十二年國民基本教育課程綱要將於108學年度正式實施，以核心素養為課程發展主軸，並強調應培養學生的探究能力。然而在科學探究的歷程當中，學生是否具備科學推理能力，往往會直接影響著他們的科學概念學習及科學學習成效。近年來資訊融入教學正蓬勃發展，歐盟的Go-Lab計畫更是積極推展線上科學探究學習系統，已在12個歐洲國家被廣泛使用，如今也已引進臺灣。因此本研究以科技接受模式（Technology Acceptance Model, TAM）為基礎，探討Go-Lab線上學習系統在臺灣之推展情況，包含三個研究方向：(一)中小學教師對於線上探究式學習平臺的期望、(二)針對中小學教師辦理Go-Lab工作坊之推廣情形、(三)中學實際應用Go-Lab於課程中之師生態度與接受度。本研究以問卷調查法進行資料蒐集，分別施以「臺灣中小學教師對於線上探究式學習平臺的期望問卷」、「臺灣中小學教師參與Go-Lab工作坊回饋問卷」、「中學教師使用Go-Lab系統進行線上探究式教學回饋問卷」及「中學生使用Go-Lab系統進行線上探究式學習回饋問卷」，藉此了解臺灣中小學師生對於Go-Lab系統的使用意向，也做為此系統未來在臺灣發展與改進之參考依據。研究結果顯示：(一)中小學教師對於使用數位方式進行教學及探究式教學皆持正向態度，而國中小或理工科教師對數位方式進行教學的態度顯著較高。(二)參與工作坊之教師對於Go-Lab系統之認知有用性與使用意向持正項態度，且Go-Lab平臺與教師理想的線上探究式學習平臺相符合。但對其認知易用性持保留態度。(三)中學生與中學教師對於Go-Lab系統之有用性、易用性及使用意向皆持正向態度，但中學教師對於其中部份題項之態度與學生略有差異。

The Directions Governing for the 12-Year Basic Education Curricula, which focus on the essential literacies and the inquiry ability of students are going to be implemented in August 2019. In the process of scientific inquiry, students’ scientific reasoning ability has direct impacts on their science learning performances. Also, since information technology has been widely implemented into teaching nowadays, the Go-Lab project, granted by the European Commission, is actively promoting an on-line inquiry-based science learning system. The system has been widely used in 12 countries throughout the Europe and has now been adopted in Taiwan. The purpose of this research is to examine the current status of how the Go-Lab system has been promoted for on-line learning in Taiwan on the base of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This research covers the following three aspects: (1) elementary and secondary school teachers’ expectation of on-line inquiry-based learning platform (2) the effects and results of Go-Lab system promotion through workshops for elementary and secondary school teachers (3) the attitude and acceptance of high school teachers and students who used Go-Lab system in class. This study collects data through questionnaires. The instrumentations used include “Elementary and Secondary teachers’ expectation of online inquiry-based learning platform in Taiwan area”, “Feedback of Go-Lab workshop”, “Feedback of using Go-Lab system to teaching online”, and “Feedback of using Go-Lab system to learning online”. The results can serve as good indicators to understand the behavioral intention of teachers and students, and provide useful feedbacks for improving the Go-Lab system in Taiwan. The result are: (1) Elementary and secondary school teachers’ attitude of teaching in digital and inquiry way are positive, especially elementary and junior high school teachers, science and engineering teachers as well. (2) Teachers participated in the workshop for Go-Lab, their attitude of perceived usefulness and behavioural intention are positive. Also, Go-Lab is accordant with teachers’ expectation of on-line inquiry-based learning platform. But teachers reserve their comments in perceived usefulness of Go-Lab. (3) Secondary school teachers and students’ attitude of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use andbehavioural intention of Go-Lab system are all positive, but there are some differences between teachers and students.

一、中文文獻
行政院經濟建設委員會（2000）。國土空間發展策略計畫摘要。臺北市：行政院經濟建設委員會。
李文清、陳麗珍（2009）。探討網路專題式學習之學習成效影響因素。商業職業教育，(114)，48-56。
沈慶衍（2004）。資訊科技融入教學之概念、應用與活動設計。教育資料與圖書館學，42（1），139-155。
周君倚、陸洛（2014）。以科技接受模式探討數位學習系統使用態度-以成長需求為調節變項。資訊管理學報，21（1），83-106。
洪振方、謝甫宜（2010）。科學學習成效理論模式的驗證與分析。教育與心理研究，33(3)，47-76。
翁榮源、莊坤鴻、吳慧育（2012）。行動學習模式在化學課程之應用研究。化學， 70（1），69-80。doi:10.6623/chem.2012007
國家教育研究院（2015）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要Q&A。取自http://www.
naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/67/192297519.pdf
張欣怡（2009）。美國網路探究課程對台灣學生學習科學之成效。中華民國第 25 屆科學教育研討會--數位時代下的科學教育。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學理學院。
張梅鳳（2004）。資訊融入生物科教學之教材製作與教學策略初探。圖書館學與資訊科學，30（1），55-65。
教育部（2008）。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。取自http://epaper.edu.
tw/files/topical/教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011.doc
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自https://www.naer.edu.
tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_5320_2729842_56626.pdf
梁育維、陳芳慶（2015）。資訊融入教學對學習態度影響之後設分析。中等教育，66（2），100-125。
陳玉婷，蔡立元（2009）。從科技接受模式觀點探討資訊科技融入學習。台南科大學報，（28），217-236。
楊貴卿（2014）。以科技接受模式探討國中教師以數位學習在職進修之意向之研究（未出版碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。doi:10.6846/TKU.2014.01078
楊凱悌、王子華、邱美虹（2011）。生物學細胞分裂主題之資訊融入教學設計原則。科學教育月刊，（342），9-19。

二、英文文獻
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 3.
Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 194-214.
Gillet, D., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., & Salzmann, C. (2013). Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for stem education at school. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (pp. 769-773). IEEE.
Mallery, P., & George, D. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Allyn, Bacon, Boston.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481.