簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 徐怡芳
Hsu, Yi-Fang
論文名稱: 行動研究: 探究式學習對英語學習者主動學習影響之探討
Action Research: The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning on English Learner’s Learning Behaviors for Taiwanese Senior High School Students
指導教授: 吳美貞
Wu, Mei-Chen
口試委員: 李宜倩
Lee, Yi-Chien
黃玟君
Huang, Wen-Jiun
吳美貞
Wu, Mei-Chen
口試日期: 2023/12/28
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系英語教學碩士在職專班
Department of English_In-service Teacher Master's Program of Teaching English as A Second Language
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 48
中文關鍵詞: 行動研究探究式學習主動學習動機學習自主性
英文關鍵詞: action research, inquiry-based learning, active learning, motivation, autonomy
研究方法: 行動研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400422
論文種類: 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類)
相關次數: 點閱:165下載:26
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 英語能力在台灣被視為個人成功與國家競爭力的基石,而英語教育在台灣也一直都是教育改革著重的目標之一。新課綱與雙語國家政策的施行將英語教育的重要性更往上提升。在提升國家整體英語水平的期待下,新課綱卻縮減英語授課時數,而在教育現場的教師關注的困境則普遍是學習動機的低落。兩政策目標的內涵及現況的教學困難將促使英語教師進行英語教學上的改變:在有限的時間中給予學生有意義的學習情境來深化學習,提升學習者語言學習的情意動機。動機和主動學習密不可分,主動學習者最大特色在於主動建構知識而非被動接受知識,並在學習過程展現積極正向的學習熱情。探究式學習重視學習者的自主性,過往的文獻指出應用於高等教育的語言教學上可促進學習者主動學習樣態。
    本行動研究旨在探討一般英語課室內使用探究式學習促進高中生主動學習能力養成的可能性。研究者使用英文課本內容作為議題討論開端,配合探究式學習的五個階段,觀察學生在學習過程中是否展現主動學習的樣貌。研究問題如下:
    使用探究式學習對外語學習者的主動學習行為的影響為何?
    研究資料蒐集包含研究者的課室觀察、學習者的學習歷程與個別訪談。分析資料顯示了三個與主動學習相關的樣態包括:
    (一) 學生從知識的接受者轉化為知識的建構者,
    (二) 學生展現正向的學習態度,
    (三) 學生習得不同的學習技巧。
    行動研究重視理論與實務的結合並重視研究者的反思及修正,故本行動研究在施行第一次探究式循環後進行反思與修正並施作第二次循環。針對第一次修正內容及檢討二次循環過程,研究者也提出完善建議。此研究將有助於未來行動研究者施作探究式語言學習,或促進語言學習者的主動學習之參考。

    English ability has long been regarded as the success of individuals but one of the most pervasive problems for language teachers in Taiwan is that learners need motivation. The Taiwan government launched new Curriculum Guidelines in 2018, in which English teaching hours were reduced, to develop every student into a lifelong learner with competencies. It is obvious that cultivating competencies or building lifelong learners is a formidable mission when students are passive and indifferent to their learning. This study addresses this real-world problem by exploring a teaching approach that can activate learner agents and lead to active learning behaviors. Due to the characteristics of inquiry-based learning in a language classroom, this student-centered approach could help deepen students’ learning and sustain learning motivation, which could eventually help cultivate students’ active learning behaviors. Therefore, the research question was as follows: In what way can inquiry-based learning affect students’ willingness to learn actively?
    Data were collected through teacher’s observation logs, students’ inquiry journals and final products, and semi-structured interviews. The significant findings of this action research related to active learning were:
    1. Students learned various learning skills.
    2. Students demonstrated positive affective abilities.
    3. Students transformed from knowledge receivers to knowledge constructors.
    Since the nature of action research lies in constant reflection and modification, this study comprised two cycles. The reflective points and the modifications after the first cycle were discussed in this report, together with the overall reflections and suggestions. The researcher hopes this will help contribute to the collective knowledge of future researchers interested in the real-world implementation of inquiry-based learning and active learning in language classrooms.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT i ENGLISH ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES v CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Two Back-to-Back Educational Policies 1 1.2 The Challenge for English Teachers 1 1.3 Autonomy, Motivation and Active Learning 2 1.4 Inquiry-based Learning and Active Learning 3 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Autonomous Learner and Active Learning 5 2.2 The Potential of Using Inquiry-based Learning in a Language Classroom 6 2.3 The Role of Textbooks in This Action Research 10 2.4 The Four Common Models of an Inquiry Cycle 11 2.4.1 Roger Bybee’s 5E Model 12 2.4.2 Bertram Bruce’s Model 13 2.4.3 Lazareva’s Model 14 2.4.4 Margus Pedaste’s Model 14 2.5 The Inquiry-based Learning Model Used in This Action Research 16 2.5.1 The Use of Pedaste’s Model in Language Learning 18 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 21 3.1 The Participants and the Classroom Setting 21 3.2 Instruments 21 3.3 Research Design and Procedures 22 3.3.1 The Purpose of Action Research 25 3.4 Data Analysis 26 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 27 4.1 The Modifications Between the Two Action Research Cycles 27 4.2 The Results of This Action Research 29 4.2.1 Students’ Learning skills 29 4.2.2 Students’ Positive Attitude 33 4.2.3 Students from Receivers to Constructors 34 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 38 5.1 Conclusions 38 5.2 Pedagogical Implications 39 5.3 Limitations of the Study 40 5.4 The Teacher-researcher’s Reflections 41 REFERENCES 43 APPLENDICES 47

    Adhami, N., & Taghizadeh, M. (2022). Integrating inquiry-based learning and computer supported collaborative learning into a flipped classroom: Effects on academic writing performance and perceptions of students of railway engineering. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-37.
    Al-Wadi, H. M. (2018). Supporting EFL students' learning of theoretical English content through using an inquiry-based teaching technique. English Language Teaching, 11(8), 73-85.
    Alameddine, M. M., & Ahwal, H. W. (2016). Inquiry-based teaching in literature classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 332-337.
    Ali, H. F., & Ulker, V. (2020). The effect of inquiry-based approach on the development of reading and writing skills of a university EFL students. Available at SSRN 3621259.
    Almusharraf, N. (2018). English as a foreign language learner autonomy in vocabulary development: Variation in student autonomy levels and teacher support. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 159-177.
    Arauz, P. E. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in an English as a foreign language class: A proposal. Revista de lenguas modernas, (19).
    Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26.
    Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5(88-98).
    Casey, L., & Bruce, B. C. (2011). The practice profile of inquiry: Connecting digital literacy and pedagogy. E-learning and Digital Media, 8(1), 76-85.
    Castrillón Álvarez, M. V. (2020). The effects of implementing inquiry-based 5Es model on Grade 9 EFL students’ interest and English language progress.
    Chan, Y. F., Sidhu, G. K., Suthagar, N., Lee, L. F., & Yap, B. W. (2016). Relationship of inquiry-based instruction on active learning in higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24, 55-72.
    Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., Loh, E. K. Y., & Chow, K. (2011). Collaborative inquiry project-based learning: Effects on reading ability and interests. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 236-243.
    Dellatola, E., Daradoumis, T., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2020). Exploring students’ engagement within a collaborative inquiry-based language learning activity in a blended environment. Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum, 355-375.
    Ermawati, Y. N., & Pammu, A. (2017). The implementation of inquiry-based learning to reading comprehension of EFL students. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(3), 1067-1071.
    Ernst, D. C., Hodge, A., & Yoshinobu, S. (2017). What is inquiry-based learning? Notices of the AMS, 64(6), 570-574.
    Ghaemi, F., & Mirsaeed, S. J. G. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning approach on critical thinking skill of EFL students. EFL Journal, 2(2), 89-102.
    Huang, C. S. H., & Wang, C. H. (2015). Developing and validating a foreign language learner autonomy scale. SPECTRUM: NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, Translation, 13(1), 1-19.
    Kahn, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2004). Guide to curriculum design: Enquiry-based learning. Higher Education Academy, 30(2), 3-30.
    Khalaf, B. K., & Mohammed Zin, Z. B. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564.
    Lazareva, I. (2014). Incorporating inquiry investigation into the language arts curriculum. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(12B), 78-82.
    Lee, H. Y. (2014). Inquiry-based teaching in second and foreign language pedagogy. Journal of language teaching and research, 5(6), 1236-1244.
    Luke, C. L. (2006). Fostering learner autonomy in a technology‐enhanced, inquiry‐based foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 71-86.
    Phala, J., & Chamrat, S. (2019, October). Learner characteristics as consequences of active learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1340, No. 1, p. 012083). IOP Publishing.
    Palupi, B. S., & Subiyantoro, S. (2020). The effectiveness of guided inquiry learning (GIL) and problem-based learning (PBL) for explanatory writing skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 713-730.
    Panasan, M., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Learning outcomes of project-based and inquiry-based learning activities. Online Submission, 6(2), 252-255.
    Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.
    Rakicioğlu-Söylemez, A. A retrospective reflection of an EFL teacher educator on mentoring an inquiry-based practicum experience. Empowering Teacher-Researchers, Empowering Learners, 29.
    Rao, Z. (2006). Helping Chinese EFL students develop learner autonomy through portfolios. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(2), 113-122.
    Rasmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., Kwon, O. N., & Hodge, A. (2017). Four goals for instructors using inquiry-based learning. Notices of the AMS, 64(11), 1308-1311.
    Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The elementary school journal, 106(3), 225-236.
    Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 35(5), 40-55.
    Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 1-14.
    Wang, S. K. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the learning performance items in the 12-year basic education curriculum guidelines for senior high school English [Master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001631
    Wilhelm, J. D., & Wilhelm, P. J. (2010). Inquiring minds learn to read, write, and think: Reaching all learners through inquiry. Middle School Journal, 41(5), 39-46.
    Witt, C., & Ulmer, J. (2010). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the academic achievement of middle school students. In Proceeding of the 29th Annual Western Region AAAE Research Conference (Vol. 269, p. 282).
    Yamashita, J. (2013). Effects of Extensive Reading on Reading Attitudes in a Foreign Language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 248-263.
    Chern, C. L. (陳秋蘭) (2010) 大學通識英文課程實施現況調查。長庚人文社會學報, 3(2), 253-274。
    Executive Yuan. (2019, January 11) 2030 打造台灣成為雙語國家—厚植國人英語力 提升國家競爭力。Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/74eb5a0e-436d-4b78-9a1c-9d379f805331。
    Hsu, C. J. (許家菁) (2019). 從十二年國教英語領綱淺談雙語教育的可能性. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(9), 76-81。
    Liao, Y. F. (廖彥棻) (2019) 英文能力分級教學的成效與省思。臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(2), 100-108。
    Lin, Z. L. (林哲立) (2019) 中學生自主學習現況調查:十二年國民基本教育課程實施之前導研究 Investigating secondary students’ learning autonomy: A pilot study for 12-year basic education in Taiwan。Research plan from National Academy for Educational Research。Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://rh.naer.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dalldb&s=id=%22RP000000000591%22.&searchmode=basic&。
    Ministry of Education. (2014) 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要 總綱。Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf。
    Mu, S. (穆萱). (2023). 加強英語教育是雙語政策成功的基石. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 12(4), 94-98。
    National Development Council. (2018, December 10) 2030 雙語國家政策發展藍圖 Blueprint for Developing Taiwan into a Bilingual Nation by 2030。Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://bilingual.ndc.gov.tw/sites/bl4/files/news_event_docs/2030%E9%9B%99%E8%AA%9E%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E8%97%8D%E5%9C%96.pdf。
    Wang. Y. P. (王俞蓓) & Lin, Z. B. (林子斌) (2021) 雙語教育的推行模式: 從新加坡, 加拿大的經驗反思臺灣雙語政策。中等教育, 72(1), 18-31。
    Wong, F. Y. (翁福元) (2022) 台灣學校實施 2030 國家雙語政策探析: 雙語或雙語教育。台灣教育, (733), 31-38。
    Wu, B. L.(吳百玲) (2019). 2030 打造臺灣成為雙語國家願景之我見. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(4), 160-165。
    Wu, Z. Y. (吳姿瑩) (2019). 探究式學習融入高中英文寫作課程與英文寫作能力提升之行動研究。
    Ye, S. N.(葉錫南) (2016). 由十二年國教課綱草案展望未來 中小學之英語文教科書. 教科書研究, 9(3), 143-168。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE