研究生: |
朱黛芬 Dai Fan Chu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探索教育與組織玩興應用於企業中階主管領導行為發展之研究 |
指導教授: | 蔡居澤 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 75 |
中文關鍵詞: | 探索教育 、組織玩興 、領導行為 |
英文關鍵詞: | Adventure education, Organizational playfulness, Leadership behavior |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:161 下載:17 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探討探索教育對企業中階主管領導行為發展關係之影響,並且探討組織玩興是否亦會對企業中階主管領導行為訓練成效發展有所影響。研究採單組前後測設計,以個案企業接受探索教育領導行為訓練課程之三十五名受訓中階主管為研究對象。
本研究之蒐集資料工具為:
一、組織玩興之評量,採用余嬪、吳靜吉、林偉文、楊潔欣(2003)所編製的「組織玩興量表」(Organizational Playfulness Climate Questionnaire)、在課前由研究對象進行評量。二、領導行為的測量,採用蘇國楨(2003)所發展的「服務業主管領導行為量表」(Leadership inventory in the service industry),分別在課前由研究對象其直屬主管針對研究對象的領導行為觀察進行評估。課後一個月再次由其直屬主管針對研究對象之領導行為觀察進行追蹤評估。
結果發現如下:一、受試者在參與探索教育課程後,領導行為有顯著改變。亦即參與探索教育訓練課程有助於提升學員的領導行為。受試者接受探索教育教學後, 在「教練式領導」(Mentor leadership)、「威權式領導」(Monarch leadership)二個層面的改變較大。而在「親情式領導」(Parent leadership)層面的影響並不大。二、組織玩興對領導行為之迴歸分析,發現當組織中玩興較高時,以探索教育為課程實施方式,員工的領導行為並無顯著改變。
最後根據研究成果從企業角度分析探索教育應用於企業中階主管領導行為發展之影響,並提供企業將探索教育納入訓練課程設計之參考。
The objectives of study are to explore the impact of adventure education on development of industrial mid-management leadership behavior as well as the possible impact of organizational playfulness on development of training result effectiveness of industrial mid-management leadership behavior. The design of the study is based on pre-activity and post-activity individual evaluation result, study targets are 35 mid-management participants from industrial leadership behavior training curriculum case studies for adventure education.
Reference materials used to collect information for the study were:
1. Evaluation of Organizational Playfulness: “Organizational Playfulness Climate Questionnaire,” 2003, written by Ping Yu, Jing-ji, Wu,Wei-wen Lin &, Chieh-hsin Yang.
2.Evaluation of Leadership Behavior: “Leadership Inventory in the Service Industry,” 2003, written by Kuo-Jen Su. The participants' immediate supervisors conducted individual evaluations of leadership behaviors prior to and one month post-study.
The results are as follows:
1. Participants’ Leadership behaviors were noticeably changed after experiencing adventure education curriculum, that is, adventure education training curriculum is conducive to improve participants’ leadership behavior. Based on post-case studies evaluation of participants, greater impacts were made in the 2 areas of Mentor Leadership and Monarch Leadership; as far as Parent Leadership, impact was not significant.
2. The finding of regression analysis between organizational playfulness and leadership behavior was, there were no noticeable changes on employees’ leadership behaviors while applying adventure education as curriculum method with higher level of playfulness in organization.
Finally, study results on the impact of industrial mid-management leadership behavior development with adventure education application will be analyzed from industrial perspectives; references will be given to industries for integrating adventure education into training curricula.
一、中文部分
方正儀(1996)。學習。管理雜誌,265,42。
王怡中(1996)。企業策略、領導風格與組織績效關聯性之研究。國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
王若蘋(2007)。從內隱理論觀點探討探索教育在團隊建立技能訓練之成效。東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
李普生譯(1992)。一分鐘領導。原著Blanchard K., Zigarmi P.& Zigarmi D.。台北市:聯經。
李德誠、麥淑華(2002)。整全的歷奇輔導。香港:突破。
吳崇旗(2005)。建構戶外冒險教育效益機轉之模式—以繩索挑戰課程為例。國立體育學院體育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
余嬪、吳靜吉、林偉文、楊潔欣(2003)。成人玩興量表與組織玩興氣氛量表之發展。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,50(1),73-110。
余嬪(2004)。樂在工作──組織玩興研究。高雄師大學報,16,19-37。
余嬪(2005)。工作趣味化:玩興管理的概念和方向。應用心理研究,26,73-94。
周旭華譯(1996)。企業推手。台北:天下文化。
林芳菁(2007)。企業員工參與探索教育對自我效能感與工作績效之影響–以壽險公司為例。中正大學成人及繼續教育所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
竺定宇(2004)。探索教育對企業團隊效能之影響。臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
康自立(1997)。中國式領導模式之建構及在技職教育之應用研究I。國科會專題計畫(NSC-86-2516-S-018-002-TG)。
張翊萱(2008)。探索教育活動對員工訓練成效及企業文化之影響-以某電子製造大廠為例。中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
郭金龍(2002)。探索教育課程對企業員工人際溝通效果之影響研究。朝陽科技大學休閒研究所碩士論文,台中。
郭誌光(2002)。個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係─台北市廣告公司的實證研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
陳慶瑞(1995)。費德勒權變領導理論研究,二版,五南文化事業機構,台北。
游曉郁(2005)。領導行為與員工效能:知覺組織支持及知覺主管支持的中介效果。國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
曾敬梅(2002)。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度,所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃貞諭(2009)。冒險教育在企業訓練的運用。體驗教育學報。3,13-24。
廖炳煌(2008)。探索教育課程要素之研究。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
劉秀娟(1994)。幼兒玩性與社會性遊戲之研究。文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
鄧桂菊(2007)。探索教育活動對企業員工團隊效能之影響-以彰化縣Y環保科技公司為例。大葉大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(2001)。探索教育活動參考手冊。台北:翰林
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(2007a)。探索教育與活動學校。桃園縣:中華探索教育發展協會。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(2007b)。將探索教育帶回學校。桃園縣:中華探索教育發展協會。
簡貞玉譯(2002)。員工訓練與能力發展。原著Raymond A. Noe。台北市:五南。
蘇英芳、鄭國枝、黃賀(2004)。使用幽默對魅力領導行為與效應的調節作用之研究—以高雄地區企業高階經理人為例。中山管理評論,12(2),223-267。
蘇國楨(2003)。我國服務業主管理導行為量表之發展:主位研究途徑的觀點。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,50(2),271-296。
鄭伯壎(1977)領導行為研究:領導方式、情境因素及人格屬性對工人工作滿足感的影響,國立台灣大學,碩士論文。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導量表:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14,3-64。
鄭伯壎、楊國樞(1977)。影響工人滿足感的因素:領導方式、情境因素及人格特質。中央研究院民族研究所集刊,44,13-45。
二、英文部分
Association for Experiential Education (1995). AEE definition of experiential education . The AEE Horizon, 15(1), 21.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.
Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3, 319-336.
Berg, D.H. (1995). The power of playful spirit at work. Journal for Quality and Participantio,18(4), 32-39
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Gulf, Houston.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1965 ). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297-334.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Happiness and creativity. The Futurist, 31(5), 8-12
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303-310.
Fleishman, E.A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Personnel Psychology,37,1-6.
Gass, M. A. (1990). Transfer of Learning in Adventure .In J. Miles & Priest, Adventure Education. State College, PA:Venture Publishing.
Gass, M. A. (1993). The evolution of processing adventure therapy experiences .In M. A. Gass (Ed.) Adventure Therapy: Therapy applications of adventure programming. Dubuque,IA:Kendall Hunt.
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71, 83-103.
Goldenberg, M. A., Klenosky, D, B., O'Leary, J. T., & Templin, T. J.(2000). A means- end investigation of challenge course experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 208-224.
Hattie, J., Marsh, H.W., Neill, J.T., & Richards, G.E. (1997). Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of class experiences that have a lasting effect. Review of Educational Research, 67, 43-87.
Hemphill, J. K., & Coons, A. E. (1950). Leader behavior description. Personnel Research Board. Ohio State University.
Hemphill, J. K., & Coons, A. E. (1970). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Book Chapter. PAGES: 6 - 38.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science,12(4), 435-449.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.
Johnson, B. E. (1997). A new generation of leadership: Education for the gifted and talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 145601)
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the ADTD, 13, 3-9.
Kolb, D. M. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englwood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Kotter, J. P.( 1990). What Leaders really do? Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp.103-111.
Kraft, R., & Sakofs, M. (1985). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association of Experiential Education.
Kroc, R. A.,& Anderson, R (1977) Grinding it out:The making of McDonald’s. NY:St. Martin’s Paperbacks.
Lieberman, N. J. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. NewYork: Academic Press.
Miller, S (1973). Ends, means, and galumphing: Some Leitmotifs of play. American Anthropologist, 75, 87-98
Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. NY:McGraw-Hill.
Parise, J. J. (1987). The effect of systematic training in leadership skills on the leadership potential of selected gifted high school students. Dissertation of Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational behavior. (12th Eds.), Pearson Prentice Hall, River, New Jersey.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York. Doubleday/Currency.
Starbuck, W. H., & Webster, J. (1991). When is play productive? Accounting, Management, and Information Technology, 1(1), 71-90.
Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the leadership behavior description questionnaire-Form XII. Columbus:Ohio State University.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Macmillan, New York.
Warr, P., & Bunce, D. (1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning.Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 347-375.
Webster, J., & Martocchoio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in Organizations. (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.