簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉翰隆
Liu, Han-Long
論文名稱: 台灣發展公民電廠的社會接受度評估-以計畫行為理論探討太陽能群眾募資之影響因素
Social Acceptance of Community Energy Projects in Taiwan: Exploring the Factors Influencing Solar Energy Projects Based on Theory of Planned Behaviour
指導教授: 郭乃文
Kuo, Nae-Wen
口試委員: 陳姿伶
Chen, Tzu-Ling
洪立三
Hung, Li-San
口試日期: 2021/07/01
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 地理學系
Department of Geography
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 128
中文關鍵詞: 公民電廠能源轉型公民參與計畫行為理論結構方程模型
英文關鍵詞: Community Energy Projects, Energy Transition, Civic Participation, Theory of Planned Behavior, Structural Equation Modeling
研究方法: 調查研究半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101097
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:118下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 臺灣的公民電廠發展正處於初期階段,尚有許多值得討論與研究空間,而過往相關研究多以再生能源政策法規面或策略面進行探討,較少從市場接受度與社會接受度的觀點進行討論。
    本研究旨在瞭解影響民眾透過太陽能募資平台參與太陽能發電計畫之因素,為達成所設定之研究目的,本研究採用混合研究方法,以量化研究為主,質性研究為輔。量化研究使用問卷調查法,以計畫行為理論做為研究理論依據,透過自編問卷做為研究工具,隨機發放給台北市、新北市與台中市民眾與環團組織成員,總計回收594份有效樣本,並使用SPSS與AMOS等軟體進行統計資料與結構方程模型分析。質性研究則採取深度訪談法,以瞭解民眾對於太陽能發電的想法與實際參與狀況。
    根據問卷調查結果發現,知覺行為控制為行為意圖最重要的影響因子,而環境知識為影響行為意圖的次要因子,態度與主觀規範雖會正向影響行為意圖,但影響效果較小。另外,環境關注會正向影響態度、主觀規範與知覺行為控制,環境知識會正向影響知覺行為控制。透過訪談結果發現,太陽能募資平台能否給與大眾足夠的信心是關鍵所在,且降低最低參與金額可提升民眾的參與意願與能力,另外募資平台若能提供二手交易的服務,將會減少民眾在財務風險方面的擔憂。本研究結果與發現將可提供我國推動公民電廠如:太陽能募資平台做為參考。

    Since community energy projects in Taiwan are still in the beginning stage, a lot of important issues should be investigated. Most researches were focused on the renewable energy policies, regulations, or strategies in the past, and few researches were concerned about the perspectives of market, society, and community acceptance.
    This study is aimed to investigate the factors that affect the public participation in the solar power generation plan through solar crowdfunding platforms. In order to achieve the research purposes, this research adopts a mixed research method, including the quantitative research mainly, and also be supplemented by qualitative research. Quantitative research were designed based on the theory of planned behavior and the self-compiled questionnaires survey was used. Questionnaires were randomly distributed to the people living in Taipei City, New Taipei City, and Taichung City and to the members of environmental groups. Finally, 594 valid samples were collected and then both SPSS and AMOS softwares were used to analyze the statistical data and to build the structural equation modeling. In addition, the in-depth interview was used in qualitative research to collect the opinions of participating in solar power generation plan through solar crowdfunding platforms.
    The final results of the structural equation modeling show that perceived behavioral control is the most important factor influence on behavior intention. While environmental knowledge is the secondary factor that affects behavior intention. Although attitudes and subjective norms positively affect behavior intention, the effect is relatively weak. Additionally, environmental concern will positively affect attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control; while environmental knowledge will positively affect perceived behavioral control. The results of the interview show that the critical issue is the confidence of the solar crowdfunding platform and reducing the minimum funding amount will increase the willingness and ability of the public to participate. In addition, if the crowdfunding platform can provide the public with second-hand transaction services, it will reduce the financial risks for the public who are concerned. The findings of this research may contribute to the development of community energy projects such as solar crowdfunding platform in Taiwan.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 從能源轉型到公民電廠 6 第二節 計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior) 11 第三節 影響民眾參與太陽能募資行為之相關變項與關係 14 第四節 混合研究 22 第三章 研究設計與實施計畫 23 第一節 研究流程 23 第二節 研究架構與假設 26 第三節 問卷調查 29 第四節 深度訪談 38 第四章 研究結果與分析 39 第一節 描述性統計分析 39 第二節 信度分析 51 第三節 獨立樣本t檢定 53 第四節 單因子變異數分析 58 第五節 皮爾森積差相關係數分析 68 第六節 小結 70 第七節 驗證性因素分析 73 第八節 路徑分析 80 第九節 訪談內容分析 88 第五章 結論與建議 95 第一節 研究假設的考驗結果 95 第二節 結論 97 第三節 建議 103 參考文獻 107 附錄一 民眾參與太陽能發電之行為研究調查問卷(問卷初稿) 116 附錄二 民眾參與太陽能發電之行為研究調查問卷(預試問卷) 120 附錄三 民眾參與太陽能發電之行為研究調查問卷(正式問卷) 124 附錄四 訪談大綱 128

    一、 中文文獻
    王柏崴、黃禎貞、唐孝蘭、葉國樑、曾治乾(2009)。台北市國中學生綠色消費知識、態度、行為意圖及其相關因素研究~以某國中為例。科學教育學刊,17(3), 255-274。
    台灣金融研訓院金融研究所(2020)。網路投資太陽能電廠的風險與權益保障。
    朱文禎、陳哲賢(2007)。探討虛擬社群之知識分享行為:以線上遊戲社群為例。電子商務研究,5(1),55-80。
    吳明杰(2018)。政府政策為干擾效果對綠色創新產品購買行為之影響–以計畫行為理論分析臺灣住宅屋頂型太陽能光電系統。國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系博士論文。
    吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務運用。麗文文化事業股份有限公司。
    李明和(2002)。中部地區中學科學教師環境知識、態度及行為意向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所,台中市。
    李政賢譯,Irving Seidman原著(2009)。訪談研究法。五南書局。
    阮學彬(2015)。環境關懷對綠色消費意圖之影響-計畫行為理論模型之應用(未出版之碩士論文)。僑光科技大學,台中市。
    周桂田、劉華美(2020)。氣候變遷治理在臺灣-高碳政權之轉型困境。國家發展研究,19(2),35-82。
    周義國(1998)。台北市高職工科應屆畢業生的環境知識、態度及行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所,台北市。
    林子倫(2016)。能源民主的實踐:能源轉型的關鍵課題。臺灣能源轉型十四講。周桂田、林子倫(主編),27-40。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
    邱皓政(2004)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。五南書局。
    邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。五南書局。
    邱皓政(2010)。量化硏究與統計分析:SPSS (PASW)資料分析範例。五南書局。
    范玫芳(2016)。低碳能源轉型的正義課題。臺灣能源轉型十四講。周桂田、林子倫(主編),41-61。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
    唐孝蘭、林建輝、曾治乾、黃禎貞、莊博閔、葉國樑(2010)。臺北市某高中學生環境永續發展行為意圖及其相關因素。學校衛生,57,87-106。
    高淑芬(2016)。能源轉型的在地實踐:社區型能源與公民電廠。臺灣能源轉型十四講。周桂田、林子倫(主編),181-197。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
    連經宇、陳育詩(2010)。餐飲業消費者個人屬性、綠色消費認知與行為意向之關係研究:以台北及新竹地區為例。餐旅暨家政學刊,7(2),133-162。
    陳國正(1996)。公共職訓機構學員環境知識、態度及環境教育需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所,高雄市。
    陳惠萍(2015)。綠能科技與在地使用:台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡分析。國立臺灣大學社會科學院社會學研究所博士論文。
    陳雅芬(2012)。運用計畫行為理論探討影響跨國消費者對臺灣製造(MIT)寢具用品網路購買意願之因素。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    陳敬中(2003)。花蓮縣政府人員之環境知識, 環境典範及環境行為研究。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    傅惠筠(2015)。大專校院學生節能減碳行為意圖及其影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,44 (2),373-388。
    黃延聰、林奕辰(2014)。遊客的綠色購買行為:以旅遊當地農產品為例。觀光休閒學報,20(1),51-80。
    黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式理論與應用。五南書局。
    黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式在教育資料應用之研究。五南書局。
    黃秋霞(2016)。淺談量化與質性研究的反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,2016,5(9),149-154。
    經濟部能源局(2021a)。平均每人實質國內生產毛額與能源消費量及能源生產力與密集度。
    經濟部能源局(2021b)。能源供給(按能源別)及國內能源消費(按部門別)。
    經濟部能源局(2018c)。公民電廠推動方案重點推動方案(計畫)初稿。
    經濟部能源局(2018d)。能源轉型白皮書初稿。台北:經濟部能源局。
    葉俊麟(2011)。以計劃行為理論與科技接受模型來探討智慧型手機的購買決策。國立中央大學管理高階主管企管碩士論文。
    劉怡君、施學琦(2010)。以計劃行為理論為基礎探討線上合購意圖與行為。電子化企業經營管理理論暨實務研討會,429-436。
    劉彥慶(2011)。消費者環境知識、環境關注與價格知覺對環保商品購買意願之影響。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    歐嘉瑞(2010)。我國再生能源發展政策。臺北:國家政策研究基金會。
    謝曜昇(2013)。環境知識、社會規範與態度對綠色產品知覺價值與購買意願之影響研究:以再生紙為例。淡江大學管理科學學系企業經營碩士在職專班論文。
    顏如君(2003)。台灣高中職學生在環境永續發展概念之現況調查─以南部地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄市。
    宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2011)。混合方法研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。
    黃麗鈴(2019)。從社會科學研究典範質量之辯探析混合研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(6),163-177。

    二、 外文文獻
    Agyeman, J., & Kollumus, A. (2002). Mind the Gap, Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
    Ajzen, I. (1985) . From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J.Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior(pp. 11- 39). Germany: Springer.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Allman,S .A. (1972). Identification of environmental education concepts for inclusion in an elememtary school cruuiculum. Marketing Management, 10(2), 6-23.
    Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
    Bang, H.-K., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology and Marketing, 17(6), 449-468.
    Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y. (2004). The effectiveness of environmental claims among Chinese consumers: Influences of claim type, country disposition and ecocentric orientation. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3/4), 273-319.
    Chen M. F. & Tung P. J. (2014). Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotel. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 36, 221-230.
    Conradie, P. D., De Ruyck, O., Saldien, J., & Ponnet, K. (2021). Who wants to join a renewable energy community in Flanders? Applying an extended model of Theory of Planned Behaviour to understand intent to participate. Energy Policy, 151, 112121.
    Crosby, L. A., Gill, J. D., & Taylor, J. R. (1981). Consumer/voter behavior in the passage of the Michigan container law. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 19-32.
    Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
    Debra, S. L., & Michael, J. S. (2012). Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions and Behaviors Among College Students. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(3), 308-326.
    Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
    Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
    Fujii, S. (2006), “Environmental Concern, Attitude Toward Frugality, and Ease of Behavior as Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262-268.
    Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Han, H. (2015). Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164-177.
    Han, H., & Kim, Y. (2010). An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 659-668.
    Han, H., Hsu, L. Y., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325-334.
    Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263.
    Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
    Hobman, E. V., & Frederiks, E. R. (2014). Barriers to green electricity subscription in Australia:“Love the environment, love renewable energy… but why should I pay more?”. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 78-88.
    IEA (2020).Key World Energy Statistics 2020.
    IPCC (2018).Global Warming of 1.5°C.
    Indrė, P. and M. Aistė (2013) Attitude formation towards local and international ecological face and body care brands among Lithuanian female consumers. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 23-42.
    Kalkbrenner, B. J., & Roosen, J. (2016). Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 60-70.
    Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and perceived consumer effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592-599.
    Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
    Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Kim, C., & Muller, T. E. (1996). The Influence of Culture on Pro-Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior: a Canadian Perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 196-202.
    Lehtonen, M. & K. Florian (2009). Deliberative socio-technical transitions. In Scrase, I.& MacKerron, G.(eds.). Energy for the future: A new agenda (pp. 85-100). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Liobikienė, G., Dagiliūtė, R., & Juknys, R. (2021). The determinants of renewable energy usage intentions using theory of planned behaviour approach. Renewable Energy, 170, 587-594.
    MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
    Maichum, K., Parichatnon, S., & Peng, K. C. (2016). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability, 8(10), 1077.
    Marcinkowski, T. J. (1989). An analysis of correlates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
    Marcinkowski, T. J. (1998). An analysis of Correlates and Predictors of Responsible Environmental Behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(12), 3677-3693.
    Mobley, C., Vagias, W. M., & DeWard, S. L. (2010). Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 42(4), 420-447.
    Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2014). Green consumption behavior antecedents: environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychology & Marketing, 31 (5), 335-348.
    Proudlove, R., Finch, S., & Thomas, S. (2020). Factors influencing intention to invest in a community owned renewable energy initiative in Queensland, Australia. Energy Policy, 140, 111441.
    Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 10-18.
    Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge.
    Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217-231.
    Scholder-Ellen, P. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 43-52.
    Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk analysis, 20(3), 353-362.
    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312.
    Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation? American Psychologist, 47 (10), 1224-1232.
    Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A (2009). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, 2, 283-317.
    Walker, G. (2008). Decentralised systems and fuel poverty: are there any links or risks?. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4514-4517.
    Weigel, R. & Weigel, L. (1978). Environmental Concern: the Development of a Measure. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 145-176.
    Wolsink, M. (2013). Fair distribution of power generating capacity: justice, microgrids and utilizing the common pool of renewable energy. Energy justice in a changing climate: social equity and low carbon energy, 116-138.
    Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N., & Ardestani, R. S. (2015). Governance of energy transition in Iran: Investigating public acceptance and willingness to use renewable energy sources through socio-psychological model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 565-573.
    Yohan, K., Y. Sunyoung and L. Joosung, (2014) Can companies induce sustainable consumption? The impact of knowledge and social embeddedness on airline sustainability programs in the U.S. Sustainability, 6, 3338-3356.
    Yun, S., & Lee, J. (2015). Advancing societal readiness toward renewable energy system adoption with a socio-technical perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 170-181.
    Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V., & Tsagarakis, K.P. (2010). Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (3), 1088-1095.

    三、 網站資料
    內政部戶政司全球資訊網(2021)。人口統計資料庫-縣市人口性比例及人口密度。檢自:https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346(2021/4/23)
    經濟部能源局(2021e)。能源統計資料查詢-發電結構。檢自:https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/wesnq/Views/B01/wFrmB0102.aspx(2021/5/12)
    葉盈君。淺談計畫行為理論。國家教育研究院電子報。檢自:http://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=51&content_no=1421(2020/9/11)

    下載圖示
    QR CODE