研究生: |
金仲傑 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
教材表徵和學習風格對國中生數學學習成就之實驗研究 An Experimental Research for Teaching Material Representations and Learning Styles to Grades 6-9 Mathematics Achievement |
指導教授: | 吳美美 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 116 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教材表徵 、學習風格 、數學 、學習成就 、認知負荷 、多媒體學習 |
英文關鍵詞: | teaching material representation, learning style, mathematics, learning achievement, cognitive load, multimedia learning |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:234 下載:26 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要在探討多媒體教材與傳統教材對不同學習風格的學習者學習國中幾何單元課程學習成就的影響,以供國中數學現職教師在考量學生之個別化差異,實施資訊科技融入教學,及發展或選用數學科多媒體教材之參考。
本研究採不等組前後測準實驗研究設計,以隨機取樣選取台中市某國中七年級二個班級共80位學生為研究對象,其中一班為實驗組,進行多媒體教材教學,另一班為控制組,進行傳統教材教學。實驗使用Kolb學習風格量表將學習者區分為「擴散者」、「調適者」、「聚斂者」和「同化者」四種學習風格。教學實驗所使用的多媒體教材係依據教學單元之教學目標,參考認知負荷理論及多媒體學習認知理論,並依照Sweller(2005)、Mayer(2001)和Atkinson(2005)所提的建議,由研究者自行編製而成。教學設計採用短教學時間設計,以避免不相關因素干擾,教學時間為四十五分鐘,教學內容取自國中八年級下學期幾何「平行與四邊形」單元,探究不同「學習風格」學習者分別接受不同「教材表徵」教學課程後在學習成就上的差異,並採用單因子共變數分析與事前比較檢定研究假設,檢定分析得到以下結論:
(一)在不同教材表徵下的學習者,其學習成就有統計上的顯著差異。接受多媒體教材教學學習者的學習成就高於接受傳統教材教學學習者的學習成就。
(二)「擴散者」、「調適者」、「聚斂者」和「同化者」四種學習風格學習者,其學習成就沒有統計上的顯著差異。
(三)在「傳統教材」下,不同「學習風格」學習者之學習成就沒有統計上的顯著差異。
(四)在「多媒體教材」下,不同「學習風格」學習者之學習成就沒有統計上的顯著差異。
(五)「擴散者」和「調適者」學習者之學習成就與「聚斂者」和「同化者」學習者之學習成就有統計上的顯著差異。
(六)在「傳統教材」下,「擴散者」和「調適者」學習者之學習成就與「聚斂者」和「同化者」學習者之學習成就有統計上的顯著差異。
(七)在「多媒體教材」下,「擴散者」和「調適者」學習者之學習成就與「聚斂者」和「同化者」學習者之學習成就有統計上的顯著差異。
本研究最後根據研究結果提出建議,以供現職教師、教育行政單位及後續相關研究者參考。
This study mainly researches the influence on achievements, among the varied learning style learners, learning the unit of geometry between multimedia teaching materials and traditional teaching material in junior high school. As a result, it may provide as the reference to mathematics teachers in junior high schools to consider students’ individual differences, to apply technological teaching materials, and develop or select multimedia teaching materials.
The study applied the nonequivalent–groups pretest–posttest quasi–experimental design. The subjects chosen randomly are the eighty students in two classes of seventh grade students in a certain junior high school in Taichung City. One class serves as the experimental group providing multi-media teaching materials and the other is the control group carrying on traditional teaching materials. It is engaged the measurements of Kolb Learning Style Inventory, which divides those learners into four learning styles- Diverger, Accommodator, Converger and Assimilator. Multimedia teaching materials in this teaching experiment are made up by the researchers based on instructional objectives of teaching units, referred to Cognitive Load Theory along with Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, and adopted the suggestions by Sweller(2005), Mayer(2001) and Atkinson(2005). The length of the instruction is forty-five minutes, a short teaching span, so as not to be interfered by irrelevant factors. Simultaneously, the teaching content is drawn from「Parallelism and Quadrilateral」 of the unit of geometry in eighth grade. It researches the differences after varied learning styles learners are exposed to different material representations. After that, the hypotheses are verified by the adopted ANCOVA and priori comparison, the results as following:
(A) Under varied teaching materials, the learners have a significant difference. The ones, exposed to multimedia teaching materials, have higher academic achievement than those are under traditional teaching materials.
(B) There is no statistically significant difference among Diverger, Accommodator, Converger and Assimilator.
(C) There is no statistically significant difference among different kinds of learning styles learners those are exposed to traditional teaching materials. Similarly, there is no statistically difference to those learners under multimedia teaching materials.
(D) There is a statistically significant difference to the two groups of learning styles learners between Diverger, Accommodator and Converger and Assimilator.
(E) There is a statistically significant difference those the two groups of learning styles learners, between Diverger, Accommodator and Converger, Assimilator, are exposed to traditional teaching materials. Similarly, there is a statistically difference to those learners under multimedia teaching materials.
Based on the results, this research is proposed several effective suggestions that could serve as the references applied by current teachers, educational authorities and researchers for future.
西文部分
Airasian, P. W. (1996). Assessment in the classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., & Samuel, B. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Arunyakanon, P. (1991). The effects of hand-held electronic learning aids and cognitive style on mathematics achievement of primary school students in Belize. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing Learning from Examples Using Animated Pedagogical Agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416-427.
Atkinson, R. K. (2005). Multimedia learning of mathematics. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Santa Barbara: University of California.
Bennett, C. (1979). Individual Differences and How Teachers Perceive Them. Social Studies, 70(2), 56-61.
Bishop, A. J. (1989). Review of research on visualization in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1),7-16.
Bruder, I.(1991). Guide to multimedia:How it changes the way we teach and learn.Electronic Learning,11(1),22-26.
Buchanan, L. K. (1992). A comparative study of learning styles and math attitudes of remedial and college-level math students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Calvano, B. J. (1985). The influence of student learning styles on the mathematics achievement of middle school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, Commerce, TX.
Chan, T., Ko, H., Tzeng, O., Chou, C., & Scenario, A. M. (2006). Optimal Capacity Building: Integrating Brain-Based Learning and Educational Research into Technology-Supported Learning. Educational technology, 46(3), 37.
Clark, R. E.(1983). Reconsidering research on learning form media。Review of educational research, 53, 445-459。
Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Cooper, G. (1998). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://paedpsych.jk.uni-linz.ac.at:4711/LEHRTEXTE/Cooper98.html
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating Technology-Some Things You Should Know. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(3), 10-13.
Dyer, D. M. (1994). The effects of computer and non-computer based instruction on symbolic, graphic, and numerical representations of mathematical functions in applied college algebra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Gasiorowski, J. H. (1998). The relationship between student characteristics and math achievement when using computer spreadsheets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Grimm, C. R. (1995). The effect of technology-rich school environments on academic achievement and attitudes of urban school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Hall, L. A. (1993). A critical exploration of learning style preferences and the mathematical achievement of chapter 1 middle school students’ administrative and instructional implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahama State University, Stillwater, OK.
Hendrickson, G. L. (1986). The effect of selected Myers-Briggs personality types and learning styles on geometry achievement in high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Jeung, H. J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329-345.
Keefe, J. W. (1979) Learning style: An overview. In NASSP's Student learning styles: Diagnosing and proscribing programs. National Association of Secondary School Principles, Reston, VA.
Kolb, A. Y. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 Technical Specifications. Boston, MA: HayGroup.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY.: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E.(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 31–48). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484-490.
Mayer, R. E., & anderson, R. B. (1992). The Instructive Animation: Helping Students Build Connections between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444-452.
McCarthy, B. (1990). Using the 4MAT System to Bring Learning Styles to Schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31-37.
McCarthy, B. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT's learning styles. Educational Leadership, 54, 46-51.
Meisels, S. J. (1995). 表現評量. 家政教育, 13(2), 19-23.
Merrill, M. M. (2003). The role of animated pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and instruction, 17(3), 215-248.
Mousavi, S. Y. (1995). Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and instruction, 9(4), 329-389.
NCTM. (1995). Assessment in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Orabuchi, II. (1992). Effects of using interactive CAI on primary grade students, higher-order thinking skills: inferences, generalizations, and math problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman’s University, Denton, TX.
Orhun, N. (2007). An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according to gender. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(3), 321-333.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1980). Analogical processes in learning. San Diego, CA: California University, Center for Human Information Processing.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Silver, H., Strong, R., & Perini, M. (1997). Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 22-27.
Smith, L. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1984). Learning style preferences: A practical approach for classroom teachers. Theory into Practice, 44-50.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E.(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 176-192.
Tarmizi, R. A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 424-436.
Thornton, G. J. (1995). Algebra Tiles and Learning Styles. Unpublished master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC,Canada.
van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of educational research, 47(1), 1-64.
中文部分
王全世(2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育雜誌,80,23-31。
王昌傑(2004)。學習風格對國中生自然科學習成就之影響。慈濟大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
皮連生(1998)。知識分類與目標導向教學。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
江鈞正(2003)。線上多媒體教學系統對國小整數四則運算應用問題解題能力與興趣之研究。大葉大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
何榮桂(2002)。台灣資訊教育現況與發展--兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育雜誌,87,22-48。
何榮桂、顏永進(2001)。資訊融入健康與體育領域教學。教師天地,112,71-75。
余民寧(1995)。心理與教育統計學。台北: 三民書局。
余民寧(1997)。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量。台北: 心理,15-19。
余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。
吳百薰(1998)。國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究。國立台中師院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
吳泓泰(2007)。國中生學習風格,數學學習態度與數學學業成就關係之研究。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
吳瑞源、吳慧敏(2008)。動畫教材之學習者控制播放模式與多媒體組合形式對學習成效與學習時間影響之研究。師大學報,53(1),1-26。
李士錡(2001)。數學教育心理。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
李仲鈞(2007)。從數量推理能力與認知風格探討傳統教材與多媒體輔助教材對學習成就之分析-以國中二年級之等差數列與等差級數為例。國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班網路學習學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
李國偉(2002)。數學的本質。2009年12月10日,取自:http://episte.math.ntu.edu.tw/articles/mm/mm_02_3_05/index.html
李榮馨(2003)。高職工業類科學生學習風格與數學科學業成就關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
李麗君(1988)。從電視特性談電視教學節目應具備之要素。隔空教育論叢,1,143-162。
季素月(2000)。數學教學概論(5冊)。南京:東南大學出版社。
林文昌(2003)。融合網路多媒體在國小數學領域教學之學習成效與態度影響研究。國立新竹教育大學進修部數理教育碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
林世華(2000)。由多元評量的觀念看傳統評量的角色與功能。科學教育,231,67-71。
林生傳(1985)。國中學生學習式態之相關因素及其與學校教育態度, 學業成就的關係。教育學刊,6,41-94。
林妙玲(2007)。國小學童學習風格與其數學熟練性之研究。國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
林振清(2007)。複式評量融入數學教學對不同學習風格的高二學生學習成效之研究。國立政治大學應用數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
林慧靜(2005)。國中數學線上補救教學成效之研究。國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
林麗琳(1995)。國小資優班與普通班學生學習風格, 學習適應與學業成就關係之研究。台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
邱俊宏(2003)。多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學童學習線對稱圖形成效之研究。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
邱瓊慧(2002)。中小學資訊科技融入教學之實踐。資訊育教育雜誌,88,1-9。
洪郁婷(2004)。3D虛擬實境教學軟體在不同性別及學習風格之數學科學習成就及學習態度之研究---以國小六年級角柱和角錐單元為例。屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張玉微(2009)。應用數學教學平台設計與執行。逢甲大學應用數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
張玉燕(1996)。教學媒體。台北市:五南。
張東天(2005)。初級華語課的華語講授與多媒體教具。第四屆全球華文網路教育研討會論文集。
張國恩(1999)。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育雙月刊,72,2-9。
張景媛(1988)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。教育心理學報,21,113-172。
張景斌(2002)。中學數學教學教程。北京:科學出版社。
張霄亭、朱則剛、張鐸嚴、洪敏琬、胡怡謙、方郁琳 等(1997)。教學原理。台北市:國立空中大學。
張儷齡(2000)。網際空間國中數學多媒體教材內容與呈現之研究。大葉大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2009)。建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。台北市:教育部。
許智豪(2005)。Y世代,X世代和嬰兒潮世代學習風格分析之研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
郭生玉(2000)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。
郭重吉(1987a)。英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究。資優教育季刊,22,2-8。
郭重吉(1987b)。評介學習風格之有關研究。資優教育季刊,23,7-16。
陳嘉慶(2008)。以貝氏網路為基礎的資訊融入數學教學對不同學習風格學生教學成效之探究─以分數的乘法單元為例。國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
黃永和(1997)。教學表徵 - 教師的教學法寶。國教世紀,178,17-24。
楊秀鳳(2009)。多媒體字源教學法對國小六年級識字困難學生識字成效之研究。國立台中教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
溫嘉榮(1996)。國民中學多媒體電腦輔助教學的開發及實驗。資訊與教育雙月刊,55,15-20。
葉進安(2009)。Gsp融入數學教學對於國中生幾何單元學習成效之研究。國立政治大學應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
趙銘(1996)。認識電腦多媒體系統。資訊與教育雙月刊,54,4-9。
蔡淑薇(2003)。高中職學生學習風格、自我調整學習與學業成就之關係。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
鄭君文、張恩華(1991)。數學學習論。南宁:廣西教育出版社。
鄭蕙如、林世華(2004)。Bloom 認知領域教育目標分類修訂版理論與實務之探討─ 以九年一貫課程數學領域分段能力指標為例。NTTU Educational Research Journal,15(2),247-274。
盧炳惠、張學斌(2001)。試論知識的類型與教學。南華大學學報(社會科學版),2(001),73-76。
蕭惠英(2006)。遊戲式網路評量對不同學習風格學生數學學習成效之影響。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
簡茂發(1999)。評量。載於黃政傑(主編),教學評量。台北市:師大書苑。
顏龍源(2000)。主題化的電腦融入課程概念。資訊與教育雜誌,80,32-40。
蘇建誠(1996)。從國小新課程標準看多媒體CAI的發展。資訊與教育雙月刊,55,21-24。
欒慶芳、潘洪建(2005)。數學知識與學習方式的選擇。現代中小學教育,2005(4),19-21。