簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 丘佳融
Chiu, Chia-Jung
論文名稱: 探討高涉入情境下論點診斷性對偏誤修正的影響
The Influence of Diagnostic Argument on Differential Correction Effect in High Involvement Situation
指導教授: 蕭中強
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 推敲可能性模型偏誤修正理論論點診斷性論點品質
英文關鍵詞: Elaboration Likelihood Model, Bias correction theory, Argument diagnosticity, Argument quality
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900566
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:196下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在消費者行為研究的心理學領域,Petty和Cacioppo的推敲可能性模型已被廣泛應用35年之久,其可用來解釋人們如何形成和改變他們對目標產品的評價與態度。
    本研究欲探討為何推敲可能性模型中沒有提及人們在高涉入情況下會產生偏誤修正行為。在本研究中,我們提出論點診斷性並將其作為一干擾變數,強的論點診斷性定義為與目標的核心價值相關,並且可以幫助消費者判斷產品;此外,加入代言人為偏誤因子以探討推敲可能性模型與Kang和Herr(2006)研究之間的差異。透過高涉入情境的操弄,以及在兩種代言人條件下比較強弱論點診斷性中的四種論點品質,我們發現當論點是弱診斷性時,消費者會產生偏誤修正行為,這證實了論點診斷性是兩個模型間差異的關鍵因素。因為在Kang和Herr的研究之中,實驗所使用的論點都是弱的診斷性論點。

    In the field of psychology about consumer behavior research, Petty and Cacioppo’s ELM model has been used for 35 years, which can be used to explain how people form and change their evaluation and attitude toward the target.
    The purpose of this study is to find why there is no mention about bias correction behavior of high involvement people in the ELM model. In this study, argument diagnosticity was proposed as a moderator, and the strong diagnosticity argument was defined to be related to the central merit of target, and can make consumers easily judge products; furthermore, endorser was used as a bias to explore the difference between the ELM model and Kang and Herr’s (2006) study. The manipulation of high involvement situation and compare four-levels argument quality within strong and weak diagnostic argument under two endorser conditions were employed. The bias correction was found would occur when the argument is weak diagnosticity, which verified that the argument diagnosticity is the key factor of the difference between two models. Since the arguments used in Kang and Herr’s research experiment were weak diagnostic argument

    謝辭 I ABSTRACT II 摘要 III TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation and Study Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 3 2.1 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) 3 2.2 Correction Theory 5 2.3 Multiple Roles 7 2.4 Argument Sufficiency 9 2.5 Argument Diagnosticity 9 CHAPTER 3 PROPOSED THEORY AND HYPOTHESES 12 3.1 Proposed Theory 12 3.2 Hypothesis 14 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 16 4.1 Overview 16 4.2 Pretest 16 4.2.1 Purpose and Design 16 4.2.2 Results 17 4.3 Main Experiment 24 4.3.1 Participants and Design 24 4.3.2 First Experiment Procedure 25 4.3.3 Second Experiment Procedure 26 4.3.4 Independent Variables 28 4.3.5 Dependent Variables 29 4.3.6 Manipulation Check 29 CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH RESULT 32 5.1 Manipulation Check 32 5.1.1 First Experiment 32 5.1.2 Second Experiment 41 5.2 Dependent Variables Measures 52 5.2.1 Attitude of the First Experiment 52 5.2.2 Attitude of the Second Experiment 54 5.3 Tests of Hypotheses 58 5.3.1 Test of Hypothesis 1 58 5.3.2 Test of Hypothesis 2 58 5.3.3 Test of Hypothesis 3 59 5.3.4 Test of Hypothesis 4 60 CHAPTER 6 GENERAL DISCUSSION 62 6.1 Conclusion 62 6.2 Academic Contribution and Managerial Implication 63 6.3 Limitation and Future Research 64 REFERENCES 66

    Martin, John J. Seta, and Rick A. Crelia (1990). Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People’s Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.

    Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1980), “Effects of Issue Involvement on Attitudes in an Advertising Context,” Proceedings of the Division 23 Program, eds. Gerald G. Gorn and Marvin E. Goldberg, Montreal, Canada: American Psychological Association, 75-79.

    Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.

    Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1984b). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-672.

    Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1986a), “Communication and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches,” Dubuque, IA: Brown.

    Petty, Richard E. & John T. Cacioppo (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.

    Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165.

    Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T., (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naïve theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 141-208. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Petty, Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener (1999), “The elaboration likelihood model: current status and Controversies,” Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Chaiken, Shelly (Ed); Trope, Yaacov (Ed), New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 37-72.

    Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo & David Schumann (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Sep.), 135-146.

    Tzu-Wei Lo. (2017). The study of Differential Correction Effect out of High Involvement versus Extremely High Involvement. Master Thesis. Graduate Institute of Management of National Taiwan Normal University. Taipei, Taiwan 300, R. O. C.

    Yong-Soon Kang, Paul M. Herr (2006). Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33,1;ABI/INFORM Global pg.123.

    Yu-Chi Chiu. (2008). The Moderating Role of Argument Sufficiency on the Judgmental Correction for the Contextual Bias. A thesis submitted to the Institute of Technology Management at National Tsing Hua University Hsin-Chu, Taiwan 300, R. O. C.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE