TED演講（TED talks）為當今最具有影響力的網路傳播演講形式之一，其名稱來源於科技（technology）、娛樂（entertainment）、設計（design）的縮寫。TED演講以英語演講的形式發展數年後，針對世界各地語言受眾的TEDx分會系統上線。TED與TEDx演講影片均以內容的多元性、豐富性與趣味性著稱，具有難以估量的語言教學應用價值。現階段針對演講語篇並將之運用到教學領域的研究大部分以研究單一語言，又尤以英語研究為主，華語教學界仍缺乏教學導向的華語與法語演講語篇對比研究。在此背景之下，本研究以25篇華語與25篇法語TEDx演講語篇為樣本進行對比分析，旨在利用語步分析法（move analysis）探究兩種語言在構築TEDx演講時訊息結構之分布特徵與異同，並歸納兩種語言典型的語步結構模型，期為針對法籍學習者的華語演講教學提供一定的理論基礎與實際應用建議。
本研究完善了Chang & Huang（2015）與Kraisriwattana & Poonpon（2021）所建之語體分析架構，發現華語與法語TEDx演講同其他演講語體一樣，具有前言、主體與結尾三段式的架構。所選語料中共出現了9種語步，分別是常出現於前言的「引導聽眾」、「介紹主題」與「敘述自我」；常出現於主體的「以主題順序展開主題」、「以敘述順序展開主題」與「以問題－解決順序展開主題」；及常出現於結尾的「結束演講」、「提供啟示」與「表達情意」。上述每個語步又均由多個策略組成，9種語步共計包含32種策略。此外，本文還發現語步與策略之間存在邊界模糊甚至融合的現象，且個別語步或策略能夠依據演講者需要穿插於其他訊息結構之內，證實TEDx演講作為一種口語語體，在結構上具有較強的靈活性。
對比分析結果顯示，整體上華語演講所使用的語步與策略數量多於法語演講，差異主要體現於主體段，華語演講主體段的語步結構更為複雜且所佔篇幅更長，同時偏好使用更多有助於與聽眾建立良好溝通關係的語步與策略；而法語演講的語步結構則更為簡單與簡短，採用更為均衡的三段式演講結構，同時傾向使用幫助勾勒演講架構的語步與策略，幫助聽眾減輕一定的認知負擔。最後本文結合語體教學法常用的「教與學週期」模型（Feez & Joyce, 1998; Hyland, 2004; Rothery, 1996），將分析結果應用於華語演講教學，不僅歸納了語體模型供學習者或教學者參考，還提供了教學主題的規劃建議與相關課堂活動範例，以期協助華語學習者與教學者提升對TED演講語體的認知，增進華語演講教學之實效。

TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) talks, as one of the most influential forms of online public speaking genres, are known for their diversity, richness, and interesting content. After several years of development in the form of English talks, TEDx program were launched, facing language communities all around the world. TED and TEDx talks both have immeasurable value for language teaching and learning. However, there is still a lack of pedagogically oriented comparative studies between Chinese and French speech texts in the CSL filed. In this context, 25 Chinese and 25 French TEDx talks were selected for this study to build two small corpora for cross-linguistic comparison and analysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the move structure in Chinese and French-language TEDx talks, and to summarize the typical structural genre models of the two languages to provide a theoretical basis and practical teaching suggestions for French Chinese-language learners.
This study adapted and improved the framework developed by Chang & Huang (2015) and Kraisriwattana & Poonpon (2021), found that Chinese and French TEDx talks have a three-stage structure of introduction, body, and conclusion like other speech genre. A total of nine moves appear in both corpora, namely Listener Orientation, Topic Introduction and Speaker Presentation, which appear mostly the introduction; Topic Development in Topical Order, Topic Development in Narrative Order and Topic Development in Problem-Solution Order, which appear only in the body; Closure, concluding messages and Regards Expression, which appear mostly in the conclusion. Each of these moves is composed of at least two strategies, and the nine steps contain a total of 32 strategies. In addition, there are some unique associations and interactions between moves and strategies are found, which demonstrates the flexible nature of the speech genre. Specifically, there is a blurring or even fusion of the boundaries between the moves and strategies, as well as those individual moves or strategies can be interrupted by and interspersed with other structures as needed. The above findings confirmed that TED talks, as a kind of spoken language genre, have a strong structural flexibility.
The results of the comparative analysis show that, the Chinese TEDx talks are more complex than the French ones in terms of the use of moves, and the length of each move strategy is longer. Chinese talks place more emphasis on the exposition and reasoning of body part than introductions and conclusion, showing a preference for moves and strategies that help to establish a good communication relationship with the audience; while the French talks has simpler and shorter moves, with a more balanced three-part structure, and a tendency to use moves and strategies that help outline the structure of the speech, thus helping to reduce a certain cognitive burden on the audience. Finally, combing the genre-based pedagogy theories, this paper not only summarized the genre model for the reference of Chinese language learners or teachers, but also provided suggestions for the planning of teaching themes and examples of classroom activities. The author expects to help Chinese learners and teachers to improve their genre knowledge in terms of TED talks and to enhance the effectiveness of Chinese speech teaching pedagogy.

Hyland, K.（2014）。談學術英語教學新趨勢（財團法人語言訓練測驗中心編輯團隊譯），語言之道，2，8-13。
王瑩瑩（2018）。TED演講中話語標記語跨學科對比研究（未出版碩士論文）。黑龍江大學，哈爾濱市。
吳欣儒（2017）。華語演講的語步分析及其教學應用（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
吳玲娟（2015）。基於TED-Ed的通用學術英語聽說翻轉課堂研究。電化教育研究，36，81-87。
孟國（2009）。試論對外漢語實況聽力教學的理論依據。天津師範大學學報：社會科學版，1，64-68。
張戈（2018）。真實語料對提高外語學習者自主學習內在動機的有效性研究──基於翻轉課堂的實證研究，外語教育研究前沿，1，56-64，92-93。
張麗珍（2005）。論演講語體的修辭特點，鄭州航空工業管理學院學報（社會科學版），24，85-86，96。
智敬誼（2017）。TED視頻應用於高中英語教學的研究（未出版碩士論文）。鄭州大學，鄭州市。
游梓翔（2015）。演講學原理：公眾傳播的理論與實際。台北市：五南圖書。
溫宥基（2020）。10堂課練就TED Talks演講力。台北市：三民。
裴錚（2015）。TED教學應用研究（未出版碩士論文）。河南師範大學，新鄉市。
趙藝（2015）。演講語體與辯論語體對比研究──以「第四屆中國軍校大學生電視演講大賽」為例，現代語文（語言研究版），3，128-131。
劉凡（2019）。語步結構視角下的中美畢業演講體裁對比分析（未出版碩士論文）。山西財經大學，太原市。
劉立軍、胡靜、宋葳（2020）。基於TED演講的通用學術英語聽力教改實踐。考試與評價（大學英語教研版），4，59-67。
劉銳、王珊（2021）。運用真實語料開發國際漢語教材：理論與實踐。語言教學與研究，1，1-11。
劉艷春、胡鳳國、趙藝（2016）。辯論與演講語體多維度、多特徵對比研究。語言教學與研究，6，103-112。
盧婧潔（2013）。淺議TED演講視頻在高校英語專業英語視聽說課程教學中的應用。長沙大學學報，27，156-158。
羅駿逸（2018）。中英政治演講之語步及互動標記對比分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
Afful, J. B. A., & Kyei, E. (2020). Move analysis of letters of recommendation written by lecturers in a Ghanaian university. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(5), 1–11.
Ahluwalia, G. (2018). Students’ perceptions on the use of TED talks for English language learning. Language in India, 18(12), 80–86.
Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Alwi, N. F. B., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Oral presentation: Self-perceived competence and actual performance among UiTM business faculty students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 98–106.
Anderson, C. (2016). TED talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Asghar, S. A., Asghar, Z. M., & Mahmood, M. A. (2015). A genre analysis of preface sections of textbook. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 58–63.
Beebe, S. A., & Beebe, S. J. (2014). Public speaking handbook (4th edition). New York: Pearson.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge.
Bhatia, V. K. (1996). Methodological issues in genre analysis. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 16, 39–59.
Briones, R. R. Y. (2012). Move analysis of philosophy research article introductions published in the University of Santo Tomas. Philippine ESL Journal, 9, 56–75.
Bu, J. (2014). Towards a pragmatic analysis of metadiscourse in academic lectures: From relevance to adaptation. Discourse Studies, 16(4), 449–472.
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. Academic Discourse, 57, 75.
Carnegie, D., & Esenwein, J. B. (2017). The art of public speaking. New York: Courier Dover Publications.
Chang, Y., & Huang, H.-T. (2015). Exploring TED talks as a pedagogical resource for oral presentations: A corpus-based move analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 39(4), 29–62.
Compagnone, A. (2015). The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 54, 49–69.
Connor, U., Upton, T. A., & Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Introduction to move analysis. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure, (23-42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cummins, J., & Davison, C. (2007). International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 15). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125–140.
DaVia Rubenstein, L. (2012). Using TED talks to inspire thoughtful practice. The Teacher Educator, 47(4), 261–267.
de Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(3), 293–306.
Denskus, T., & Esser, D. E. (2014, July). TED Talks on international development: Science communication,‘digital solutionism’and social change. Paper presented at APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper, Washington, DC.
Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392.
Donovan, J. (2014). How to deliver a TED talk. New York: McGraw Hill.
Eggins, S., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. Discourse as Structure and Process, 1, 230–256.
Etemadfar, P., & Namaziandost, E. (2020). An investigation of interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign speeches. Critical Literary Studies, 2(2), 117–130.
Feez, S., & Joyce, H. D. S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT journal, 54(4), 369-378.
Furka, I. (2008). The curriculum vitae and the motivational letter: a rhetorical and cultural analysis. WoPaLP Journal, 2,18-37.
Gallo, C. (2014). Talk like TED: The 9 public speaking secrets of the world’s top minds. New York: Pan Macmillan.
Gunawan, S. (2012). Using online speeches for supporting the teaching of English public speaking. Paper presented at the first International Conference on Language Teaching Materials, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Hamilton, C. (2014). Cengage advantage series: Essentials of public speaking. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Han, D. (2011). Utterance production and interpretation: A discourse-pragmatic study on pragmatic markers in English public speeches. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2776–2794.
Hennessey, A. (2019). Your guide to public speaking: Build your confidence, find your voice, and inspire your audience. Avon, MA: Simon and Schuster.
Hirano, E. (2009). Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 240–250.
Huang, D. (2014). Genre analysis of moves in medical research articles. Stylus, 5(1), 7–17.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2013). Genre and discourse analysis in language for specific purposes. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2281–2288). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.
Juan, Z., & Tao, W. U. (2013). A genre analysis of medical abstracts by Chinese and English native speakers. Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 28(1), 60–64.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Writing scientific research articles in Thai and English: Similarities and differences. Silpakorn University International Journal, 7, 172–203.
Kraisriwattana, J., & Poonpon, K. (2021). A discourse analysis of speech structure from TED talks corpus. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(2), 59–72.
Kuhi, D. (2008). An analysis of move structure of textbook prefaces. Asian ESP Journal, 7, 63–78.
Leopold, L. (2016). Honing EAP learners’ public speaking skills by analyzing TED talks. TESL Canada Journal, 33(2), 46–58.
Li, L.-J., & Ge, G.-C. (2009). Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93–104.
Li, X., & Li, F. (2021). Corpus-Based Move Analysis of TED Talks about Education. Creative Education, 12(1), 166–175.
Li, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhang, D. (2016). To speak like a TED speaker—A case study of TED motivated English public speaking study in EFL teaching. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 53–59.
Lingley, D. (2009). Using commencement speeches to link global issues with language learning. Global Issues in Language Education, 73, 14–17.
Loi, C. K. (2010). Research article introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 267–279.
Loi, C. K., & Evans, M. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2814–2825.
Lucas, S. E. (1989). The art of public speaking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ludewig, J. (2017). TED Talks as an emergent genre. CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(1).
Lumen Learning (2022). Principles of Public Speaking. Retrieved from
https://s3.amazonaws.com/lumenlearning/success/Master+PDFs/Principles-of-Public-Speaking_1-2-17.pdf
Luo, H. (2014). Foreign language speaking anxiety: A study of Chinese language learners. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 15(1), 99–117.
Mai, H. (2016). An intercultural analysis of meta-discourse markers as persuasive power in Chinese and American political speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(6), 207–219.
Martín-Martín, P., & Burgess, S. (2004). The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article abstracts. Text & Talk, 24(2), 171–195.
Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tajino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1–11.
McGregor, A., Zielinski, B., Meyers, C., & Reed, M. (2016). An exploration of teaching intonation using a TED Talk. Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 143–149.
Nodoushan, M. (2012). A structural move analysis of discussion sub-genre in applied linguistics. International Conference on Languages, E-Learning and Romanian Studies.
Nodoushan, M., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(3), 111–132.
Nursafira, M. S. (2020). TED talks in EFL context: An alternative way for teaching and improving student’s speaking skills. ELSYA: Journal of English Language Studies, 2(2), 43–47.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119–138.
Park, S., Jeon, J., & Shim, E. (2021). Exploring request emails in English for business purposes: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 137–150.
Ratanakul, S. (2017). A study of problem-solution discourse: Examining TED talks through the lens of move analysis. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 10(2), 25–46.
Romanelli, F., Cain, J., & McNamara, P. J. (2014). Should TED talks be teaching us something? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(6).
Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan &. G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.
Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–70.
Samayoa, P. (2017). The extent of influence that genre conventions have on TED Talks. Stylus, 8, 46–59.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1–17.
Samraj, B., & Monk, L. (2008). The statement of purpose in graduate program applications: Genre structure and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 193–211.
Sari, A. M. (2014). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers used in Michelle Obama’s speech. (Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis), Dian Nuswantoro University.
Schreiber, L., & Hartranft, M. (2017). Introduction to public speaking. TS Rice, Fundamentals of Public Speaking, 6–22.
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2014). The role of proximity in online popularizations: The case of TED talks. Discourse Studies, 16(5), 591–606.
Shehzad, W. (2012). Introduction of computer science research paper: Divergence from CARS. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 15(2), 19–39.
Soler-Monreal, C., Carbonell-Olivares, M., & Gil-Salom, L. (2011). A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4–17.
Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45–57.
Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V., Tsou, A., Mongeon, P., & Macaluso, B. (2013). Scientists popularizing science: characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PloS One, 8(4), e62403.
Suryani, F. B., & Rismiyanto, R. (2019). Move analysis of the English bachelor thesis abstracts written by Indonesians. Prominent, 2(2).
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takaesu, A. (2017). TED talks as an extensive listening resource for EAP students. Asian-Focused ELT Research and Practice: Voices from the Far Edge, 108.
Tardy, C. M., & Swales, J. M. (2014). Genre analysis. Pragmatics of Discourse, 3, 165.
Taylor, G., & Tingguang, C. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 319–336.
Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analysing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171–186.
Tsou, A., Thelwall, M., Mongeon, P., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). A community of curious souls: an analysis of commenting behavior on TED talks videos. PloS One, 9(4), e93609.
Vakili, E. Z., & Kashani, A. F. (2012). The contrastive move analysis: An investigation of Persian and English research articles’ abstract and introduction parts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 129.
Wang, C. (2016). A comparative genre analysis of schematic structures in public speeches of native and nonnative English speakers. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 4(5), 320–330.
Wang, D. (2018). Motivating students to talk: TED conference in university-based Chinese language classrooms. Chinese Language Teaching Methodology and Technology, 1(4), Article 2.
Wang, H. (2005). A pragmatic genre analysis of job application letters. Sino-US English Teaching, 2(12), 76–81.
Weber, Kerstin. (2011). A genre analysis of the American presidential inaugural address. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Vienna.
Wingrove, P. (2017). How suitable are TED talks for academic listening? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 79–95.
Yang, X., & Liang, M. (2020). Teaching design and application of TED talks in English autonomous listening class. Creative Education Studies, 8(4), 489-496.
Zhan, L.-L. (2012). Understanding genre in use. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 38(2), 211–235.
Rossette-Crake, F. (2021). La «New Oratory»: les nouveaux genres de prise de parole «en public» à l’ère digitale [The "New Oratory": new types of public speaking in the digital age]. Questions de Communication [Questions of Communication], 39, 329–356.