研究生: |
楊淳涵 Yang, Chun-Han |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以服務設計觀點探討幼兒創作學習紀錄應用程式設計 Studying on the Application of Recording Children's Creation through Service Design Perspective |
指導教授: |
梁桂嘉
Liang, Kuei-Chia |
口試委員: |
黃啟梧
Huang, Chi-wu 鄧建國 Teng, Chien-Kuo |
口試日期: | 2021/07/08 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
設計學系 Department of Design |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 122 |
中文關鍵詞: | 服務設計 、人物誌 、使用者旅程地圖 、使用者經驗 、應用程式 |
英文關鍵詞: | Service design, Persona, User journey map, User experience, Application |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 、 深度訪談法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101014 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:143 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年智慧型行動裝置的多元發展,人類的生活型態也隨之改變,攝影已經日常化,拿起身邊的手機就能拍下生活的感動,因社會人口結構的改變,子女生育數減少,父母更願意對子女的教育做較多的投資,並看重孩子所付出的努力與成長的軌跡。隨手拿起手機就能拍照的方便性,讓父母習慣用手機來幫孩子拍下各種成長的回憶,但當快門按個不停拍下滿滿的精彩片段時,也產生了很大量的照片檔案,若是又疏於整理,下次想要欣賞某張隨手記錄下來的作品時,卻已經淹沒在滿滿的生活照之中而找不到。
故本研究希望以服務設計觀點,從使用者的角度出發,找出痛點以貼近使用者的需求,挖掘父母在使用拍照記錄應用程式時的體驗需求與痛點,整合使用者經驗與介面使用性的觀點,歸納探討出影音的紀錄分類與編輯輸出應用程式之介面設計原則,並進行應用程式之原型設計與實驗驗證,歸納結論與建議提供後續相關應用程式介面設計之參考依據。
本研究以雙鑽石設計的發現、定義、發展與執行的設計流程,先透過半結構式訪談,並從訪談結果篩選出之應用程式進行案例分析,定義出使用者偏好之功能需求,利用人物誌描繪定義出目標使用者樣貌,再透過使用者旅程地圖與服務藍圖來收斂問題與需求,設計出一幼兒創作學習記錄應用程式,並依循使用者經驗蜂巢模型的7項使用者經驗指標為依據,搭配SUS系統易用性尺度量表測試問卷進行實驗驗證。
研究結果顯示:SUS系統易用性尺度量表測試問卷結果為A級。而在易用性方面,受測者對於操作流程是容易理解並易於上手的,在渴望性評估結果方面,對於愉悅的使用體驗上,受測者皆不約而同表示介面乾淨簡約的設計,令受測者有著愉悅的使用體驗,而易尋性、便利性、可靠性評估中,受測者的反饋也是予以正向回應,最後的價值性評估,受測者表示整體的使用體驗令人感到便利省事,可以幫助使用者輕鬆的得到其目的,並會想繼續使用此應用程式。
With the diversified development of smart mobile devices in recent years, human life styles have also changed. Photography has become routine. You can capture the touch of life with any mobile phone. Due to changes in the social demographic structure, while the number of children born has decreased, parents are more willing to make investment in the education of their children. Moreover, these parents value their children's efforts and growth trajectory. The convenience of mobile phones has made parents used to taking photos of various growing memories for theirs kids with their phones. However, as they continuously press the shutter to take down all the fabulous moments, a great amount of photo files is also generated. If parents neglect to organize it, by the time they want to appreciate a certain piece of work that has been recorded casually, they would find themselves drowning in a pool full of life photos and unable to find it.
Therefore, this research aims at finding out the pain points of users from the aspect of service design in order to find out. By discovering the inconveniences parents are confronted with when using the photo recording applications, and by integrating user experience and usability of interface, this research summarizes the interface design principles of audio-visual record classification and editing and output application programs, and conducts application prototyping and experimental verification. Its conclusions and recommendations provide reference for subsequent related application program interface design.
This research, undertaken in the design process of the discovery, definition, development, and implementation of The Double Diamond Design Process, firstly selects application programs for analysis from the interview results of semi-structured interviews and defines the functional requirements that users prefer and also the appearance of the target users through persona. After that, through user journey map and service blueprint we converge the problems and needs and design an application for recording the learning and creation of children. This research also follows the 7 user experience indicators of the user experience honeycomb model and makes use of SUS system usability scale test questionnaire for experimental verification.
The test result of questionnaire of the SUS system usability scale is A-level. In terms of ease of use, the testees could easily understand the operation process and easily handle the program. In terms of eagerness evaluation results, for a pleasant experience, the testees all agreed that the design of interface is clean and simple, which brought them a pleasant experience. In the evaluation of ease of search, convenience, and reliability, the feedback of the testees is also positive. In the final evaluation for value, according to the testees, the overall user experience is convenient, trouble-free and needs-meeting, which makes them more willing to continue using this application.
中文文獻
池佩娟(2010)。幼兒生活美感教育班級教學之個案研究–以一個公立幼稚園班級為例。國立臺中教育大學幼兒教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
池熙璿 (譯) (2013)。這就是服務設計思考。臺北市:中國生產力中心。(Marc Stickdorn, & Jakob Schneider, 2005 原著 )
何舒軒、宋同正(2014)。綜論服務設計學術研究發展。設計學報,19(2), 45-66。
吳佳欣 (譯) (2020)。這就是服務設計!方法篇。臺北市:基峰資訊。(Marc Stickdorn , 2020 原著 )
呂廷和(譯)(2007)。赫伯特.里德(Herbert Read)著。透過藝術的教育(Education Throu gh Art, 3rd rev. ed.)。臺北市:藝術家。
宋同正(2014)。序–服務設計的本質內涵和流程工具。設計學報,19(2)。 1-8
卓耀宗(譯) (2000)。(原作者:Norman, D. A.)著。設計心理學:以使用者為中心、安全易用的日常生活用品設計原理(The design of everyday things)。台北:遠流出版。
卓耀宗(譯) (2007) 。(原作者:Norman, D. A.)著。設計&日常生活。台北:遠流出 版。
林子虹(2016)。使用者經驗於行動介面音效設計之研究。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
林小玉(2008)。從當代音樂教育哲學之發展論美感教育之定位與省思。教師天地,153,29-35。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2)。
林碧芳(2009)。從文化資本探討才藝學習對學習成就的影響.教育與社會研究,17,111- 134。
洪沛然 (譯) (2011)。iPhone User Experience簡單法則:好感度的iPhone使用者體驗。台北市:基峰。(Suzanne Ginsburg, 2010原著)
洪鈺珒(2006)。從藝術賞析開啟幼兒美感經驗與創作。四季兒童教育專刊,(22),24-29。
張振芬(2005)。孩子開心學才藝,不用逼。學前教育,27(11),6-15。
張嘉娜(2016)。幼兒「美感與生活教育」教材設計與教學之行動研究。國立臺中 教育大學美術學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
陳木金(1999)。美感教育的理念與詮釋之研究。載於國立臺灣藝術學院教育學程中心舉辦之「全人教育與美感教育詮釋與對話研討會」學術研討會論文論文集, 36–51。
陳宜秀(譯) (2014)。(原作者:Norman, D. A.)著。設計的心理學。台北:遠流出版
陳建雄(譯)(2006)。互動設計:跨越人-電腦互動。臺北市:全華圖書。 (Preece, J., Rogers, Y. & Sharp, H., 2003)
曾于珍、談玉儀、李文珊、洪麗珠、劉美玲、桂雅文譯(2000)。愛德蒙.惠特曼 (Edmund Burke Feldman)著。藝術教育的本質(Philosophy of art education)。臺北市:五觀藝術管理。
曾惠青(2008)。ㄧ起發現藝術:新式多元智能藝術教學法(第二版)。臺北市:藝術家。
黃文樹主編(2015)。幼兒園美感教育。臺北市:獨立作家。
資策會(2008)。服務體驗工程方法指引-研究篇。台北:經濟部技術處。
Institute for Information Industry (2008). SEE, service experience engineering- Research part. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs. [in Chinese, semantic translation]
廖玫雅(2005)。利用媒體實施國小學童美感教育的教學研究。國立台南大學科技發展與傳播研究所碩士論文。
英文文獻
Battarbee K, Botero A, Mattelmaki T and Rizzo F. (2008). Designed for Co- designers. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.
Boughton, D. (2004). Learning visual culture: the important relationship of curriculum and assessment. NTAEC,4 (2),76-90.
Chuang, P. T. (2007). Combining Service Blueprint and FMEA for Service Design. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2007, 91-104.
Cooper, A (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Macmillan.
Cooper, A., & Saffo, P. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum. Sams.
Grudin, J & Pruitt, J (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development. PDC 2002.
Holmlid, S., & Evenson, S. (2008) Bringing service design to service sciences, management and engineering. In B. Hefley & W. Murphy (Eds.), Service science, management and engineering: Education for the 21st century (pp. 341-345). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Hosono, S., Hasegawa, M., Hara, T., Shimomura, Y., & Arai, T. (2009). A methodology of persona-centric service design. In Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference–Competitive Design. Cranfield University Press.
Jones, M., & Samalionis F. (2008). From small ideas to radical service innovation. Design. Management Review, 19(1), 20-27.
Kadushin (1990). The Social Work Interview: A Guide for Human Service Professionals. New York: Columbia University Press, 3rd, ed. pp.3-8.
Kindler, A. M. (1999). “From endpoints to repertoires”: A challenge to art education. Studies in Art Education, 40(4), 330-349.
Mager, B. (2009). Service design as an emerging field. In S. Miettinen & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Designing services with innovative methods (28-42). Helsinki, Finland: Taik.
Mager, B., & Sung, T. J. (2011). Special issue editorial: Designing for services. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 1-3
Manzini, E., & Vezzoli, C. (2003). A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems: Examples taken from the ‘environmentally friendly innovation’ Italian prize. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(8), 851-857.
Marcus, A. (2001). Babyface design for mobile device and the web. In S. J. Michael & S. Gavriel (Eds.), Human-Computer Interface Internet (HCII). Vol. 2. 514-518. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McCormick, E. J., &Sanders, M. S. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill.
Morelli, N. (2006). Developing new product service systems (PSS): Methodologies and operational tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1495-1501.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego.
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observation on mental models. In A. L. Stevens & D. Gentner (Eds.), Mental models (pp.7-14). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norman, D. A. (2002). Emotion & design: attractive things work better. Interactions, (4), 36-42.
Rayport, Jeffrey F. and Bernard J. Jaworski (2004). Best Face Forward. Harvard Business Review, 82 (6), 47-58.
Schneider, J., & Stickdorn, M. (Eds.) (2011). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
Shneiderman, B. (2009). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human- Computer Interaction (5th ed.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Sinha, R. (2003). Persona development for information-rich domains. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Stefan Moritz, (2005). Service Design: practical access to an evolving field. Köln International School of Design, Germany.
Tarasewich, P. (2003). Designing mobile commerce applications. Communicatio- ns of the ACM, 46(12), 57-60.
V. Zeithaml, M. J. Bitner, and D. Gremler. (2006). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm. 4th edition. 267-276. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., & Wäljas, M. (2011). How do users find out what's new: A study of change indicators in mobile services. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 201-204.
網路文獻
唐國豪(2003)。人與機器的對話:人機互動。2020年5月27日,檢索自:http://www.iem.mcut.edu.tw/~humanfactors/3.pdf
教育部(2012)。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。2020年5月27日,檢索自:https://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/archives/5432
教育部(2013)。教育部美感教育第一期五年計畫:臺灣.好美~美感從幼起、美力終生學。2020年5月27日,檢索自:https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/8/relfile/0/2073/e221c236-b969-470f-9cc2-ecb30bc9fb47.pdf
教育部(2015)。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。2020年5月27日,檢索自: http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cbdic/index.html
資安人科技網(2015)。迎接雲端時代正式來臨,全民做好數位檔案管理準備。2020年5月27日,檢索自:https://www.informationsecurity.com.tw/article/article_print.aspx?aid=8124
衛生福利部(2018)。兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告-兒童篇。2020年5月27日, 檢索自: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-1771-43369-113.html
親子天下翻轉教育(2019a)。設計思考×美感素養,台灣老師的藝術課驚豔芬蘭。 2020年5月27日,檢索自:https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/5538
親子天下翻轉教育(2019b)。豐富的學習空間,讓想像力起飛。 2020年12月10日,檢索自:https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/5358
G.Lynn Shostack(1984). Designing Services That Deliver. January 1984, Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1984/01/designing-services-that-deliver
Garrett, J. J. (2002). The Elements of User Experience: User-centered design for the Web. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://www.jjg.net/elements
John Brooke (1986). System Usability Scale. Retrieved 1986, from https://hell.meiert.org/core/pdf/sus.pdf
Peter Morville (2004) From: http://semanticstudios.com/user_experience_design/ UPA Poster: Designing the User Experience. (2007). From: http://www.upassoc.org/upa_publications/ux_poster.html