本研究旨在探討臺中市高職綜職科學生家庭對於家庭支持服務需求程度與獲得現況，並分析不同變項對於家庭支持服務需求與獲得現況之影響。透過自編的「臺中市綜職科學生家庭支持服務需求與家庭支持服務獲得現況調查問卷」進行調查，問卷共寄出382份，回收342份，回收率為90%，有效問卷265份，有效率為77%，回收問卷以描述統計、t檢定和單因子變異數進行分析，結論說明如下：
一、家庭支持服務中，需求程度最高為生涯規劃支持服務，其次依序為性別教育支持服務、資訊支持服務、精神支持服務，需求程度最低為經濟支持服務。
二、家庭支持服務獲得程度最高為精神支持服務、其次依序為生涯規劃支持服務、性別教育支持服務、資訊支持服務，獲得程度最低為經濟支持服務，獲得程度皆為低。
三、整體家庭支持服務、經濟支持服務、性別教育支持服務、資訊支持服務、精神支持服務、生涯規劃支持服務需求與獲得間有顯著落差。
四、家庭支持服務的需求程度會因居住地區、家庭主要照顧者身分、家庭主要照顧者教育程度與家庭平均月、子女障礙程度不同而有差異。
五、家庭支持服務的需求程度不因家中子女數、身心障礙子女就讀年級、身心障礙子女性別與身心障礙子女家中排行而有差異。
六、家庭居住地區、家庭主要照顧者身分、家庭主要照顧者教育程度、家庭平均月收入、家中子女數、子女就讀年級、子女性別、子女障礙程度與子女家中排行對於家庭在獲得支持服務上沒有顯著影響。
並依據上述研究結果，提供建議，做為有關單位及未來研究之參考。

This study aimed to explore the demand and acquisition of family support services toward special education class students in a vocational high school in taichung City, and analyze how different factors would cause an impact through a self-conducted questionnaire survey, "Demand and Acquisition of Family Support Services Questionnaire for Special Education Class Students in Vocational High Schools in Taichung City " 382 questionnaires were sent, 342 response were received at a receive rate of 90%, and 265 of them were valid at a validity rate of 77%. Descriptive statistics, T-test and ANOVA were performed, and the results are as follows:
Within family support services, the most demanded service was career planning support services, followed by sexual education support services, information support services, and spiritual support services; the least demanded was economical support services.
Within family support services, the most obtained service was spiritual support services, followed by career planning support services, sexual education support services, and information support services. The least obtained was financial support services, all families got a low support.
We saw a significant gap between their demand and acquisition in overall family support services, economical support services, sexual education support services, information support services, spiritual support services, and career planning support services.
The level of demand of family support services varies based on residencies, family caregiver statuses, family caregiver education levels, average monthly income, and disability levels of the child.
There were no significant difference in the level of demand of family support services from different numbers of children with disabilities, year the disabled child is in, gender of the disabled child, nor the birth order of the child.
The family’s residence, family caregiver status, family caregiver education level, household monthly income, number of children at home, year the child is in, gender of the child, child disability level, and birth order of the child made no significant impact on the level of family support services obtained.
Based on these findings, we can provide recommendations for related agencies and as a reference for future research.

內政部(2009)：身心障礙者權益保障白皮書。檢自
http://www.moi.gov.tw/dsa/news_content.aspx?sn=2841
內政部統計處（2006）：95 年身心障礙者生活需求調查結果摘要分析。檢自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Survey/list.html
內政部統計處(2012)：101年上半年身心障礙者福利統計。檢自：
http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/list.htm
內政部統計處(2012)：身心障礙福利服務機構概況。檢自：
http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/year.aspx
內政部統計處(2012)：臺灣地區都會區分類。檢自：
http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15262&CtNode=3596&mp=4
王天苗(1992)：智障者家庭支持。上課講義，臺北：師大。
王天苗(1993)：心智發展障礙兒童家庭需要之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，9，73-90。
王天苗(1994)：心智發展障礙幼兒家庭狀況之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，10，119-141
王天苗(1995)：心智發展障礙幼兒家庭支持實施成效及相關問題之研
究。特殊教育研究學刊，12，75-103。
王慧婷、陳淑瑜、邱春瑜、葛竹婷、任麗華、鄭雅莉、柯秋雪合譯(2013)。洪儷瑜校閱。Turnbull , Turnbull , J. Erwin ,L. C . Soodak , K. A. Shogren原著(2010)。親師合作與家庭支持：由信任與夥伴關係創造雙贏(Family, professional, and Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnership and Trust,6rd ed)。臺北：華騰。
全國法規資料庫(2012)：身心障礙者權益保障法。檢自：
http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContent.aspx?pcode=D0050046
何華國 (2002)：特殊兒童親職教育。臺北市，五南。
利慶松（1992）：自閉症患者母親之身心壓力、生活適應與服務需求(未出版碩士論文)。私立東海大學，臺中。
呂婌華（2004）：視覺障礙學生家庭需求之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東。
洪于筌(2011)：國中資源班學生主要照顧者對家庭支持服務之研究-以臺中市為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
胡雅各、郭慧龍（2001）：高中職特教班智障學生的父母親家庭支持服務需求調查研究。載於亞洲區障礙理解教育國際研討會論文集，21-49。彰化縣：國立彰化師範大學。
特殊教育通報網(2013)：年度統計資料。檢自：
http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp
秦文力(1994)：障礙家庭的生涯福利需求。社區發展季刊，67，218-223。
張世慧(2005)：融合教育的遞嬗與在融合班中協助身心障礙學生的方
法。國教新知，52(3)，1-11。
張美雲、林宏熾(2008)：發展遲緩兒童家庭社會支持與增權賦能之相關研究。特殊教育學報(26)，55-84。
張淑燕(1997)：國中啟智班學生家庭需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
教育部(2007)：特殊教育發展五年計畫。檢自：
http://140.111.34.54/plannews_detail.aspx?sn=361&pages=8
教育部(2012)：特殊教育法。檢自：
http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080027
教育部(2012)：特殊教育法行細則。檢自：
http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080032
教育部特殊教育通報網(2012)：100年度特殊教育統計年報概況。檢自：http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/contact/101%E9%A0%81%E9%9D%A2.asp
教育部特殊教育通報網(2012)：98年度特殊教育統計年報概況。檢自
http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/contact/98%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1%E9
%A0%81%E9%9D%A2.asp
許天威，徐享良，張勝成主編(2005)：新特殊教育通論。臺北：五南。
郭書廷(2011)：高屏地區國小特教班學生家庭需求及家庭支持服務獲得現況之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學，屏東。
陳昭儀(1995)：身心障礙兒童與家庭。師大學報，44，187-212。
陳進吉(2003)：台北市發展遲緩兒童家庭支持及其家庭需求調查之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學，臺北。
陳麗如，Dalun Zhang (2004)：美國身心障礙者重要法案之陳述。台東特教，19，41-47。
陶瑜(2004)：系統觀點對自閉症兒童的家庭需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學，臺北。
程婉毓(2006)：桃竹苗地區國小啟智班學生家庭支持服務之研究(未出版之碩士文)。國立新竹教育大學，新竹。
黃世鈺（民83）：特殊兒童之親職教育。載於王文科（主編）。特殊教育導論（頁634-458）。臺北：心理。
萬育維、王文娟譯(2002)。Turnbull, A., & Turnbull, R..(2002)：身心障礙家庭：建構專業與家庭的信賴聯盟(Families, Professionals, And Eeceptionality: Collaborating For Empowerment)。臺北：洪葉文化。
臺中市特教資源中心(2013)：臺中市特教資源中心輔具借用規則。檢自：http://60.249.7.138/borrow/index.aspx
臺中市教育局(2011)：臺中市身心障礙專業團隊服務暨管理要點。檢自：http://www.tc.edu.tw/m/146
臺中市教育局(2011)：臺中市身心障礙學生獎補助辦法。檢自：
http://www.tc.edu.tw/m/146
臺中市教育局(2012)：臺中市身心障礙學生補助交通費實施辦法。檢自：http://www.tc.edu.tw/m/146
臺中市教育局(2012)：臺中市高級中等以下學校身心障礙資源班實施要點。檢自：http://www.tc.edu.tw/m/146
臺中市教育局(2013)：臺中市身心障礙幼兒學生及身心障礙人士子女學雜費減免補助要點。檢自：http://www.tc.edu.tw/m/146
劉芷寧(2011)：特殊教育學校家庭支持服務現況與滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
蔡東霖(2008)：屏東縣特殊幼兒家庭需求及服務滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學，屏東。
盧建文(2009)：台北縣在家教育學生之家長對服務現況及家庭需求調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。
蕭美珠（2004）：國小聽障學生家庭動力及家庭需求之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東。
謝秀芬(1997)：家庭與家庭服務。臺北：五南。
鍾淑慧(2005)：國民小學提供身心障礙學生家長家庭支持服務之現況調查研究-以彰化縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中。
羅富美(2002)：注意力缺陷過動症兒童家庭需求之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學，臺北。
Agosta, J., & Melda, K. (1995). Supporting families who provide care at home for children with disabilities Exceptional Children, 62(3), 271-282.
Bradley, V. J. (1992). Overview of the family support movement. Monographs of theAmerican Association on Mental Retardation, 18, 167-174.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge , MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (Vol. 6, pp. 187-251). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Burton-Smitha, R., McVillyb, K. R., Yazbeckc, M., Parmenterc, T. R., & Tsutsuid, T. (2009). Service and support needs of Australian carers supporting a family member with disability at home. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(3), 239-247.
Donald B.Bailey, J., & Blasco, P. M. (1990). Parents' perspectives on a written survey of family needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 1(14), 196-203.
Donald B.Bailey, J., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. The Journal of Special Education 22(1), 117-127.
Donald B.Bailey, J., Skinner, D., Correa, V., Arcia, E., E.Reyes-Blanes, M., Rodriguez, P., et al. (1990). Needs and supports reported by Latino families of young children with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retradation, 104(5), 437-451.
Dunst, C. J., Cooper, C. S., Weeldreyer, J. C., Snyder, K. D., & Chase, J. H. (1987). Family needs scale: reliability and validity. Asheville, NC: Winterberry.
Freedman, R. I., & Boyer, N. C. (2000). The power to choose: supports for families caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. Health &Social Work, 25, 59-68.
Guralnick, M. J. (1997). Second-generation research in the field of early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The effective of early intervention (pp. 3-22). Baltimore ,MA: Brookes.
Hill, R. (1958). Generic features of families under stress. Social Casework, 39, 139-150.
Kyzar, K. B., Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., & Gómez, V. A. (2012). The relationship of family support to family outcomes: A synthesis of key findings from research on severe disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(1), 31-44.
Manalo, V., & Meezan, W. (2000). Toward building a typology for the evaluation of services in family support programs. Child Welfare, 79(4), 405-429.
McCubbina, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The family stress process:The double ABCX model of family adjustment and adaptation. In H. I. McCubbin, M. B. Sussman & J. M. Patterson (Eds.), Social Stress and the Family: Advances and Developments in Family Stress Theory and Research (Vol. 6). New York ,NY: Hsworth.
Nina I. Zuna, and, A. T., & Summers, J. A. (2009). Family quality of life: moving from measurement to application. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability, 6(1), 25-31.
Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30(5), 583-594.
Philp, M., & Duckworth, D. (1982). Children with disabilities and their families : a review of research Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.
Rizzolo, M. C., Hemp, R., Braddock, D., & Schindler, A. (2009). Family support services for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities: recent national trends. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 152-155.
Seligman, M., & Darling, R. B. (1989). Ordinary families, special children, third edition: A systems approach to childhood disability. New York ,NY: The Guilford Press.
Singer, G. H. S., Biegel, D. E., & Ethridge, B. L. (2009). Toward a cross disability view of family support for caregiving families. Journal of Family Social work, 12, 97-118.
Tess Bennett, DeLuca, D. A., & Allen, R. W. (1996). Families of children with disabilities: positive adaptation across the life cycle. Children Schools, 18(1), 31-44.
Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Erwin, E. J., Soodak, L. C., & Shogren, K. A. (2010). Families, professionals, and exceptionality Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1986). Stepping back from early intervention: An ethical perspective. Journal of the Devision for Early Childhood, 8(2), 106-117.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: collaborating for empowerment(4th edition) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., summers, J. A., Brotherson, M. J., & Benson, H. A. (1986). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Turnbull, H. R., Stowe, M. J., John Agosta, Turnbull, A. P., Schrandt, M. S., & Muller, J. F. (2007). Federal family and disability policy: special relevance for developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 114-120.
United Nations (1971).Declaration on the rights of mentally retarded
persons. 檢索日期20120924，檢自
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/res2856.htm
United Nations (2006). Draft convention on the rights of persons with
disabilities.檢索日期20131023，檢自
http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
U.S. department of health and human services (2012).Family support
services.檢索日期20120926，檢自http://www.childwelfare.gov/supporting/support_services/index.cf
Wang, P., & Michaels, C. A. (2010). Chinese families of children with severe disabilities: family needs and available support. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(2), 21-32.