近來，隨著市場競爭加劇和勞動力成本快速上升，企業與企業間彼此競爭需不斷創新，產業因科技發展快速，全球競爭日益激烈，促使創新型產業不斷崛起，企業創新人才需求比例逐年增加；因此，企業內部創新議題受到產業界及學術界的關注，除了員工的知識提升與認知思考使本身自我效能提升產生創新能力外，而企業主管的領導風格及創新領導方式的也是員工創新能力發展的重要因素。企業的長期發展優勢來自於研發活動，除了研發部門擔負著延續企業生命力的任務外；其他部門人員的工作創新與企業產品生產效率息息相關。
本研究以塑膠相關產業之部門員工為研究對象，並採用立意取樣的問卷調查方式，針對自我效能、主管創新領導風格對於主觀規範、知覺控制行為對於創新行為意圖之間影響關係探究。本研究透過應用結構方程模式(SEM)為檢定本研究假設方法，其研究結果發現主管創新領導風格對主觀歸範有正向的關係、主管創新領導風格對知覺行為控制有正向的關係、自我效能對主觀歸範有正向的關係、自我效能對知覺行為控制有正向的關係、主觀規範對創新意圖有正向的關係、知覺行為控制對創新意圖有正向的關係。最後就本研究之結果與建議可提供給相關企業主管與企業主參考，盼能主管發揮創新領導效能並提高部屬自我效能以促進企業創新發展。

The competition among enterprises is becoming severe along with rapidly increasing labor cost and marketing competition. The fast paced technology advancement and stringent global competition lead to continuously booming development of innovative industry and rising demand of innovative staffs year by year. Therefore, the innovative initiatives within the enterprise become the highly focused subjects of the agenda of management review and academic case studies. In addition to upgrade of staff’s knowledge and thoughts to improve the individual performance for higher innovative capability, the manager’s leadership style and innovation is also an important factor of staff team innovative ability .development. The long term competitive strength of the enterprise is based on the rigorous research and development activities. Not only the RD team’s innovative power in product development will create value to the company, but the enterprise benefit is closely correlated to manufacture operation team’s innovation in process efficiency improvement and logistics administration.
This research aims to find the relationships between employee’s self-efficiency, manager’s innovation leadership on subjective norms, perceived control behavior and staff’s intention to innovation in the plastic related industry through questionnaire survey by purposive sampling. The study employs the Structure Equation Modeling approach (SEM) to test the hypothesis of the research. The study result reveals that the staff’s subjective norm is positively correlated with the manager’s leadership style. The staff’s perceived behavior control is positively correlated with manager’s innovative leadership style. The self-efficiency is positively correlated with staff’s subjective norm and perceived behavior control. The innovative intention is positively correlated with staff’s subjective norm. The author wishes the study result and concluded suggestion may help the corporate high management a good reference to inspire the manager’s innovation leadership style and uplift the employees’ self-efficiency which will create continuous innovation for long term operation.

參考文獻
一、中文部分
王國川（1998）。計劃行為理論各成份量表之設計、發展與建立─以青少年無照騎車行為之研究為例。《師大學報》，43（2），67-91。
孔貞貽（2011）。服務業員工創新行為之研究。國立臺北大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新北市。
林清山（1998）。多變項分析統計法：社會及行為科學研究適用。東華書局。
方慈霞（2011）.領導風格工作動機對工作投入之影響-以組織公帄為調節變項。(未出版之碩士論文)。中山大學。高雄市
李劍華, 王智永, 詹玉瑛, & 郭欣易. (2014). 大專院校餐旅系科學生校外
實習與職涯規劃意圖關係之研究. 休閒與遊憩研究, 6(2), 69-114.
林碧芳、邱皓政.(2008). 創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究. 教育研究與發展期刊 (第四卷第一期).頁, 141-169.
林欽榮（2000）。人力資源管理。新北市：揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
林明杰、李信達。（2011）。組織社會化程度、授權賦能認知對個人創新行為影響之研究：顧客導向行為的中介效果。科技管理學刊，16（2），53-80。
林倩后（2012）正面思考與工作價值觀對職場網路霸凌覺知之研究. 臺灣師範大學工業教育學系學位論文, ，未出版，台北市。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變相模式：SIMPLIS的應用。台北市：高等教育。
余鑑、于俊傑、蔡尚鈞、劉曾若。（2011）。人力資源管理對組織承諾之影響—以敬業貢獻度為中介變項。創新研發學刊，7（1），75-89。
高申春（2001）。人性輝煌之路：班杜拉的社會學習理論，台北：貓頭鷹出版社。
洪榮昭（1990）。主管領導力激發與培育（四版），臺北市：清華管理科學圖書中心。
洪榮昭（1998）。創意領先—如何激發個人與組織的創造力（初版）。台北市：張老師文化事業股份有限公司。
洪榮昭、傅惠筠. (2012). 大專校院學生節能減碳行為意圖之研究. 教育心理學報, 44(2), 373-387.
吳明隆（2008）。SPSS 操作與應用問卷統計分析實務，台北市：五南書局。
吳明隆（2008）。結構方程模式Amos 的操作與應用，台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
倪靜貴（2006）。高級中學校長創新領導表現指標建構之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。
李茂興、余伯泉(譯)（1995）。社會心理學(原作者:Aronson, E.)，台北市：
揚智文化。
胡政源（2005）。科技創新管理。台北：新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
黃荷婷（2003）。研發團隊成員目標導向與創新行為，創新績效-自我效能與集體效能的中介效果。(未出版碩士)。東吳大學企業管理研究所。
台北市。
黃致凱（2004）。組織創新氣候知覺、個人創新行為、自我效能知覺與問題解決型態關係之研究-以銀行業為研究對象。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
黃能堂、曾暄芹（2015）。員工創新行為之研究探討。科技與人力教育季刊，2（2），1-15。
邱瑜婷（2007）。國際觀光旅館餐飲部門組織正義、員工創新行為與績效表現之相關研究―以組織支持為干擾變項。天主教輔仁大學餐旅管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，新北市。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模型： lisrel的理論技術與應用。 台北市：雙葉書廊。
邱皓政（2005）。量化研究與統計分析（二版），台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
徐聯恩、洪兆祥（2013）。營造支持性氛圍就能促進員工創新嗎？創業管理研究，8（1），23 -46。
程炳林、林清山（2001）。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊，48（1），1-41。
張嘉琪（2002）。以認知,自我效能及學習型組識理論探討知識創新之研究。(未出版碩士論文)。私立大葉大學資訊管理研究所。彰化縣。
張碧惠（2014）。員工創新意圖之實證研究：雙元機制的觀點。臺北大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文，未出版，台北市。
張慶勳（2005）。論文寫作手冊。台北市：心理出版社。
1111 人力銀行（2017）。2017 企業最愛大學調查。取自：
https://www.1111.com.tw/news/surveyns_con.asp?ano=100821
經濟部（2015）。《中小企業白皮書》。取自：
http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=676&mp=1
二、英文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. 1985, New York: Springer-verlag.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology,22(5), 453-474.
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. Attitude structure and function, 241-274.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and the Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179−211.
Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. NJ :Prentice Hall.
Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Center for Creative Leadership.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, pp.191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 805.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 87-99.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 76-94.
Byrne, B. B. (2010). Structural equation modeling using AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd Ed, New York: Routledge.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Carmines, E., & Mclver, J. (1981), Analyzing models with unobservd variables: Analysis of covariance structures,, In G. Bohmstedt & E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current Issues, Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 76(5),839-855
Dörner,N.(2012).Innovative work behavior: the roles of employee expectations and effects on job performance.University of St.Gallen.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw (1989b). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparisonof two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8), pp.982-1003.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Mis Quarterly, 453-461.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior, 8th. New York: Dryder.
Fleishman, E. A., Harris, E. P., & Burt, H. E. (1955). Leadership and Supervision: An Evaluation of a Supervisory Training Program. Ohio State University Bureau of Educational Research, Columbus.
Fonell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Feist, J., & Feist, G.J. (1998). Theories of personality (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Fan, X., B. Thompson, and L. Wang (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill
Fishbein,M., & Ajzen,I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review, 17(2), 183-211.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positivemood, negativemood, and supervisory behavior to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-

Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., & Biddle, S. J. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 24(1), 3-32.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis(7th ed.). Upper saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Holt, K. (1985). User-oriented product innovation-Some research findings. Technovation, 3(3), 199-208.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55
House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory ofleadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-97.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the program and application. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams (pp. 111-120). Boston, Harvard.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.

Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. and Chervany, N.L. (1999), ‘Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-213.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 779-793.
Lekvall, P., & Wahlbin, C. (1973). A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion functions. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75, 362–377.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
McLeod, J., & Cropley, A. (2013). Fostering academic excellence. Elsevier. Science pergamon press
Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S. and Stilwell, C.D. (1989) “Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models”, Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445
Ma Prieto, I., & Pilar Perez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208.
New York. Kline, R.B. (2005), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Edition ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, controversies and applications. New Delhi: Prentice Hall
Robbins, S. P. (1996). Basic motivation concepts. Organizational Behavior, Concepts, Controversies, and Applications Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc, 210-49.
Robbins, S.P. (1996), Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall., 98, 103-105.
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. 4 rd ed, New York: The Free Press.
Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 55(1), 120-151.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.

Sparks, P., Guthrie, C. A., & Shepherd, R. (1997). The Dimensional Structure of the Perceived Behavioral Control Construct1. Journal of applied social psychology,27(5), 418-438.
Sial, A., Kousar, S. W. A., & Habib, S. (2014). Impact of servant leadership on knowledge sharing intensons among employees (Study of higher education commission of pakistan). European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 2(1), 1-11.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International journal of research in marketing, 12(2), 137-155.
Ullman , M T . T he declarative/ procedu ral model of lex icon an d gram mar[ J] . Journ al of Psycholinguistic Research , 30(1), 37-69.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied psychology, 81(6), 680.
West, M. A. (1987). Role innovation in the world of work. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 305-315.
Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1987). The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and psychological measurement, 47(4), 1013-1024.
Werth, L., Markel, P., & Förster, J. (2006). The role of subjective theories for leadership evaluation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 15(1), 102-127.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The leadership quarterly, 14(4), 545-568.