簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃麗樺
Huang, Li-Hua
論文名稱: 名留還是心留?美髮設計師的離職與回任理由研究
Home is Where the Heart is:Why do Hairdressers Leave and Return?
指導教授: 許書瑋
Hsu, Shu-Wei
口試委員: 涂敏芬 柳育德 許書瑋
Hsu, Ryan Shuwei
口試日期: 2021/05/14
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 83
中文關鍵詞: 美容美髮美髮設計師離職傾向
英文關鍵詞: Beauty Salon, Hairdressing Designer, Turnover Intention
研究方法: 個案研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100502
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:141下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過去有關美髮設計師離職傾向相關的研究較少,不易了解服務提供者,即美髮設計師離職的真正原因,是個人的因素亦或是組織的因素?且美髮設計在養成的過程至少二年半甚至三年的時間,公司必須花費許多有形與無形的成本,離職傾向是一個嚴重的問題,特別是與高勞動力的美髮業,一位美髮設計師離職,等於是公司損失了人才與成本。而且過去探討美髮設計師離職傾向相關研究中,較少以美髮業經營管理者的角度來探討。
    本研究在控討以美髮業經營管理者所服務的名留集團,了解名留集團美髮設計師離職與回任的理由,以質性研究,半結構試訪談法來進行,共訪談10位曾經在名留集團服務過的美髮設計師,其中離職組5位即目前已離開名留而現在仍從事美髮業工作之美髮設計師,回任組5位即曾經離開名留而目前回任名留之美髮設計師。本研究於取得受訪者的同意進行錄音,與每一位受訪者訪談時間約在70至80分鐘左右完成。將訪談錄音內容書寫文字稿,再將訪談大綱分門別類之後,再進行資料的分析、歸納整理。訪談進行採開放性、輕鬆方式進行,讓受訪者在訪談中能對訪談問題自由表達想法,以萃取出豐富的研究資料。
    經由文獻回顧與語意分析後,整理結果如下:美髮設計師離職傾向涵蓋範圍有「個人因素」、「人際關係」、「組織因素」三構面。「個人因素」包含難以融入團隊、志向未定、角色衝突三個準則。「人際關係」包含主管領導、同事關係二個準則。「組織因素」包含教育訓練、工作環境、工作滿足三個準則。
    最後再依據研究結果進行逐字稿之分類與分析,以萃取出訪談概念和類別,進行個案分析,最後提出管理意涵並對公司組織提出建議,以降低美髮設計師之離職率,為組織永續經營做為參考依據。

    In the past, there were few studies on the turnover tendency of hairdressing designers, therefore, it was not easy to understand the real reasons for hairdressing designers to leave. It takes at least two and a half years or even three years to develop a professional hairdressing designer. The company must spend a lot of tangible and intangible costs. The tendency to resign is a serious problem, especially in the hairdressing industry with a high labor force, which is equivalent to the loss of talents and costs to the company. Moreover, in the past, in the research on the turnover tendency of hairdressing designers, it was rarely discussed from the perspective of managers in hairdressing industry.
    This research is to discuss the reasons for the resignation and return of the hairdressing designers of the Minliu Group, which is served by the managers of the hairdressing industry. It is conducted by qualitative research and semi-structured trial interviews. A total of 10 interviews have been conducted. Among them, 5 of the leaving group are those who have left Mingliu and are still working in the hairdressing industry; and the other 5 belonging to the returning group have left Mingliu and are currently returning to Mingliu. This study was recorded with the consent of the interviewees, and the interview time with each interviewee was about 70 to 80 minutes. After interview, the researcher write the text of the recording content, divide the interview into different categories, and then analyze, summarize and organize the data. The interviews were conducted in an open and relaxed way, allowing the interviewees to freely express their thoughts so as to extract rich research data.
    After conducting literature review and semantic analysis, the results are as follows. There are three dimensions for hairdresser's turnover intention including “personal factors”, “interpersonal relationships”, and “organizational factors”. “Personal factors” involves three criteria: difficulty in integrating into the team, undecided aspirations, and role conflicts. "Interpersonal relationship" includes two criteria: supervisory leadership and colleague relationship. "Organizational factors" contains three criteria: education training, working environment, and job satisfaction.
    Finally, according to the research results, first, the verbatim classification and analysis are carried out to extract the concepts and categories of the interviews. Second, the researcher would conduct case analysis, and make suggestions on the company’s organization to reduce the turnover rate of hairdressing designers as a reference basis.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 論文架構6 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 離職之定義與離職傾向 8 第二節 離職類型 9 第三節 各種離職相關模型 11 第四節 影響離職傾向之因素 19 第五節 我國美髮業離職行為之研究 25 第三章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究方法 33 第二節 資料蒐集與訪談大綱設計 34 第三節 個案選擇 36 第四節 名留美髮集團簡介 37 第四章 研究結果 42 第一節 名留集團美髮設計師離職傾向之架構 42 第二節 回任個案離職前後傾向分析 43 第三節 離職個案離職前後傾向分析 54 第四節 跨個案分析 64 第五章 結論與建議 68 第一節 研究結論 68 第二節 管理意涵 74 第三節 研究貢獻與建議 78 參考文獻 79

    中文部分
    行政院主計總處(2021)。行政院主計總處薪情平台,2021年2月1日取自https://earnings.dgbas.gov.tw/query_payroll.aspx
    林莉融(2012)。知覺工作價值對工作家庭衝突、情緒耗竭與離職傾向之調節效果-以美髮業為例。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文。台北。
    林欽榮(2002)。人力資源管理。新北:揚智文化。
    林燦螢、鄭瀛川、金傳蓬(2015)。人力資源管理理論與實務。台北:雙葉書廊。
    姜雪影(譯)(2012)。BOSS學自我對話超越盲點。台北:天下。(Linda A. Hill.,
    & Kent Linebac., 2012)
    張永隆(2006)。領導型態、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職意願關係之研究-以大桃園地區美髮業員工為例。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。花蓮。
    張舒涵(2004)。大學院校約聘人員人格特質、工作滿意度及離職傾向之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。高雄。
    張齊軒(2016)。人格特質與工作滿意度、員工幸福感、組織承諾及工作責效之控討:以連鎖美髮業為例。國立臺中科技大學流通管理系碩士班碩士論文。台中。
    戚樹誠(2017)。組織行為精華二版。台北:雙葉書廊。
    曹美華(2011)。美髮從業人員工作壓力、薪資滿意度與離職傾向之關係研究。大葉大學管理學院碩士班人力資源與管理組碩士論文。彰化。
    莊慶民(2015)。美髮業員工工作動機、組織承諾與離職傾向關係之研究。天主教輔仁大學企業管理學系管理學碩士在職專班碩士論文。新北。
    陳泰良、洪啟智(2011)。結合習慣領域與層級分析法探討員工離職傾向-以製造業員工為例。管理科學研究,8(1),69-81。
    陸洛、高旭繁(2015)。組織行為。新北:前程文化。
    彭美惠(2017)。激勵因子、職場友誼與離職傾向關係之研究—以藍領員工為例。長庚大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程在職專班經營管理組碩士論文。桃園。
    曾光榮、魏鸞瑩、黃金印(2002)。人力資源管理。新北:前程文化。
    黃同圳(譯)(2016)。人力資源管理:全球思維臺灣觀點。台北:華泰。(Leslie W.Rue, Nabil A.Ibrahim, & Lloyd L. Byars, 2016)
    黃英忠(1989)。現代人力資源管理。台北:華泰。
    黃英忠(1989)。現代人事管理。台北:東華。
    葉錦婷(2013)。美髮從業人員離職關鍵因素之探討。稻江科技暨管理學院境外EMBA企業管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。嘉義。
    愼侑根(1982)。人事管理。漢城:經文社。
    趙其文(2002)。人力資源管理。台北:華泰。
    鍾倫納(1998)。應用社會科學研究法。台北:台灣商務。
    魏郁禎、黃櫻美(2020)。人力資源管理。新北:普林斯頓國際。
    英文部分
    Abelson, M.A. (1987). Examination of avoidable and unavoidable turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 382-386.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Oxford: Westview Press.
    Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Blakely, G. L., & Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Group cohesion as an enhancement to the justice—affective commitment relationship. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 736-755.
    Arnold, H. J. & Feldman, D.C. (1982). A Multivariate Analysis of the Determinants of Job Turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 350-360.
    Ayman Bahjat Abdallah, Bader Yousef Obeidat, Noor Osama Aqqad, Marwa Na’el Khalil Al Janini, Samer Eid Dahiyat . (2016). Communications and Network, l.9(1).
    Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, M. N., Jr. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230.
    Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). A Unified Model of Turnover from Organization. Human Relations, 35, 138.
    Edward E. Lawler III. (1971). Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View . New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York:Harper.
    House, R. J., & Michell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-97.
    J R Hackman, G R Oldham, R Janson, and K Purdy. (1975). A New Strategy for Job Enrichment. California Management Review, 17(4), 58.
    Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory of work motivation. The Academy of Management, 14(2), 150-172.
    Lucas, M. D., Atwood, J. R., & Hagaman, R. (1993). Replication & Validation of Anticipated Turnover Model for Urban Registered Nurses. Nursing Research, 42(1), 29-35.
    Michaels, C. E., & Spector, P. E.(1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53–59.
    Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R. and Hulin, C. L., (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth Model of Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 509-517.
    Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414.
    Mobley, W.H., Griffeth, R.W., Hand, H.H., & Meglion, B.M. (1979). Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493-522.
    Mobley, William H. (1977) . Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover Process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237-240.
    Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
    Robbins, S.P. (1995). Organization Behavior(6th ed.).New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Robert Kreitner, Angelo Kinicki. (2009). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J. E. (2005). Alternative Conceptualizations of the Relationship between Voluntary Turnover and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 50–68.
    Szilagyi, A. D. (1979). Keeping Employee Turnover under Control. The Management of People at Work, 56, 42-52.
    Wanous, J. P. (1979). Job Survival of New Employee. Psychology, 32, 651-662.
    Weick, K. E. (1970). Managerial Behavior Performance and Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hall.
    William H. Mobley, Stanley O. Horner, and A. T. Hollingsworth. (1978). An Evaluation of Precursors of Hospital Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408-414.
    Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
    Y-Lermusiaux. (2005). Calculating the High Cost of Employee Turnover. www.ilogos.com/en/expertviews/articles/strategic/200331007_YL.html,accessed April 15,2005,p-1. The various costs of employee turnover are also discussed by W-G-Bliss, “Cost of Employee Turnover,” www.isquare.com/turnover.cfm, accessed April 15, 2005.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE