本研究強調大學圖書館數位資源與使用者評鑑之重要性，大學圖書館使用者認為重要之數位資源評鑑要素為何？大學圖書館資訊生態構面對使用者的重要性為何？大學圖書館使用者對圖書館的期望為何？都是本研究欲探討的問題。本研究首先瞭解圖書館數位資源系統的發展與重要性，整理並歸納國外現有圖書館數位資源評鑑構面與影響要素，並以資訊生態學作為理論基礎，探究大學圖書館數位資源系統使用者的資訊環境及其對圖書館的期望，並針對國立臺灣師範大學圖書館使用者分享其使用經驗以進行資料分析，彙整使用者之想法與概念，試圖瞭解大學圖書館數位資源系統使用者資訊生態之間的關係，協助圖書館檢討現有系統的相關問題，進而評估大學圖書館數位資源系統是否符合實際使用者之需求，以發展出更好的圖書館數位資源系統介面及服務。

This study emphasizes on the importance of research library’s digital resources and user evaluation. There are some research problems investigated from this study: What is the most important evaluation elements about digital resources which is the research library’s users consider? What is the importance of information ecology dimensions to users in research library? What is the users' expectation of research library? In this study, to understand the importance of the development of digital libraries, organize and summarize existing assessment dimensions of Digital Library Evaluation Indicators. Information Ecology as a theoretical basis to explore the user's information environment and its expectations of research library. This study attempts to investigates the library users’s sharing experience in National Taiwan Normal University for data analysis, and compile and summarize the user's ideas and concepts. Trying to understand the relationship of users’ information ecological environment in research library. Contribute of the library to review issues related to the existing system and evaluating research library digital resources system from the dimensions of Information Ecology. Finally, developing a better interface and library services for the purpose.

一、 中文部分
尤克強（2000）。知識管理的實踐策略。遠見雜誌，170。
王梅玲（2000）。中國圖書館學會八十九年電子館藏發展專題研習班研習手冊台北市：數位資源與館藏發展。中國圖書館學會，15。
王梅玲、蔡明月、陳志銘、柯雲娥、蔡佳縈、陳勇汀、林怡甄（2008）。台灣圖書館史數位圖書館建構之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，34(1)，15-38。
王梅玲（2011）。中華民國圖書館發展史。
王梅玲（2012）。從資訊使用觀點探討學術圖書館電子資源評鑑。CONCERT研討會，1-18。
王麗蕉、鄭雅靜（2006）。大學圖書館評鑑之探討。國家圖書館館刊，95(1)：35-58。
李金泉（2010）。易學易用SPSS PASW 統計分析實務。台北：全華圖書。
李秀琴、李志偉、徐臨嘉與陳威有（2011）。觀察研究法在教育上的應用。黎明學報，22(1)，15-24。
呂文珍（2005）。網路資訊環境使用者資訊行為與圖書館服務之探討。亞東學報，25，185-194。
何建明、黃世昆、莊庭瑞、李德財（2000）。典藏數位化資訊環境之探討。圖書館學與資訊科學，26(2)：38-48。
周正賢（2000）。電子書給閱讀一個新定義。中華印刷科技學會會訊，54。
吳美美（2004）。資訊素養與媒體素養：數位時代的素養與素養教育。臺灣教育，629：9-14。
林信成（2010）。開放式數位典藏系統之研究。台北市：文華圖書館管理。
林英峰（2000）。知識經濟與知識管理。知識管理研討會-領導21世紀之經營管理，政治大學商學院北區中小企業研訓中心主辦。
林珊如（2006）。數位圖書館使用者研究趨勢之考察。圖書館學與資訊科學，32(2)：18-31。
林珊如、許禎芸（2009）。從國內碩士論文探討資訊行為相關研究。圖書資訊學研究，3(1)：51-74。
侯望倫（2002）。組織知識管理整合架構設計與探討--資訊軟體業為例。國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，台北市。
陳信良（2008）。資訊使用者、需求面與提供者：學術圖書館的新挑戰。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，17，1-9。
陳昭珍（2012）。從全球化與在地化重新定義大學圖書館的角色及改變之道。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，21，52-65。
陳書梅（2006）。數位時代圖書館館員之心理素質問題探討。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，15，21-32。
國立臺灣師範大學圖書館（2013）。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館電子資源經費運用與績效評估經驗分享。CONCERT年度座談會。
程蘊嘉（2006）。電子書的過去與未來。今日生活，380。
楊美華（2005）。數位科技對大學圖書館的衝擊。
詹麗萍（2004）。圖書館數位館藏使用評鑑。全國大專院校圖書館自動化第二十次研討會，國家圖書館主辦，國立中山大學圖書館承辦。
趙國安（2007）。建立後勤維修資訊知識管理架構之研究。國防大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
蔡天民（2002）。概念構圖對國小學童自然科學習成就、學習態度及概念改變之研究。台北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
謝秀豔與賴阿福（2007）。電腦概念構圖軟體融入國小自然與生活科技領域教學之學習成效：以環保概念為例。臺北市立教育大學，臺北市。
蕭立人與高巧汶（2008）。概念構圖教學輔助系統之探討。銘傳大學資訊傳播工程學系，桃園縣。
蘇桂枝（2007）。了解與參與：世界數位圖書館。國家圖書館館訊，97：1，14-16。
顧敏（1999）。數位時代複合圖書館的服務及發展策略。中國圖書館學會學報，63，91。

二、 英文部分
Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applies Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
Alavu, M. & D. E. Leidner (1998). Knowledge Management System: A Descriptive Study of Key Issue, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1(7), 1-37.
Anderson, R. (2011). The Crisis in Research Librarianship. The journal of Academic Librarianship.
Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital libraries. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Pr.
Association of Research Libraries. (1995). Definition and purposes of a digital library. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from: http://www.arl.org/.
Association of Research Libraries. Statistics & Assessment. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from: http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/statistics-assessment.
Association of Research Libraries (2013). DigiQUAL®: Charting Digital Library Service Quality. Retrieved September 15, 2013, from: http://www.digiqual.org/
Association of Research Libraries (2013). Library Budget Prediction for 2013. Library Budget Survey.
Association of College and Research Libraries (2011). Environmental Scan 2010 by the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. Chicago: American Library Association.
Association of College and Research Libraries (2012). 2010 Top Ten Trends in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 71(6), 311-320.
Bawden, D. (2011). Transitions Between Concepts of Information in Varied Domains. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Beaulieu, M. (2000).Interaction in information searching and retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 431–439.
Becker, F. (2004). Offices that Work: Workspace Strategies that Add Value and Improve Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Becker, F. (2007). Organizational Ecology and Knowledge Networks. California Management Review, 49(2), 1-20.
Becker, L. K. W. (2006). Globalisation and Changing Practices for Academic Librarians in Australia: a literature review. Academic and Research Libraries, 37(2).
Bellinger, G., Castro, D., Mills, A. (2004). Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom.
Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35, 227–243.
Borgman, C. L., Sølvberg, I., and Kovács, L. (2002). Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics. Fourth DELOS workshop.
Borgman, C. L. (2003). Personal digital libraries: Creating individual spaces for innovation. NSF Workshop on Post-Digital Libraries Initiative Directions.
Brown, S. and Swan, A. (2007). Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services: a report commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries.
Calhoun, K. (2006). The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with other Discovery Tools. Library of Congress, Washington, DC, available at: www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf.
Chowdhury, G. G., & Chowdhury, S. (2003). Introduction to digital libraries. London: Facet Publisher.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, B. H., Caldera, L., and Soares, L. (2011). Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress and Innosight Institute.
Crews, K. D. (1997). The Academic Library in the Information Age: Changing Roles. Seal Beach, CA: Consortium for Educational Technology for University Systems.
Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT’s Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. Harvard Business Review, Mar-Apr, 119-131.
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David, R. B. (2000). Change and the Information Professional. Information Outlook, 4(6).
DELOS(2004). About the DELOS Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries.
Digital Library Federation. (1999). A Working Definition of Digital Library.
EDUCAUSE (2012). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 36.
Elaine G. Toms (2002). Information interaction: providing a framework for information architecture. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(10), 855-862.
Fox, E. A., Akscyn, R. M., Furuta, R. K., & Leggett, J. J. (1995). Digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 23–28.
Gary, C. (2001). Digital Libraries: Definitions, Issues and Challenges. Universal Dataflow and Telecommunications Core Programme Occasional Paper, 8.
Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
ISO (1998). ISO 9241-11: Guidance on Usability. Retrieved December 24, 2012, from: http://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/acsd/vt09/ISO9241part11.pdf.
Jeng, J. (2005). What Is Usability in the Context of the Digital Library and How Can It Be Measured? Information Technology and Libraries, 24(2), 47-56.
Javier, F., & Marco, G. (2011). Libraries in the digital ecology: reflections and trends. The Electronic Library, 29(1), 105-120.
Jokela, T., Iivari,N, Matero,J. & Karukka, M. (2003). The Standard of User-Centered Design and the Standard Definition of Usability: Analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 53-60.
Kyrillidou, M. and Giersch, S. (2005). Developing the DigiQUAL Protocol for Digital Library Evaluation. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 172-173.
Leavitt, H. J. and Whisler, T. L., (1958). Management in the 1980’s. Harvard Business Review, 41-48.
Lesk, M. (1997). Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes, and Bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Lincoln, Y. S., Cook, C & Kyrillidou, M. (2004). Evaluating the NSF National Science Digital Library Collections: Categories and Themes from MERLOT and DLESE. Paper resented at the MERLOT International Conference, Costa Mesa, California, 1-22.
Lorenz, M. (2011). Information Ecology of a University Department. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Malhotra, Y. (2002). Information Ecology and Knowledge Management: Toward Knowledge Ecology for Hyper turbulent Organizational Environments. Encyclopedia of Life Support System (EOLSS)
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and Fall of Strategic Planning.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H. & Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing Understanding in Biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 118-125.
Moran, B. B. (2011). Adaptation, Evolution, or Extinction: Libraries and the New Information Ecosystem. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Naghshineh, N. & Zardary, S. (2011). Information ecology as a mind tool for repurposing of educational social networks. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3640-3643.
Nardi, B. A., O’Day, V. (1999). Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
Nielsen, J. (1990). The art of navigating through hypertext. Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 296.
Nielsen, J. (1995). Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from:
http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge London: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D. & Musonda, D. (1991). A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning. American Education Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153.
Patten, B. C. (1978). Systems approach to the concept of environment. Ohio Journal of Science, 78, 206-222.
Peter F. Drucker (1988). The Coming of the New Organization. Harvard Business Revier, 66, 45-53.
Probst, L. K. (1996). Libraries in an Environment of Change: Changing Roles, Responsibilities, and Perception in the Information Age. Journal of Library Administration, 22(2-3), 7-20.
Rainie, L., Zickuhr, K., and Duggan, M. (2012). Mobile Connections to Libraries. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from:
http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2012/12/31/mobile-connections-to-libraries/.
Rowlands, I. & Bawden, D. (1999). Digital Libraries: A Conceptual Framework. Libri, 49, 192-202.
Saracevic, T. & Covi, L. (2000). Challenges for Digital Library Evaluation. Proceedings of The Annual Meeting-American Society for Information Science, 37, 341-350.
Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital library evaluation: Toward an evolution of concepts. Library Trends, 49, 350–369.
Saracevic, T. (2004). Evaluation of digital libraries: An Overview. DELOS Workshop on the Evaluation of Digital Libraries.
Seffah A., Donyaee M., Kline R. B., & Padda H. K. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Control, 14(2), 159-178.
Staggers, N. (2000). Usability Concept and Clinical Computing. In M. J. Ball, K. J. Hannah, S. K. Newbold, & J. V. Douglas, Nursing Informatic, 95-109.
Staley, D. J. (2012). Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians: Scenarios for the Future of the Book. Association of College and Research Libraries.
Steinerová, J. (2010). Ecological dimensions of information literacy. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 15(1), 1-10. Retrieved February 21, 2013, from: http://InformationR.net/ir/15-4/colis719.html.
Steinerová, J. (2010). Information products in the electronic environment: from users´ experience to information ecology.
Steinerová, J. (2010). Users´ relevance behavior and information ecology for digital libraries. European Library Automation Group (ELAG), 11.
Steinerová, J. (2011). Information Ecology of the Academic Information Environment in Slovakia. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Steinerová, J. (2012). Information Ecology: Emerging Framework for Digital Scholarship. Libraries in the Digital Age, 12, 1-9.
Stepp, J. R. (1999). Prospectus for Information Ecology. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 3, 39-73.
Stepp, J. R., Jones, E. C., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., Casagrande, D., and Zarger, R. K. (2003). Remarkable properties of human ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 7(3).
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA.
Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information (2007). Preserving Digital Information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Commission on Preservation and Access, 11.
Vitousek, P. M., and Mooney, H. A. (1997). Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science, 277, 494-499.
Walsh, T. (2011). Unlocking the Gates: How and Why Leading Universities are Opening Up Access to Their Courses. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Xie, H. (2006). Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Criteria and problems from users’ perspectives. Library and information Science Research, 28, 433–452.
Xie, H. I. (2008). Users' evaluation of digital libraries (DLs): Their uses, their criteria, and their assessment. Information Processing and Management, 44(3), 1346-1373.