摘 要
本研究旨在初探高雄市國中資優生的愛情現況及愛情態度，並探討資優生情緒過度激動特質與愛情相關因素及愛情態度的關係。為達上述之研究目的，本研究以高雄市國中二、三年級藝術才能/一般智能資優班學生為研究對象，就個人因素（性別、年級、班別、戀愛經驗、次數、持續時間長短、認識方式、對象的選擇、目前是否正在戀愛）及家庭因素（父母親的婚姻關係及對子女戀愛的態度）等變項，以「國中資優生愛情態度調查問卷」為研究工具，以問卷調查法來探討資優生的愛情態度，並以卡方、獨立樣本T檢定及皮爾遜積差相關進行資料分析。歸納之研究結果如下：
一、 以整體戀愛經驗情況來看：
1. 有戀愛經驗者佔全體人數27.9％。 2.因同班上課認識者佔有戀愛經驗樣本52.4％。 3.有74.4％之高雄市國中資優生以同校同學為戀愛對象。 4.三年級資優生有戀愛經驗的比例顯著高於二年級資優生。 5.女性資優生有戀愛經驗之比例顯著高於男性資優生。 6.來自其他類型家庭之資優生有戀愛經驗的比例顯著高於來自雙親家庭之資優生。 7.情緒量表得分高分組有戀愛經驗的比例顯著高於低分組資優生。
二、高雄市國中資優生的愛情態度探討(p＜.05)
1. 高雄市國中資優生的愛情態度傾向「友伴之愛」。 2.男性資優生在「情慾之愛」、「友伴之愛」、「奉獻之愛」得分顯著高於女性資優生。 3.三年級資優生傾向「遊戲之愛」與「狂熱之愛」。 4.無戀愛經驗者具「現實之愛」；而有戀愛經驗者具「狂熱之愛」與「奉獻之愛」。 5.具情緒過度激動特質者傾向「狂熱之愛」與「奉獻之愛」。 6.戀愛次數為0次者，具「現實之愛」；戀愛次數三次以上者具「狂熱之愛」、「奉獻之愛」。 7.戀愛持續時間愈長，愈具有「狂熱之愛」。 8.目前正在戀愛者具「友伴之愛」、「狂熱之愛」、「奉獻之愛」；而目前無戀愛者則具「遊戲之愛」。 9.來自雙親家庭者比其他類型家庭者較具「現實之愛」。
三、情緒過度激動特質與愛情相關因素探討(p＜.05)
1. 情緒量表得分高低與戀愛經驗、戀愛次數、戀愛持續時間、性別有顯著相關或差異。 2.而與年級、就讀班別無顯著相關或差異。
四、資優生的情緒過度激動特質與「情慾之愛」、「友伴之
愛」、「現實之愛」、「狂熱之愛」、「奉獻之愛」愛情態度面向達顯著的正相關。（p<.01）
五、研究者分析影響高雄市國中資優生愛情態度的因素包括：性別、年級、戀愛經驗、戀愛次數、戀愛持續時間、情緒過度激動特質、父母的婚姻關係等七種因素。

關鍵字：資優生、情緒過度激動、愛情態度

Abstract
The purposes of this study are to investigate the love attitude and current situation of junior high school gifted students, and to explore the relativity between their emotional overexcitability and the love related factors and love attitude. To achieve the goal, samples of this survey are drawn from the second and third grade art and intellectually gifted junior high school students in Kaohsiung City; targeted at their personal changing factors (such as, gender, grade, love experience, class, count of love experience, duration of love, method of knowing his/her pal, samples are currently in a relationship or not, etc.) and family factors (marriage of their parents, parents’ attitude toward students’ love) by using “Gifted Junior High school students’ love attitude” questionnaire, with questionary method and analysis of Chi-square, Independent t-test and K.Pearson’s product-moment correlation. Inference of this research is as following,

1. Analysis from aspect of general love experience,
A. 27.9％ of students have love experience
B. 52.4％ of students knew their pals because of attending the same class.
C. 74.4％ of gifted students from Kaoshiung city have/had relationship with his/her schoolmates.
D. Percentage of 3rd grade-gifted students who have love experience is higher than as of 2nd grade students.
E. The percentage of female students who have love experience is higher than that of male students.
F. The percentage of love experience of those gifted students with high score on emotional scale is higher than that of others with lower score.

2. Inference toward love attitude of gifted students in Kaohsiung city, (p<.05)
A. Love attitude of gifted students in Kaohsiung is disposed to “storge”.
B. The male students have a higher tendency to hold “eros, storge and agape” attitudes than the female students.
C. The 3rd grade students have a higher tendency to hold “ludus and mania” attitude
D. Students who have no love experiences have a higher tendency to hold “pragma” attitude. Others with love experiences have a higher tendency to hold “mania and agape” attitude.
E. The students with emotional overexcitability charateristic have a higher tendency to hold “mania and agape” attitude.
F. Students who no love experiences have a higher tendency to hold “pragma” attitude. Others with love experiences have a higher tendency to hold “mania and agape” attitude.
G. Longer duration of love, higher tendency of holding “mania” attitude.
H. Those students who are currently in love have high tendency of holding “storge, mania and agape” attitude, for those who are not, they have a higher tendency to hold “ludus” attitude.
I. Students from families with parents have higher tendency on holding “pragma” attitude.
3. Inference on emotional overexcitability charactor and love related factors, (p<.05)
A. score on emotional scale is significantly related to love experience, counts of love, duration of love.
B. which is not significantly relative to students’ class or grade.

4. Characteristic of gifted students’ emotional overexcitability is significantly corelative to hold “ storge, pragma, mania and agape” love attitude. (p<.01)

5. Seven possible factors could make love attitude of gifted / talent junior high school students in Kaohsiung City. They are , gender, grade, count of love experience, love experience, duration of love, marriage of their parents and emotional overexcitability.

Keyword: Gifted students, Emotional overexcitability, Love attitude.

壹、中文參考書目
中國時報（民87），資優女生為情跳樓。中國時報，9月17日，第五版。
中國時報（民92）， 清大校園情殺案涉案女主角洪曉慧高雄服刑表現良好。中國時報，6月24日，第五版。
王慶福（民84）。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所博士論文。
王慶福，張德榮，林幸台(民84)。愛情關係及其影響因素的分析研究。中華輔導學報，3，92-126。
台灣日報（民93），愛的太狂林偉盟自毀前程。台灣日報，10月9日，第五版。
李美枝（民72）。兩性之間的喜歡、愛情與婚前性行為容許度。中華心理學刊，25（2），121-135。
李育忠 (民89)。 父母婚姻關係、親子互動對高中職子女異性交往之相關研究~台東地區單、雙親家庭之比較。國立臺東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
李維庭（民84）。愛上一個人─愛情現象的詮釋。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
沈利君（民90）。台北縣市國中學生愛情態度研究。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育教學碩士班學位論文。
余振民(民88)。未婚男性的愛情觀—現象學方法的研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
余憶鳳（民91）。網住e世情─網路戀情發展歷程及其影響因素之理論建構十五位研究參與者的網戀故事。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
杜仲傑(民79)。大學生人際親密的評量與身心適應—親子、情人、異性朋友、同性朋友四種角色的相關分析。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文 。
吳昭儀（民92）。大學生的共依附與愛情態度之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳靜吉(民70)。青年的四個大夢。台北:遠流。
林妙華（民91）。資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
林宜旻、陳皎眉(民84)。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究。教育與心理研究，18，287-311。
林淑華（民91）。國小學童情緒管理與人際關係之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
卓紋君(民89)。從兩性關係發展的模式談兩性親密關係的分與合。輔導季刊，36 (2)，31-44。
洪儷瑜（民83）。不同評量來源的社會特質與學生的社交地位之相關研究。中華輔導學報，2，60-83
胡致芬（民76）。從實徵研究看資優生的特質。資優教育季刊，25，32-35。
徐澄清（民87）。社會化過程的重要機轉--同儕互動。健康世界，145，10-14。
晏涵文(民87)。現代青少年的感情生活與性教育。理論與政策,47﹐165-181。
晏涵文、林燕卿、張利中（ 民87）。青少年婚前性行為及其趨勢探討。國立教育資料館。
陳玉賢（民88）。資優兒童的心理壓力與輔導。輔導與諮商，164期，23-25。
陳美芳(民83)。資優學生的心理輔導。開創資優教育的新世紀:我國資優教育二十年來的回顧與展望,255-271。國立台灣師大特教系所、中華民國特殊教育學會編印。
陳美芳（民85）。資優學生心理特質與評量。國立教育資料館教育資料集刊,21,13-26。
陳貞夙(民86)。青少年對於兩性互動的態度與看法研究。學生輔導訊,48 ,126-138。
陳貞蓉（民82）。國中資優班學生家庭環境、親子關係與其人格特質相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
陳淑華（民91）。高雄市國中學生性知識、性態度、性行為之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳蕙君、翁繩玉（民85）。民生國小資優生與普通生人際關係比較研究。資優教育季刊，59，31-35。
教育部（民86）。中華民國特殊教育法。台北市：教育部。
教育部（民88）。中華民國身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準。台北市：教育部。
張文雄(民82)。從類型觀點探討大學生的愛情觀，東海學報，34 卷,449~462。
張令恬（民87）原生家庭經驗對大學女生愛情關係的影響及其改變歷程之分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
張春興（民83）。現代心理學。台北：東華。
張春興（民84）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張春興（民87）。教育心理學。台北：東華。
張馨仁（民90）。資優生過度激動特質之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
郭靜姿（民89）。談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊，75，1-6。
郭靜姿（民92年4月）。從資優生特質研究談情意輔導需求。情意思考教學研討會，國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
郭靜晃（民89）。少年身心與生活狀況─ 台灣地區調查分析。台北市，洪葉文化事業有限公司。
黃芳田（民90）。邱比特的箭。Sternberg (1998) 原著。台北：遠流。
詹美娟（民81）。青少年知覺之父母支持與青少年自我價值之相關研究。國立師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
詹馨（民75）。資賦優異兒童的情緒和社會發展。資賦優異兒童教學與輔導,137-143。高雄，復文。
莊雅琴（民91）青少年兩性親密行為之研究--以自我發展及習慣觀點初探。國立成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文。
彭瓊慧(民91)。我國資優教育研究之回顧與後設分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
彭瓊慧(民92)。資優教育研究三十年之回顧。資優教育季刊，87，18-26。
楊語芸(民86)。九O 年代社會心理學。Deaux, K., Dane, F. C. & Wrightsman, L. S.（1993）原著。台北：五南。
趙震（民64）。高中生心理學。白石浩一（1968）原著。台北：不二。
潘裕豐（民89）。談資優學生的情意教育。資優教育季刊，77，1-7。
鄭秀美（民74）。愛的藝術。Fromm（1983） 原著。台北：吾友
蔡文輝（民89）。婚姻與家庭。台北：五南。
簡茂發（民72）。國小學童友伴關係的相關因素之分析。教育心理學報，16，71-88。
魏延華(民89)。高中女學生閱讀少女愛情漫畫與愛情態度之關聯。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
魏章玲譯（民77）。家庭社會學。Goode, William J.原著。台北：桂冠。
謝怡玲（民90）。你是資優生—發展潛能.自我管理）。台北：漢藝色研。
謝孟芳（民90）。性別、家庭背景及職業興趣對國中資優班學生教育及職業選擇影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。

貳、英文參考書目
Ackerman, C. M.（1993）. Investigating an alternate method of identifying gifted students. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ammirato, S. P.（1987）. Comparison study of instruments used to measure developmental potential according go Dabrowski’s theory of emotional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young ad ults: Atest of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
Bowlby, J.（1969）. The making and breaking of Affectional Bonds’, British Journal of Psychiatry 130：201-10.
Clark, B. (1979). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. New York: Merrill.
Cho Wen. (1995). Taiwanese Love Styles and Their Association with Self -Esteem and Relationship Quality. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs. 121(3), 283.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J.(1994). Cognitive Representations of Attachment: The Structure and Function of Working Models. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Dabrowski, K.（1964）. Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
Dabrowski, K., Kawczak, A., & & Piechowski, M. M.（1970）. Mental growh: Through positive disintegration. London: GryfPublications.
Falk, R. F., Piechowski, M. M., & Lind, S.（1994）. Critiria for rating the intensity of overixcitabilities. Unpublished manuscript.
Ford, M. A. (1989). Students’ perceptions of affective issues impacting the social emotional development and school performance of gifted/ talented youngsters. Roeper Review, 11(3), 131-134.
Gallagher, S. A. (1985). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth grade students. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona.
Gross, M. U. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.19-29). Washington: Prufrock.
Hamilton, M. & Franks, B. A. (1995). Gifted adolescents: psychological behaviors, values, and development implications. Roeper Review, 17(3), 186-191.
Hatkoff, T. S. & Lasswell, T. E., (1979). Male-female similarities and differences in conceptualizing love. Love and Attraction: An International Conference (pp.221-227). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog y,42(3), 511 -524.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (1993) Lovers as friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10 ,459-466.
Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (1992) Romantic Love. Sage Publications. New York.
Hendrick , C. & Hendrick , S. S. (1990). A Relationship -specific version of the love attitudes scale. In Neuliep, J. W. (Ed.),Replication research in the social sciences (pp.239-254). Newbury Park , CA; Sage.
Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1987a). Love and sex attitudes：A close relationship. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 141-169.
Hendrick , C. & Hendrick , S. S.(1986). A Theory and method of love, Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 50, 392-402.
Hetherington﹐E. M., & Cox﹐R.（1978）. The Aftermath of divorce. Stevens﹐J. Jr.＆ M.（Eds.）﹐Mother-Child,Father-Child Relations﹐149-76.Washinton﹐D. C. : National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Huesmann, L. R., & Levinger, G. (1976). Incremental exchange theory: A formal model for progression in dyadic social interaction. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
Kitano, M. K.（1990）. Intellectual abilities and psychological intensities in young children: Implications for the gifted. Roeper Review, 13（5）, 5-10.
Lasswell, T. E. & Lasswell , M. E., (1976). I love youbut I am not in love with you. Journal ofMarrige and Family Counseling,2, 211-224.
Lee, J. L.（1974）.The Styles of Loving. Psychology today,8（5），44-51.
Lee, J.A. (1976). The Colors of Love. Bantam Books. New York.
Lerner, R. M. ＆ Lerner, J. V. (1977).Effects of ages,sex,and physical attractiveness on childpeer relations,acadedmic performance,and element school djustment. Development Psychology,13(6),585-590.
Lewis,J.A.（1994）. The codependence concept and the status quo. Family Journal, 2（3）,238-240.
Lewis, R. B., Kitano, M. K., & Lynch, E. W. (1992). Psychological intensities in gifted adults. Roeper Review ,15(1), 25-31.
Lovecky, D. V. (1993). The quest for meaning: Counseling issues with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the Gifted and Talented (pp.29-50). Denver: Love.
Lufting, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1991). An assessment of the social status and perceived personality and school traits of gifted students by non-gifted peers. Roeper Review, 13(3), 148-153.
Lysy, K. Z. & Piechowski, M. M. （1983）. Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108 , 267-320.
Miller, K. A. (1988). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of overexcitabilities with measures of verbal and mathematical attitude among academically precocious adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
Miller, N. B. (1991). Miller assessment coding system manual for rating levels of emotional development. Unpublished manuscript.
Miller, N. B.; Silverman, L. K. & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 18(1), 20-38.
O’Connor, K. J. (2002). The application of Dabrowski’s theory to the gifted. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.51-60). Washington: Prufrock.
Piechowski, M. M.（1979）. Levels of emotional development. Illinios Teacher, January/February, 134-139.
Piechowski, M. M. & Colangole, N. (1984). Development potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 80-88.
Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F.（1985）. Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549.
Piechowski, M. M.（1986）. The concept of developmental potential. Roeper Review, 8（3）, 18-32.
Piechowski, M. M.（1991）. Emotional development and edmotional giftedness. Psychological and Counseling Services, 285-306.
Piechowski, M. M. & Miller, N. B.（1995）. Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Review, 17（3）, 176-180.
Piechowski, M. M. (1999). Overexcitabilities. Encyclopedia of creativity, 2, 325-334.
Renzulli, J. S.,Smith, F. H.,White, A. J.,Callahan, C. M.,&Hartm an, R. K.(1976).Scales for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of superior students.(SRBCSS ) Wethersfield,Conn.:Creative Learning Press.
Roeper, A.（1982）. How the gifted cope with their emotions. Roeper Review, 5（2）, 21-24.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Rosenman, M. F. (1978). Liking, loving, and styles of loving. Psychological Reports,42, 1243-1246.
Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: an invitation to social psychology. New York , Holt,　Rinehart and Winston .
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love.Journal of Personalty and Social Psychology, 16,265-273.
Sandor, D. & Rosental, D. A. (1986). Youths’ outlooks on love: Is it just a stage or tow. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1(2), 199-212.
Schneider, B. H., Clegg, M. R., Byrne, B. M., Ledingham, J. E., & Crombie, G. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 48-56.
Schuler, P. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.71-79). Washington: Prufrock.
Siegel , J. M. , Yancey, A. K., Aneshensel, C. S., & Schuler, R. (1999). Body- image, perceived pubertal timing, and adolescent mental-health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25(2), 155-165.
Silverman, L. K.（1983）. Issues in affective development of the gifted. In J. Van.
Silverman, L. K.（1990）. Social and emotional education of the gifted: The discoveries of Leta Hollingworth. Roeper Review, 7（3）, 171-178.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.3-28). Denver: Love.
Silverman, L. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.31-37). Washington: Prufrock.
Spreacker,A.（2001）.Educating for moral development. Gifted education international,15,pp.188-193.
Sternberg, R. J. & Grajek, S.(1984). The nature of love .Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2),312-329.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love .Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Love Is A Story：A New Theory of Relationships. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Tassel-Baska（Ed.）. A practical guide for counseling the gifted（pp.6-21）. Reston, VA: CEC Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H.(1959). Genetic studies of genius:Vol. 5. The gifted grows at midlife. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M . (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children.In Terman, L. M. (Ed.), Genetic studies of genius(Vol.Ⅰ).Stanford,CA: Stanford University Press.
Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Woll, B. (1989). Personality and Relationship Correlates of Loving Styles. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 480-505.
Wyndol Furman, B.Bradford Brown, and Candice Fiering. (1999). The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence. Cambridge University Press.