研究生: |
楊雅惠 Ya-Hui Yang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
聽覺障礙學生手語敘事與故事寫作能力之研究 A study on sign language narratives and story writing abilities of hearing impaired students |
指導教授: |
林寶貴
Lin, Bao-Guey |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 265 |
中文關鍵詞: | 聽覺障礙 、手語 、敘事 、故事寫作 |
英文關鍵詞: | hearing impaired, sign language, narrative, story writing |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:254 下載:45 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
聽覺障礙學生手語敘事與故事寫作能力之研究
中文摘要
手語可說是啟聰學校師生之間與學生之間,傳授課業、傳遞資訊與溝通訊息最主要的溝通管道。由於研究者多年的啟聰教育教師背景,以及未有研究探討聽障學生的手語敘事與故事寫作能力,因此引發研究者的研究動機。
本研究對象主要選取台北市啟聰學校高中(職)一年級至三年級學生,排除多障的學生,有效樣本共為31名學生,男生22人,女生9人。
研究工具採用企鵝家族卡通影片,內容充滿事件順序、因果、邏輯關係之概念,每單元約為5分鐘,並未使用語言,以避免語文因素對聽障學生的干擾。聽障學生在看完影帶後以手語敘事並錄影,錄影後寫下故事的內容。
以量化分析手語敘事語料的故事結構要素,以及手語敘事與故事寫作能力之相關;並從質化方面分析手語溝通的特徵。結果發現如下:
一、 聽障學生在手語敘事與故事寫作能力方面
(一)聽障學生的手語敘事有故事結構的能力。在「起始事件」、「結果」二要素的能力最強,「行動」能力尚可,「背景」的敘述會因發生的地點而不同,在「內在反應」的能力最弱。
(二)故事寫作發展的水準方面,以層次三「焦點鏈」的人數為最多;其次為層次四「完整的敘述」;層次最低的人數佔第三高。寫作層次越高者,所寫出的總字數、詞數皆多於層次低者。
(三)手語敘事與故事寫作能力的相關為.70,達到中度相關的程度。
(四)本研究進一步就手語敘事的語料和故事寫作的文字稿,分析其間的特性。
二、 聽障學生手語敘事的語言特徵
從聽障學生的敘事語料中,可以發現,聽障學生在敘述故事時,具有文法手語和自然手語交互使用的情形,而其關鍵點,在於所敘事的內容,如果具有視覺性的語言時,就會進行兩種語言的交互使用。同時本研究也歸納、分析了手語敘事語料中自然手語特有的語言特徵,以供研究或有關單位參考。
最後根據本研究的文獻探討、研究結果與結論,對啟聰教育與未來研究,提出若干參考建議。
關鍵字:聽覺障礙、手語、敘事、故事寫作
A Study on Sign Language Narratives and Story Writing Abilities of Hearing Impaired Students
Ya-Hui Yang
Abstract
Sign language is the medium through which students and teachers among themselves convey lessons, information, and communication. The motive of this study arose from my teaching background in hearing impairment education, and the lack of studies on sign language narratives and story writing abilities of hearing impaired students in this field.
Subjects were chosen from freshman, sophomore, and junior high school students from the Hearing Impaired High School in Taipei. Multiple-impaired students were excluded; the sample included 22 males and 9 females, with a total of 31 student subjects.
Research tools included two cartoon series on video, with concepts filled with chronological, cause-and-effect, and logical relations. Every series was approximately five minutes. Sign language was not used lest it becomes a distraction to hearing impaired student subjects. After viewing the video, subjects were asked to use sign language to make narratives which were taped on video; they were also asked to write down the stories.
Using quantitative analysis in analyzing the core components of story structures of sign language narratives data and the relationship between sign language narratives and story writing abilities, while using qualitative analysis in analyzing the communication characteristics of sign language, the research findings were as the following:
1. The sign language narratives and story writing abilities of hearing impaired student subjects:
a. The hearing impaired students indicated the ability in constructing the structure of stories using sign language narratives. They performed strongest in two major components: cause of incident and consequence; their performance in showing the stories’ actions was average; and they were weakest in their internal response in their narratives of the background of the stories, possibly due to the various different settings of the stories.
b.As to the level of story writing, most subjects fell into the third level of the focus chain; the second highest number of subjects fell into the fourth level of true narratives; the lowest level was occupied by the third highest number of subjects. The higher the level, the more the subject’s total number of words and vocabulary was used than those subjects at the lower levels.
c. The correlation between sign language narratives and story writing ability was .70, reaching a middle level of correlation.
d. This study analyzed the differences in the abilities using data collected from sign language narratives and manuscripts of written stories.
2. The characteristics of the sign language narratives of hearing impaired students were as follow:
From the hearing impaired student subjects’ narratives data, the researcher found that when they narrated stories, they interchanged grammar sign language and natural sign language. They use these two kinds of language particularly when the content of the narrative had visual language involved. This study also summarized and analyzed the characteristics of natural sign language to provide reference to further studies.
Lastly, according to relevant literature discussed, the research results, and conclusions, the researcher proposed suggestions for further studies on hearing impaired education.
Key words: hearing impaired, Sign Language, narrative, story writing.
一、中文部分
王志遠(民91):即時手部動作辨識系統之研發。私立中原大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文,未出版。
史文漢、丁立芬(民86): 手能生橋。中華民國聾人協會。
江智勝(民91):手部動作辨識語音系統之研究。私立中原大學醫學工程研究所碩士論文,未出版。
兵素琴、吳美萩(民93):聽故事與看圖教詞彙策略對學障兒童敘事能力之影響。手語暨溝通障礙研討會論文集,241-250。
吳荔雲(民90):智能障礙者之手語教學。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,29-34。
岑清美(民90):思考手語與啟聰教育。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,169-174。
李芃娟(民86):聽覺障礙學童輔助工具使用之調查研究。台南師院學報,30,315。
李宛靜(民91):語言學習障礙兒童口語述說能力:故事結構分析。台北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李振輝(民86):聽語障無障礙環境與手語翻譯員制度。福利社會,61,15-21。
邢敏華(民87):台灣區啟聰學校教師之教學溝通行為與所需具備之專業能力調查。特殊教育與復健學報,6,103-123。
邢敏華、葉仕漢、李志明(民90):手語圖畫故事對啟聰學校聾生閱讀理解能力與閱讀興趣之效果研究。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,210-222。
林文寶(民89):敘述、敘事與故事。兒童文學學刊,3,20-63
林佩菁(民92):故事結構教學對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版。
林麗卿(民89):敘事體在學前幼兒發展中之功能探討,新竹師院學報, 13,149-186。
林寶貴(民73,83):聽覺障礙兒童語言溝通法與語文教學法之研究。台北,教育部教育計畫小組。
林寶貴(民90):手語意見調查研究。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,45-67。
林寶貴、李真賢(民76):聽覺障礙學生國語文能力之研究。台灣教育學院學報, 12 ,1-27。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、邢敏華(民90):聽障學生學習手語畫冊成效及影響因素之研究。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,118-130。
林寶貴、黃瑞珍、彭千紅(民86):兒童書寫語言發展指標研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,計畫編號:84-2421-H-003-028。
林寶貴、楊雅惠、戴素美(民90): 「修訂版手語畫冊」手語詞彙表現建構向度分析研究。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,68-81。
林寶貴、錡寶香(民89):國小學童書寫語言測驗之編制。特殊教育與復健學報,8,53-74。
林寶貴、錡寶香(民91):聽覺障礙學童口語述說能力之探討:語意、語法與迷走語之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,22,127-154。
姚俊英(民90):台灣手語演進。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,142-147。
徐志民編譯,游順釗原著(1991):視覺語言學。台北,大安。
張雪莪(民90):談聽障教育與手語。手語教學與應用研討會論文集,103-117。
張蓓莉(民76):回歸主流聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,3,119-134。
張蓓莉(民78):聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊, 5,165-204。
教育部(民86):特殊教育法。台北:教育部。
教育部手語研究小組(民88): 修訂版手語畫冊,教育部特殊教育工作小組發行。
教育部手語研究小組(民89): 常用詞彙手語畫冊,教育部特殊教育工作小組發行。
莊妙芬(民84):重度障礙者之非口語訓練。台北,中華民國特殊教育學會84年年刊,1-24。
許瑛珍(民90):手語的腦功能定位。國教世紀,197,33-36。
連淑鈴、崔夢萍(民92):電腦看圖故事寫作對國小二年級學童寫作成效及寫作態度影響之研究。初等教育學刊,15,47-82。
郭啟祥(民89):應用自然語言處理於台灣手語轉語音系統之研究。國立成功大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,未出版。
郭譽玫(民84):手語新知:視覺語言學。教育資料與研究,2, 63-73。
陳怡君(民92):台灣地區聾人手語選用情形與現行手語政策之探討。國立政治大學語言研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳姝蓉(民91):故事結構教學對增進國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。台北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳榮華、林坤燦(民86):手語/口語併用溝通訓練方案對增進中重度智能不足者溝通技能之成效研究。花蓮師院學報,7,183-214。
曾志朗(民86):聽障生閱讀能力之提升。聲暉雙月刊,14,4-12。
黃仲陵(民86):聽障者電腦輔具之相關技術的研發。國科會身心障礙者就學、就業之科技支援研討會會議手冊,29-36。
黃瑞珍(民88):故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用,國小特殊教育,27,4-10。
楊宗仁(民87):美國聾校學生手語說故事能力與英語故事故事寫作能力之相關研究。東台灣特殊教育學報,1,217-255。
趙于翔(民91):可攜式台灣手語發聲系統。私立淡江大學電機工程研究所碩士論文,未出版。
趙子嫻(民86):「口語法」「手語法」「併用法」對無口語重度智能障礙者溝通效果之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
趙玉平(民88):手語大師Ⅳ。現代經典文化事業有限公司印行。
劉秀丹(民93):啟聰學校學生文法手語、自然手語及書面語故事理解能力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育博士論文,未出版。
蔡銘津(民84):文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
鄭功偉(民91):具容錯之手語檢索機制於手語至中文翻譯之應用。國立成功大學碩士論文,未出版。
鄭智仁(民92):中文轉錄手語及手語影像合成之研究。國立成功大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,未出版。
錡寶香(民88):口語述說:理論、評量與學習障礙。載於迎千禧談特教, 249-291。台北:中華民國特殊教育學會。
錡寶香(民90):國小低閱讀成就學生的口語述說能力:語言層面的分析。特殊教育學報,15,129-175。
錡寶香(民92):國小低閱讀能力學童與一般閱讀能力學童的敘事能力:篇章凝聚之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,24,63-84。
高令秋(民86):歷程導向寫作教學法對國中聽覺障礙學生寫作能力影響之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,15, 173-196。
Marschark, M.; Mouradian, V; & Halas, M.. (1994). Discourse Rules in the Language Productions of Deaf and Hearing Children. Journal of Exceptional Child Psychology, 57, 89-107.
Meadow, K.P.(1980). Deafness and child development. Berkeley: University of California.
Merritt, D.D., & Liles, B.E.(1987). Narrative analysis: Clinical applications of story generation and retelling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorder, 54, 438-447.
Moores, D. F.(1987). Education The Deaf: Psychology, Principles, and Practice(3rd ed), Houghton Mifflin Boston, MA.
Musselman, C., & Szanto, G.(1998). The written language of deaf adolescents: Patterns of performance. Journal of Deaf Studies and Dead Education, 3:3, 245-257.
Paul, P. V.,& Quigley, S.P. (1994). Language and deafness. 2nd ed. San Diego:Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Preece, A. (1987). The range of narrative forms conversationally produced by young children. Journal of Child Language, 6, 91-109.
Quigley, S.P., & Paul, P. V.(1984). Language and deafness. San Diego, CA: College-hill press, 141-163.
Quigley, S.P., & Paul, P. V.(1986). A perspective on academic achievement. In D. Luterman(Ed.), Deafness in perspective,55-86.
Ripich, D. N., & Griffith, P. L.(1985). Story structure, cohesion and propositions in learning disabled children. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
Schick, B. (1997). The effects of discourse genre on English language complexity in school-age deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 234-251.
Sensenig, L. D.,Mazeika, E.J., & Topf, B.(1989). Sign language facilitation of reading with students classified as trainable mentally handicapped. Education and Training of the Mentally Retard, June,121-125.
Simmons, A(1963). Comparison of written and spoken language and written language of deaf and hearing children. The Volta Review, 64, 117-121.
Stein, N.L., & Glenn, C. G.(1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle(Ed.), Discourse processing : Multi-disciplinary perspectives,53-120. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
Stokoe, W. C.Jr. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf.(Studies in Linguistics: Occassional Papers,8).
Strong, M., & Prinz, P.(1997). A study of the relationship between ASL and English literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 37-46.
Stuart, C. (1992). A case study description of children who establish peer friendships in a residential treatment program for children with behavioral and emotional handicaps. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Supall, S.(1991). Manually coded English: The modality question in signed language development. In Siple, P. & Fischer, S.(Eds.), Theoretical issues in Sign Language research: Acquistion,85-109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Talmy ,L.(2003):The representational of spatial structure in spoken and signed languaged: A Neural Model. Language and Linguistics 4(2), p207-250.
Weiss, A. L., & Johnson, C. J.(1993). Relationships between narrative and syntactic competencies in school-aged, hearing-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 35-39.
Westby, C. E.(1984). Development of narrative language abilities. In G. Wallach & K. Butler(Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children, 103-107.
Wilbur, R.B.(1979). American Sign Language and sign systems. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Downey, D. M.(1992). When a story is not a story: a process analysis of the written language of hearing-impaired children. The Volta Review, 95, 131-158.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Snyder .(1985). Form and meaning in the written language of hearing-impaired children. The Volta Review, 87, 75-90.