Bourdieu所提出的「文化資本」是當前教育社會學界，用以解釋社會階級、家庭與學校教育如何相互構建，有利於階級再製的重要概念。然而自從DiMaggio將「文化資本」概念化為變項進行量化分析後，有關文化資本的實際效果，一直是爭議的焦點。其中，除文化資本的操作定義外，文化資本與習性變項間孰輕孰重、教師的角色、性別差異等，都是各研究探討的議題。基於此，本研究參酌過去台灣地區有關文化資本的研究，歸納出本論文的文化資本操作定義，並參考國內外相關文獻，建構文化資本影響學業成就的路徑機制，且利用結構方程模式的統計方法，針對所提出的路徑機制進行分析與討論。研究結果如下：1. 社經地位會透過文化資本與習性再影響學業成就，其中通過習性影響的幅度較大；2. 社經地位影響學業成就之路徑模式有性別差異，透過文化資本再影響學業成就的幅度，女生高於男生；透過習性再影響學業成就的幅度，男生高於女生；3. 教師知覺是「文化資本」效果發揮的關鍵中介變項，特別是男生；4. 文化資本作用模式在台灣偏向「文化再製」理論。最後，研究者根據研究發現，針對教育行政當局、學校、家庭與文來研究提出相關的建議，以為未來教育行政決策、學校與家庭教育實施、學術探討等參考依據。

The idea of Cultural capital raised by P. Bourdieu has become a key concept in sociology of education to explain the inequality of educational opportunity. However, the effect of cultural capital on student achievement is still in debate since DiMaggio’s quantitative research in 1982. These controversies include the operational definition of cultural capital, the role of teachers, the influence results from gender, and effects of cultural capital and habitus. Based on the background, the study proposed a new model to explain how cultural capital, habitus, and teachers’ perception of students mediated the relationship between school success and family socioeconomic status. To achieve the goal, the study used Taiwan Education Panel Study as the source and analyzed the data with structural equation models. The research findings showed that: 1. Both cultural capital and habitus had significant effect on students’ score. However, the total effect that habitus displayed was stronger than it of cultural capital. 2. Cultural capital and habitus could help to explain how socioeconomic status influenced students’ academic achievements. But cultural capital had more significant influence on female students than on males, habitus had more significant influence on male students than on females. 3. Teachers’ perception of students was the critical variable that influenced the effect of cultural capital on students’ scores, especially for male students. 4. The results of Taiwan supported cultural reproduction theory. At last, suggestions according to the findings were proposed.

于嘉雲、張恭啟（譯）（1980），Keesing, R.著。文化人類學。台北市：巨流。
王麗雲、游錦雲（2005）。學童社經背景與暑期經驗對暑期學習成就進展影響之研究。教育研究集刊，51（1）， 1-41。
台灣教育長期資料庫（2011）。台灣教育長期資料庫計劃介紹。2011年4月2日，取自http://www.teps.sinica.edu.tw/introduction.htm。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式 : SIMPLIS的應用。台北市：高等教育。
吳悅如（2009）。文化資本對國小學童的學習態度與學業成就之影響-以宜蘭地區六年級國小學童為例。私立佛光大學社會教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版，宜蘭縣。
吳素援（2004）。家庭教育關聯資本對國小學生數理成就影響模式之研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。
巫有鎰（1999）。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較。教育研究集刊，43，213-242。
巫有鎰（2007）。學校與非學校因素對台東縣原、漢國小學童學業成就的影響。台灣教育社會學研究，7（1），29-67。
李文益、黃毅志（2004）。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究：以台東師院為例。台東大學學報，15（2），23-58。
李明(譯)，Matras(著)（1990）。社會不平等：社會階層化與流動。台北市：桂冠。
李威伸（2006）。文化資本與學業成就關係之研究：以台中市國中學生為例。私立東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
周新富（2008）。社會階級對子女學業成就的影響：以家庭資源為分析架構。台灣教育社會學研究，8（1），1-43。
林松齡（1999）。母親對子女學業成就的影響：文化資本、經濟資源、與監督角色的比較。台灣大學社會學刊，27，73-105。
林俊瑩（2007）。檢視個人與家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響：以SEM與HLM分析我國國中教育階段機會均等及相關問題。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林信吉（2010）。結構再製與主體創新的爭辯:新台灣之子學習過程之個案研究。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
林碧芳(2009)。從文化資本探討才藝學習對學習成就的影響。教育與社會研究，17，111-134。
林碧芳（2011）。家庭文化資本與個人學習動機對青少年學習成就影響之貫時研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
俞懿嫻（2004）。讀馥茗師的《人格教育學》一書：恭賀馥茗師八秩嵩壽。載於張建成（編），文化、人格與教育（頁3-26）。台北市：心理。
姜信彰（2010）。高中學生文化資本之探究─以TEPS第一波資料為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
孫智綺（譯）（2002），P. Bonnewitz著。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課。台北市：麥田。
高宣揚（1991）。論布爾迪厄的「生存心態」概念。思與言，29（3），21-76。
高宣揚（1998）。當代社會理論（下）。台北市：五南。
高宣揚（2002）。布爾迪厄。台北市：生智。
張芳全（2006）。社經地位、文化資本與教育期望對學業成就影響之結構方程模式檢定。測驗學刊，53（2），261-296。
張芳全（2011）。家長教育程度、文化資本、自我抱負、學習興趣與數學成就之關係研究。台中教育大學學報，25（1），29-56。
張建成、陳珊華（2006）。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異：兼論家庭與學校文化的連續性。教育研究集刊，51（1），129-161。
張笠雲（2007）。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：公用使用版-第一波(2001)、第二波(2003)、第三波(2005)資料使用手冊。台北市： 中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
許崇憲（2002）。家庭背景因素與子女學業成就之關係：台灣樣本的後設分析。中正教育研究，1（2），25-62。
許嘉猷（1992）。社會階層化與社會流動。台北市：三民。
陳如涵（2011）。台灣勞工階級的孩童照顧安排與養育風格。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳怡靖、鄭耀男（2000）。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷：檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在台灣的適用性。人文及社會科學研究彙刊，10（3），416-434。
陳青達（2006）。文化資本與學業成效關係之研究：以雲林縣國民小學六年級學生為例。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
陳保朱（譯）（2002），大江健三郎著。孩子為什麼要上學。台北市：時報文化。
陳珊華（2004）。小學生文化資本之累積與作用。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳順利（2001）。原、漢青少年飲酒行為與學業成就之追蹤調查：以台東縣關山地區為例。教育與心理研究，24，67-98。
陳曉佳（2004）。台灣地區國中學生文化資本、習性與學業成就之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育學研究所士論文，未出版，台北市。
渠東（譯）（2004），Durkheim著（2004）。社會分工論。臺北縣 : 左岸文化。
黃武雄（2003）。學校在窗外。臺北縣：左岸文化。
黃芳銘（2004）。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。台北市：五南。
黃雁祥（2010）。國中學生家庭文化資本、英語學習態度與英語學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
黃毅志（1994）。社經背景與地位取得過程之結構機制：教育、社會資源及文化資本。私立東海大學社會學研究所博士論文，未出版。
翟本瑞（2002）。家庭文化資本對學校教育影響之研究：以農業縣山區小學為例。教育與社會研究，4，181-195。
趙惠鈴（1995）。布狄厄論「文化資本」的再生產結構：文化區辨與社會區辨的社會建構過程。思與言，33（1），161-184。
蔡文輝（1990）。社會學。台北市：三民。
蔡淑鈴（2004）。高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。台灣社會學，7，47-88。
蔡蕙如（2007）。台北縣國小教師和一般家長對子女教育投入文化資本、社會資本之比較研究。國立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
鄭名惠（2007）。國小學生家庭文化資本與其學業成就關係之研究。國立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
盧淑華（2007）。文化資本。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
譚光鼎（1998）。社會與文化再製理論之評析。教育研究集刊，40，23-50。
蘇船利、黃毅志（2009）。文化資本透過學校社會資本對台東縣國二學生學業成 績之影響。教育研究集刊，55（3），99-129。
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Anheier, H. K., & Gerhards, J., &Romo, F. P. (1995). Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: Examing Bourdieu’s scoial topography. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 859-903.
Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3-42.
Aschaffenburg, K., & Mass, I. (1997). Cultural and educational careers: The dynamics of social reproduction. American Sociological Review, 62(4), 573-587.
Becker, H. S. (1952). Social-class variations in the teacher-pupil relationship. Journal of Educational Sociology, 25(8), 451-465.
Bernstein, B.(1971). Class, codes and control V1. London: Routledge and K. Paul.
Blau, P., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Free Press.
Boudon, R. (1973). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society. New York: Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1967). System of eduation and system of thought. International Social Science Journal, 19(3), 338-358.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47.

Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Cultural reproduction and scoial reproduction. In J. Karabel, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487-511). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977b). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson(Ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. (pp.241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron Jean-Claude (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Beverly Hills.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron Jean-Claude (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist American: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. NY: Basic Books.
Braun, C. (1976). Teacher expection: Scoiopsychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 185-213.
Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual review of sociology, 31(1), 223-243.
Byun, Soo-yong. (2007). Cultural capital and school success: The case of South Korea. Dissertation Abstracts Interational, AAT 3279654.
Chueng, G.W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing MI. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 235-255.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Equality of educational opportunity. NH: Ayer.
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.
Criswold, C. P. (1994). Families, education, and equality: The role of social and cultural capital. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 3398939.
Dahrendorf. R. (1958). Toward a theory of social conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(2), 170-183.
Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2), 242-249.
De Graff N. D., De Graff P. M., & Kraaykamp. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherland: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92-111.
Devine, F. (2004). Class practices: How parents help their children get good jobs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status cultural participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Scoiological Review, 47, 189-201.
DiMaggio, P., & Mohr J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. The American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231-126.
Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and School success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44-68.
Dumais, S. A. (2006). Early childhood cultural capital, parental habitus, and teachers’ perception. Poetics, 34, 83-107.
Durkheim, E., & Mauss, M. (1963). Primitive classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Early schooling: The handicap of being poor and male. Sociology of Education, 80(2), 114-138.
Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connection. The American Journal of Sociology, 102(2), 217-251.
Farkas, G., Grobe, R., Sheehan, D., & Shaun, Y. (1990). Cultural resources and school success: Gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban district. American Sociological Review, 55, 127-142.
Goffman, E. (1971). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Goldthrope, J. H. (1998). Rational actional theory for sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 167-192.
Grusky, D. (2005). Inequality: Classic readings in race, class, and gender. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Harker, R. K. (1990). An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: The practice of theory. London: Macmillan.
Jæger, M. M. (2011). Does cultural capital really affect academic achievement? New evidence from combined sibling and panel data. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 281-298.
Jæger, M. M., & Holm, A. (2007). Does parents economic, cultural, and social capital explain the social class effect on educational attainment in the Scandinavian Mobility Regime? Social Science Research, 36, 719-744.
Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge.
Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies percepual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 469-480.
Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 22-34.
Katillis, J., & Rubinson, R. (1990). Cultural capital, student achievement, and educational reproduction: The case in Greece. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 270-279.
Kingston, P. W. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of cultural capital theory. Sociology of Education,74(0), 88-99。
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Lamont, A., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Scoiological Theory, 6(2), 153-168.
Lareau, A. (1987). Social class difference in family-school relationships: The importantnce of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73-85.
Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. NY: Falmer Press.
Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747-776.
Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37-53.
Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. B. (2003). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567-606.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McClay, D. A. (2000)The relationaship between family ownership of cultural capital and school achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 9998946.
McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools: introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York: Longman.
Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 36-73.
Nash, R. (2006). Controlling for ‘ability’: A conceptual and empirical study of primary and secondary effects. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 157-172.
Ost, D. H., ＆ Ost, L. J. (1988). The culture of teaching: Implications for staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 9(3), 50-55.
Palmer, E. A. (2001). Cultural capital and school success: Implications for student achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 9999978.
Parsons, T. (1964). The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society. In A. H. Halsey, F. Floud, & C. A. Anderson(Eds.), Education, Economy and Society.(pp. 434-455). New York: Glencoe Press.
Persell, C. H. (1977). Education and inequality: The roots and results of stratification in America's schools. New York: Free Press.
Robinson, R. V., & Kelley, J. (1979). Class as conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on income inequality and politics in the United States and Great Britain. American Sociological Review, 44(1), 38-58.
Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158-178.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. F. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schultz, T. W. (1960). Capital formation by education. Journal of Political Economy, 68 (6), 571-583.
Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 82-92.
Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 548-557.
Thompson, J. B. (1991). Editor’s introduction. In J. B. Thompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power(pp. 1-31). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. NY: Academic Press.
Vryonides, M. (2007). Social and curtural capital in educational research: Issues of operationalisation and measurement. British Education Research Journal, 33(6), 867-885.
Weber, M. (1978). Classes, status groups and parties. In W. G. Runciman (Ed.), Max Weber : Selections in translation (pp. 43-56), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werfhorst, H. G. Ven de, & Hofstede, S. (2007). Cultural capital or relatve risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 391-415.
Wildhagen, T. (2009). Why does cultural capital matter for high school academic performance？An empirical assessment of teacher-selection and self-selection mechanisms as explanations of the cultural capital effect. The Sociological Quarterly, 50, 173-200。
Wills, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wong, R. Sin-Kwok. (1998). Multidimensional influences of family environment in education: The case of socialist Czechoslovakia. Sociology of Education, 71(1), 1-22.
Wright, E. O., & Perrone, L. (1977). Marxist class categories and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 32-55.
Yamamoto, Y., & Brinton, M. C. (2011). Cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of Japan. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 67-83.