數位物件保存是各機構一直以來都必須重視的議題，在數位化時代，文化記憶機構亦積極將其典藏的重要資源數位化。不論是數位儲存媒體的損壞、老舊，或者數位檔案格式的過時，以及數位檔案的真實性與完整性等因素，都使數位資源保存的議題更形複雜。本研究目的為探討國內文化記憶機構對數位物件保存的認知和其重要性、國內文化記憶機構的數位物件保存策略和檔案保存格式，並探討PREMIS和數位物件長期保存實務工作之間的相關性，以及了解數位物件長期保存面臨的問題和困難。
本研究採用質性研究方法，以深度訪談法進行資料蒐集，對國內文化記憶機構進行訪談，前測受試者一位。參與研究的對象共14人，其中所屬機構為圖書館的有七位（分屬四個圖書館），檔案館的有四位，博物館的有三位。
本研究結果顯示，國內文化記憶機構面臨到的問題和困難往往都是數位載體壽命有限、儲存空間不足、數位物件的檢查工作耗力又耗時、經費不足、人力時常變動、設備老舊等。然而，保存不僅限這些問題，還需定期檢查數位物件的真實性、完整性和固定性，以確保數位物件的更動歷史、判斷保存的內容是否完整，以及是否經過有意無意的竄改。此外，需定期執行權利盤點，以確保擁有所有數位物件的完整授權。因國內文化記憶機構目前皆無導入PREMIS，期望未來國內化記憶機構和研究者可以將PREMIS導入保存系統，並搭配OAIS標準之數位物件保存系統，探討實際操作情形並提出改善方向。

The preservation of digital objects is an issue that institutions must always pay attention to. In the digital era, memory institutions also actively digitize the important resources of their collections. Whether it is the damage of the digital storage media, the aging, or the outdated digital file format, and the authenticity and integrity of the digital files, it’s made the issue of digital resource preservation become more complicated. The purpose of this study is to explore the cognition and importance of digital preservation in domestic memory institutions, the digital object preservation strategy and preservation format of domestic memory institutions, and to explore the correlation between PREMIS and long-term preservation practices of digital objects, and understand the problems and difficulties faced by long-term preservation of digital objects.
This study used qualitative research methods to collect data by in-depth interviews, interviewed domestic cultural memory institutions, and pre-tested one subject. There were 14 participants in this study, including seven in the library (belong to four libraries), four in the archives, and three in the museum.
The results of this study show that the problems and difficulties faced by domestic memory institutions are often limited by the limited life of digital carriers, insufficient storage space, laborious and time-consuming inspection of digital objects, insufficient funds, frequent changes in manpower, and old equipment. However, preservation is not only limited to these problems, but also necessary to regularly check the authenticity, integrity and fixity to ensure the history of changes to digital objects, to determine whether the content is intact, and whether it has been intentionally or unintentionally tampered with. In addition, enrollment of rights is performed on a regular basis to ensure full authorization of all digital objects. Since domestic memory institutions do not currently import PREMIS into system, it is expected that domestic memory institutions and researchers can import PREMIS into the preservation system in the near future, and use the OAIS standard digital object preservation system to explore the actual operation situation and propose improvement directions.

一、英文文獻
American Library Association. (2007). Definitions of Digital Preservation. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408
Abbott, D. (2008). What is Digital Curation? DCC Briefing Papers: Introduction to Curation. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Retrieved from
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation
Caplan, P. (2008). The Preservation of Digital Materials. Library Technology Reports, 44(2). Retrieved from
https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4224/4809
Caplan, P. (2009). Understanding premis. Washington DC, USA: Library of Congress.
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archiving Information System (OAIS). Retrieved from
https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf
Day, M. (1998). Issues and Approaches to Preservation Metadata. Retrieved from https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/655712/paper.pdf
Digital Library Federation. (1998). A working definition of digital library. Retrieved from https://old.diglib.org/about/dldefinition.htm
Digital Curation Centre. (2006). Instalment on “Preservation Metadata”, Version 1.0. Retrieved From
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/resource/curation-manual/chapters/preservation-metadata/preservation-metadata.pdf
Digital Curation Centre. (2008). The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model . Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/DCCLifecycle.pdf
Dappert, A., Peyrard, S., & Guenther, R. S. (2016). An Introduction to Implementing Digital Preservation Metadata. In Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners (pp. 1-9). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43763-7
Dappert, A., Guenther, R. S., & Peyrard, S. (2016). Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners: Implementing PREMIS. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43763-7
Digital Preservation Coalition. (2018). Digital Preservation Handbook. Retrieved from https://www.dpconline.org/handbook/glossary#D
Giaretta, D., Matthews, B., Bicarregui, J., Lambert, S., Guercio, M., Michetti, G., & Sawyer, D. (2009). Significant properties, authenticity, provenance, representation information and OAIS information. UC Office of the President: California Digital Library. Retrieved from
http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_italy_dissemination_cpr_guercio_ipres-2009.pdf
Gunia, B., Sandusky, R. J. (2010). Designing metadata for long-term data preservation: DataONE case study. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-2.
Groenewald, R., Breytenbach, A. (2011). The use of metadata and preservation methods for continuous access to digital data. The Electronic Library, 29(2), p.236-248.
Guenther, R. (2010). Metadata to support long-term preservation of digital assets: PREMIS and its use with METS. ACM, 14. doi: 10.1145/2039274.2039288
Harvey, D. R. (2008). Preserving digital materials. Walter de Gruyter. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=Z_8glIHqKgQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=zh-TW&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hockx-Yu, H., Knight, G. (2008). What to preserve?: Significant properties of digital objects. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 141-153.
ISO. (2012). Space data and information transfer systems -- Open archival information system (OAIS) -- Reference model. Ginebra: International Organization for Standardization.
Jantz, R., & Giarlo, M. J. (2005). Digital preservation: Architecture and technology for trusted digital repositories. Microform & imaging review, 34(3), 135-147.
Kranch, D. A. (1998). Preserving electronic documents. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries (pp. 295-296). ACM.
Library of Congress (2010). Why digital preservation is important for everyone. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/qEmmeFFafUs?list=PLEA69BE43AA9F7E68.
Muir, A. (2001). Legal Deposit of Digital Publications: A Review of Research and Development Activity. In Edward A. F., Christine L. B. (Chair), Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. (pp.165-173). ACM. doi: 10.1145/379437.379475
OCLC/RLG Working Group. (2001). Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects: A Review of the State of the Art. Retrieved from
http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf
PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. Retrieved from
http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
Research Libraries Group (2002). Trusted digital repositories: Attributes and responsibilities. An RLG-OCLC Report. Retrieved from
http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/trustedrep/repositories.pdf
Ross, S. (2012). Digital preservation, archival science and methodological foundations for digital libraries. New Review of Information Networking, 17(1), 43-68. Retrieved from
http://info.iibi.unam.mx/~mt14s01q/contenido/data/file/Ross_digital.pdf
Smith, A. (2007). Digitization is not preservation – at least not yet. In Kresh, D. (Eds.) The whole digital library handbook (pp. 342-345). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Vermaaten, S., Lavoie, B., & Caplan, P. (2012). Identifying Threats to Successful Digital Preservation: the SPOT Model for Risk Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/vermaaten/09vermaaten.html doi: 10.1045
二、中文文獻
王文英（2006）。淺論保存後設資料。圖書與資訊學刊，59，75-91。
吳錦範、柯皓仁（2006）。數位圖書館 e 化服務之行動研究--以台東大學圖書館中文新書薦購系統為例（碩士論文）。國立交通大學資訊學院碩士在職專班數位圖書資訊組，新竹市。
吳朝裕（2008）。數位保存模擬策略與詮釋資料之關係研究（未公開之碩士論文）。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，新北市。
林巧敏（2008）。國家圖書館電子資源館藏發展之研究（博士論文）。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系，臺北市。
林珊如（2006）。數位圖書館使用者研究趨勢之考察。圖書館學與資訊科學，32（2），18-31。
林素甘、楊美華、柯皓仁（2008）。數位化發展對檔案典藏與保存之影響。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，4，67-88。
林信成、鄭國祥（2009）。數位典藏資訊系統之長期保存規劃與實施。教育資料與圖書學，46（3），323-349。
林信成（2010）。數位典藏資源共享平臺之建置。檔案季刊，9（2），4-19。
林芳伶（2011）。表演藝術團體導入數位典藏作業程序之研究（碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
林芳伶、柯皓仁（2012）。表演藝術團體導入數位典藏之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，50（1），75-102。
張郁蔚（2010）。歐洲數位圖書館Europeana之建置與發展。檔案季刊，9（2），121-128。
項潔、陳雪華（2003）。數位博物館大觀園。臺北市：遠流。
阮明淑（2012）。資訊生命週期。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679188/
詹雅蘭（1994）。OAIS參考模式應用在國家檔案永久典藏機制之探討（碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
歐陽崇榮（2002）。數位資訊保存之探討。檔案季刊，1（2），36-47。
歐陽崇榮（2007）。數位資訊保存策略。臺北市：文華圖書。
數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫（2010）。數位化工作流程整合性工作流程指南。取自http://content.teldap.tw/index/?p=1194&page=7
數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫（2012）。數位典藏文物數位化規格。取自
http://rdoffice.fguweb.fgu.edu.tw/front/bin/download.phtml?Part=1010424&Nbr=575&Category=0
蔡永橙、黃國倫、邱志義等（2007）。數位典藏技術導論。國立臺灣大學出版中心。
鄭寶梅（2012）。從德國圖書館發展策略談未來的圖書館。佛教圖書館館刊，54，35-55。取自http://www.gaya.org.tw/journal/m54/54-main3.pdf
陳昭珍（2001）。電子資源的長久保存。取自http://www.gaya.org.tw/journal/m25-26/25-main3.htm
陳淑君（2013）。典藏性詮釋資料。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1954763/
陳淑君（2017）。文化記憶機構的資訊組織博物館篇。取自http://catweb.ncl.edu.tw/flysheet_admin/new_file_download.php?Pact=FileDownLoad&Pval=2877
盧秀菊（1993）。圖書館之未來發展初探。圖書館學刊，8，55-70。
薛理桂（2010）。我國公共檔案館建置芻議。檔案季刊，9（2），68-79。
薛理桂（2014）。數位典藏長期保存策略及系統建置之研究：以中研院台史所檔案館為例。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：MOST 102-2410-H-004-220-）。臺北市。
藍振維（2011）。數位典藏系統長期保存之行動研究：以虛擬機器應用為例（未公開之碩士論文）。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，新北市。
顧敏（2009）。數位圖書館服務與智慧財產權保護。國家圖書館館訊，122，3-4。
顧敏（2009）。廣域圖書館時代的大學圖書館。國家圖書館館刊，2，1-29。