簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 應蘭琪
Ying, Lan-Chi
論文名稱: 探索式學習效果研究–以新加坡美國國際學校IB小學中文課程為例
Exploration-Based Mandarin Learning: A Case of the American Elementary International Baccalaureate School in Singapore
指導教授: 蔡雅薰
Tsai, Ya-Hsun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 華語文教學系
Department of Chinese as a Second Language
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 102
中文關鍵詞: 能力驅動教育探索式學習IB課程CIPP模式
英文關鍵詞: Ability-Driven Education, Inquiry-based learning, IB program, CIPP Mode
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001354
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:253下載:55
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 自1997年以來,新加坡的國際學校發展迅速。由於他們採用了能力驅動的教育(ADE),清楚地概述了每個學習者的獨特性。為了實現這一目標,探索式學習的概念已經被接受。探索式學習是一種鼓勵學生用已學過的知識去了解新知識的教學方法。IB課程的基礎學位是3到12歲,並且以其注重細節和針對學習者的獨特性聞名。現在有很多評估教育機構的方式,但它們不如Stufflebeam於2003年提出的CIPP模式受歡迎。該模式僅用於課程評估,此模式具有四個要素。它們包括:背景評估(C),輸入評估(I),過程評估(P)和成果評估(P)。最後通過對教師、學生、家長和學校的工作人員的問卷調查和訪談,了解中文教學目前在新加坡IB國際小學的現況和探索式教學的重要性。

    Since 1997, Singapore’s international schools have grown rapidly. Since they have adopted an Ability-Driven Education (ADE), which outlines all the meanings of personal comparison and the uniqueness of each child. To achieve this the concept of inquiry-based learning has been embraced. Exploratory learning can be defined as a teaching method that encourages students to learn and study new materials to discover the relationship between existing background knowledge and unfamiliar content and concepts. The foundation degree of the IB program is 3 to 12 years old, and is known for its meticulous and targeted. From time to time, there are many designed projects, programs and systems for evaluating any educational institutions, but they are not as popular as the CIPP model proposed by Stufflebeam in 2003. This model is only used for course evaluation and has four elements. They include: context (C), input (I), process (P) and product (P). Finally, through the survey and interview with the Teachers, students, parents and staff, we understand the current circumstance of Chinese teaching in Singapore IB international primary schools as well as the importance of inquire-base teaching.

    謝辭 i 中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 一、探索性學習的發展情況 2 二、中文課程教學方式的發展歷程 3 三、IB課程發展情況概述 4 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究方法 5 第四節 研究的重要性 6 第五節 名詞釋義 7 第六節 小結 8 第二章 文獻綜述 9 第一節 探究式學習理論 9 一、探究式學習理論及相關研究 10 二、探索式學習的成效評估要素及標準研究 13 第二節 中文課程教學理論及相關研究 15 一、中文課程教學模式選擇的相關理論研究 16 二、中文課程教學評估的相關理論 17 第三節 新加坡國際學校中文課程教育情況及分析 18 一、國際IB課程的發展現狀 19 二、新加坡國際小學IB中文課程教學模式 20 三、新加坡斯坦福美國國際學校四年級中文課程教學及學習情況 21 四、新加坡斯坦福美國國際學校四年級中文課程學習成效的評估及標準 21 第四節 小結 22 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究對象 24 第二節 研究工具 25 第三節 研究框架 26 第四節 資訊收集来源 27 第四節 小結 28 第四章 數據分析 30 第一節 問卷調查設計 30 第二節 調查結果 30 一、教師問卷情況調查及分析 30 第一項 教師基本資料 30 第二項 中文教學目前的實施情況 32 第三項 四年級中文教師教學現況 36 二、學生問卷情況調查及分析 41 第一項 學生基本資料 41 第二項 學習者在中文課堂學習現況 44 第三項 四年級學習者學習現況 50 三、家長問卷情況調查及分析 53 第一項 家長基本資料 53 第二項 學生在家的學習反饋 55 第三項 家長對於中文課程情況的了解 56 四、學校工作人員問卷情況調查及分析 60 第一項 工作人員基本資料 61 第二項 中文教學在學校呈現的現況 63 第三項 中文教師的在職進修計劃 67 第三節 中文課程評估及數據分析 69 第四節 四年級學生探索能力課程活動評估及結果 70 第五節 探索式教學範例 73 第六節 小結 75 第五章 結論 76 第一節 研究結論 76 第二節 研究建議 77 第三節 研究限制 79 參考文獻 80 中文部份 80 一、書籍類 80 二、期刊與雜誌類 80 三、碩博士論文 81 四、網站 81 英文部份 82 一、書籍類 82 二、期刊與雜誌類 84 三、碩博士論文 87 四、網站 87 五、視聽媒體資料 89 附錄 90

    中文部份
    一、書籍類
    林文韵、林景蘇、陳仁富、陳雅鈴、蔡雅薰和劉瑩(2014)。兒童華語教學導論。新北市:正中書局股份有限公司。
    施玉惠、楊懿麗和梁彩玲(譯)(2017)。原則導向教學法–教學互動的終極指南(原作者:H. D. Brown)。新北市:台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司。
    香港課程發展議會(2001)。學習學習:課程開發的前進方向。香港:政府印刷廠。
    陳永明(2003)。 教師教育研究。上海,中國:華東師範大學出版社。
    唐睿等人(譯)(2017)。語言與兒童–美國中小學外語課堂教學指南(原作者:H. Curtain與C. A. Dahlberg)。北京:外語教學與研出版社。
    黃壬來(2003)。藝術與人文教育。台北:桂冠圖書出版公司。
    楊接期(2013)。遊戲為基礎的語言學習。載於柯華葳(主編),語文數位學習(108-121頁)。臺北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司
    蔡雅薰、余信賢(2019)。IB國際文憑與中文教學綜論。臺北市:新學林出版股份有限公司。
    二、期刊與雜誌類
    李博宏和王薰巧(2004)。科技教育教學評量問題之探討。生活科技教育月刊,37(3),72-84。
    洪振方(2003)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報,15,641-662。
    張鬱雯(2012)。學習進展:形成性評量與總結性評量之整合架構。 教育人力與專業發展,29(4),15-26。
    三、碩博士論文
    唐雅蘭(2000)CIPP評鑑模式應用在特殊教育推展成效評估之研究-以花東地區啟智學校教育為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
    四、網站
    江姿儀(2019)。教中文好崩潰?台灣女孩創漢字圖解 Chineasy ,讓外國人秒懂中文字。取自https://www.marketersgo.com/marketing/201903/mk1-chineasy/
    張金蘭(2014)。法國教學現況及其對台灣華語文教學的啟示。取自 https://tcsl.cycu.edu.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1421906361386.pdf
    新加坡教育部 (MOE)(2010)。 樂學善用:2010母語檢討委員會報告書。取自https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/media/press/2011/mtl-review-committee-s-full-report-(chinese-language).pdf
    劉文婷(2016)。 數學課堂中的探究式教學。取自https://www.jxfls.com/plus/view.php?aid=12850

    英文部份
    一、書籍類
    Attieh, M. (2008). Modern curriculum and teaching methods. Amman: Dar Al- Manaheg.
    Bloom, B. S. (1982). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Biggs, J. & Tang. C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
    Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
    Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Boyer, E. (1995). The basic school: A community for learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
    Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
    Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Clark. A. (2010). Transforming children's spaces: Children's & adults' participation in designing learning environments. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    de Freitas, S. & Yapp, C. (2005). Personalizing learning in the 21st century. Stafford: Network Educational Press.
    de Marrias, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In K. deMarrais, & S. D. Lapan, (Eds.), Foundation for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 51-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new phycology of success. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
    Gay, L. R. (1985). Educational evaluation and measurement. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
    Gronlund, N.E., & Linn, R.L. (1990) Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: McMillan Company.
    Hattie. J (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, OX: Routledge
    Ibrahim. (2007). Education research and assessment. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo
    International Baccalaureate Organization [IBO]. (2009). Making the PYP happen: A curriculum framework for international primary education (Revised). Wales, Cardiff: Anthony Rowe Ltd.
    Johnson, L., & Adams, S. (2011). Challenge based learning: The report from the implementation project. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
    Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matter
    Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Lee, H. C. (2000). Education in traditional China: A History. Boston: Brill.
    Mayes, T. & de Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.
    Mertler, G. (2009). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. London: Sage.
    Piaget.J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin
    Rinaldi, C. (2005). Documentation and Assessment: What is the Relationship? In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, & P. Moss, (Eds.), Beyond listening. Children's perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 17-28). Bristol: The Policy Press.
    Saxena, C. P. (2002). Student learning behavior scale. India: Jabalpur Arohi Manovigyan Kendra.
    Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation in international handbook of educational evaluation (pp.31-62). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, Illinois: Peacock.
    Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Webb, J., Thomas, G., & Walker, D. (1998). The making of the inclusive school. London: Routledge
    West-Burnham, J., & Coates, M. (2005). Personalized learning: Transforming education for every child. London: MPG Books Ltd.
    二、期刊與雜誌類
    Asadi, M., Reza, G., Akbari, R., & Ghafar, R. (2016). Program evaluation of the new English textbook (Prospect 1) in the Iranian Ministry of Education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291-301. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.10
    Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.
    Burton, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Retrospect and prospect. Music Educators Journal, 87(5), 17-21.
    Cancemi, J. (2011). A dialogue between the Reggio Emilia experience and the IB primary year programme. International Schools Journal, 31(1), 32-41.
    Clark. E. T. (2011). Implementing an integrated curriculum. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 24(5), 34-45.
    Field, J. (2007). Looking outwards, not inwards. ELT Journal, 61(1), 30-38.
    Goh, M. (2012). Teaching with cultural intelligence: developing multiculturally educated and globally engaged citizens. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 395-415.
    Gronlund, N.E., & Linn, R. L. (1990) Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: McMillan Company.
    Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-77.
    Harwood, R., & Bailey, K. (2012). Defining and evaluating international- mindedness in a school context. International Schools Journal, XXXI (2), 77-86.
    Hmelo-Silever. C., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex system. Journal of the Learning Science, 9(3), 247-298
    Hudson, B., Henderson, S., & Hudson, A. (2015). Developing mathematical thinking in the primary classroom: Liberating students and teachers as learners of mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 374-398.
    Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A. & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139-154.
    Karatas, H. & Fer, S. (2009). Evaluation of English curriculum at Yildiz Technical University using CIPP Model. Education and Science, 34(153), 134-154.
    Lee, H. (2014). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language pedagogy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1236-1244.
    Lee, J. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177-185.
    Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2012). A distributed perspective on instructional leadership in international baccalaureate (IB) schools. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 48, 664-698.
    Liu, X. L., & Goh, C. (2006). Improving second language listening: Awareness and involvement. In T.S.C. Farrell (Ed.), Language teacher research in Asia (pp. 91-106). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    Luke, A., Freebody, P., Lau, S., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 5-28.
    Martinez, M., Amante, B., Cadenato, A., & Gallego, I. (2012). Assessment tasks: Center of the learning process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 624-628.
    Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51-60.
    Pakir, A. (1991). The range and depth of English‐knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes, 10(2) 167-179.
    Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14-20.
    Ross, V. (2003). The Socratic method: What it is and how to use it in the classroom. Speaking of Teaching: Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching, 13(1), 1-4.
    Sassila, R. (2010). A proposed proposal to ensure the quality of the educational environment in kindergartens in the Syrian Republic. University of Damascus Journal, 26, 235-280.
    Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145–186.
    Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Woodworth, G. (1990). A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curricula of the 60's on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 127–144.
    Silver, R. E. (2005). Priorities in English language education policy and classroom implementation. Language Policy, 4, 107-128.
    Skelton, A., Higgins, R., & Hartley, P. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53-64.
    Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19-29.
    Stephen, W., Gallagher, S., & Workman, D. (1993). Problem-based learning for traditional and interdisciplinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 338-357.
    Wen, X. (1991). Motivation and language learning with students of Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 3(2), 323-346.
    Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10-16.
    三、碩博士論文
    Burton, L. L. (2012). Professional development in an International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme (doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3498453)
    四、網站
    Barrows, H. W. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. Retrieved from http://idtoolbox.eseryel.com/uploads/9/0/7/5/9075695/plb.pdf
    Bernard, M. E. (2013). Social-emotional wellbeing (SEW) survey. Retrieved from https://www.acer.org/au/sew
    Barufaldi, J. (2002). 5E model of instruction. Retrieved from http://www.ptisd.org/upload/page/0204/docs/CScope.5E_Expanded.pdf
    de Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearninginnovation/gamingreport_v3.pdf
    Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (2015). Teaching and learning toolkit: An accessible summary of the international evidence on teaching 5-16 year-olds. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching
    Galileo Educational Network. (2011). What is inquiry? Retrieved from http://www.galileo.org/inquiry-what.html
    Heick, T. (2019). 4 phases of inquiry-based learning: A guide for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/4-phases-inquiry-based-learning-guide-teachers/
    Hmelo, C. E. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. https://www.academia.edu/26278435/Designing_to_Learn_About_Complex_Systems
    International Baccalaureate Organization [IBO]. (2012). IB world school statics. Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/facts/schoolstats/progcombinationsbyregion.cfm
    International Baccalaureate Organization [IBO]. (2013). Curriculum framework for primary school projects: Evaluation curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/pyp/curriculum/learned/inquiry/
    International Baccalaureate Organization [IBO]. (2013). Find an IB world school. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/find-an-ib-school/
    International Baccalaureate Organization [IBO]. (2013). Missions. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/about-the-ib/mission/learning-toolkit/
    Meyer, D. (2010, March 10). Math class needs a makeover. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_meyer_math_class_needs_a_makeover
    Newmann, F. M., Bryk, A. S., & Nagaoka, J. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence?. Retrieved from https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/authentic-intellectual-work-and-standardized-tests-conflict-or-coexistence
    Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf
    Ralph, A. T., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. B. (2010). How student achievement is related to student behaviors and learning style preferences. Retrieved from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/How+student+achievement+is+related+to+student+behaviors+and+learning...-a0299759816
    Thomas, J. W. & Mergendoller, J. R. (2000). Managing project-based learning: Principles from the field. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.532.3730&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    五、視聽媒體資料
    Dewey, J. (1910). What is thought? [Recorded by Linda Andrus]. On How we think [CD]. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company. Retrieved from https://librivox.org/how-we-think-by-john-dewey/

    下載圖示
    QR CODE