研究生: |
劉雨橙 Liu, Yu-Cheng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
動物園之動物福利教學對高中生動物使用態度的影響 |
指導教授: |
劉湘瑤
Liu, Shiang-Yao |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 69 |
中文關鍵詞: | 高中生 、動物園 、動物福利 、動物使用態度 |
英文關鍵詞: | high school students, zoo, animal welfare, attitudes towards animal use |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000254 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:182 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討高中生利用本研究設計之動物福利教材進行教學,探討課程實施前後對於動物園(以台北市立動物園為例)中動物福利觀念如何感受及回應,以及學生在實際參訪動物園後對動物的使用態度及對動物福利的認知是否有所改變,同時探索教師之教學實施及教材詮釋的過程。
研究中利用動物使用態度之前後測問卷、教材使用及學生實際參觀動物園之動物福利評鑑學習單做為資料蒐集來源及評量工具,配合研究者實際進入教材實施的教學現場,進行個案教師授課過程觀察後,再進一步分析此教材實施前後對於高中生的動物利用態度是否能有所提升。
The purpose of this study was to investigate how high school students perceived and responded to the concept of animal welfare in the zoo (taking Taipei Zoo as an example) after receiving the animal welfare teaching material designed in this study. Students' attitudes towards the use of animals and their understandings of animal welfare were assessed after their actual visit to the zoo site. Exploration was also on how the biology teacher interpreted and implemented the animal welfare teaching material. In this study, the questionnaire of pre-test and post-test of animal attitudes, the use of teaching materials, and the animal welfare evaluation work sheet for students’ actual visits to the zoo were used as the source of data collection and assessment tools. Analyses focused on whether high school students towards animal use can be improved after the implementation of this teaching material.
中文文獻
《動物保護法》第4條修正草案,全國法規資料庫。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0060027
《窩抱報》第7期「動物園的每一天」原標題:動物們,你好嗎?台灣動物新聞網。取自http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/11721
山夢嫻(2018)。人物專訪:山夢嫻老師談12年國教與動保教育。關懷生命協會。取自https://www.lca.org.tw/news/node/7011
王敏玲(2007)。高中動物保護社團學生對農場動物福利觀念之回應。國立高雄師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。
王瑞香譯(1996)。環境倫理學:對自然界的義務與自然界的價值(原著作者:Rolston, H. III)。台北:國立編譯館。
世界動物園保育方略(1994版)。台北:台北市立動物園。
台北市立動物園(2007)。台北市立動物園九十六年年報。台北:台北市立動物園。
台北市立動物園新聞稿(2005年11月)。取自https://www.zoo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=BD065B2FA7782989&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=F5218283A7F9EE29
台灣動物社會研究會(2005)。動物福利科學-簡介與簡史。取自:https://www.east.org.tw/action/1229
台灣動物社會研究會(2007)。動物園哺乳類動物福利評鑑手冊。
行政院(1993)。環境教育要項。行政院八十一環字三六四五一號函核定。取自http://www.edu.tw/environmental/rules/import.htm
取自:http://scimonth.blogspot.com/2009/04/blog-post_9862.html
孟祥森、錢永祥譯(1996)。動物解放(原著作者:Singer, P.)。台北:關懷生命協會。
林秀梅譯 (1998)。新動物園:在荒野與城市中漂泊的現代方舟(原著作者:Croke, V.)。台北:胡桃木文化。
美洲動物園暨水族館協會(1990)。地區公報。
徐聖凱撰述(2014)。臺北市立動物園百年史。台北:台北市立動物園。
張芬芬、張嘉育(2015)。十二年國教「議題融入課程」規劃芻議。臺灣教育評論月刊。4(3),頁27。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程總綱。取自http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944.c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強(2012)。解析設計教育研究法的架構與實施:以科學教育研究為例。教育科學研究期刊,57(1),1-27。
陳一菁、許皓潔、陳湘繁(譯)。2006。WAZA(2005). Building a future for wildlife-The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy. 為野生動物開創未來–世界動物暨水族館保育方略。台北;五南。
陳玉敏(2016)。禁錮與瘋狂──動物園是誰的快樂天堂。台北:獨立評論@天下。取自https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/391/article/4654
陳映妤(2019)。現今動物園的存在目的,就是為了讓動物園永遠消失。關鍵評論。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/amparticle/115480
陸承平(2002)。動物保護概論。台北:九州圖書。
彭仁隆(2005)。圈養野生動物的倫理爭議─從動物園的存在價值談起。關懷生命協會。弘誓雙月刊,87,59-73。DOI:10.29665/HS.200706.0015
楊冠政(1997)。環境教育。台北:明文書局。
詹心懿、王順美(2008)。台北市立動物園實施動物福利教育之潛力。台北市立動物園九十七年年報,20。台北:台北市立動物園。
漢寶德(2000)。展示規劃理論與實務。台北:田園城市。
錢永祥(2002)。〈譯序〉,載於Marc Bekoff主編,黃宗慧等(譯),動物權與動物福利小百科。台北:台灣動物社會研究會。
龍緣之(2018)。談迷路小黑熊,談中國保育大貓熊所帶來的警示。環境資訊中心。取自https//:www.e-info.org.tw/node/213334
謝欣怡、張明雄(2009)。打造動物豐富的生活環境-行為豐富化。科學月刊。
英文文獻
Ayers, P. M. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Conservation and education: prominent themes in zoo mission statements. The Journal of Environmental Education 38(3), 53-60.·DOI: 10.3200/JOEE.38.3.53-60
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
Ceballos, G., Paul, R. Ehrlich& Dirzo, R. (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines Gerardo. PNAS, 114(30) E6089-E6096.
Claxton, A. M. (2011). The potential of the human–animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 133(1-2), 1-10.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. New York:Academic Press.
Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, CL, Bronnenkant, K., Heimlich, J. E., & Deans, N. L. (2007). Why zoos and aquariums are important: assess the impact after a visit. zoo and aquarium association. Retrieved from http://www.aza.org/uploadedFiles/Education/why_zoos_matter.pdf
Hill, S. P., & Broom, D. M. (2009). Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice. Zoo Biology, 28(6), 531-544.
Kagan, R. & Veasey, J. (2010). Challenges of zoo animal welfare. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286346839_Challenges_of_zoo_animal_welfare
Kagan, R., Allard, S. & Scott Carter (2018). What is the future for zoos and aquariums. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 21(sup.1), 59-70. DOI:10.1080/10888705.2018.1514302
Melfi, V. A., McCormick, W., & Gibbs, A. (2004). A preliminary assessment of how zoo visitors evaluate animal welfare according to enclosure style and the expression of behavior. Anthrozoös, 17(2), 98-108.
Miles, R & Tout, A. (1992). Exhibitions and public understanding of science. Museum and public understanding of science, 27-33. London: Science Museum.
Millar, R. &Osborne(1999). Beyond 2000: Science/biology education for the future. Journal of biological education 33(2),68-70. DOI:10.1080/00219266.1999.9655644
Phillips, C. J. C, & McCulloch, S. (2005). Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society. Journal of Biological Education, 40(1), 17-24. DOI:10.1080/00219266.2005.9656004
Rahbek, C. (1993). Captive breeding-a useful tool in the preservation of biodiversity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(4), 426-437.
Rennie, L.J., & Stocklmayer, S.M. (2003). The communication of science and technology: Past, present and future agendas. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 759-773.
Tunnicliffe, S.D. (1999). It's the way you tell it! What conversations of elementary school groups tell us about the effectiveness of animatronics animal exhibits. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 23-37.
University of Warwick. (2014). Zoos and aquariums really teach us biodiversity, as evidenced by the largest international studies. Science Daily. Retrieved from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140303083545.htm
Wagoner, B., & Jensen, E. (2010). Learn science at the zoo: Assess children's understanding of animals and their habitats. Psychology and Society, 3(1), 65-76.
Ward, S. J., Sherwen, S. & Clark, F.E. (2018). Advances in applied zoo animal welfare science. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 21(sup.1), 23-33. DOI:10.1080/10888705.2018.1513842
Watters, J. V., & Wielebnowski, N. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on zoo animal welfare. Zoo Biology, 28(6), 501-506.
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013). New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(3-4), 247-260.
Wickins-Dražilová, D. (2006). Zoo animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1), 27-36.
Zimmerman, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L., & West, C. (2007). Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521618588