研究生: |
羅文杰 Wen-Chieh Lo |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
九年一貫前後不同階段國中學生體育課程表現之研究-以體適能表現、體適能認知程度及體育課程滿意程度為例 A Study on Students’ Performance of Physical Education between the Old System Curriculum and the Nine-year Joint Curriculum |
指導教授: |
李志文
Lee, Chih-Wen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 110 |
中文關鍵詞: | 九年一貫 、體育 、體適能表現 、體適能認知 、體育課程滿意 |
英文關鍵詞: | Nine-Year Joint Curriculum, Physical Education, Fitness Performance, Fitness Recognition, Satisfaction of Physical Education Curriculum |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:279 下載:31 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在比較九年一貫課程實施前後之不同階段(舊制體育課程、
新制健康與體育學習領域課程)學生體適能表現、體適能認知程度及體育課程滿意程度三部份之差異。研究對象係為台中市立向上國中九十一學年度舊制二年級男女學生及九十二學年度九年一貫新制八年級男女學生,並分別以「體適能測驗工具」、「體適能認知測驗試題卷」及「學生對體育課程滿意程度量表」進行測驗與調查。
研究結果顯示,「學生體適能表現」方面發現,舊制與新制之男生在「坐姿體前彎項目」及「立定跳遠項目」達到顯著水準,且新制優於舊制。舊制與新制之女生在「坐姿體前彎項目」及「一分鐘仰臥起坐項目」達到顯著水準,且新制優於舊制。
「體適能認知程度」方面發現,舊制與新制之男生在「體適能中測量身體組成之認知程度」及「身體質量指數的公式換算之認知程度」達到顯著水準,且新制優於舊制。舊制與新制之女生在「規律的運動可減少疾病發生之認知程度」、「身體質量指數的公式換算之認知程度」及「政策宣導體適能概念之認知程度」達到顯著水準,且新制優於舊制。
「體育課程滿意程度」方面發現,舊制與新制男生在「教師與教學」、「教學行政」與「同儕學習」題項之滿意程度差異達顯著水準,且新制低於舊制。舊制與新制女生僅在「學習效果」題項之滿意程度差異達顯著水準,且新制女生低於舊制女生滿意程度。
The aim of this study was to compare ‘Fitness Performance’ (FP), ‘Fitness Recognition’ (FR), and ‘Satisfaction of Physical Education Curriculum’ (SPEC) of Junior High School students between the Old System Curriculum and the Nine-year Joint Curriculum. This research was taken in Hsiang-Shang Junior High School, participated by second-year students who were in the old learning system and eighth-year students who were in the new learning system. ‘FP Measure Instrument’, ‘FR Testing Paper’, and ‘SPEC Measurement Table’ were used as a testing and investigation tools in this research.
As the result showed, male students had a significant difference between the two systems in FP, especially in ‘Sit-and-Reach’ and ‘Standing-Long-Jump’. New system’s male students were better than the old system’s. Female students s had a significant difference between the two systems in ‘Sit-and-Reach’ and ‘Sit-Up’. New system’s female students were better than the old system’s.
In the FR aspect, the result showed that male students had a significant difference between the two systems in ‘Body Composition Measurement of Fitness’ and ‘Recognition of BMI Indication Formula’. New system’s male students were better than old system’s. Female students had a significant difference between the two systems in ‘Recognizing of Regular Exercise Reducing Illness’, ‘Recognition of BMI Indication Formula’ and ‘Recognition of Fitness Policy Conducting’. New system’s female students were better than old system’s.
In the SPEC aspect, it was found that male students had a significant difference between the two systems in ‘Teacher and Teaching’, ‘Teaching Administration’ and ‘Schoolmate Leaning’. The SPEC was lower in male students of the new system. For female students only ‘Leaning Effects’ had a significant difference between the two systems. Old system’s female students were better than new system’s.
一、中文部份
方進隆(1992)。運動與健康—減肥健身與疾病的運動處方增訂版,頁231。台北:漢文書店。
方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。台北:漢文書局。
方進隆(1997)。提昇體適能的策略與展望。教師體適能指導手冊,頁12-14。台北:教育部。
王俊明(1999)。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。載於張至滿、王俊明主編:體育測驗與評價,頁139-158。台北:中華民國體育學會。
王順正(2002)。建立運動選手選材制度-以建立青少年體能商(physical fitness quotient)常模為例。行政院體委會委託專案研究計劃。
行政院(2003年5月4日)。SARS防治手冊。頁4。http://www.cdc.gov.tw/
atyp/2SARS防治宣導資料/SARS防治手冊.htm
行政院(2000)。行政院衛生署公布之促進國民健康體能指引指導本。
林貴福(1993)。國小體育實務。台北:心理出版社。
林貴福、盧淑雲(1999)。認識健康體能。台北市:師大書苑有限公司。
林傑斌、劉明德(2001)。第二十章 信度分析。SPSS 10.0與統計模式建構,頁20-6。台北市:文魁資訊。
林本源(2002)。編製中小學學生體育態度量表之研究。桃園:國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。
林正常(1997)。體適能的理論基礎。教師體適能指導手冊,頁47-59。台北:教育部。
林聰敏(1996)。後設認知學習理論及其在體育教學上的應用。高市鐸聲,第7卷第1期,頁38-41。
李淑芳譯(1996)。休閒與人類行為,頁304。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
李文田(1996)。體育課程的設計模式與價值取向。台灣省學校體育,6 卷5期,頁42-48。
李彩華、方進隆(1998)。國中學生身體活動量與體適能相關因素研究。體育學報(25),頁139-148。
李孟印、姜信淇(2000)。新竹縣竹東、北埔地區國民健康體能之調查研究。
資料取自:http://www.fses.hcc.edu.tw
李勝雄(2001)。九年一貫健康與體育教學理論與實務,頁4-5。台北市:師大書苑。
卓旻怡(2000)。雲林縣國中生體育課學習滿意度調查研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文。
卓俊辰(1992)。體適能—健身運動處方的理論與實際。國立台灣師範大學體育學會。
卓俊辰(2000)。青少年健身運動習慣的培養。學校體育,10(4),頁20-24。
吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用與實務。台北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。
吳裕益(2001)。高雄縣原住民地區國中生與都會區國中生體適能之比較研
究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文。
吳玉妹(2001)。體適能課程實施對學生體適能認知及表現之影響研究。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文。
郭丁熒譯(1992)。認知與測驗。國教之友,第43卷第4期,頁27-28。
陳顯宗(1983)。台北市蘭雅國中七十一學年度應屆畢業生體育意向調查。體育學報,5輯,頁127-144。
許義雄(1997)。體適能與生活品質。教師體適能指導手冊,頁23-31。台北:教育部。
許義雄(2001)。國民體能常模報告書。行政院體育委員會。
許義雄(2000)。九年一貫健康與體育學習領域探討。學校體育,55期,頁10-18。
康軒文教事業出版(2001)。九年一貫課程與現行課程之差異—課程鬆綁、培養能力。九年一貫課程專刊,頁14-23。
教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北:教育部。
教育部體育司(1999)。教育部提升學生體適能中程計畫核定本。
教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
教育部(2003)。中華民國體適能護照(國中學生適用版)。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-健康與體育學習領域,92.01.15台國字第092006026號函。台北:教育部。
教育部體育司(2002)。「各級學校體育實施辦法」【法令規章】。中華民國九十一年六月二十五日,台(九一)參字第九一0九一八四八號修正,http://www.edu.tw/physical/rules/100.doc
黃文俊(2000)。針對坐式生活型態在兒童健康體適能之比較分析研究。體育學報(28),頁339-348。
黃彬彬(1996)。台灣地區青少年的健康與體能之研究。八十五年度體育學術研討會,頁161-172。
黃永寬(2002)。如何營造良好樂趣化的教學氣氛。行政院體育委員會之國民體能推廣教室指導員講習會授課講義,頁26-34。台北:國立體育學院。
曾俊凱(2002)。八十二年公布新課程與八十七年公布九年一貫新課程之異同—從九年一貫談新舊「心」課程。http:/ezgo.tpc.edu.tw/social/fmes/
chapter/910204.htm
曾茂山(2003)。社區介入策略對國中生運動行為及體適能之影響研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系碩士論文。
張威克(1998)。運動經驗與人生。國民體育季刊,第27期,頁108。
張春興(1987)。心理學概要。台北:東華書局。
蔡崇濱(1976)。國立成功大學體育設施及學生興趣調查報告。國民體育季刊,5卷5期,頁66-69。
楊宜青(2001)。體能活動與健康。成大體育,第36卷第1期,頁2-10。
楊志顯、吳惠櫻、陳茶瓊、翁樹平(1997)。體育課實施方式與學生滿意度
廖政訓(2000)。國立台北科技大學學生體育態度調查研究。學校體育,55期,頁33-39。
廖欽清(1987)。我國大學院校學生課外體育活動之分析與討論(上)。輔大體苑,63期,頁4-11。
廖欽清(1987)。我國大學院校學生課外體育活動之分析與討論(下)。輔大體苑,64期,頁2-12。
劉一民(1997)。運動經驗的現象學考察—透過運動關照生命本體。體育研究,副刊號第3期,頁83-89。
鄭金昌(1997)。東海大學學生對體育課興趣分組教學滿意度與修課態度調查研究。大專體育,29期,頁22-32。
鄭婉敏(1999)。認知的學習理論的教學意涵及其對教學的啟示。台中師院學報,第13期,頁57-72。
歐楊金樹(1997)。國立聯合中商專校學生對興趣保齡球運動滿意度之調查。大專體育,31期,頁34-46。
謝應裕(2000)。九年一貫健康與體育學習領域探討。學校體育,55期,頁8。
謝錦城(2000)。運動與心血管功能。台北市:國家衛生研究院。
謝幸珠(1996)。大學女生健康體能課程之效果研究。台北:漢文書店。
簡茂發、郭生玉(1989)。測驗的編制。社會及行為科學研究法,頁439-461。台北:東華書局。
簡金福(2000)。有效提昇九年一貫體育課程品質之策略。學校體育,55期,頁49-56。
簡紅珠(1997)。在新世紀的學校教育脈絡中建構良性互動與有效學習的班級環境。教師天地,89期,頁25-29。
二、西文部份
Aicinena, S. (1991). The teacher and student attitudes toward physical education. The Physical Educator,48(1), 28-32.
Asher, S. R., Oden, S. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1977). Children’s friendships in school setting. In L. G. Katz (Ed.), Current Topics in Early Childhood Education (Vol. 1, 33-61). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cramer, S. R. (1996). Assumptions central to the quality movement in education. The Clearing House, 69, 360-364.
Corbin, C.(1987). Physical fitness in the K-12 curriculum: Some defensive solutions to perennial problem. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation,and Dance, 58(7), 49-54.
Duda, J. L. (1992). Motivation in sport settings: A goal perspective approach. In G. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in Sport and Exercise, 57-91. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Daan, G. U. (1993). Relationships between changes in health and fitness and the perception of exercise. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(3), .343-347.
Graham, G. (1990). Physical education in U.S. school, K-12. Journal of Teaching in Physical education, 61(2),35-39.
Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and Instruction:Theory into Practice(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and Instruction:Theory into Practice(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hamilton, R., & Ghatala, E. (1994). Learning and Instruction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls. J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3),435-441.
Judith, A.F. & Jacqueline, A.W. (1997). Rural fourth graders’ perceptions of physical fitness and fitness testing. Journal of Physical Education,
Recreation and Dance. 1997,Spring, 78-87.
Luke, M. D., & Sinclair, G. D. (1991). Gender differences in adolescents’ attitudes toward school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,11, 31-46.
Malkin, M. (1995). Aerobic walking: The Weight-loss Exercise. NY: Jone Wiley
and Sons Inc., 133-146.
Martin, C. L.(1988). Enhancing children’s satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms. The Physical
Educator, 45(4), 196-209.
Placek, J.H.(1992). Rethinking middle school physical education in England-An investigation among parents, pupils and teacher. The physical Educator, 45(3),154-156.
Pritchard, O. (1988). Attitudes towards physical education in England-An investigation among parents, pupils and teachers. The Physical Educator,45(3),154-156.
Paffenbarger, R.P, Jr., Hyde, R.T., Wing, A.L. (1990). Physical Activity and Physical Fitness as Determinats of Health and Longevity. In Exercise, Fitness, and Health, Human Kinetic Books.
Rosato (1994). Fitness for Wellness, The Physical Connection, 3nd edition, West Publishing Company.
Rice, P.L. (1988). Attitudes of high school students toward physical education activities, teachers, and personal health. The Physical Educator, 45(2), 94-99.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Cognitive Psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Steward, M. J., Green, S.R., & Heulskamp, J. (1991). Secondary student attitudes toward physical education. The Physical Educator,45(3), 154-156.
Siedentop, (1994). Introduction to Physical Education, 155-159, CA: Mayfield.
Strand, B., & Scantling, E. (1994). Analysis of secondary student Preferences toward physical education . The Physical Educator, 51(3), 119-129.
Schmidt, R.B., & Walkusk, J.A (1998). Psychological effects of exercise among the elderly. In P. Seraganian. Exercise Psychology, 163, 237-253.
Tannehill, D., & Zakrajsek, D. (1993). Student attitudes toward physical education: A multicultural study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 78-84.
Thomas L.M., James F.S., Nell F., Julia J.R., & Bohdan K. (1993). Effects of a curriculum and inservice program on the quantity and quality of elementary physical education classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(2), 178-187.
Tannehill, D., & Zakrajsek, D. (1993). Student attitudes towards physical education: A multicultural study. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 13, 78-84.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1992). Healthy People 2000:
National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives (Summary Report). Boston: Jones and Barttlet Publishers.