簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐以庭
Hsu, Yi-Ting
論文名稱: 不當督導與部屬反應:探討不當督導歸因的調節效果
Subordinates’ Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Subordinates’ Attributions for Abusive Supervision
指導教授: 謝慧賢
Hsieh, Hui-Hsien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 不當督導歸因風格工作敬業歸因理論資源保存理論
英文關鍵詞: Abusive Supervision, Attribution Style, job engagement, Attribution Theory, Conservation of Resource Theory
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000585
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:212下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來探討不當督導的研究甚多,過往文獻指出不當督導對員工的流動率有正向影響,當不當督導的程度越高,員工的離職率越高。過高的員工流動率會對組織效能產生不良影響。惟,少數研究發現在不同條件與情境下員工對於不當督導較不易出現負向反應,甚至會有正向的結果。本研究目的有二,一在於檢視與驗證工作敬業在不當督導與離職意圖兩者關係間所扮演之中介角色;一在於探討員工對於不當督導的內、外部歸因是否會增強或削弱不當督導對於工作敬業與後續的離職意圖之影響。本研究採兩階段問卷調查,研究對象為第一類事業從業人員,實際有效樣本258份。研究結果顯示員工工作敬業對不當督導與員工離職意圖具有中介效果,且當員工對於不當督導進行高度外部歸因時會增強不當督導對員工工作敬業的負向影響,進而導致員工離職意向上升。

    In recent years, there have been many studies on abusive supervision (AS), and some have pointed out that AS has positive effect on employee turnover. High employee turnover will have an adverse effect on organizational effectiveness. A few studies pointed out that under different conditions, employees are less likely to have negative reactions to AS, and even have positive results. Two purpose of this study. First, examine the role of work engagement (WE) in the relationship between AS and intentions to quit (IQ). Second, explore whether internal and external attributions of AS will strengthen or weaken the impact of AS on WE and IQ. This study adopts a two-stage questionnaire survey. The research object was the first type of business workers, and 258 valid samples as used. The results show that WE mediate on AS and IQ. When employees have high degree of external attribution to AS, the negative impact of AS on WE will be enhanced, which will lead to increase in IQ.

    誌 謝 i 中文摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目 錄 V 表 次 VIII 圖 次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 不當督導 5 第二節 不當督導與工作敬業 7 第三節 工作敬業之中介效果 9 第四節 歸因風格 11 第五節 不當督導與歸因風格 14 第六節 不當督導內部歸因的調節效果 16 第七節 不當督導外部歸因的調節效果 18 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究架構與假設 20 第二節 研究對象與抽樣方式 22 第三節 測量工具 24 一、不當督導 24 二、離職意向 24 三、工作敬業 25 四、不當督導之歸因 25 五、控制變項 26 第四節 分析方法 28 一、描述性統計分析 28 二、相關分析 28 三、信度分析 28 四、驗證性因素分析 29 五、迴歸分析 29 第四章 結果 31 第一節 敘述性統計 31 第二節 相關分析 32 第三節 驗證性因素分析 34 第四節 假設驗證 38 第五章 結論與建議 44 第一節 研究討論 44 第二節 管理意涵 47 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 49 一、研究限制 49 二、未來研究建議 49 參考文獻 51 一、中文部分 51 二、外文部分 51

    吳宗祐(2008)由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果。中華心理學刊,50(2),201-221。
    胡昌亞、鄭瑩妮(2014)。不當督導研究回顧與前瞻。中華心理學刊,56(2),191-214。
    高瑞堂、張婉菁(2017)。以角色理論觀點探討影響高科技產業員工離職傾向之因素。企業管理學報,115,1-26。
    許境頤、江彧慈(2013)。「罵」有用嗎?以資源保存理論看不當督導對部屬的影響。人力資源管理學報,13(1),81-104。
    梁欣光、陳彥君(2018)。揮之不去:以反芻思考認知的觀點連結不當督導與部屬長期負向情感狀態。人力資源管理學報,18(1),35-56。
    Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
    Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.
    Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
    Ashkanasy, N. M. (1989). Causal attribution and supervisors’ response to subordinate performance: The Green and Mitchell model revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 309–330.
    Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 20(4), 265-269.
    Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723-752.
    Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 629.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.
    Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work and Stress, 25, 309–320.
    Breaux, D. M., Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Folger, R. G. (2010). An attributional analysis of employees’ responses to abusive supervision. The “Dark” Side of Management, 69-92.
    Brown, S. P. (1996). A Meta-Analysis and Review of Organizational Research on Job Involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2): 235-255.
    Buckingham, M., & Coffman, C. (1999). First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Bufquin, D., DiPietro, R., Orlowski, M., & Partlow, C. (2017). The influence of restaurant co-workers’ perceived warmth and competence on employees’ turnover intentions: The mediating role of job attitudes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 13-22.
    Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011). Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 389-398.
    Burton, J. P., Taylor, S. G., & Barber, L. K. (2014). Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 871-891.
    Chi, S.-C. S., & Liang, S. G. (2013). When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 125-137.
    Chiu, S. F., & Tsai, M. C. (2006). Relationships among burnout, job involvement, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 140(6), 517-530.
    Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 993-1005.
    Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331-351.
    Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., Connelly, C. E., Barling, J., & Hoption, C. (2006). Workplace aggression in teenage part-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 987-997.
    Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
    Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in Organizational Justice, 1, 1-55.
    Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marin, A., Carrillo, L., Coates, M. L., Burke, B., et al. (2007). The organization of work: Implications for injury and illness among immigrant Latino poultry-processing workers. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, 62, 19-26.
    Hackman, J.R. and G. R. Oldham (1980). Work reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Haivas, S., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). Volunteer engagement and intention to quit from a self‐determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(9), 1869-1880.
    Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 252-263.
    Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 264-280.
    Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
    Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 874–888.
    Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
    Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A.(2001). Stress and burnout in the workplace R. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 41-60), New York: Dekker.
    Jian, Z., Kwan, H.K., Qiu, Q., Liu, Z.Q., Yim, F.H.K., 2012. Abusive supervision and frontline employees’ service performance. Serv. Ind. J. 32 (5), 683–698.
    Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
    Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9, 341-357.
    Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15, 192–238. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    Lau, M. Y. (2017). Anger or Shame? The Impacts of Abusive Supervision on Subordinate’s Reactional Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. (Doctoral dissertation or master's thesis). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z8ktjb
    Lyu, Y., Zhu, H., Zhong, H. J., & Hu, L. (2016). Abusive supervision and customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of hostile attribution bias and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 69-80.
    Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965.
    Martinko, M. J. (2004). Parting thoughts: Current issues and future directions. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: Theoretical and empirical contributions (pp. 297–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
    Martinko, M. J., & Thomson, N. F. (1998). A synthesis and extension of the Weiner and Kelley attribution models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 271–284.
    Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., Ford, R., & Gundlach, M. J. (2004). Dues paying: A theoretical explication and conceptual model. Journal of Management, 30, 49–69.
    Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Douglas, S. C. (2007). The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 561–585.
    Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 751-764.
    Martinko, M. J., Sikora, D., & Harvey, P. (2012). The relationships between attribution styles, LMX, and perceptions of abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(4), 397-406.
    Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1984). Burnout in organizational settings. Applied Social Psychology Annual.
    Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
    May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.
    Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159-1168.
    Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1148-1170.
    Ogunfowora, B. (2013). When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1105-1123.
    Phillips, J. D. (1990). The price tag on turnover. Personnel Journal, 12:58-61.
    Priesemuth, M. (2013). Stand up and speak up: Employees’ prosocial reactions to observed abusive supervision. Business and Society, 52, 649-665.
    Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 289-298.
    Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245-259.
    Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137-152.
    Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
    Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
    Schilling, J., & Schyns, B. (2015). The causes and consequences of bad leadership.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
    Takase, M., Teraoka, S., & Kousuke, Y. (2015). Investigating the adequacy of the Competence‐Turnover Intention Model: how does nursing competence affect nurses’ turnover intention?. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(5-6), 805-816.
    Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.
    Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261-289.
    Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/ dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 156-167.
    Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974.
    Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers' organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455.
    Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates' psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169-1180.
    Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009- 1031.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van den Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self‐determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 251-277.
    Weiner, B. (1985a). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
    Weiner, B. (1985b). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84.
    Whitman, M. V., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Holmes, O. (2014). Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 38-53.
    Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 531-543.
    Yalabik, Z. Y., Popaitoon, P., Chowne, J. A., & Rayton, B. A. (2013). Work engagement as a mediator between employee attitudes and outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(14), 2799-2823.
    Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068-1076.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/07/04
    QR CODE