74 4.4.3 General Discussion on Effects of Explicitness .................................. 76 4.5 Promising Strategies ............................. 78 4.5.1 General Usage of Promising Strategies ...... 79 4.5.2 Effects of Social Status on Promising Strategies ................................. 82 4.5.3 Effects of the Promiser‘s Sincerity on Promising Strategies ................ 83 4.5.4 General Discussion on Promising Strategies ....................................... 84 4.6 Effects of Age ................................... 88 4.7 Summary of Chapter Four .......................... 93 Chapter Five Conclusion ................................ 94 5.1 Summary of the Major Findings .................... 94 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Further Research ....... 96 Bibliography ........................................... 97 Appendix A: Scenarios Used in the Comprehension and Production Tasks ............. 102 Appendix B: Consent Form .............................. 113

    Aijmer, K. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. London: Longman.
    Anderson, Elaine S. 1990. Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistics Skills of Children. London: Routledge.
    Astington, J. W. 1988a. Children‘s understanding of the speech act of promising. Journal of Child Language, 15: 157–173.
    Astington , J. W. 1988b. Children‘s production of commissive speech acts. Journal of Child Language , 15: 411–423.
    Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bates, E. 1976. Language and Context: the Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. Beebe, L. M., T. Takahashi and R. Uliss-Weltz. 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. Developing communicative competence in a second language, eds. by R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Anderson, and S. D. Krashen, 55–94. New York: Newburry House.
    Bernicot, Josie and Virginie Laval. 1996. Promises in French children: comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 101–122. Bickhard, M. H. and R. L. Campbell. 1992. Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model theoretic possible worlds semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 17: 401–433.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11.2: 131–146.
    Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elite Ohlstain. 1984. Requests and apologies: a cross cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5.3: 196–214.
    Bornstein, M. H., M. O. Haynes, K. M. Painter, and J. L. Genevro. 2000. Child language with mother and with stranger at home and in the laboratory: A methodological study. Journal of Child Language, 27: 407–420.
    Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bucciarelli, M., L. Colle, and G. B. Bruno. 2003. How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35:207–241.
    Cerf, Walter. 1969. Critical review of How to Do Things with Words. Symposium on J. L. Austin., ed. by K. T. Fann, 351–379. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1959. A review of B. F. Skinner‘s verbal behavior. Language, 35: 26–129.
    Colby, A. and L. Kohlberg. 1987. The Measurement of Moral Judgment 1: Theoretical Foundations and Research Validation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Damon, W. 1983. Social and Personality Development: Infancy through adolescence. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. and D. P. Gordon. 1986. The development of requests. Communicative Competence: Acquistion and Intervention, ed. by R. L. Schiefelbusch, 295–312. Beverly Hills, C A: College Hill Press.
    Flavell, John H. 1963. Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand.
    Fraser, Bruce. 1974. An analysis of vernacular performative verbs. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    Fraser, Bruce. 1981. On apologizing. Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situation and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by F. Coulmas, 259–271. The Netherlands: Mouton.
    Freud, S. 1960. A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. New York: Washington Square Press (Original work published 1935).
    Genesee, F. and E. Nicoladis. 2007. Bilingual development. Handbook of language development, eds. by E. Hoff and M. Shatz, 324–342. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, eds. by Cole, P and J.L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic.
    Harris, P. L. and M. Nunez. 1996. Understanding of permission rules by preschool children. Children Development, 67: 1572–1581.
    Herbert, Robert K. 1989. The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. Contrastive Pragmatics, ed. by Wieslaw Oleksy, 3–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Hoff, Erika. 2010. Context effects on young children‘s language use: The influence of conversational setting and partner. First Language, 30.3-4: 461–472.
    Holmes, Janet. 1988. Paying compliments: a sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12: 485–508.
    House, Juliane and Gabriele Kasper. 1981. Politeness markers in English and German. Conversational Routine, ed. by F. Coulmas, 157–185. The Hague: Mouton.
    Howe, Nina and Holly Recchia. 2006. Sibling relations and their impact on children‘s development. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, eds. by Tremblay, R. E., R. G. Barr, and RDeV. Peters, 1-8. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development
    Inhelder, B. and J. Piaget. 1958. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolesence. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1955).
    Keller, Monika, Orlando Lourenco, Tina Malti, and Henrik Saalbach. 2003. The multifaceted phenomenon of ‗happy victimizers‘: A cross-cultural comparison of moral emotions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21:1–18. Keller, Monika, Wolfgang Edelstein, Christine Schmid, Fu-xi Fang, and Ge Fang. 1998. Reasoning about responsibilities and obligations in close relationships: a comparison across two cultures. Developmental Psychology, 34.4: 731– 741.
    Kohlberg, L. 1963. The development of children‘s orientations toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6: 11–33.
    Kohlberg, L. 1984. Essays on Moral Development 2: The Psychology of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
    Kulik, James A. and Patricia Carlino. 1987. The effect of verbal commitment and treatment choice on medication compliance in a pediatric setting. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10.4: 367–376.
    Kurzon, Dennis. 1998. The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 29: 571–596.
    Lakoff, Robin. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.
    Lanza, E. 1992. Can bilingual two-year-olds code switch? Journal of Child Language, 19: 633–658.
    Leech, Geoffrey. 1983.Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
    Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
    Liu, Guoxiong and Fu-xi Fang. 2003. Review on children‘s moral emotion judgment. Advances in Psychological Science, 11.1: 55–60.
    Lyon, T. D. 2000. Child witnesses and the oath: empirical evidence. Southern California Review, 73: 1017–1074.
    Maas, F. K. 2008. Children‘s understanding of promising, Lying, and False Belief. The Journal of General Psychology 135: 301–321.
    Maas, F. K. and Leonard Abbeduto. 1998. Young children‘s understanding of promising: methodological considerations. Journal of Child Language 25: 203–214.
    Maas, F. K. and Leonard Abbeduto. 2001. Children‘s judgments about intentionally and unintentionally broken promises. Journal of Child Language, 28: 517–529.
    Mannle, S., M. Barton, and M. Tomasello. 1992. Two-year-olds‘ conversations with their mothers and preschool-aged siblings. First Language, 12: 57–71.
    Mant, Catherine M. and Josef Perner. 1988. The child's understanding of commitment. Developmental Psychology, 24.3: 343–35l. Mey, Jacob L. 1985. Whose Language? Philadelphia : J. Benjamins. Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Michele, G. 2000. Pragmatic study of agreement and refusal messages in young French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 569–582.
    Nysse-Carris, K. L. 2002. Promises to Keep a Secret, Promises to Tell the Truth: Understanding the Promise-honesty Effect. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
    Ochs, E. 1988. Culture and language development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Peters, R. S. 1981. Moral Development and Moral Education. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    Piaget, J. 1965. The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932).
    Piaget, J. 1969. The Child's Conception of Time. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published1946).
    Piaget, J. 1970. The Child's Conception of Movement and Speed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1946).
    Piaget, J. 1974. The Child's Conception of Quantities. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1941).
    Reese, E. and R. Fivush. 1993. Parental styles of talking about the past. Developmental Psychology, 29: 596–606. Rosaldo, M. 1980. Knowledge and Passion: Ilongot Notions of Self and Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rosaldo, M. 1982. The things we do with words: ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society, 11: 203–238. Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. Readings in English Transformational Grammar, eds. by R.A. Jacobs and P. S. R. Rosenbaum, 222–272. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.
    Sachs, J. and J. Devin. 1976. Young children‘s use of age appropriate speech styles in social interaction and role-playing. Journal of Child Language, 3: 81–98.
    Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Sell, Marie A., and Mabel L. Rice, 1988. Girls‘ excuses: Listener, severity of violation, and developmental effects. Discourse Processes, 11: 357–371.
    Shatz, M. and R. Gelman. 1973. The development of communications skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38: 1–37.
    Sperber, D. and I. A. Noveck. 2004. Experimental Pragmatics, 1.13: 50–71. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Talwar, V, K. Lee, N. Bala, and R. C. L. Lindsay. 2002. Children‘s conceptualknowledge of lying and its relation to their actual behaviors: implications for court competence examinations. Law and Human Behavior, 26.4: 395– 415.
    Trosborg, Anna. 1987. Apology strategies in native / non-native. Journal of Pragmatics, 11: 147–167.
    Turiel, E. 1998. The development of morality. Handbook of Child Psychology, 3: 870–879.
    Vendler, Zeno. 1972. Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Wang, Fan. 2009. An Experimental Study on the Comprehension and Metapragmatic Knowledge of Promising in Chinese-Speaking Children. MA Thesis, Hunan University.
    Werlen, Iwar. 1983. Vermeidungsritual und Ho flichkeit: zu einigen Formen konventionalisierter indirekter Sprechakte im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache, 3: 193–218.
    Wolfson, N. and J. Manes. 1980. The compliment as a social strategy. Linguistics, 13.3: 391–410.
    Wolfson, N., L. D‘Amico Reisner, and L. Huber. 1983. How to arrange for social commitments in American English: the invitation. Sociolinguistics and Language acquisition, eds. by N. Wolfson and E. Judd, 116–128. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
    Wolfson, Nessa. 1983. An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, eds. by Nessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd, 96–102. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Youngblade, L. M. and J. Dunn. 1995. Individual differences in young children's pretend play with mother and sibling: Links to relationships and understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs. Child Development; 66.5: 1472–1492.
    Zhang, Ping, Xiaoqing Cheng, Huichang Chen, and Guangzhen Zhang. 2009. The developmental characteristics of high school students‘ promise judgment and the effect of friendship and situation. Psychological Science, 32.2: 338– 341.
    Zhang, Qiqi. 2007. Commissive speech act verbs. MA Thesis, East China Normal University.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE