簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳嬿如
論文名稱: 電子公司實施同儕師徒制之相關課題研究
指導教授: 賴志樫
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞: 師徒制同儕師徒制
英文關鍵詞: mentoring system, peer mentoring system
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:516下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究係以實施同儕師徒制的電子公司研發單位為研究對象,旨在了解同儕師徒制的特性,探討電子公司實施同儕師徒制的現況及運作方式,並了解其實施同儕師徒制的企業組織背景及原因。研究方法是採質性研究之多重個案研究法,以訪談方式進行研究資料蒐集,研究過程中共訪談三位在受訪企業中擔任人力資源人員、五位擔任師傅的資深研發人員及五位擔任徒弟的研發人員,共13名受訪對象,依據研究主題將訪談資料整理、分析後,獲得研究發現,其主要結論列示如下:
    一、同儕師徒制之重要特性在於是一種橫向的師徒形式,且為組織內部的一種教育訓練方式。
    二、受訪企業師徒制的運作現況,係以正式或非正式的方式實施同儕師徒制,以計畫性的安排師徒配對,加上系統化的工作教導模式,並結合考核與激勵制度。
    三、電子公司之所以實施同儕師徒制的背景原因,主要受到公司環境的影響、因應組織發展的需求,以及員工的個人因素。
    四、電子公司實施同儕師徒制所面臨的困難,包括:資源分配不均、師傅工作量、責任增加師徒間的對立與爭執等。為解決前述困難,除了排解雙方紛爭外,還調整師徒配對、加強主管的支持,並結合考核與獎勵制度,師傅進行再訓練。
    五、電子公司實施同儕師徒制對組織與師徒的影響,最大的效益在於可提高組織團隊的績效及技術的傳承,在此過程中,師徒雙方得以獲得成長,師傅在教導的過程中得到成就感,而徒弟也獲得心理支持及工作上的滿足,進而帶動組織的成長。然而負面的衝擊則在於容易造成組織的分化及師徒集體跳槽,師傅因為工作及責任加重而造成壓力太大,徒弟易受師傅影響,缺乏獨利立自主的能力。

    The purpose of this research is to study (1) the characteristics, practices, and working mechanisms of the peer mentoring system, currently adopted by electronic companies, and (2) reasons and backgrounds that an electronic company chooses to adopt a peer mentoring system. The study subjects include only staff from the research and development department at electronic companies. This research adopted the case study
    approach. Interviews were the main means of data collection and specifically, 13 employees were interviewed: five mentors, five protégés, and three HR managers.
    After data cleaning and analyses, this study provides the following five insights:
    1. the protégé and mentor are hierarchically equal in a peer mentoring system that is viewed as a form of onthejob
    training.
    2. for all companies under study, a peer mentoring system is adopted either officially or unofficially. Mentors utilized systemically designed teaching techniques and were
    strategically chosen to lead their designated protégés. Also, the performance review mechanism and motivation were also tightened to the peer mentoring system to evaluate its effectiveness.
    3. the considerations that electronic companies choose to adopt a peer mentoring system include environmental influences, organizational developments, and employee personal factors.
    4. challenges that electronic companies faced when they adopt a peer mentoring system include: a) equality for resource allocations; b) extra workloads and responsibilities that mentors have to take on; and c) potential conflicts and opinion differences between mentors and students in the mentoring process. To effectively conquer these challenges, organizations need to incorporate the following mechanisms: a conflict resolution mechanism, personality match evaluation process, manager supports,
    performance review and motivational systems, and training programs for effective mentoring skills.
    5. an organization can benefit from a peer mentoring system by increasing organizational performances and passing on skill sets to new employees. Mentors and protégés can both grow by participating in the mentoring process. Mentors can feel a sense of achievements, and protégés are encouraged at the new jobs with increased job satisfaction and can acquire psychological supports from their mentors. Thus, the
    morale of pursuing organizational growth can be cultivated this way. The negative impacts of a peer mentoring system include a) the adopting organization can be disunited with a peer mentoring system and both mentors and protégés may just leave for other companies together; b) mentors may be stressed out from all these extra workloads of mentoring; and c) protégés may become overly relied on their mentors
    for decision making and thus become indecisive.

    目 錄 謝 誌................................i 摘 要................................iii ABSTRACT.................................v 目 錄................................vii 表 次................................ix 圖 次................................xi 第一章 緒論...............................1 第一節 研究背景與動機...................1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題...............5 第三節 研究範圍與限制...................6 第四節 重要名詞釋義.....................8 第二章 文獻探討............................11 第一節 師徒制的意涵.....................11 第二節 師徒功能與優缺點.................16 第三節 師徒制之相關研究分析..............20 第三章 研究設計............................23 第一節 研究方法........................23 第二節 研究步驟........................25 第三節 研究對象........................27 第四節 研究工具........................29 第五節 資料分析........................30 第四章 訪談資料分析.......................33 第一節 實施同儕師徒制之運作現況..........33 第二節 實施同儕師徒制之背景原因..........42 第三節 實施同儕師徒制之困難與解決方法.....46 第四節 實施同儕師徒制對組織與師徒之影響...51 第五節 研究發現........................58 第五章 結論與建議........................67 第一節 結論...........................67 第二節 研究建議........................70 參考文獻...................................73 一、中文部分...............................73 二、英文部分...............................75 附 錄...............................79 附錄一 訪問邀請函.......................81 附錄二 錄音同意書.......................82 附錄三 訪談大綱.........................83 附錄四 逐字稿範例.......................86

    一、中文部分
    何中馨(2007)。跨界的知識傳遞-台灣奧美廣告學習經驗之個案研究。地理學報,47,59-83。
    何明恕(2003)。師徒功能認知對大學研究生學習成效影響之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    李正綱、黃金印(2001)。人力資源管理:新世紀觀點。台北:前程企管。
    李翠萍(2005)。不成功的實習輔導關係之個案研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。
    尚榮安(譯) (2001)。R. K.Yin著。個案研究法。臺北:弘智文化。
    林月雲 (2000)。企業內部知識種類及其移轉方式之研究-人際關係類型與行為導向。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    林佳暖(2005)。師徒關係與組織承諾。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    林俊宏(2008)。教導與師徒制在公部門的應用。 T&D飛訊,66,12-16。
    周希敏(譯)(1995)。Zey, M.G.著。職場導師。台北市:方智。
    高美琴(2002)。師徒間認知差異對知識移轉績效之影響,調節模式的驗證。國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。台北市:洪葉文化。
    陳長庚(2007)。關務人員師徒關係對生涯發展影響之研究。銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    陳嘉彌(2003)。師徒式教育實習之理論與實踐。台北:心理。
    陳嘉彌(2004)。青少年學習應用同儕師徒制可行性之探析。教育研究資訊雙月刊,12(3),3-22。
    黃河明(1999)。從資訊應用進入知識管理之實務經驗。產業論談,1(1),65-72。
    黃俊英(1999)。企業研究方法。台北:東華。
    黃善美(2004)。同儕師徒制輔助教學策略之個案研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。
    黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
    黃瓊玉(2005)。師徒功能認知、工作滿足與組織公民行為關聯性之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所論文,未出版,桃園。
    楊登伍(2004)。師徒關係對組織承諾與組織公民行為影響之研究-國稅局稅務人員之分析。銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展研究所碩士在職專班,未出版,台北。
    劉怡蘭(2006)。師徒關係對組織社會化的影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
    滕慧敏(2003)。師徒功能對工作-家庭衝突影響之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    蕭賢良(2006)。跨年級同儕師徒中徒弟生轉換成師傅生之個案研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。
    謝其睿(2006)。Mentor:現代職場師徒演義-給新手找一個嚮導與教練。就業情報雜誌,358,74-76。
    謝宜栴(2007)。師徒功能對壽險業務人員工作績效的影響:職場個人學習為中介效果。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。

    二、英文部分
    Aryee, S., Chay, Y. W. & Chew, J. (1996). The motivation to mentor among managerial employee. Group and organization Management, 21, 261-277.
    Baabe, B. & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271-293.
    Burke, R. J., Mckeen, C. A. & Mckenna, C.(1991). How do mentorships differ from typical supervisory relationships? Psychological Reports, 68(2)459-466.
    Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D., (1992). Formal and Informal Mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with mentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45, 619-636.
    Chao, G. T. (1997). Mentoring phases and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 15-28.
    Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
    Dansky, K. H. (1996). Managerial professional and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 525-535.
    Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review, 41, 79-94.
    Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage:Perceived career/job experience of protégé v.s. non-protégés. Journal of Organization Behavior, 11(10)309-320.
    Fisher, B. (1994). Mentoring. London:Library Association Publishing Ltd.
    Hegstad, C. D. (1999). Formal mentoring as a strategy for human resource development: A review of research. Human Resources Development Quarterly, 10(4)383-390
    Koberg, C. S., Boss, R. W. & Goodman E. (1998). Factors and outcomes associated with mentoring among health-care professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 58-72.
    Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-625.
    Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
    Lee, F. K., Dougherty, T. W. & Turban, D. B. (2000). The role of personality and work values in mentoring programs. Review of Business, 21(1)33-37.
    Levinsion, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levision, M. H. & Mckee, B. (1978). The seasons of man’s life. NY : A. A. Knopf.
    Malone, R. J. (2001). Principal mentoring. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management Eugene OR.
    McManus, S. E. & Russell, J. E. A., (1997). New directions for mentoring research: An examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 145-161.
    Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457-479.
    Pullins, E, B., Fine, L. M. & Warren, W.L. (1996). Identifying peer mentors in the sales force: An exploratory investigation of willingness and ability. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 125-136.
    Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 321-339.
    Ragins, B.R. & Scandura, T. A. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 4, 957-971.
    Scandura, T. A. & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43, 251-265.
    Scandura, T.A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 169-174.
    Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shield, M. & Abrams, L. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management information system, 18(1) 95-114.
    Sweeny, B.W. (2002). Formal or informal mentoring? Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://198.66.196.166/FormalorInf.html
    Wickman, F. & Sjodin, T. (1997). Mentoring: The most obvious yet overlooked key to achieving more in life than you dreamed possible. NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
    Willbur, J. (1987). Does mentoring breed success? Training & Development Journal, 41, 38-41.
    Wilson, J. A. & Elman, N. S. (1990). Organizational benefits of mentoring. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 88-93.
    Zey, M. G. (1990). The mentor connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    Zey, M. G. (1995). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE