簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭恬君
Tien-chun (Gina) Kuo
論文名稱: 外國口音英語辨識度與對應策略之認知差異: 專業口譯員與學生口譯員對比研究
Perceived Intelligibility and Processing of Foreign-accented English Speech: Professional vs. Trainee Interpreters in Taiwan
指導教授: 陳子瑋
Chen, Tze-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 翻譯研究所
Graduate Institute of Translation and Interpretation
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 144
中文關鍵詞: 談話辨識度談話理解度口音跟述
英文關鍵詞: intelligibility, comprehension, accent, shadowing
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:238下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討專業與學生譯者對於有外國口音的英語談話之辨識度(intelligibility)與認知策略之異同。研究對象為七名專業譯者與十四名學生譯者,針對美國口音與西班牙口音之講者發言進行跟述,並於跟述後接受回溯訪談。數量與質性分析結果發現:(1) 兩組譯者因外國口音而造成的談話辨識度下降程度並無顯著差異。(2) 兩組譯者皆自述跟述有口音之言談時,使用預測、上下文線索等理解技巧輔助,並需提高聆聽與分析之氣力(effort in listening and analysis)。(3) 然而,學生譯者自述有時理解技巧無法成功使用,氣力協調也受到負面影響。專業譯者則無此兩種情況。(4) 學生譯者在訪談時使用「猜」、「恐懼、害怕」等字眼描述跟述有口音講者之過程。根據研究結果,口譯訓練納入有口音講者時,應採取全面性的角度(holistic approach),目標為達成最大的理解程度,並將克服有口音講者之語音特色視為達成整體目標的工具之一,而非首要工具。

    This study investigated professional and trainee interpreters' perception of processing foreign-accented English speech in a simultaneous mode. Seven professional interpreters (Group P) and fourteen trainee interpreters (Group T) who are Chinese A and English B were invited to shadow two texts delivered by a native (American) and nonnative (Spanish) speaker. After shadowing, a retrospective interview was conducted to elicit participants' perception of their processes during the shadowing task and general comments on shadowing/interpreting for foreign-accented English speakers. The results of quantitative and qualitative analysis reveal that: a) Statistically speaking, the degree of intelligibility impairment as a result of foreign English accent does not differ significantly between the two groups. b) Both groups reported using anticipation and contextual clues to compensate the loss of intelligibility, and the need to increase the listening and analysis effort when shadowing the accented speaker. c) However, general failures of adopting comprehension strategies and struggle to maintain good capacity management were reported by Group T while the same cannot be observed in Group P. d) Group T used languages of guessing and fear in describing their processing of the shadowing task. Based on these findings, this study concludes that the inclusion of foreign-accented speakers in interpreting classrooms should adopt a holistic approach where conquering the phonological challenge is treated as one of the, but not primary, tools one can use to reach the goal of optimal comprehension of the source text.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background of the study 1 1.2 The Study and Thesis Organization 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 8 2.1 Defining the Constructs 8 2.1.1 Accent and foreign accent 8 2.1.2 Intelligibility 11 2.2 Factors Contributing to Intelligibility of Foreign-accented Input 14 2.2.1 Foreign-accentedness and Intelligibility 14 2.2.2 Speaker Factors of Intelligibility 16 2.2.3 Listener Factors of Intelligibility 17 2.3 The Impact of Non-standard English Input on Interpreting Performances 18 2.3.1 Review of Empirical Studies 18 2.3.2 The Gap in Existing Literatures 28 2.4. Differences between Expert and Novice Performance 29 2.4.1 Studies on Expert Performance in General 29 2.4.2 Differences between Professional and Trainee Interpreters' Performance 31 2.5 Cognitive Management in Simultaneous Interpreting: The Effort Model 32 2.6 Research Questions 34 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 37 3.1 Research Methods 37 3.1.1 Shadowing 37 3.1.2 Retrospective Interviews 40 3.1.3 Participants 41 3.2 Materials 44 3.2.1 Speakers 44 3.2.2 Speech Text Preparation 46 3.2.3 Recordings of the Stimulus Materials 48 3.3 Procedures 50 3.3.1 Shadowing Task 50 3.3.2 Retrospective Interview 55 3.3.3 Pilot Test 56 3.4 Validity and Reliability 57 3.4.1 Validity of Retrospective Interviews 58 3.4.2 Reliability 59 Chapter 4 Findings 60 4.1 Shadowing Results 60 4.2 Retrospective Interviews 64 4.2.1 Data Entry 65 4.2.2 Findings of Interview Results 66 Chapter 5 Discussions 91 5.1 Discussion of Shadowing Results 91 5.2 Discussion of Retrospective Interview Results 95 5.2.1The Relationship Between Intelligibility and Comprehensibility 95 5.2.2 Comprehension Skills: Anticipation and Contextual Clues 96 5.2.3 Effort Management 101 5.2.4 Attitudes toward the Task 103 5.2.5 Pedagogical Implications 104 5.3 Pedagogical Applications 107 5.3.1 Comprehension and Skills Take the Priority 108 5.3.2 Confidence Building 111 Chapter 6 Conclusions 113 6.1 Summary of Study 113 6.2 Limitations of the Current Study 117 6.3 Directions for Future Research 119 6.4 Conclusion 120 References 122 Appendix 132 Appendix i: Speech Materials 132 Appendix ii: Normalization Message (Instructions) 136 Appendix iii: Practice Speech 137 Appendix iv: Pamphlets of Instruction 138 Appendix v: Sample of Shadowing Transcript 139 Appendix vi. Intelligibility Score of Each Participant 144

    AIIC. (2002). Workload Study. Geneva: AIIC.
    AIIC. (2012). Who can join AIIC? Retrieved Jun 26, 2012, from http://aiic.net/node/2397/who-can-join
    Albl-Mikasa, M. (2010). Global English and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): Implications for the interpreting profession. Trans-kom, 3(2), 26-148.
    Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529-555.
    Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600-1610.
    Bent, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Smith, B. L. (2007). Segmental errors in different word positions and their effects on intelligibility of non-native speech. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 331-347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyziing Explanatory Text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bowles, M. A. (2010). The Think-aloud Controversy in Second Language Research. New York: Routledge.
    Bradlow, A. R. and Bent, T. (2003). Listener adaptation to foreign accented English. Proc. XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain.
    Chang, C.-c., & Wu, M.-j. (2012). Non-native English in international conferences: Perspectives from the conference interpreters. Unpublished Manuscripts of National Science Council Research Project No. 99-2410-H-002-198. Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, National Taiwan University.
    Chang, Y. F. (2008). Parents' attitudes toward the English education policy in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 423-435.
    Christoffels, I. K., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2004). Components of simultaneous interpreting: Comparing interpreting with shadowing and paraphrasing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 27-240.
    Crystal, D. (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
    Crystal, D. (2008). Two thousand million? English Today, 24(1), 3-6.
    Darò, V., & Fabbro, F. (1994). Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics, 15 (4), 365-381.
    Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1-16.
    Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476-490.
    Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G. E. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393-410.
    Derwing, T., Rossiter, M. J., & Munro, M. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23, 245-259.
    Donovan, C. (2009). A study of changing patterns of language use in international conferences. In C. Laplace, M. Lederer & D. Gile (Eds.), La traduction et ses métiers: Aspects théoriques et pratiques (pp. 53-69). Paris: Minard.
    Ericsson, K., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptations to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
    Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performanc: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Fayer, J., & Krazinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37, 313-326.
    Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 173-180.
    Field, J. (2003). The fuzzy notion of 'intelligibility': A headache for pronunciation teachers and oral testers. IATEFL Special Interest Groups Newsletter, 34-38.
    Field, J. (2004). Psycholinguistics: The Key Concepts. Oxon: Routledge.
    Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 39-423.
    Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2006). Does a Regional Accent Perturb Speech Processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(5), 1276-1293.
    Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effet of familiarity on the comprehension of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65-89.
    Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J. H. D. e. al. (Ed.), Congnitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting (pp. 196-214). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
    Gile, D. (Ed.). (2009). Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training (Revised Edition). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English? Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-elt-future.pdf
    Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L.-A. B. (2009). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (Third edition ed.). Belmont USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
    Hsiao, J.-y. (2011). The Influence of Asian English Accents on Taiwanese Students' Listening Comprehension. MA, National Chung Cheng University.
    Hustad, K. (2008). The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(3), 562-573.
    Hustad, K., & Beukelman, D. (2002). Listener comprehension of severely Dysarthric speech: Effects of linguistic cues and stimulus cohesion. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 45-558.
    Janelle, C. M., & Hillman, C. H. (2003). Expert performance in sport: Current perspectives and critical issues. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert Perormance in Sports: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise (pp. 19-47): Human Kinetics.
    Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an International Language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.
    Jenkins, J. (2007). ELF: What it is and what it is thought to be. In J. Jenkins (Ed.), English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity (pp. 1-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kachru, B. B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. In B. B. Kachru (Ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (pp. 355-365): University of Illinois Press.
    Kalina, S. (1992). Some views on the theory of interpreter training and some practical suggestions. In M. Snell-Hornby, F. Pöchhacker & K. Kaindl (Eds.), Translation Studies: An interdiscipline (pp. 219-225). Amsterdam: John Benjamis.
    Kalina, S. (1994). Analyzing interpreters' performance: Methods and problems. In C. Dollerup & A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Visions (pp. 225-232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Kluge, D. C., Reis, M. S., Nobre-Oliveira, D., & Rauber, A. S. (2008). Intelligibility of accented speech: The perception of word-final nasals by Dutch and Brazilians. Paper presented at the V Jornadas en Tecnología del Habla Bilbao.
    Kurz, I. (1991). 'Shadowing' exercises in interpreter training. In C. Dollerup & A. Loddegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, talent, and experience (pp. 245-250): John Benjamins Publishing Compan.
    Kurz, I. (2008). The impact of non-native English on students' interpreting performance. In G. Hansen, A. Chesterman & H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (Eds.), Efforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research (Vol. 80, pp. 179-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Lambert, S. (1992). Shadowing. Meta: Translator's Journal, 37(2), 263-273.
    Lambert, S. (2004). Shared attention during sight translation, sight interpretation and simultaneous interpretation. Meta: Translators' Journal, 49(2), 294-306.
    Li, C. (2010). Coping strategies for fast delivery in simultaneous interpretation. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 13, 19-25.
    Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Lin, I. H. (2011). The Impact of Non-Native Accented English on Rendition Accuracy in Simultaneous Interpreting. MA, National Changhua University of Education.
    Lin, J. Y. (2010). Strategies for Interpreting Accented Speeches – A Case Study on the Responses of Student-interpreters. MA, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan.
    Liu, M. & Chiu, Y. H. (2009). Assessing source material difficulty for consecutive interpreting: Quantifiable measures and holistic judgment. Interpreting, 11(2), 244-266.
    Liou, I. Y. S. (2010). EIL in Action: non-native speaking teachers' reflections on the spread of English as an international language. Paper presented at the Conference on Applied Foreign Language Studies: Globalization, Englishes for specific purposes, and intercultural studies, Miao-li, Taiwan.
    Liu, M. (2008). How do experts interpret? Implications from research in Interpreting Studies and cognitive science. In G. Hansen, A. Chesterman & H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (Eds.), Efforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research (Vol. 80, pp. 159-177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Liu, M., Schallert, D. L., & Carroll, P. J. (2004). Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting, 6(1), 19-42.
    Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173-190.
    Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    Marslen-Wilson, W. (1985). Speech shadowing and speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 4, 55-73.
    Matsuura, H., Chiba, R., & Fujieda, M. (1999). Intelligibility and comprehensibility of American and Irish Englishes in Japan. World Englishes, 18(1), 49-62.
    Mazzetti, A. (1999). The influence of segmental and prosodic deviations on source-text comprehension in simultaneous interpretation. The Interpreters' Newsletter, 9, 125-147.
    McAllister, R. (1997). Perceptual foreign accent and its relevance for simultaneous interpreting. In B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language Processing and Simultaneous Interpreting: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 45-63). Amsterdam: John Benjamnis.
    McKay, S. L. (2009). Introspective techniques. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Applied Lintuistics (pp. 220-241). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Moser-Mercer, B. (1997). The expert-novice paradigm in interpreting research. In E. Fleischmann, W. Kutz & P. A. Schmitt (Eds.), Translationsdidaktik: Grundfragen der Übersetzungswissenschaft (pp. 255-261). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    Moser-Mercer, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., Casado, B., & Künzli, A. (2000). Serching to define expertise in interpreting. In B. E. Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language Processing and Simultaneous Interpreting: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 107-131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    Munro, M. (2006). The role of foreign accent in the perception and evaluation of speech. In G. E. Wiebe, G. Libben, T. Priestly, R. Smyth & H. S. Wang (Eds.), Phonology, Morphology, and the Empirical Imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce L. Derwing (pp. 325-346). Taipei: Crane Publishing.
    Munro, M. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 193-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38(3), 289-306.
    Nelson, C. L. (2008). Intelligibility since 1969. World Englishes, 27(34), 297-308.
    Pennington, M. (1996). Phonology in English Language Teaching. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
    Rajadurai, J. (2007). Intelligibility studies: A consideration of empirical and ideological issues. World Englishes, 26(1), 87-98.
    Sabatini, E. (2000). Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two 'non-standard' English speeches. Interpreting, 5(1), 25-48.
    Schraagen, J. M. (2009). Designing training for professionals based on subject matter experts and cognitive task analysis. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments (pp. 157-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2004(24), 209-239.
    Selinger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Data and data collection procedures Second Language Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Smith, B., Bradlow, A. R., and Bent, T. (2003). Production and perception of temporal contrast in foreign accented English. Proc. XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain.
    Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333-342.
    Smith, L. E., & Rafiqzad, K. (1979). English for cross-cultural communication: The question of intelligibility. Tesol Quarterly, 13(3), 371-380.
    Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press.
    Ste-Marie, D. (2003). Expertise in sport judges and referees: Circumventing information-processing limitations. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert Performance in Sports: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise (pp. 169-189): Human Kinetics.
    Tommola, J., & Hyona, J. (1990). Mental load in listening, speech shadowing, and simultaneous interpreting: An pupillometric study. Paper presented at the Meeting of the World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece.
    Tommola, J., Laine, M., Sunnari, M., & Rinne, J. O. (2000). Images of shadowing and interpreting. Interpreting, 5(2), 47-157.
    Tse, J. K. (1987). Language Planning and English as a Foreign Language in Middle School Education in The Republic of china. Taipei: The Crane Publicshing Co.
    Tsui, A. B. M., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 432-451.
    Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6-18.
    Wells, J. C. (1982a). Accents of English: An Introduction (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wells, J. C. (1982b). Accents of English: Beyond the British Isles (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Zielinski, B. (2003). Intelligibility in Speakers of English as a Second Language. Paper presented at the 16th Education Conference Melbourne. Retrieved June, 2010, from http://www.englishaustralia.com.au/ea_conference03/proceedings/pdf/040F_Zielinski.pdf

    下載圖示
    QR CODE