簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 施雅恩
Shih, Ya-En
論文名稱: 伴侶間衝突因應策略、情緒調節策略與關係滿意度:主角與伴侶相依模式之檢驗
Conflict Resolution Strategies, Emotion Regulation Strategies, and Relationship Satisfaction: An Examination of Actor-Partner Interdependence Model
指導教授: 王麗斐
Wang, Li-Fei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 主角與伴侶相依模式情緒調節衝突因應關係滿意度伴侶關係
英文關鍵詞: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM), Emotion regulation, Conflict resolution, Relationship satisfaction, Couple relationships
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000483
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:351下載:57
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究最重要的價值在於突破傳統分析方式假設「樣本獨立性」之限制,以強調關係相互性的統計分析模式來探究伴侶間的相處模式,更細緻地探究雙方在衝突處理、情緒調節上之差異如何影響親密關係滿意度。
    研究之主要目的為探討伴侶間衝突因應策略、情緒調節策略與關係滿意度之間的關係。研究採問卷調查法,以滾雪球的方式發放問卷,共邀得93對交往中情侶及已婚夫妻參與本研究。研究工具主要使用三份量表:衝突因應策略量表、情緒調節量表及關係品質量表,採「主角與伴侶相依模式」(the Actor-Partner Interdependence model,以下簡稱APIM)進行資料分析,以了解夫妻及伴侶雙方衝突因應策略、情緒調節策略的使用傾向與關係滿意度之間的關聯,並著重於各變項對於伴侶雙方的相互影響。
    研究結果發現:單看衝突因應策略對關係滿意度之影響可知,男性使用「整合型」衝突因應策略同時具有「主角效果」及「伴侶效果」;而女性使用「整合型」衝突因應策略僅具有「伴侶效果」。而針對情緒調節策略對關係滿意度之影響,研究結果顯示:不論男女,使用「認知再評估」情緒調節策略皆會對自身之關係滿意度帶來正向影響,使用「表現壓抑」情緒調節策略則會對自身關係滿意度帶來負向影響,僅具「主角效果」。
    而同時考量衝突因應策略與情緒調節策略對關係滿意度之影響時,可發現男性使用「整合型」衝突因應策略,對自身及伴侶之關係滿意度有正向影響,同時具有「主角」和「伴侶效果」。而女性使用「逃避型」衝突因應策略及「認知再評估」情緒調節策略,會對自身滿意度帶來顯著正向影響;使用「表現壓抑」情緒調節策略,會對自身滿意度帶來顯著負向影響;皆為「主角效果」。而女性若使用「整合型」因應策略,會對伴侶之關係滿意度帶來顯著正面影響,具有「伴侶效果」。
      此外,若考量衝突因應策略與情緒調節策略對關係滿意度中正負向情感─「充實感」與「後悔感」之影響時,研究結果顯示:對女性來說,使用正向或負向的情緒調節策略會對自己在關係中的充實感有顯著影響,但影響方向相反,具「主角效果」;而男性若能在關係中使用「整合型」衝突因應策略,則會對自己及伴侶的充實感產生顯著正向影響,同時具有「主角」與「伴侶效果」。而在「後悔感」的部分在「後悔感」的部分,結果發現:女性使用「逃避型」因應策略對自身在關係中的後悔感有顯著負向影響、使用正負向的情緒調節策略會對自己在關係中的後悔感有顯著影響,但影響方向相反,上述皆為「主角效果」;而女性使用「整合型」因應策略和「表現壓抑」調節策略會對男性在關係中的後悔感產生負向影響,為「伴侶效果」。對男性來說,使用「整合型」因應策略會對自身在關係中的後悔感帶來顯著負向影響、使用支配型因應策略則會對自身之後悔感有顯著正向影響,具「主角效果」;而使用「整合型」因應策略則會對伴侶在關係中之後悔感帶來負向影響,具「伴侶效果」。
    綜合以上研究結果,本研究協助男女雙方理解使用不同衝突因應和情緒調節策略時,對雙方關係滿意度的影響,若能多運用正向的方式則能促進關係品質。女性可學習使用「整合型」衝突因應策略及「認知再評估」情緒調節策略,但在衝突時亦不需強迫自己馬上面對,暫時使用「逃避型」策略也不失為一種正向方式。男性則可學習「整合型」衝突因應策略,並尊重女性需要透過「逃避型」策略暫時喘息、平復情緒,不要求其立即解決問題,也能多鼓勵女性抒發情緒,避免其使用「表現壓抑」情緒調節策略,而為關係滿意度帶來負面影響。

    The major contribution of this study is to overcome the limitation of “sample independence” assumption of conventional analytical methods. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) makes present study can clearly see the interactions in intimate couples.
    The main purpose of present study aims at realizing how couples use different conflict resolution strategies, emotion regulation strategies could affect their own and their partner’s relationship satisfaction. An online questionnaire with snowball sampling was used. The questionnaire included 3 main scales, which were the Rahim Organization Conflict Inventory-II, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and Relationship Quality Scale. The total of 93 intimate (married and unmarried) couples participated in this study. The APIM method was utilized to analyze data which focused more on the bidirectional influences and interdependence between dyadic samples.
    The results showed that males who tend to use integrating strategy during conflicts have better relationship satisfaction and their partners are more satisfied as well, which means there are actor and partner effects at the same time. On the other hand, females who tend to use cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression emotion regulation strategies only affect their own relationship satisfaction in different directions but not affect their partner’s satisfaction. In addition, females using avoiding strategy during conflicts have better relationship satisfaction, which might be due to cultural factors, all of above effects are actor effects. Females using integrating strategy to deal with conflicts could affect their partner’s satisfaction in a positive way, which is partner effect.
    Present study suggests that couples should realize the gender differences when dealing with relationship conflicts and their own emotions. Females can learn to use positive emotion regulation strategy and also practice integrating strategy when coping conflicts. However, it’s also fine if they don’t want to deal with the problem right away, using avoiding strategy is a good way as well. For males, learning integrating strategy during conflicts could help both his and his partner’s satisfaction.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 主角與伴侶相依模式之理論與文獻探討 7 第二節 衝突因應策略之理論與文獻探討 8 第三節 情緒調節相關之理論與文獻探討 11 第四節 關係滿意度相關之理論與文獻探討 16 第五節 衝突因應策略與關係滿意度相關之理論及文獻探討 17 第六節 情緒調節與關係滿意度相關之理論與文獻探討 20 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究設計 23 第二節 研究參與者 24 第三節 研究工具 24 第四節 研究流程 26 第四章 研究結果 29 第一節 先導分析 29 第二節 變項間之相關分析 32 第三節 伴侶衝突因應策略、情緒調節策略與關係滿意度的互依關係 33 第五章 討論 43 第六章 結論與建議 47 第一節 結論 47 第二節 研究限制 48 第三節 建議 49 參考文獻 51 附錄 59 附錄一 量表使用之同意書 59 附錄二 線上施測問卷 61

    江宇萱(2011)。當親密關係遇見衝突:情緒調節策略的效果(未出版)。私立世新大學社會心理學研究所碩士論文。
    江彥陵(2006)。大學生親密關係中依附類型、衝突因應與關係適應之相關研究(未出版)。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    利翠珊(2012)。夫妻關係間的忍與婚姻滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊,25(3),447-475。
    李怡真、林以正(2006)。愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突之縱貫研究。中華心理學刊,48(1),53-67。
    周玉慧(2009)。夫妻間衝突因應策略類型及其影響。中華心理學刊,51(1),81-100。
    修慧蘭、孫頌賢(2002)。大學生愛情關係分手歷程之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,15(4),71-92。
    陳彥竹(2014)。大學生知覺父母婚姻關係、情緒調節與愛情關係衝突反應方式之相關研究(未出版)。國立台北教育大學教育學院心理與諮商學系碩士論文。
    張妤玥、陸洛(2007)。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊,20(2),155-178。
    張思嘉(2001)。婚姻早期的適應過程:新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究,16,91-133。
    張時雯(2003)。大學生自我效能、衝突反應方式與戀愛關係品質之研究(未出版)。國立政治大學教育學系教育心理與輔導組碩士論文。
    陸洛、張妤玥(2015)。主管支持、工作對家庭增益,及情緒耗竭之關聯:夫妻之行動者─伴侶互依模式。本土心理學研究,44,73-116。
    程淑華(2015)。愛情嫉妒對親密伴侶選擇攻擊策略之調節效果分析。課程與教學季刊,18(2),45-78。
    劉惠琴(2003)。夫妻衝突調適歴程的測量。中華心理衛生學刊,16(1),23-50。
    潘怡潔(2014)。情緒調節策略的使用差異與整體幸福感之關係初探:以兩組年齡層不同之樣本作比較(未出版)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    蕭綱玉、葉光輝、吳志文(2018)。親密關係衝突中的建設性轉化歷程:行動者與伴侶相依模式之探討。中華心理衛生學刊,31(1),29-67。
    謝文宜、曾秀雲(2007)。探討伴侶關係滿意度及其相關因素:比較已婚夫妻、未婚情侶與同志伴侶的差異。臺灣性學學刊,13(1),71-86。
    謝雨生、周玉慧(2012)。每下愈況或漸入佳境?:夫妻婚姻品質之變化與相互影響性。臺灣社會學,23,101-154。
    Anderson, T. L., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 57(2), 153-172.
    Ben-Naim, S., Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Mikulincer, M. (2013). An experimental study of emotion regulation during relationship conflict interactions: The moderating role of attachment orientations. Emotion, 13(3), 506–519.
    Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130-144.
    Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., & Shaver, P. R. (2009). Attachment, perceived conflict, and couple satisfaction: Test of a mediational dyadic. Family Relations, 58(5), 634-646.
    Brackett, M. A., Warner, R. M., & Bosco, J. S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal Relationships, 12, 197–212.
    Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140-149.
    Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29 (2), 101–109.
    Decuyper, M., Bolle, M. D., & Fruyt, F. D. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 128–145.
    Dildar, S., Sitwat, A., & Yasin, S. (2013). Intimate enemies: Marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in dissatisfied married couples. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 15(10), 1433-1439.
    Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 136-157.
    Fitness, J. (2001). Emotional intelligence and intimate relationships. In J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, & J. D. Mayer (Eds.) Emotional Intelligence and Everyday Life (pp.xi-xviii). Psychology Press.
    Fitzpatricka, J., Gareaua, A., Lafontainea, M., & Gaudreaua, P. (2016). How to use the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) to estimate different dyadic patterns in MPLUS: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(1), 74-86.
    Finkel, E. J., Slotter, E. B., Luchies, L. B., Walton, G. M., & Gross, J. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1595–1601.
    Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence:Why it can aatter aore than IQ?. Bantam Books.
    Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(5), 271-299.
    Gross, J. J. (2014). Handbook of emotion regulation. Guilford.
    Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26.
    Geist, R. L., & Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 49-60.
    Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.
    Gianaros, P. J., Marsland, A. L., Kuan, D. C.-H., Schirda, B. L., Jennings, J. R., Sheu, L. K., Hariri, A. R., Gross, J. J., & Manuck, S. B. (2014). An inflammatory pathway links atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk to neural activity evoked by the cognitive regulation of emotion. Biol Psychiatry, 75, 738–745.
    Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927-947.
    Gross, J. J., Richards, J. M., & John, O. P. (2006) Emotion regulation in everyday life. In D.K. Snyder, J. A. Simpson, & J. N. Hugher (Eds.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 13-35). American Psychological Association.
    Gross, J. J., Sheppes, G., & Urry, H. L. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation: A distinction we should make (carefully). Cognition and Emotion, 25, 765–781.
    Houts, R. M., Barnett-Walker, K. C., Paley, B., & Cox, M. J. (2008). Patterns of couple interaction during the transition to parenthood. Personal Relationships, 15, 103–122.
    Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137-142.
    Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., English, T., John, O., Oveis, C., Gordon, A. M., & Keltner, D. (2012). Suppression sours sacrifice: Emotional and relational costs of suppressing emotions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 707-720.
    Impett, E. A., Le, B. M., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2014). When you think your partner is holding back: The costs of perceived partner suppression during relationship sacrifice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 542-549.
    Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 279-294.
    Kenny D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford.
    Marchand, J. F. (2004). Husbands' and wives' marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Attachment & Human Development, 6(1), 99-112.
    Mannarini, S., Balottin, L., Munari, C., & Gatta, M. (2017). Assessing conflict management in the couple: The definition of a latent dimension. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 25(1), 13-22.
    Panno, A., Lauriola, M., & Figner, B. (2013). Emotion regulation and risk taking: Predicting risky choice in deliberative decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 27(2), 326-334.
    Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376.
    Richards, J. M., Butler, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). Emotion regulation in romantic relationships: The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), 599-620.
    Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 429-438.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.
    Stinson, M. A., Bermúdez, J. M., Gale, J., Lewis, D., Meyer, A. S., & Templeton, G. B. (2017). Marital satisfaction, conflict resolution styles, and religious attendance among Latino couples: Using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 25(3), 215-223.
    Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik, C., Coston, T. D., Greeson, C., Jedlicka, C., Rhodes, E., & Wendorf, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 523-536.
    Sumalata, T. B., & Yadav, V. S. (2013). Conflict resolution strategies among working couples. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 14(4), 31-37.
    Thompson, R. A. (1991), Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3(4), 269-307.
    Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Shulman, S. (2006). Resolution of disagreements between romantic partners, among adolescents and young adults: Qualitative analysis of interaction discourses. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(4), 561–588.
    Vater, A., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behaviour in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29, 201-215.
    Werner, K. H., Goldin, P. R., Ball, T. M., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Assessing emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder: The emotion regulation interview. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 33, 346–354.
    Wei, M., Su, J. C., Carrera, S., Lin, S.-P., & Yi, F. (2013). Suppression and interpersonal harmony: A cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and European Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 625–633.
    Zeidner, M., & Kloda, I. (2013). Emotional intelligence (EI), conflict resolution patterns, and relationship satisfaction: Actor and partner effects revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 278–283.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE