簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 杜依倩
Tu, Yi-Chien
論文名稱: 大學教師參與MOOCs之科技需求及問題研究
A Study of the Technical Needs and Problems of University Faculties’ Participation in MOOCs
指導教授: 陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 圖書資訊學研究所
Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 225
中文關鍵詞: 大規模開放式線上課程科技融入學科教學知識數位學習科技需求
英文關鍵詞: Massive Open Online Courses(MOOCs), Technology Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TPCK), digital learning, technology needs
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:262下載:81
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著數位學習工具及開放式教育資源的持續演進下,大規模開放式線上課程(Massive Open Online Courses, MOOCs)隨之應運而生,國內外各大學亦群起投入心力及資源進行推展。而相關文獻顯示,教師對於參與MOOCs仍感憂心及卻步,主要源於MOOCs之教學模式及課程內容呈現方式有別於實體教學,而MOOCs相關文獻卻較少著墨於教師其參與MOOCs所需知能或需求等層面,故相關單位實難給予教師適切之支援。本研究旨探討我國大學教師參與MOOCs之科技需求及問題,包含:參與動機與歷程、教師TPCK之應用情形、各面向之科技需求,同時了解教師參與過程中面臨之問題及所需支援。依據以上研究目的,本研究主要利用半結構式訪談法,訪談10位國內曾參與MOOCs之大學教師。
    研究結果顯示:教師參與MOOCs主要動機為受到邀請、樂於嘗試新型態教學以及作為翻轉教室教學之執行基礎。而教師參與MOOCs主要共通之歷程則包括:製作課程分析及選擇、教學素材蒐集及確認、課程內容設計及製作、課程錄製環境設備建置安排、課程影片錄製、課程後製及剪輯以及課程組織管理等階段。另一方面,教師參與MOOCs教學過程中之TPCK應用情形特性主要為:能運用基礎簡報工具或相關軟體,將教材內容轉化為適合MOOCs教學環境之使用、著力於教材內容之互動性及圖像解說。此外,教師在設計適宜MOOCs之教學策略,以及課程內容精緻化方面較需要獲得支援。
    教師參與MOOCs之科技需求主要著重於設備工具、教育講習、動畫及互動性技術支援、課程平台功能提升等四面向。而教師參與MOOCs所面臨問題主要包含:MOOCs特性所帶來之教學限制、教學內容設計及製作耗時、部分課程討論區使用率低落、經費運用僵化等四面向,而教師表示所需支援還包含:人力及經費、設備及技術、教學講習、學分折免等面向。

    With the continuing evolution of digital learning tools and open educational resources, and the universities of all over the world, rallied into promoting massive open online courses (Massive Open Online Courses, MOOCs) . However, literature reveals that teachers still feel worried and discouraged about participating MOOCs. The foremost reason is that teaching model of MOOCs is different from tranditional teaching, while the literature about MOOCs but less dwell on teacher knowledge and skills required for their participation in MOOCs or demand level. The purpose of this study is to explore the current situation of university teachers’ participation, techonology needs, problems, and to understand university teachers’ expectation on improvements in MOOCs. In this study, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which based on the architecture of Technology Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TPCK), and interviewed with 10 proffessor who have been participated in MOOCs.
    The finding of this study includes that the main motivations for teachers to participate in MOOCs are invited, willing to try new types of teaching and classroom teaching as a flip executive foundation. The teachers' participation in MOOCs mainly in common course include thar the production and selection of courses, teaching materials collection and validation, course content design and production, environmental equipment to build the course record schedule, course video recording, editing and post-course system and the organization and management courses phases. On the other hand, TPCK application scenarios characteristics of teachers involved in the teaching process of MOOCs mainly: able to use basic presentation tool or related software, the teaching materials suitable for use MOOCs into the teaching environment, focus on interactivity and image interpretation for the content of textbooks . In addition, teachers in the design of suitable MOOCs of teaching strategies and curriculum content areas refined than the need to get support. The
    The technology needs of the teachers who participated in MOOCs includes equipment tools, educational workshops, animation and interactive technical support, and enhancing platform capabilities. The problems faced by teachers mainly includes that the restrictions of teaching result from MOOCs, the content of design and production is time-consuming, course discussion area utilization is low, and the use of rigid funding. Teachers’ expectation on MOOCs include that human and funding support, equipment and technology, teaching workshops, and the measure of credit fold free.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 9 第三節 研究範圍及限制 10 第四節 名詞解釋 11 第二章 文獻探討 13 第一節 數位學習型態的改變 13 第二節 大規模開放式線上課程 20 第三節 數位時代教師應具之知能 50 第三章 研究方法 72 第一節 研究設計 72 第二節 研究對象 75 第三節 資料蒐集與分析 76 第四節 研究流程 81 第四章 研究結果分析 82 第一節 大學教師參與MOOCs之動機及歷程 82 第二節 大學教師參與MOOCs之TPCK應用情形 100 第三節 大學教師參與MOOCs教學之科技需求 153 第四節 教師參與MOOCs之問題及所需支援 174 第五章 結論與建議 192 第一節 結論 192 第二節 建議 206 第三節 未來研究方向建議 208 參考文獻 210 附錄一 訪談邀請函 210 附錄二 訪談大綱 210 附錄三 科技工具使用檢核表 210

    中文部分
    王敏娟、賀防(2006)。學習者的文化因素對投入性線上學習的影響。中國遠端教育,12,16-21。
    王梅玲(2012)。數位課程教學法模式與應用:「知識組織與資訊取用課程」實例探討。大學圖書館,17(1),1-21。
    王煒(2008)。英國ICT應用于學科教學的教師能力標準概覽及啟示。中國信息技術教育,4,9-10。
    何昭儒(2010)。幼教老師科技融入學科教學知識發展與師資培育課程教師之教育科技學習楷模示範之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    林祖強(2012)。職前生物教師資訊科技融入學科教學知識(TPCK)發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    林進材(2004)。教學原理。臺北:五南。
    崔英玉、曲飛、高亞杰(2008)。韓國教師ICT應用能力標準參考與借鑒。中國信息技術教育,4,13-15。
    張添洲(2000)。教材教法-發展與革新。臺北市:五南圖書。
    張湄鈴(2011)。發展一份量表評估國小自然科教師的科技學科教學知識。中原大學教育研究所學位論文(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
    教育部(2012)。教育部遠距教學交流認證。民102年12月18日,取自:http://ace.moe.edu.tw/b02_2.php
    教育部(2013)。迎接數位化學習時代─教育部規劃全面性的數位學習推動計畫。民103年1月3日,取自:http://www.edu.tw/news1/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=18104&Index=&WID=3ee9c9ee-f44e-44f0-a431-c300341d9f77
    徐敏珠、楊建民(2006)。我國高等教育之數位學習發展策略分析。教育學刊,26,191-214。
    施文玲(2006)。教師導入數位化教學之理論模式。生活科技教育, 39(6),30-36。
    施文玲(2007)。以學習理論為基礎的數位化教學策略。生活科技教育月刊, 40(2),32-41。
    國立交通大學開放式課程。民102年12月13日。取自:http://ocw.nctu.edu.tw/
    陳年興、楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習理論與實務。臺北市:博碩文化公司。
    陳志銘(2009)。創新數位學習模式與教學應用。臺北市:文華圖書。
    陳宜旻(2011)。TPCK發展歷程之研究:以IWB融入國小國語科教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮市。
    陳茹玲(2011)國小自然科教師發展科技學科教學知識 之個案研究—以 [一起來賞月] 單元為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
    楊婷婷(2012)。國小數理教師有無使用電子白板與其TPACK之調查研究-以桃園縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
    磨課師分項計畫辦公室(2014)。民103年7月31日。取自:http://taiwanmooc.org/
    臺灣開放式課程連盟(TOCWC)。民103年1月5日。取自:http://www.tocwc.org.tw/portal_g7.php?button_num=g7
    謝雅青(2007)。失業勞工數位學習成效評估之研究—以輔助參加提升數位能力研習計畫者為對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    劉芷源(2010)。運用教師社群發展國小數學教師TPCK之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。
    劉怡甫(2010)。從促進教師發展「學科科技融入教學知識」能力之觀點看PCK→TPCK→ICT-TPCK的思維脈絡。輔仁大學深耕教與學電子報,23。民103年1月15日。取自:http://www.teachers.fju.edu.tw/epapers/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=291&Itemid=294
    劉怡甫(2013)。與全球十萬人作同學:談MOOC現況及其發展。評鑑雙月刊,(42)。
    劉譬儀(2003)。國內企業e-Learning實施現況之分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    樊文強(2012)。基於關聯主義的大規模網路開放課程(MOOC)及其學習支持。Journal of Distance Education,3。
    顏春煌(2007)。漫談數位學習的理論。空中大學訊,10,91-96。
    顧小清(2008)。國際化視野中的教師教育技術能力標準。中國信息技術教育,4,16-19。

    英文部分
    Anderson, T. & Dron , J. (2011) Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
    Aguaded Gómez, J. Ignacio(2013). The MOOC Revolution: A new form of education from the technological paradigm? Comunicar, 21(41), 7-8.
    Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2008). TPCK in pre-service teacher education: Preparing primary education students to teach with technology. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New York City.
    Angeli, C., &; Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technologicalpedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers &Education, 52(1), 154-168.
    Archambault, L., &; Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
    Babson Survey Research Group (2011). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States, Retrieved from :http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012
    Bansal, N. (2013). Adaptive Recommendation System for MOOC (Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay).
    Berkley Resource Center of online learning(2013). Overview: Creating a MOOC . Retrieved from: http://online.berkeley.edu/overview-creating-MOOC-0
    Breslow, L. B., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOCs. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25.
    Carey, K. (2012), ‘Into the future with MOOCs’,
    Cheung, A. MOOCs–The Australian State of Play1. The Virtual University: Impact on Australian Accounting and Business Education, 103.
    Clark, L. H. & Starr, I. (1996). Secondary and middle school teaching method. Eaglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.
    Conrad, D. & McGreal, R. (2012). Flexible paths to assessment for OER learners: A comparative study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2(0). Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-12
    Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-44.
    Dalgarno, N., & Colgan, L. (2007). Supporting novice elementary mathematics teachers’ induction in professional communities and providing innovative forms of pedagogical content knowledge development through information and communication technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1051-1065.
    DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice. Teachers College Press, New York.
    DeBoer, J., Seaton, D., Stump, G. S. & Breslow, L. (2013). Diversity in MOOC Students’ Backgrounds and Behaviors in Relationship to Performance in 6.002 x. In Proceedings of the Sixth Learning International Networks Consortium Conference.
    Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
    Epelboin, Y. (2013). Report on MOOC: a European view experience in American universities. Doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia.
    Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).
    Friesen, N. (2009). Open source resources in education: Opportunities and challenges. Open Source Business Resource.
    Frances Bell(2011). Connectivism : Its Place in Theory-Informed Research and Innovation in Technology-Enabled Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118.
    Grover, S., Franz, P., Schneider, E., & Pea, R. (2013). The MOOC as Distributed Intelligence: Dimensions of a Framework for the Design and Evaluation of MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 16-19).
    Heiner, M., Schneckenberg, D., & Wildt, J. (2004). Online pedagogy - Innovative teaching and learning strategies in ICT-environments. Background Paper of the cEVU working group Online Pedagogy.
    Inge de Waard (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to Understand Chaos, Emergence, and Complexity in Education. The international review of research open and distance learning, 12(7), 94-115.
    New, J. (2013, January 22). Georgia State U. to Grant Course Credit for MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/
    Young, Jeffrey R. (2013, January 15). California State U. Will Experiment With Offering Credit for MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from:
    http://chronicle.com/
    Johnstone, S. M., & Poulin, R. (2002). What is OpenCourseWare and why does it matter? Change, 34(4), 48-50.
    Knox, J., Bayne, S., MacLeod, H., Ross, J., & Sinclair, C. (2012). MOOC Pedagogy: the challenges of developing for Coursera. ALT Online Newsletter, 28(8), 2012
    Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
    Koehler, M. J., &; Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
    Koehler M. J., Mishra, P., &; Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers &; Education, 49(3), 740-762.
    Kolowich Steve (2013, February 18). Professor Leaves a MOOC in Mid-Course in Dispute Over Teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from:http://chronicle.com/
    Kolowich Steve (2013, April 29). Why Some Colleges Are Saying No to MOOC Deals, at Least for Now. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from:http://chronicle.com/
    Kolowich Steve (2013, May 2). Why Professors at San Jose State Won't Use a Harvard Professor's MOOC? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from:http://chronicle.com/
    Kolowich Steve (2013). How Will MOOCs Make Money?. Retrieved from:
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/11/experts-speculate-possible-business-models-MOOC-providers
    Ku, H., & Lohr, L. L. (2003). A case study of Chinese students’ attitude toward their first online learning experience. Education Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 94-102.
    Lefrancois, G. R.(1999). Psychology for teaching. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
    Levy, D. (2011). Lessons learned from participating in a connectivist massive online open course (MOOC). In Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2011: Learning in the technological era (pp. 31-36).
    Liau, Yun qing. (2012). E-learning going mobile in Asia. Zdnet. Retrieved from: http://www.zdnet.com/e-learning-going-mobile-in-asia-7000000191/
    Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-h., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). Cultural Differences in Online Learning: International Student Perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 177-188.
    Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S., & Adams, A. (2013). The impact and reach of MOOCs: a developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers, (33).
    McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice.online learning experience. Education Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 94-102.
    Ministry of Education Taiwan” Comparison of University Tuition and Fees between Taiwan and Other Nations”. Retrieved from:
    http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7517&ctNode=505&mp=1
    Mishra, P., &; Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, New York) (pp. 1-16).
    Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2010). The 7 trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology.
    NETS Project (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers (2nd ed.).Washington, DC, United States: ISTE.
    Pope, J. (2013). Mountain View's Coursera strikes huge online-education deal with state university systems. San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved from: http://www.mercurynews.com/
    Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5(1), 67-73.
    Sadler, D. (2012), How Australian universities can play in the MOOCs market. Retrieved from: http://theconversation.edu.au/how-australian-universities-can-play-in-the-MOOCmarket-973
    Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., &; Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
    Siemens, G. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning: Concepts, discourses and examples. Munster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag.
    Siemens, G.(2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.
    Retrieved from: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.
    Smith, B. O.(1987). Definition of teaching. In M.J. Dunkin(Ed), The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (p.11-14). New York: Pergamon.
    Stacey, P. (2013). The Pedagogy Of MOOCs. Retrieved from:
    http://edtechfrontier.com/2013/05/11/the-pedagogy-of-MOOCs/http://edtechfrontier.com/2013/05/11/the-pedagogy-of-MOOCs/
    Straumsheim, C. (2013). Open-Source MOOCs. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/09/11/edx-and-google-develop-open-source-mooc-platform
    Tamar, L. (2013). Public Universities to Offer Free Online Classes for Credit. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/23/education/public-universities-to-offer-free-online-classes-for-credit.html?smid=tw-share&_r=2&
    The Marqutette Tribune, 2013, Retrieved from: http://marquettetribune.org/2013/09/05/viewpoints/editorial-MOOC-offer-promising-new-model-but-uses-are-limited/
    Voss, B. D. (2013). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): A primer for university and college board members. Retrived from http://agb. org/sites/agb. org/files/report_2013_MOOCs. pdf.
    Young, Jeffrey R. (2013). Will MOOCs Change the Way Professors Handle the Classroom? Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/
    Yuan, L., Powell, S., & CETIS, J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Cetis White Paper.
    Zhang, J. (2007). A cultural look at information and communication technologies in Eastern education. Education Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 301-314.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE