簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張賁寗
Chang, Pi-Ning
論文名稱: 普特合作:學習區工作盒對發展遲緩幼兒IEP目標學習成效之研究
A Collaboration Between General-Special Educators: Effects of Using Structured Task Boxes in Learning Centers to Address IEP Objectives for Children with Developmental Delay
指導教授: 王慧婷
Wang, Hui-Ting
口試委員: 王慧婷
Wang, Hui-Ting
林佩蓉
Lin, Pei-Jung
柯秋雪
Ko, Chiou-Shiue
口試日期: 2022/05/31
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系碩士在職專班
Department of Special Education_Continuing Education Master's Program of Special Education
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 126
中文關鍵詞: 工作盒巡迴輔導教師發展遲緩幼兒結構化教學學前特教學習區
英文關鍵詞: children with developmentally delay, itinerant teachers, learning center, preschool special education, structured teaching, task boxes
研究方法: 單一受試研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201709
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:236下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 學前特殊需求學生以發展遲緩為主,並且大多安置於學前普通班,接受特教巡迴輔導服務。本研究目的為使巡輔師的服務時間以外,學生也能夠持續進行相關個別化教育計畫(IEP)目標練習,使用結構化工作盒以解決融合教育中落實IEP目標的困難。本研究採用單一受試跨行為多基線實驗研究法,選擇一位發展遲緩幼兒為研究對象,參考其相關IEP設定三個彼此獨立、難易度相當的工作盒目標,並加入研究對象的興趣設計工作盒,放置對應的學習區域,於班級每天都會進行的「學習區時間」操作,藉此探討發展遲緩幼兒於班級自然環境中操作工作盒的學習成效,並期許能進一步協助班級教師執行IEP目標。研究自變項為三個工作盒,依變項為工作盒介入後行為的改變,也就是目標達成百分率。研究結果發現,自變項工作盒的介入後,顯著提升了研究對象目標達成率也提升了練習的次數,亦有良好的維持效果及社會效度。雖然本研究並未直接針對IEP目標測量成效,然而普通班教師對於工作盒實施成效持正向態度,對於未來研究上,建議能具體針對巡迴輔導的普特合作再深入測量與探究;實務上則建議工作盒能有多層次設計,有利於全班混齡幼兒的差異化學習,並以漸進的方式,和班級教師合作。

    Preschoolers with special needs are often identified as developmentally delayed and are placed in general classes with special education itinerant services in Taiwan. With a view to solving the difficulties in implementing the objectives of individualized education program (IEP) in inclusive education, the purpose of this study is to use a structured task boxes that enables students to continue practicing relevant Individualized Education Program (IEP) objectives in addition to the support services of itinerant teachers. This study used a single case multiple baseline design across behaviors. A participant with developmental delay was chosen to be engaged with three task boxes, each boxes were referred to its IEP and set three independent goals of equal difficulty. The researcher placed the structured work boxes in the corresponding learning area, and asked the subject to operate them during the "learning area time" every day. In this way, the learning effect of children with developmental delay in operating the task boxes in the natural environment will be explored, and the instructor will be assisted in implementing the IEP objectives. The independent variable was the three task boxes, and the dependent variables were the behavior modification after the intervention of the three task boxes, which means the percentage of completion steps. The results showed that the intervention of the variable task boxes significantly increased the target achievement rate and promoted the number of trials of the participants, and even had good maintenance effects and social validity. Although this study did not directly measure the effectiveness of the IEP objectives, instructor has a positive attitude towards the effectiveness of the task box implementation. For further studies, more in-depth research should be conducted on the collaboration between the itinerant teachers and the general education teachers. In practice, it is recommended to have a multi-level design work boxes, and cooperate with class teachers in a progressive manner, which will be beneficial to the differentiated learning of mixed-aged class children.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究問題 5 第四節 名詞釋義 5 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 巡迴輔導服務 9 第二節 結構化教學的內涵與應用 21 第三節 學習區的內涵與應用 32 第三章 研究方法 41 第一節 研究方法 41 第二節 研究對象及場域 42 第三節 工作盒 48 第四節 依變項資料蒐集 62 第五節 研究步驟 67 第六節 研究信、效度 71 第七節 資料分析 75 第八節 研究倫理 78 第四章 結果與討論 81 第一節 工作盒設置能提升IEP教育目標達成率 81 第二節 於普通班級中使用工作盒具社會效度 87 第五章 綜合討論與建議 89 第一節 綜合討論 89 第二節 限制和建議 95 參考文獻 99 附錄一 工作盒目標練習次數記錄表暨觀察者間一致性信度紀錄表 111 附錄二 自變項過程信度檢核表研究者版本 117 附錄三 工作盒介入社會效度調查表 120 附錄四 視覺分析摘要表 124

    中文書目
    Horn, E. M., Palmer, S. B., Butera, G. D., Lieber, J. A. (2020):學前融合教育課程架構(盧明、劉學融,譯)。心理(原著出版於2016)
    Mesibov, G., Howley, M.(2010):自閉症學生的融合教育課程:運用結構化教學協助融合(楊宗仁、李惠蘭,譯)。心理。(原著出版於2003年)
    Sandall, S. R., Schwartz, I. S.(2008):學前融合教育課程建構模式(盧明、魏淑華、翁巧玲,譯)。心理。(原著出版於2002)
    王大延(2000):結構性教學對自閉症者之職業訓練成效之研究(NNSC 89-2413-H-133-009)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    王天苗(1995):嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗。教育部:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
    王天苗(2000):學前特教課程指引手冊。教育部:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
    王天苗(2002):發展遲緩幼兒在融合教育環境裏的學習。特殊教育研究學刊,23,1-23。
    王慧婷(2016):初級影片示範教學教導自閉症幼兒生活自理技能之研究:以洗手為例。特殊教育研究學刊,41(1),33-62。
    林天祐(2002):認識研究倫理。載於:研究論文與報告撰寫手冊(96-134頁)。台北市立師範學院學生輔導中心。
    林怡滿、林美玲、周芸頻、蔡淑君、洪慧英(2015):幼兒園課程變革之行動研究:從傳統到學習區。長庚科技學刊,22,53-70。
    林佩蓉(2021):幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表─2021版。教育部國民及學前教育署委託。
    林淑莉、胡心慈(2014):由教師執行之結構化個別工作系統訓練方案對特幼班兒童主動行為的影響。臺北市立大學學報,45(1),81-103。
    身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法(2013):中華民國一百零二年九月二日教育部臺教學(四)字第1020125519B號令修正發布第8~14條條文;並增訂第7-1條條文。
    李惠藺、蔡昆瀛(2009):融合教育下特殊教育課程設計之探討。國小特殊教育,47,39-50。
    特殊教育法(2019):中華民國一百零八年四月二十四日總統華總一義字第10800039361號令修正公布第14、26、47條條文;增訂第28-1條條文。
    特殊教育法施行細則(2020):中華民國一百零九年七月十七日教育部臺教學(四)字第1090096143B號令修正發布第4、9條條文。
    洪儷瑜(2014):【特殊教育法立法三十年專文】邁向融合教育之路-回顧特殊教育法立法三十年。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,21-31。
    胡慈恩、王慧婷(2019):在學前普通班運用「學前融合教育課程建構模式」提升發展遲緩幼兒溝通能力之實務分享。特殊教育季刊,153,27-34。
    秦麗花、顏瑩玫(2004):普教與特教老師以課程核心的合作模式之行動研究。特殊教育研究學刊,27,59-75。
    教育部(2017):幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。
    教育部(2021):中華民國特殊教育統計年報。
    張小芬(2006):特教巡迴輔導教師之工作現況與工作滿意度調查研究。特殊教育學報,24,57-84。
    鈕文英(2008):擁抱個別差異的新典範-融合教育。心理。
    鈕文英(2016):身心障礙者的正向行為支持(第二版)。心理。
    鈕文英、吳裕益(2019):單一個案研究法:設計與實施。心理。
    湯志民(2012):幼兒學習環境設計。五南。
    鄒啟蓉(2004):建構接納與支持的班級文化-學前融合班教師促進普通與發展遲緩幼兒互動及人際關係之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,27,19-38。
    蔡昆瀛(2017):巡迴輔導follow me:學前特殊教育巡迴輔導實務參考手冊。教育部國民及學前教育署。
    鄭嘉凌、徐珮娟(2019):實施社會技巧課程融入校訂社團活動之普特協同教學行動研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,108,55-68。
    謝中君(2018):發展遲緩兒幼兒園活動參與研究。特殊教育研究學刊,43(2),31-64。
    蘇文利、盧台華(2006):利用自然支援進行融合式班級合作諮詢模式之行動研究。特殊教育研究學刊,30,53-73。
    英文書目
    Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with Learning: Motivation, Affect and Cognition in Interest Processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405.
    Antia, S. D. (1999). The Roles of Special Educators and Classroom Teachers in an Inclusive School. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(3), 203-214.
    Barnette, J. J., & Wallis, A. (2005). The Missing Treatment Design Element. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 106-123.
    Bennett, K., Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2011). Effects of structured teaching on the behavior of young children with disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26(3), 143-152.
    Brown, M. S., Bergen, D., House, M., Hittle, J., & Dickson, T. (2000). An observational study: examining the relevance of developmentally appropriate practices, classroom adaptations, and parental participation in the context of an integrated preschool program. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(1), 51-56.
    Brownell, M. T., Griffin, C., Leko, M. M., & Stephens, J. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 235-249.
    Bryan, L. C., Gast, D. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(6), 553-567.
    Carnahan, C. R., Hume, K., Clarke, L., & Borders, C. (2009). Using structured work systems to promote independence and engagement for students with autism spectrum disorders. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41(4), 6-14.
    Compton, M. V., Appenzeller, M., Kemmery, M., & Gardiner-Walsh, S. (2015). Itinerant teachers’ perspectives of using collaborative practices in serving students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 160(3), 255-272.
    Cooper, A. (1981). Learning centers: what they are and aren’t. Academic Therapy, 16(5), 527-531.
    Day, B., & Drake, K. (1983). Early childhood education: curriculum organization and classroom management. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Dettmer, P., Thurston, L. P., & Dyck, N. (2005). Consultation, Collaboration, and Teamwork for Students with Special Needs. In Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 182-184).
    Dinnebeil, L. A., & McInerney, W. F. (2000). The Role of the “Tuesday Morning Teacher”. Young Exceptional Children, 4(1), 19-26.
    Dinnebeil, L. A., McInerney, W., & Fox, C., & Juchartz-Pendry, K. (1998). An analysis of the perceptions and characteristics of early childhood personnel regarding inclusion in community-based programs: Implications for training and preparation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 118–128.
    Dinnebeil, L. A., McInerney, W. F., & Hale, L. (2006). “Shadowing” itinerant ECSE teachers: a descriptive study of itinerant teacher activities. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(1), 41-52.
    Dinnebeil, L. A., McInerney, W. F., Roth, J., & Ramaswamy, V. (2001). Itinerant early childhood special education services: service delivery in one state. Journal of Early Intervention, 24(1), 35–44.
    Dinnebeil, L. A., Pretti-Frontczak, K., & McInerney, W. (2009). A Consultative Itinerant Approach to Service Delivery: Considerations for the Early Childhood Community. Language, Speech, And Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 435-445.
    Foster, S., & Cue, K. (2009). Roles and Responsibilities of Itinerant Specialist Teachers of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(5), 435-449.
    Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 69-86.
    Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2007). Interaction: collaboration skills for school professionals (5th). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
    Gallagher, P. (1997). Teachers and inclusion: Perspectives on changing roles. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 363-386.
    Garey, C. (1982). An early childhood. program: a continuing development involving many changes. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Basic Education Skills Project.
    Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    Gomez-Najarro, J. (2019). An Empty Seat at the Table: Examining General and Special Education Teacher Collaboration in Response to Intervention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 109-126.
    Guteng, S. I. (2005). Professional concerns of beginning teachers of deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf, 150 (1), 17-41.
    Hanrahan, M. (1998). The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737-753.
    Heckmon, M., & Rike C. (1994). Westwood early learning center: a framework for integrating young children with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26(2), 30–35.
    Hentz, S. M., & Jones, P. M. (2011). Collaborate Smart! Practical Strategies and Tools for Educators. Arlington. Virginia: Council for Exceptional Children.
    Hoing, A. S. (1992, March). Creating Integrated Environments for Young Handicapped Children. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Bridging the Gap Program, Fairfax, VA.
    Holmes, R., & Cunningham, B. (1995). Young children's knowledge of their classrooms: names, activities, and purposes of learning centers. Education and Treatment of Children, 18(4), 433-442.
    Horn, E., & Sandall, S. (2000). The Visiting Teacher: A Model of Inclusive ECSE Service Delivery. Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series, 2, 49-58.
    Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidencebased practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
    Horner, R. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2012). Synthesizing Single-Case Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practices: Some Brief Reflections. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 266–272.
    Hume, K., & Odom, S. (2007). Effects of an individual work system on the independent functioning of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1166-1180.
    Hume, K., Plavnick, J., & Odom, S. L. (2012). Promoting task accuracy and independence in students with autism across educational setting through the use of individual work systems. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(10), 2084-2099.
    Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69(3), 315-332.
    Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23-40.
    Larsen, R. (2011). Shoesbox Tasks. Activities designed with success in mind. North Carolina, US: Centering on Children, Inc.
    Luckner, J. L. & Howell, J. (2002). Suggestions for preparing itinerant teachers: a qualitative analysis. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(3), 54-61.
    Luckner, J. L. & Miller, K. L. (1994). Itinerant teachers: responsibilities, perceptions, preparation, and students served. American Annals of the Deaf, 139(2), 111-118.
    Lynch, P., & McCall, S. (2007). The role of itinerant teachers. Community Eye Healthy Journal, 20(62), 26-27.
    Mavropoulou, S., Papadopoulou, E. & Kakana, D. (2011). Effects of task organization on the independent play of students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(7), 913–925.
    Mechling, L. C., & Savidge, E. J. (2010). Using a Personal Digital Assistant to Increase Completion of Novel Tasks and Independent Transitioning by Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(6), 687–704.
    Mesibov, G. B., Shea, V., & Schopler, E. (2004). The TEACCH Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer, US: New York.
    Mulholland, M., O'Connor, U. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion: perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support/resource teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(10), 1070-1083.
    Nelson, C., Lindeman, D. P., & Stroup-Rentier, V. L. (2011). Supporting early childhood special education personnel for itinerant service delivery through a state-level technical assistance project. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 367–380.
    Odom, S. L., & Diamond, K. E. (1998). Inclusion of young children with special needs in early childhood education: The research base. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(1), 3–25.
    Odom, S. L., Horn, E. M., Marquart, J. M., Hanson, M. J., Wolfberg, P., Beckman, P., Lieber, J., Li, S., Schwartz, I., Janko, S., & Sandall, S. (1999). On the forms of inclusion: organizational context and individualized service models. Journal of Early Intervention, 22(3), 185–199.
    Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., Caputo, V., & Impellizzeri, C. (1998). Use of structured teaching for treatment of children with autism and severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 367-374.
    Panerai, S., Zingale, M., Trubia, G., Finocchiaro, M., Zuccarello, R., Ferri, R., & Elia, M. (2009). Special education versus inclusive education: the role of the TEACCH program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(6), 874-882.
    Patillo, J., & Vaughan E. (1992). Learning Centers for Child-Centered Classrooms. Washington D.C.: National Education Association.
    Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the Evaluative Method for Evaluating and Determining Evidence-Based Practices in Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1311–1319.
    Reinbiller, N. (1996). Coteaching: New Variations on a Not-So-New Practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19(1), 34-48.
    Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. Regional Language Centre Journal, 44(1), 5–33.
    Sadler, F. H. (2003). The itinerant special education teacher in the early childhood classroom. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 8-15.
    Schopler, E., Mesibov, G. B., & Hearsey, K. (1995). Structured teaching in the TEACCH system. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Current issues in autism. Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 243–268). Springer, US: New York.
    Schultheis, S. F., Boswell, B. B., & Decker, J. (2000). Successful Physical Activity Programming for Students with Autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(3), 159–162.
    ShoeboxTasks Centering on Children (2011). Shoebox Tasks Handbook. North Carolina, US: Centering on Children, Inc.
    Susan F. S., Boswell B. B., Decker J. (2000). Successful Physical Activity Programming for Students with Autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(3), 159-162.
    Villegas, A. M. (2012). Collaboration Between Multicultural and Special Teacher Educators: Pulling Together the Threads in the Conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 286-290.
    Wardani, A. D., Gunawan, I., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Benty, D. D. N., Sumarsono, R. B., Nurabadi, A., Handayani, L. (2020). Student learning motivation: A conceptual paper. Proceedings of the 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020), Atlantis Press.
    Yarger, C. C., & Luckner, J. L. (1999). Itinerant teaching: the inside story. American Annals of the Deaf, 144(4), 309-314.
    Zagona, A. L., Kurth, J. A., MacFarland, S. Z. C. (2017). Teachers’ Views of Their Preparation for Inclusive Education and Collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(3), 163-178.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE