環境教育大師David Orr曾說：「一切教育，都是環境教育」。從環境教育法於2011年實施至今，已開始出現公務人員並非出於自願，而是「半強迫」的去接受環境教育，在環境教育漸漸僵化，大眾對於超量環境議題的新聞麻木的今日，如何使用創新的角度，進行「聽眾導向」的環境教育設計，用「對方的語言」與對方溝通，從「他者」在乎與關切的東西談起，成為現今環境教育發展的重要課題。作為一項前瞻研究，本研究以「臺灣饒舌音樂愛好者」為對象，探討如何以饒舌樂迷的語言―饒舌音樂―與其「溝通」，進而邀請這個為數不多，在一般人眼中與環保毫無關係的群體，加入環境保護的行列。
本研究之目的除了欲瞭解以饒舌音樂進行環境教育的發展性，也欲瞭解Petty等人於1983年提出，原屬於行銷學及社會心裡學的推敲可能性理論（Elaboration Likelihood Model, ELM）是否能夠跨出產品廣告涉入的範疇，進而套用在歌曲中環保議題的涉入？若能套用，還期望能解釋：「究竟是饒舌音樂中的哪些元素，能夠影響饒舌樂迷產生環境關注意圖的改變？」
本研究根據Petty(1983)提出的推敲可能性模型設計出研究架構，以網路問卷，對臺灣饒舌樂迷進行滾雪球式方法進行施測。研究結果發現，ELM模型可適用於饒舌音樂愛好者對於環保相關歌曲之涉入情形，並且主要影響饒舌音樂愛好者之六項歌曲元素（歌詞含意、音樂錄影帶內容、演唱歌手、饒舌技巧、氣氛營造、曲風類型）中，對其影響最大者為「歌詞含意」與「音樂錄影帶內容」。最後，經由質量混合研究之統整，得出對饒舌應用於環境教育方向之主要建議：歌詞內容與音樂性皆須兼顧，不可偏廢。

Since the Environmental Education Act has been enforced in 2011, more and more government employees are reluctant to receive at least 4 hours of environmental education curriculum each year. This phenomenon shows that the serious problems of environmental education occur today in Taiwan. That is, environmental education has gained its efficiency but loosed its effective functions, or its social impacts. Therefore, as David Orr said, “All education is environmental education ”. The key, changing this trend, is to activate environmental education from the contents to make it more flexible, or more ‘learner-based self-learning’. This means that environmental educators should be requested to use the language and the value systems to meet their ‘customers’ in a communicating free style associated with them. To meet up for this point, when we are facing a group of ‘rap music lovers’, the best way to‘communicate’with them should be involving in their rap-music world! However, how can we introduce rap music into the learning fields of environmental education? This research uses the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to find a way out. ELM has been known as a social psychological and marketing theory, can it be possible to be applied on a crucial issue, through spiritual rap songs, rather than mechanic products through an advertisement? Through delivering the on-line questionnaires by snowball sampling, this research has found that the ELM can actually be used to explain the rap-lovers involvement to environmental-themed rap songs. Also, this research finds out that, among so many elements of a rap song, the lyric and the music video contents are the strongest ones affecting their “Environmental Concern Intention” on listeners. This research also gives to concrete suggestions toward future studies of environmental educators with music lovers.

一、英文文獻
Abdul‐Muhmin, A. G. (2007). Explaining consumers’ willingness to be environmentally friendly. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 237-247.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 339-370.
Barrett, C. (2012). Hip-hopping across China: Intercultural formulations of local identities. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 11(4), 247-260.
Batjargal, N. (2015). The Application of Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to Website Shopping—Take Mobile Phone as an Example. Master Thesis, Department of International, Business Administration, College of Business, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Boyd, T. (2004). ‘Check Yo Self before You Wreck Yo Self. That’s the joint, 325-40.
Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly, 805-825.
Burton, J. A. (2017). Posthuman Rap. Oxford University Press.
Bridges, T. (2011). Towards a pedagogy of hip hop in urban teacher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 325-338.
Cermak, M. J. (2012). Hip-hop, social justice, and environmental education: Toward a critical ecological literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(3), 192-203.
Chavis, B., & Lee, C. (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States. United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice.
Chebat, J. C., Chebat, C. G., & Vaillant, D. (2001). Environmental background music and in-store selling. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 115-123.
Childish Gambino (2018). Feels Like Summer. On Feels Like Summer. RCA Records.
Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2000). Religious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: A replication of the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 63-68.
Douglas, S. C., Kiewitz, C., Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Kim, Y., & Chun, J. U. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: An Elaboration Likelihood Model for workplace aggression. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 425-451.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education, 9(4), 10-19.
Dyson, M. E. (2007). Know What I Mean?: Reflections on Hip-hop. New York: Civitas Books.
Forman, M. (2000). ‘Represent’: race, space and place in rap music. Popular Music, 19(1), 65-90.
George, N. (2005). Hip Hop America. Penguin.
Gorlewski, J., & Porfilio, B. (2012). Revolutionizing environmental education through Indigenous hip hop culture. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 17, 46-61.
Helder, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York.
Hunt, J. (2015, March 30). Supreme Court to Decide Pollution Standards for Black Communities. The Dallas Weekly. Retrieved from https://www.dallasweekly.com
Jackson, B., Dimmock, J., & Compton, J. (Eds.). (2017). Persuasion and Communication in Sport, Exercise, and Physical Activity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Karson, E. J., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2001). An experimental investigation of Internet advertising and the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 23(2), 53-72.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of the History of Social Psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public opinion quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.
Leon, F. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Il: Row, Peterson.
Lien, N. H. (2001). Elaboration Likelihood Model in consumer research: A review. Proceedings of the National Science Council, 11(4), 301-310.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice (Vol. 28). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 532-539.
Mate, D. (2015). Difference between old school and new school hip-hop [Online forum]. Retrieved from https://genius.com/discussions/123772-Difference-between-old-school-and-new-school-hip-hop
McKeown, S., Haji, R., & Ferguson, N. (eds.)(2016). Understanding Peace and Conflict through Social Identity Theory. Contemporary Global Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer.
Mitchell, A. A. (1981). The dimensions of advertising involvement. ACR North American Advances.
Morgan, G., & Warren, A. (2011). Aboriginal youth, hip hop and the politics of identification. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(6), 925-947.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. New York: Suny Press.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Priester, J. R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (3rd Eds.) (pp. 125-164). New York: Routledge.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion (pp. 1-24). New York: Springer.
Rosenthal, D. J. (2006). 'Hoods and the woods: Rap music as environmental literature. The Journal of Popular Culture, 39(4), 661-676.
Potter, R. A. (2001). Soul into hip hop. The Cambridge companion to pop and rock, 143-157.
Serrano, S. (2015). The Rap Year Book: The Most Important Rap Song from Every Year Since 1979, Discussed, Debated, and Deconstructed. New York: Abrams Image.
Schweig, M. (2016). “Young Soldiers, One Day We Will Change Taiwan”: Masculinity Politics in the Taiwan Rap Scene. Ethnomusicology, 60(3), 383-410.
Sfetcu, N. (2014). The Music Sound. Nicolae Sfetcu.
Sigler, T., & Balaji, M. (2013). Regional place representation in hip-hop music. Communication, Culture and Critique, 6(2), 336-352.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change.
Shusterman, R. (1991). The fine art of rap. New Literary History, 22(3), 613-632.
Sousa, M. D. R., Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2005). Can music change ethnic attitudes among children?. Psychology of Music, 33(3), 304-316.
Stapleton, S. R. (2015). Environmental identity development through social interactions, action, and recognition. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(2), 94-113.
Social Psychology: Volume One (SAGE Social Psychology Program). London, UK: SAGE press.
Sulé, V. T. (2016). Hip-hop is the healer: Sense of belonging and diversity among hip-hop collegians. Journal of College Student Development, 57(2), 181-196.
Turner, K., & Freedman, B. (2004). Music and environmental studies. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 45-52.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2011). Handbook of Theories of

二、中文文獻
Babbie, E.著，林秀雲譯（2013）。社會科學研究方法。臺北市：雙葉出版。
GO$H（2015）。霧都夜話。蒐錄於【Wudu Montana】。重慶市：GO$H Music。
Levitin, D. J.著，林凱雄譯（2017）。為什麼傷心的人要聽慢歌。臺北市：商周出版。
大支（2017）。人。蒐錄於【人】。臺北市：亞神音樂。
大支（2002）。臺灣SONG。蒐錄於【舌粲蓮花】。臺北市：魔岩唱片（滾石唱片代理）。
王穎（2018）。美國後民權運動時代早期的種族囹圄政治。中外文學，第47卷，2，47-87。
方偉達（2017）。期刊論文寫作與發表。臺北市：五南圖書。
古尚恆（2018）。嘻哈社團蓄勢待發，嘻研 CYPHER 狂潮襲來。【HIP HOP培養皿】取自https://www.cool-style.com.tw/wd2/archives/311592。
石慧瑩（2017）。論環境正義的多元涵義。應用倫理評論，63, 101-122
多位作者（2008）。【嘻哈寶典6星級】。臺北市：環球國際唱片
朱約信（1995）。美麗新世界--台灣吃的天堂。蒐錄於【外好汝甘知】。臺北市：滾石唱片。
何穎怡譯（2002）。嘻哈美國：Hip hop America（原作者：Nelson George）。臺北市：商周出版（原出版年：2002）。
李靜怡（2005）。臺灣青少年嘻哈文化的認同與實踐。成功大學藝術研究所學位論文。
李英宏（2016）。臺北直直撞。蒐錄於【臺北直直撞】。臺北市：顏社企業。
吳念達（2016）。【嘻哈樂史】DJ Kool Herc與他那場返校派對。取自https://sosreader.com/dj-kool-herc/
林浩立（2005）。流行化、地方化與想像：臺灣嘻哈文化的形成。人類與文化，37, 7-28。
林建煌（2010）。消費者行為概論。臺北：華泰圖書。
林泰佑（2017）。找阿找。蒐錄於【乾坤大挪移】。臺北市：亞神音樂。
周湯豪（2016）。帥到分手。蒐錄於【REAL】。臺北市：太陽娛樂。
周杰倫（2003）。梯田。蒐錄於【葉惠美】。臺北市：新力唱片。
洪嘉穗（2009）。 嘻哈文化之展現與反思。大專體育，101, 16-21。
徐裕傑、莫康笙與林浩立（2008）。參劈的饒舌大計劃。臺北市：聯經出版。
拷秋勤（2008）。逆天。蒐錄於【拷!!出來了!!!】。臺北市：野火樂集。
拷秋勤（2009）。灰色海岸線。蒐錄於【無名英雄】。臺北市：喜瑪拉雅音樂。
孫憶南（譯）（2004）流行音樂的文化(原作者：Andy Bennett)。臺北市：書林出版（原著出版年：2001）
張李誌（2015）。臺灣饒舌音樂的確立與發展-以大支與蛋堡為例。成功大學臺灣文學系學位論文。
黃俊英（2000）。多變量分析。臺北市：翰蘆圖書。
曾郁惠（2014）。我國綠色大學執行現況與推動之研究。臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士學位論文。
頑童（2017）。幹大事。蒐錄於【幹大事】。臺北市：滾石唱片。
劉仲恩（2011）。【環境資訊協會文章】綠色嘻哈新勢力 唱出低碳饒舌歌。取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/62820
蔡振家（2013）音樂認知心理學。臺北市：國立臺灣大學出版中心。
張三李四（2017）。看不見明天。蒐錄於【張三李四】。臺北市：安樂茂思國際。
蕭采薇（民103年2月3日）。155公分跳街舞被揍！饒舌歌手小人霸凌MV逼哭84萬人。ETtoday新聞雲。取自https://star.ettoday.net/news/318979
鐵虎兄弟（2003）。核能牌丁字褲。蒐錄於【鐵虎兄弟】。臺北市：角頭音樂。