研究生: |
簡婉如 Wan-Ju Chien |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
分析真實教室環境中多媒體教材之閱讀歷程 An Eye Tracking study of Learning with the Multimedia Presentation in a Real Classroom |
指導教授: |
楊芳瑩
Yang, Fang-Ying |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 124 |
中文關鍵詞: | 圖文閱讀 、多媒體教學環境 、眼球追蹤 、閱讀歷程 |
英文關鍵詞: | Text and picture reading, Multimedia learning enveriment, Eye movements, Reading comprehension |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:191 下載:20 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
由於多媒體工具與網際網路蓬勃發展,使得知識的擷取管道變得更為便利,不論是教師的教學教材或評量工具的選擇都更加多元化,然而,多數的多媒體學習研究於實驗室中進行,對於學生如何閱讀課室中多媒體圖文,是否與實驗室結果一致?且圖文閱讀歷程又如何與先備知識交互作用?這些問題仍有待進一步的釐清。
本研究主要是透過「眼球追蹤」方法,紀錄受試者在真實教室環境中,閱讀多媒體恐龍教學教材時的視覺注意歷程。研究方法主要是將恐龍投影片主要分為標題、文字、圖片三類區域,然後利用「眼球追蹤儀」紀錄學生於這些區域的視覺注意歷程,並進一步比較分析區域間的視覺注意力之分配情況,以及視覺注意力與學生背景之關係。眼動資料的分析指標包括:凝視整頁區域、標題區域、文字區域及圖片區域的「全凝視時間」(Total fixation duration)、「平均凝視時間」(Average fixation duration)、「區域內分配時間百分比」(Percent time spent in zone)等。本研究使用SPSS 19 軟體搭配依據理解測驗結果的分組,進行描述性統計、同質性檢定與單因子變異數分析(ANOVA)。
結果發現,地科相關背景學生在文字部份所花費的凝視時間普遍比圖片部份高。同時也具有較多的圖文交互閱讀次數。相較於地科背景學生,非地科背景學生置於圖片的視覺注意力較高,也較易受圖片線索的影響而增加閱讀注意力。
Because of the blooming multimedia and internet, teaching and learning materials have become more and more diverse. For educators, how students learn with and acquire from the multimedia materials is always a focue of discussion. However, most of the studies about multimedia learning have progressed under the laboratory environments not in the real classrooms. Consequently, to promote multimedia learning, weather the results of students’ learning with multimedia materials in the laboratory settings would be the same as in the real classroom needs to be examined thoroughly.
This study employed the eye-tracking method to examine university students’ eye movement patterns when they were asked to view a multimedia presentation on the topic of “dinosaur” in a real classroom. The presentation projected on a big screen for the study consisted of 12 different text-picture PowerPoint (PPT) slides. To analyze students’ eye movement patterns, each PPT slide was further divided into three regions of interest (ROIs) including title, text, and picture ROIs. The eye movement data in these ROIs were recorded by the FaceLAB eye tracker. The eye movement measures examined in the study include: total fixation duration, average fixation duration, and percent time spent in zone. Statistc analyses, such as descriptive statistics, and one way ANOVA with homogeneity test were conducted. Correlations between subjects’ attention distribution and their background knowledge were also compared. The analyses on the eye movement data revealed the allocations of students’ visual attention distirbutions, the time needed to process various information, and differences in the reading of different PPT slides.
英文部份
Balluerka, N. (1995). The influence of instructions, outlines, and illustrations on the comprehension and recall of scientific texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(3), 369-375.
Bjo¨rn B. de Koning , Huib K. Tabbers , Remy M.J.P. Rikersa, Fred Paas (2010)Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction 20
Carroll, P. J., Young, J. R., & Guertin, M. S. (1992). Visual analysis of cartoons: A view fromthe far side. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception andreading (pp. 444–461). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Clark, R. C., Lyons, C. (2004).Graphics for learning: proven guidelines for planning,designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. (2nd ed.). London Springer.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developin
d’Ydewalle, G., & Gielen, I. (1992). Attention allocation with overlapping sound, image, andtext. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading(pp. 415–427). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Findlay, J. M.. & Gilchrist, I. D. (1998). Eye guidance and visual search.In G. Underwood, (Ed). Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. (pp. 295-312). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1989). Understanding machines from text and diagrams. In H.
Hegarty, M. (1992). The mechanics of comprehension and comprehension of mechanics.In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading(pp. 428–443). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hoffman, J. E., Subramaniam, B. (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and psychophysics, 57(6), 787-795
Hannus, M., & Hyona, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123.
Tabbers, H. K., Paas, F., Lankford, C., Martens, R. L., & Merrie¨nboer, J.G. (2008).Chapter 9 Studying Eye Movements in Multimedia Learning Multimedia learning, P169-183
Hyo¨na¨. J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning.
Learning and Instruction, 20, 172-176
Kean, M., & Lambert, A. (2003). Orienting of visual attention based on peripheral information. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp.27-47). Amsterdam:North-Holland
Krauzlis, R. J. (2005). The control of voluntary eye movements: new perspectives. The Neuroscientist, 11, 124-137.
Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movementsin the control of activeties of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311-1328.
Land, M. F. (2007). Fixation strategies during active behavior: a brief history. In: R.P.G.van Gompel, M.H. Fischer, W.S. Murray and R.L. Hill, (Eds.), Eye movements: Awindow on mind and brain, (pp. 75-98). Oxford: Elsevier.
Mason, L.;Tornatora, M.C., Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60, 95-109.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484-490.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helpingstudents build connections between word and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 444-452.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims. V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning.Education Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 167-171.
Miller, L. M. S. (2003). The effects of age and domain knowledge on text processing. Journals of Gerontology Series B-psychological Science and Social Sciences, 58, 217-223..
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
Schuster, D. A.; & Carlsen, W. S. (2009). Scientists' Teaching Orientations in the Context of Teacher Professional Development. Science Education, 93(4), 635-655
Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-tracking students’ attention to PowerPoint photographs in a science education setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(4), 509-520.
Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computers & Education ,53 , 445–453.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK:
Paivio, A., & Clark, J. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-170.
Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 3–21). New York: Elsevier Science.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., Rotello, C. M., Stewart, A. J., Keir, J., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Integrating text and pictorial information: Eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 219–226.
Reiber, L. P. (1994). Computer, Graphics & Learning. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K.(1998).Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1A), 31-40.
Schuster, D. A.; & Carlsen, W. S. (2009). Scientists' Teaching Orientations in the Context of Teacher Professional Development. Science Education, 93(4): 635-655.
中文部份
伊彬、林演慶(2006)。視覺影像處理之眼球運動相關研究探討。設計學報,11,63-69。
吳瑞源、吳慧敏 (2007)。動畫教材之學習者控制播放模式與多媒體組合形式對學習成效與學習時間影響之研究。師大學報,53,第一期科學教育類。
邱月玲(2001)。不同的科學圖文配置對學生閱讀學習的影響-以「月相概念」為例。國立臺中師範學院自然科學教育學研究所碩士論文。
邱惠芬(2003)。多媒體介面對國小學童學習動機、學習成就及學習保留的影響。國立屏東師範學院教育。
柯重吉(2005)。國小教師運用多媒體電腦輔助教學融入因數倍數教學之研究。嘉義大學教育科技研究所。
唐大崙、莊賢智(2005)。由眼球追蹤法探索電子報版面中圖片位置對注意力分佈之影響。廣告學研究,24,89-104。
唐大崙、張文瑜 (2007)。利用眼球追蹤法探索傳播研究。中華傳播學刊,12(5):165-211。
陳秀如(2008)。多媒體教學策略對外籍生華語文學習成效、認知負荷與學習動機之影響-以漢字筆畫書寫及義類辨識為例。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系研究所碩士論文。
陳柏裕(2010) 。以眼動探討多媒體呈現方式及先備知識對學生學習成效與認知負荷的影響。國立嘉義大學。
張格瑜(2007)。運用眼動儀探討不同學科背景大學生之細胞擴散和滲透作用的心智表徵建構。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡介立、顏妙璇、汪勁安 (2005)。眼球移動測量及在中文閱讀研究之應用。應用心理學,28,91-104。
蔡金成(2007)。運用眼球追蹤法探討國小科學與非科學教師在電流動畫中的注意力分佈與其概念之研究。
蘇芳如(2004)。國中地理科電化教學資源的設計與應用--以透明投影片(T.P.)及簡報式課程軟體(Microsoft PowerPoint)之設計與教學為例。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。