簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周嘉翎
Zhou, Jia-Ling
論文名稱: 華語交友軟體中請求聯絡資訊之語用策略研究及其教學應用
A Study of Pragmatics Strategies for Requesting Contact Information in Chinese-Language Dating Apps and Their Applications
指導教授: 謝佳玲
Hsieh, Chia-Ling
口試委員: 謝佳玲
Hsieh, Chia-Ling
洪嘉馡
Hong, Jia-Fei
李家豪
Li, Jia-Hao
口試日期: 2024/07/26
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 華語文教學系
Department of Chinese as a Second Language
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 142
中文關鍵詞: 請求策略交友軟體性別差異語用教學
英文關鍵詞: request strategy, dating app, gender differences, pragmatics teaching
研究方法: 實驗設計法言談分析
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401553
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:59下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 網路成為當代人們交流以及建立新的人際關係的重要場域,人類可以透過網路建立新的人際連結,例如結識生活圈外的朋友或開始一段浪漫關係,因此交友軟體因應而生並成為了網路語境中的新興溝通媒介。研究顯示交友軟體的使用者經常透過請求對方的聯絡資訊,將交流媒介由交友軟體轉換到社群媒體上,使用者透過這樣的過渡儀式(rituals of transition)以加強雙方間的親密程度(Broeker, 2023)。然而請求是威脅面子的行為,說話者需要利用不同策略減輕面子威脅程度同時達成溝通目的,過往研究中不乏以請求為主題的文獻,截至目前中文文獻中較少見研究者針對交友軟體上的請求策略進行分析,因此本文選擇交友軟體作為研究媒介,分析使用者在交友軟體上向他人請求聯絡資訊的策略,並歸納華語母語者在交友軟體中溝通的語言特徵。
    本文根據Blum-Kulka et al.(1989)和謝佳玲(2015)的請求架構分別分析180筆語篇補全語料及60筆真實語料,最終分析出交友軟體使用者經常使用的三種請求的主體策略以及八種具有輔助功能的策略。研究結果顯示交友軟體使用者請求時偏好使用維護他人面子的探詢策略,使用次數最少的則是屬於自我取向策略的指示策略。而在性別的對比上,無論在語篇補全或真實語料中,男性和女性在請求時偏好的輔助策略都是釋因以及表情策略,然而男性較女性更傾向使用暗示以及釋因策略,而女性較男性傾向選擇探詢以及問候策略。
    最後,本文根據研究結果提出教學建議,以語用教學的觀點設計交友軟體為情境的請求策略課程,提供華語教師更多元的教學內容,作為提升學習者交際能力的參考。

    Internet has become an important field for communicating and building new relationships. People now are able to start new connection with others, such as making friends outside of your social circle or even to start a romantic relationship. As a result, Dating apps that use mobile phones as their platform have emerged and become a new communication medium in online communication. Dating app users switch communication platform from dating apps to social media by requesting other’s personal contact information. By doing this, study shows that the users’ gain intimacy with each other by doing so-called rituals of transition (Broeker, 2023). However, request is a face-threatening act, so it is necessary to employ different strategies to mitigate the threats. The speech act of request has been frequently studied, yet so far there are only a few Chinese studies regarding the request strategy in dating apps. Hence, the present study aims to analyzing how users request for others’ personal contact information as well as to identify Chinese speakers’ language traits while communicating in dating apps.
    A data set of 240 requests from both discourse completion tests (DCT) and authentic data was collected. Based on the request frameworks of Blum-Kulka et al. (1989) and Hsieh (2015), the result showed that there are three head acts and eight supportive moves used in the context of requesting in dating apps. The research findings indicate that users of dating apps overall prefer query strategy to save others' face, while the least favored strategy is directive strategy. As for supportive moves, the most used ones are reason-explaining move and emoticon move. Regarding the gender differences in both DCT and authentic data, males used more directive strategy and reason-explaining move than females do. On the other hand, females’ preferences are query strategy and emoticon move.
    Finally, this study designs a dating app requesting strategy lesson plan from the pragmatics teaching viewpoint, hoping to provide Chinese language teacher with more diverse teaching content as a reference for enhancing Chinese learners' communication skills.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 v 表目錄 ix 圖目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 5 一、交友軟體 5 二、語用教學 7 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 溝通和禮貌 11 一、言語行為理論 11 二、合作原則和禮貌原則 15 三、面子理論 19 第二節 請求行為研究 25 一、請求言語行為 25 二、不同媒介中的請求行為 33 三、請求行為中的性別差異 38 第三節 交友軟體與網路溝通 40 一、網路溝通與網路中的人際關係 40 二、網路語言 44 三、交友軟體相關研究 51 第四節 小結 53 第三章 研究方法 55 第一節 研究流程 55 第二節 語料篩選 58 第三節 分析流程 59 第四章 研究結果與討論 63 第一節 交友軟體語境中的禮貌 63 第二節 請求策略與語言特徵 69 一、主體策略 70 二、輔助策略 76 第三節 策略分布 86 一、主體策略分布 87 二、輔助策略分布 88 三、交友軟體請求語境中的性別差異 91 第四節 交友軟體上的語言特色 95 一、書寫口語化 96 二、精簡的語言形式 96 三、表情符號的使用 97 第五節 研究結果討論 98 第五章 教學應用 103 第一節 教學目標 103 一、課程目標 103 二、學習目標 104 第二節、教學設計 106 第六章 結論 111 第一節 研究總結 111 第二節 研究限制與未來展望 112 參考文獻 115 附錄 129 一、交友軟體情境中男性請求他人聯絡資訊的語篇補全語料分析結果 129 二、交友軟體情境中男性請求他人聯絡資訊的訊息截圖語料分析結果 134 三、交友軟體情境中女性請求他人聯絡資訊的語篇補全語料分析結果 136 四、交友軟體情境中女性請求他人聯絡資訊的訊息截圖語料分析結果 141

    丁鳳(2002)。漢語請求言語行為中的性別差異。西安外國語學院學報,10(1),46-50。
    于根元(2001)。網路語言概說。中國經濟出版社。
    王曉彤、張紹杰(2011)。"請求"言語行為的跨文化研究。東北師大學報,3,117-120。
    吳峻安(2003)。從三個傳播要素檢視網路溝通的初步形成。資訊社會研究,5,305-326。
    谷玲玲(2013)。網路親密關係中的自我揭露。資訊社會研究,24,1-26。
    林玉婷(2007)。電腦中介的新人際溝通型態:MSN Messenger暱稱之呈現與溝通策略。傳播與社會學刊,4,103-135。
    林宛瑩、周文修(2010)。以人際溝通為基礎之情感論壇網站設計。資訊傳播研究,1,45-65。
    林綱(2014)。網路語言的演變與網路言語社區分析。華語文教學研究,11(2),59-85。
    林南宏、胡珈瑄(2017)。線上使用者匿名傾向的前因及結果。商略學報,9(1),17-36。
    胡惠君(2015)。察覺App使用者之心智模式:以即時通訊軟體LINE為例。設計學報,20(2),24-42。
    侯政男(2020)。行動通訊時代下的尋找自我:男同志透過行動定位服務交友軟體的性傾向認同探索。性學研究,1(11),1-20。
    徐富昌(2002)。網路語詞的發展與衝擊──以臺灣的網路現象為例。臺大中文學報,17,287-326。
    晏涵文、劉潔心、馮嘉玉(2009)。青少年網路交友與約會、婚前性行為影響因素探討。中華公共衛生雜誌,28(4),322-333。
    高婉瑜(2009)。論兩性的拒絕言語行為──以澎湖縣為例。中山人文學報,27,77-94。
    原坤陽、李柏令(2011)。英漢請求言語策略實證對比研究。現代語文,9,93-97。
    陳家幸、賴冠州(2004)。網際網路語言溝通模式之建立及其對新世紀教育的衝擊。教育理論與實踐學刊,12,105-115。
    陳志萍、周英寶(2012)。銀髮族網路交友動機之研究。資訊社會研究,22,21-47。
    陳梅影、曾嘉悌(2015)。臺灣大學生的請求策略與當代華語教材請求語義公式之比較。中華語文教學研究,12(3),125-151。
    陳新仁(2015)。基於社會建構論的英語語用教學探析。中國外語教育,8(3),3-10。
    陳怡儒(2019)。大學生使用交友APP之動機及其人際行為現象──以開南大學學生為例(未出版碩士論文)。淡江大學。
    張上冠(2007)。眾聲喧嘩:一個翻譯理論的考量。文山評論,1(6),33-48。
    張玉佩、寸得杏(2012)。網路傳播科技作為跨文化溝通的契機與困境:以文化弱勢者的觀點觀之。傳播文化,11,29-60。
    張絮茵(2012)。商務漢語拒絕言語行為研究。中華語文教學研究,9(1),73-98。
    張詠菡(2015)。網路人際互動的連線與斷線。康大學報,5,35-53。
    張慧美(2006)。網路語言之語言風格研究。彰化師大國文學誌,13,331-359。
    許恬忻(2007)。企業公關人員如何使用MSN:以證券公關人員為例。廣告學研究,28,59-86。
    許雅惠、黃天佑、鄭琳蓉、林家正(2017)。網路交友行為與社交焦慮之研究。資訊科學應用期刊,3(2),53-77。
    黃玫珍、白依芳(2009)。國小英語教學語言行為研究:教科書分析與教師認知調查。英語文暨口筆譯學集刊,5,117-140。
    黃音霓、陳星沐(2015)。即時通訊軟體的使用行為之研究──以LINE為例。圖文傳播藝術學報,6,345-352。
    彭思潔(2013)。社交應用程式之策略行銷分析,以BAND APP為例(未出版碩士論文)。政治大學。
    蔡金田、董德佑(2017)。行動即時通訊軟體應用於學校行政溝通之探討──以南投縣國民小學為例。教育行政論壇,9(1),49-72。
    劉仲矩、黃金榜(2008)。網路人際衝突成因與性別差異之研究。電子商務學報,9(1),113-138。
    劉自暉(2019)。再論網絡語言的修辭特點。東亞漢學研究,特別號,321-325。
    劉世華(2005)。青少年網路交友之探討。競技運動,7,87-96。
    謝佳玲(2009)。虛擬社會的求助策略探討。中國社會語言學,1,86-100。
    謝佳玲(2015)。漢語與英語跨文化對比:網路社會之語用策略研究。文鶴出版有限公司。
    鄭如婷(2006)。傳統中文與台灣網路中文的比較研究(未出版碩士論文)。輔仁大學。
    鄭盈盈(2010)。試析中俄網路語言特性──以中俄網路聊天室為例。俄語學報,16,57-81。
    鄭英傑(2021)。「薄友誼」現象:數位原住民世代的網路社群交友觀及課程思維──以臺灣的大學生為例。課程研究,16(2),63-86。
    鮑紫玉(2009)。一種任務式教學法的實踐──用表演學中文。台灣華語文教學,6,72-75。
    黎少銘(2015)。香港網絡語言初探。中國語文通訊,94(1),3-26。
    戴怡君、董旭英(2022)。使用網際網路進行互動者特質之探討。資訊社會研究,2,29-58。
    譚躍、郭莘(2021)。青少年使用移動交友軟體的動機和社交風險及其調節因素。傳播與社會學刊,58,29-58。
    財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2022年6月)。2022年台灣網路報告。https://twnic.tw/stat_n.php
    Similarweb(無日期)。tinder.com流量分析、排名和受眾。SimilarWeb。2024年1月6日,取自https://www.similarweb.com/zh-tw/website/tinder.com/#overview
    AbuSa’aleek, A. O. (2015). Internet linguistics: A linguistic analysis of electronic discourse as a new variety of language. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 135-145.
    Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63-76.
    Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177.
    Aleksić-Maslać, K., Borović, F., & Biočina, Z. (2018). Comparative content analysis of the Netspeak elements among pupils and students in asynchronous discussion ''professor-student''. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 12, 86-90.
    Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
    Baker, W., & Bricker, H. B. (2010). The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback. System, 38(1), 75-84.
    Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Teaching pragmatics. The Office of English Language Programs of the U.S. Department of State.
    Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1453-1469.
    Baron, N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 397-423.
    Baron, N. S. (2013). Do mobile technologies reshape speaking, writing, or reading? Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 134-140.
    Bernicot, J., Volckaert-Legrier, O., Goumi, O., & Bert-Erboul, A. (2012). Forms and functions of SMS messages: A study of variations in a corpus written by adolescents. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1701-1715.
    Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Wiesenforth, D. (2001). E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message. Language, Learning and Technology, 5(1), 135-165.
    Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of E-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language, Learning and Technology, 11(2), 59-81.
    Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213.
    Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Broeker, F. (2023). ‘We went from the anonymity of the internet into my private WhatsApp’ : Rituals of transition among dating app users in Berlin. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2551-2571.
    Brown, P. (1980). How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In R. Borker & F. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 111-136). Blackwell.
    Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usages. Cambridge University Press.
    Brown, P. (2005). Politeness and language. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 326-330). Elsevier.
    Cai, C. (2023). A study on the Mandarin Chinese request strategies of Taiwanese college students under the influence of gender, social distance, and social power. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 13, 50-69.
    Chen, C. F. E. (2011, February 24-27). Making e-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students [Conference presentation]. AAAL 2001 Convention, St. Louis, MO.
    Chen, Y. S. (2015). Chinese learners' cognitive processes in writing email requests to faculty. System, 52, 51-62.
    Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
    Dayter, D. (2021). Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics, 174, 28-42.
    De Seta, G. (2018). Biaoqing: The circulation of emoticons, emoji, stickers, and custom images on Chinese digital media platforms. First Monday, 23(9), 1-19.
    Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. V. (2008). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 99-101.
    Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. (2018). Continued use of mobile instant messaging Apps: A new perspective on theories of consumption, flow, and planned behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 147-169.
    Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 119-146.
    Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2023). “The language is very formal and appropriate”: L2 learners’ in/appropriateness evaluations and metapragmatic judgments in student-faculty emails. Journal of Pragmatics, 217, 17-32.
    Fraser, B. (1978). Acquiring social competence in a second language. RELC Journal, 9, 1-21.
    Fullick, M. (2013). “Gendering” the self in online dating discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237-257.
    Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213-231.
    Gao, Y. D., & Duan, H. Q. (2014). Reconsideration of Grice’s cooperative principle. Modern Linguistics, 2(4), 172-178.
    Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
    Gu, Y. G. (1990). Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237-257.
    Has, C., Takayoshi, P., Carr, B., Hudson, K., & Pollock, R. (2011). Young people's everyday literacies: The language features of instant messaging. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(4), 378-404.
    Ho, V. (2018). Using metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through
    workplace request emails. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 70-81.
    Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concept of "face". American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
    Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 208-228). Blackwell.
    Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2014, January 4-7). “Nice picture comment!” graphicons in Facebook comment threads [Conference presentation]. 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, HI.
    Herring, S. C. (2022). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 109-168.
    Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. N. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 246-256.
    Hong, W. (1997). Gender differences in Chinese request patterns. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 25(2), 193-210.
    House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Volume 2 Conversational Routine (pp. 157-185). De Gruyter Mouton.
    Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(21), 177-192.
    Jalagat, J. R. J., & Yapo, J. R. (2021). The language of hookups: A conversation and self-presentation analysis of Tinder chats. Plaridel, 18(2), 85-118.
    Jan, C. W., Lin, C. C., & Li, B. J. (2015). A pragmatic study of the speech act of polite requests for action. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, 61, 177-195.
    Jamal, N. H. (2022). Politeness strategies in request e-mails of Iraqi undergraduate student. Journal of Al-Frahids Arts, 14(49), 537-248.
    Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning, 52(1), 1-352.
    Kirkpatrick, A. (1991). Information sequencing in Mandarin letters of request. Anthropological Linguistics, 33(2), 183-203.
    Kollock, P., & Smith, M. A. (1976). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 109-128). John Benjamins.
    Kurtyka, A. (2019). I complain, therefore I am: On indirect complaints in Polish. Journal of Pragmatics, 153, 34-45.
    Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80.
    Lee, H. (2006). Defining the nature of online chat in relation to speech and writing. English Language & Literature Teaching, 12(2), 87-105.
    Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
    Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
    Leopold, L. (2015). Request strategies in professional e-mail correspondence: Insights from the United States workplace. TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 1-29.
    Li, X., & Lin, L. (2015). A pragmatic study on the speech of refusal by Chinese EFL learners. Language and International Studies, 13, 23-46.
    Lim, S. S. (2015). On stickers and communicative fluidity in social media. Social Media + Society, 1, 1-3.
    Lin, R. (2010). The sociolinguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In R. Lin & P. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 335-349). Springer.
    Liu, C. C., & Chang, I. C. (2016). Model of online game addiction: The role of computer-mediated communication motives. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 904-915.
    Liu, W., Lin, L., & Wei, R. (2021). Variational pragmatics in Chinese social media requests: The influence of age and social status. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 349-362.
    Liu, X., & Wang, Q. (2023). A pragmatic study on request behavior in instant message: On characteristics and validity. International Journal of Linguistics Literature & Translation, 6(4), 10-14.
    Luo, X., & Gao, J. (2011). On pragmatic failures in second language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 283-286.
    Ma, R. (1996). Poring over the findings: Saying "yes" for "no" and "no" for "yes":A Chinese rule. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 257-266.
    Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The Meaning of Meaning (pp. 296-336). Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
    Manganari, E. E. (2021). Emoji use in computer-mediated communication. The International Technology Management Review, 10(1), 1-11.
    Mao, L. M. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451-486.
    Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-426.
    Metz, L. M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication: Literature review of a new context. 1994Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2(2), 31-49.
    Michelet, S. (2009). L2 Pragmatics: Exploring linguistic, stylistic and pragmatic features of apologies and requests in CMC. Discourse and Interaction, 2(1), 71-100.
    Miller, B. (2015). “They’re the modern-day gay bar’’: Exploring the uses and gratifications of social networks for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 476-482.
    Nair, A., & Padmakumar, K. (2020). Analyzing Tinder through user motivations and experiences among Indian young adults. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50, 32-47.
    Nouich, F. (2015). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Revue Expressions, 1, 95-101.
    Nugroho, A. (2012). An analysis of the speech act of request by male and female learners of English. Journal of English Language and Culture, 2(2), 125-149.
    Oishi, E. (2006). Austin’s speech act theory and the speech situation. Esercizi Filosofici, 1(1), 1-14.
    Omrani, B., & Tafazoli, D. (2021). English language learners' pragmatic knowledge: Do motivation type and proficiency level matter? Lenguas en Contexto, 12, 6-17.
    Önem, E. E. (2016). A study on gender differences in the length of requests in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 13-21.
    Park, S., Jeon, J., & Shim, E. (2021). Exploring request emails in English for business purposes: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 137-150.
    Pourshahian, B. (2019). A Gender-based analysis of refusals as a face threatening act: A case study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(2), 177-182.
    Pratama, H. (2019). linguistic politeness in online communication. Penerbit LPPM.
    Precisely, F. M. (2017). Politeness in request strategies used by male and female EFL learners. ELLiC, 1, 309-314.
    Ranzini, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 80-101.
    Ren, Y. (2021). Variational pragmatics in Chinese social media requests: The influence of gender. Sino-US English Teaching, 18(11), 317-320.
    Rosari, M. M. (2020). The speech act of request in computer-mediated communication. Deskripsi Bahasa, 3(1), 1-8.
    Rosenfeld, M., & Thomas, R. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.
    Rosenfeld, M., Thomas, R., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How Online Dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 1-10.
    Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
    Searle, J. R. (1975). Speech acts and recent linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263(1), 27-38.
    Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.
    Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
    Solodka, A., & Perea, L. (2018). The speech act of complimenting as part of the Ukrainian, Russian and English-speaking communities: Ukraine and the USA. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 39-55.
    Sun, H. M. (2010). A study of the features of Internet English from the linguistic perspective. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(7), 98-103.
    Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310.
    Tanck, S. (2004). Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and non-native English-speakers’ production. TESOL Working Papers 2. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17606/M6XQ04
    Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Effects of using mobile instant messaging on student behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement: A quasi‑experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education volume, 19(1), 1-22.
    Thangaraj, S., & Perak, K. M. (2015). The influence of netspeak on students’ writing. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 45-52.
    Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
    Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1), 1-27.
    Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). Development and validation of the Tinder motives scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341-350.
    Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. In W. B. Gudykunst, L. P. Stweart & S. Ting-Tommey (Eds.), Communication, Culture, and Organizational Processes (pp. 71-86). Sage.
    Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Sage.
    Togatorop, F. (2009). Politeness strategies used in the conversation between the students of finance and banking department in Murni Sadar Polytechnic Pematangsiantar. Journal of English Teaching as a Foreign Language, 5(1), 37-48.
    Wahid, R., & Farooq, O. (2022). Uses and abuses of netspeak. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(1), 53-59.
    Wang, Q. (2019). A comparative study of gender differences in refusal strategies from English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(8), 1040-1048.
    Wang, Z. (2021). Politeness in making requests and responses in computer-mediated communication among Chinese college students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 43-50.
    Yazdanfar, S., & Bonyadi, A. (2016). Request strategies in everyday interactions of Persian and English speakers. Sage Open, 6(4), 1-11.
    Yeung, L. (1997). Polite requests in English and Chinese business correspondence in Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 505-522.
    Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. John Benjamins.
    Zanden, T. V. D., Schouten, A., Mos, M., Lee, C. V. D., & Krahmer, E. (2019). Effects of relationship goal on linguistic behavior in online dating profiles: A multi-method approach. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1-12.
    Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. J. (2018). Reconstructing the politeness principle in Chinese: A response to Gu’s approach. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15(5), 693-721.
    Zhu, J., & Bao, Y. X. (2010). The pragmatic comparison of Chinese and western “politeness” in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 848-851.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE