簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳柏亨
Chen, Po-Heng
論文名稱: 婚姻規範性承諾與婚姻穩定之關聯探討
The Association between Moral Commitment and Marital Stability
指導教授: 林如萍
Lin, Ju-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 58
中文關鍵詞: 婚姻規範性承諾婚姻穩定潛在類別分析臺灣社會變遷基本調查
英文關鍵詞: Moral Commitment, Marital Stability, Latent Class Analysis, Taiwan Social Change Survey
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202205496
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:318下載:61
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過往來說,針對婚姻承諾的研究多專注於「愛與依附」,少有針對規範性承諾的研究,且研究方法上過往都以加總、分面向來討論。而以婚姻穩定為主題的研究,多發現知覺滿意有關。但除了滿意外,是否有其他穩定婚姻的因素呢?因此,本研究目的有二:第一,探索婚姻規範性承諾之類型及影響因素;第二,婚姻規範性承諾與婚姻穩定之關聯。
    本研究使用「臺灣社會變遷基本調查」六期二次已婚者之資料,共1086個樣本,進行資料分析。潛在類別分析的結果顯示,依「婚姻重視度」及「離婚接受度」為指標,可將已婚者的婚姻規範性承諾類型分成以下三類:「夫妻關係本位型」、「婚姻制度本位型」、「子女福祉本位型」。以多項式邏輯斯迴歸分析類型的影響因素發現:影響婚姻規範性承諾類型的因素大致符合現代化理論;最後使用邏輯斯迴歸分析婚姻穩定之因素,結果顯示:除婚姻滿意外,婚姻規範性承諾為穩定婚姻的重要因素。本研究也依據研究結果針對家庭生活教育、一般民眾及未來研究給予建議。

    In the past, most studies aimed at commitment were more focused on “love and attachment,” but fewer on “moral commitment.” Researches had shown that marital satisfaction is the key to stability, but are there any other factors? Therefore, this study had two objectives. The first was to investigate the latent class of moral commitment and to examine whether the factors affect moral commitment. The second was to examine the association between moral commitment and marital stability.
    The data came from Taiwan Social Change Survey (2011), the sample consisted of 1086 Taiwanese married individuals. The result of latent class analysis showed there are three types of moral commitment: Relation-oriented, Marriage-oriented and Children-oriented. The results of multi-nominal logistic regression showed that the factors affect moral commitment are corresponded to Modernization Theory. According to the results of logistic regression, except marital satisfaction, moral commitment is another factor of marital stability. Through the findings, suggestions are made for family life education, the general and future studies.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題與研究目的 3 第三節 名詞釋義 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 婚姻穩定與影響因素 5 第二節 婚姻規範性承諾 10 第三節 婚姻規範性承諾與婚姻穩定之關聯 17 第三章 研究設計 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究假設 20 第三節 資料來源與研究對象 21 第四節 變項及測量 22 第五節 資料處理 25 第四章 研究結果 27 第一節 樣本及變項描述 27 第二節 婚姻規範性承諾類型分析 32 第三節 影響婚姻穩定的因子 38 第五章 結論與建議 43 第一節 結論與討論 43 第二節 建議 49 參考文獻 52 中文部分 52 西文部分 54

    中文部分
    內政部(2014)。內政部11月統計月報。2014年12月1日,取自:http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/list.htm
    伊慶春(2007)。台灣家庭結構之變遷:九0年代以後。2014年12月1日,取自:http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/TSCpedia/index.php/台灣社會變遷全記錄
    行政院主計處(2006)。都市化程度。2014年6月25日,取自:http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/662017264471.pdf
    行政院主計處(2013)。生命統計。2014年6月25日,取自:http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=3622&mp=4
    利翠珊、蕭英玲(2008)。華人婚姻品質的維繫:衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究,29,77-116。
    吳明燁、伊慶春(2003)。婚姻其實不只是婚姻:家庭因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響。人口學刊,26,71-95。
    李良哲(2000)。維繫婚姻關係因素的成人期差異研究。中華心理衛生學刊,13(3),61-87。
    周玉慧(2011)。夫妻間衝突因應策略之類型變遷及其長期影響。中華心理學刊,53(2),229-253。
    周玉慧、謝雨生(2009)。夫妻間支持授受及其影響。中華心理學刊,51(2),215-234。
    林如萍(2003)。婚前教育之方案發展—以「遇見幸福」婚前教育活動為例分析。載於中華民國家庭教育學會(主編),家庭教育的新紀元(頁121-147)。臺北:師大書苑。
    林如萍(2008)。姻緣天註定?!大學生的關係信念對婚姻教育態度之影響。中華家政學刊,43,43-59。
    林如萍(2014)。家庭政策的新視角:朝向「協同整合」邁進。2014 臺灣家庭政策國際研討會暨城市家庭政策論壇。臺北:國家圖書館。
    林如萍(2014)。iLove戀愛時光地圖。2014年12月30日,取自: http://mrep.moe.edu.tw/
    林如萍(主編)(2013)。iLove戀愛時光地圖手札。臺北市:教育部。
    柯澍馨、何嘉雯(2005)。大學生親子關係,婚姻態度與婚前性行為之研究—以臺北縣市私立大學學生為例。Journal of Hospitality and Home Economics,2(4), 593-609。
    陳富萍(2006)。牽手一生:女性的婚姻承諾在婚姻中的變化。臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。臺北市,未出版。
    黃迺毓、林如萍、唐先梅、陳芳茹(1995)。家庭概論。國立空中大學。
    黃樹仁(2002)。臺灣都市化程度析疑。臺灣社會學刊,27,163-205。
    黃囇莉、許詩淇(2006)。虛虛實實之間: 婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制。本土心理學研究,25,3-45。
    蔡勇美、伊慶春(1997)。中國家庭價值觀的持續與改變: 臺灣的例子。載於張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌主編(123-170頁)。九○年代的臺灣社會: 社會變遷基本調查研究系列二 (下)。中央研究院
    蕭英玲(2012)。新婚前三年夫妻婚姻滿意度的變化與其影響因素。中華心理學刊,54(4),433-450。
    蕭英玲、曾秀雲(2005)。臺北市新婚夫妻的衝突反應。臺灣社會學年會學術研討會。國立臺北大學
    西文部分
    Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1999). Interpersonal commitment in historical perspective. In Adams J. M. & Jones W. H. (Eds). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 1-36). New York: Springer US.
    Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 628-640.
    Amato, P. R., & Hohmann‐Marriott, B. (2007). A Comparison of High‐and Low‐Distress Marriages That End in Divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 621-638.
    Amato, P. R., & Kane, J. B. (2011). Parents’ marital distress, divorce, and remarriage: Links with daughters’ early family formation transitions. Journal of Family Issues, 32(8), 1073-1103.
    Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Do attitudes toward divorce affect marital quality? Journal of Family Issues, 20(1), 69-86.
    Amato, P. R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A., & Rogers, S. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 1-22.
    Barber, J. S. (2004). Community social context and individualistic attitudes toward marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(3), 236-256.
    Burr, R. (1973). Theory construction and the Sociology of the Family. New York: Wiley.
    Clements, R., Swensen, C.H. (2000). Commitment to one’s spouse as a predictor of marital quality among older couples. Current Psychology,19(2), 110-120.
    Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 392-409.
    Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American sociological review, 65, 19-51.
    Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., Edwards, J. N., & Booth, A. (1986). Dimensions of marital quality toward methodological and conceptual refinement. Journal of Family Issues, 7(1), 31-49.
    Johnson, M. P. (1999). Personal, moral, and structural commitment to relationships: experiences of choice and constraint. In Adams J. M. & Jones W. H. (Eds). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 73-87). New York: Springer US.
    Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P. & Huston, T. L. (1999).The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 160-177.
    Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.
    Kersten, K. K. (1990). The process of marital disaffection: Interventions at various stages. Family Relations, 39(3), 257-265.
    Kreager, D. A., Felson, R. B., Warner, C., & Wenger, M. R. (2013). Women's education, marital violence, and divorce: A social exchange perspective. Journal of marriage and family, 75(3), 565-581.
    Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669-698.
    Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19-28.
    Levinger, G. (1976). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1), 21-47.
    Levinger, G. (1999). Duty toward whom? In Adams J. M. & Jones W. H. (Eds). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 37-52). New York: Springer US.
    Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I. and Reiss, I. L. (Eds.) Contemporary theories about the family: research-based theories. (pp. 268-294). New York: Free Press.
    Lin, J.P., & Yi, C. C. (2011). Filial Norms and Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare 20, 109-120.
    Lo, T. F. (2007). Kinship network and marriage stability through Taiwan’s demographic transition. Journal of Population Studies, 35, 1-35.
    Lydon, J., Pierce, T., & O'Regan, S. (1997). Coping with moral commitment to long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 104.
    Miller, R. B., Hollist, C. S., Olsen, J., & Law, D. (2013). Marital quality and health over 20 years: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 667-680.
    Park, H., & Raymo, J. M. (2013). Divorce in Korea: Trends and educational differentials. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(1), 110-126.
    Pope, A. L. (2013). Intimate relationship commitment: An integrated conceptual model. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(3), 270-289.
    Pope, A. L., & Cashwell, C. S. (2013). Moral commitment in intimate committed relationships: A conceptualization from cohabiting same-sex and opposite-sex partners. The Family Journal, 21(1), 5-14.
    Previti, D., & Amato, P. R. (2003). Why stay married? Rewards, barriers, and marital stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 561-573.
    Ramirez, A. (2008). An examination of the tripartite approach to commitment: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis of the effect of relational maintenance behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 943-965.
    Schoebi, D., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2012). Stability and change in the first 10 years of marriage: does commitment confer benefits beyond the effects of satisfaction? Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 729-742.
    Stanley, S. M. (2005). The power of commitment: A guide to active, lifelong love. Jossey-Bass.
    Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 595-608.
    Whitton, S. W., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Johnson, C. A. (2013). Attitudes toward divorce, commitment, and divorce proneness in first marriages and remarriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 276-287.
    Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2009), A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 465–477.
    Yucel, D. (2014). What Predicts Egalitarian Attitudes Towards Marriage and Children: Evidence from the European Values Study. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 213-228.
    Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Cognitive theories in social psychology. The handbook of social psychology, 1, 320-411.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE