簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 莫文哲
Eduardo Jesus Jimenez Moro
論文名稱: The Glocalization of Corporate Social Responsibility and its Effects on Business Performance in Spain and Taiwan
The Glocalization of Corporate Social Responsibility and its Effects on Business Performance in Spain and Taiwan
指導教授: 施正屏
Shih, Cheng-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 145
中文關鍵詞: United Nations Global CompactLocal InfluencesCorporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness Performance
英文關鍵詞: United Nations Global Compact, Local Influences, Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Performance
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202205163
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:134下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This study analyzes the Glocalization of Corporate Social Responsibility in the modern society and how it affects to the Business Performance of organizations in Spain and Taiwan. In order to empirically analyze these factors, the researcher developed the Glocal CSR model including the United Nations Global Compact and the Local Influences as the main dimensions that influence CSR, and lastly relating CSR with Business Performance. The structural equation model was conducted through a quantitative approach by surveying manufacturing organizations from Spain and Taiwan. The results from both countries support the effects of the glocal dimensions on CSR while also demonstrate the influence of CSR on Business Performance in both countries. Moreover, the research includes T-test analyses comparing on one side Spain and Taiwan, while lastly comparing the self-perception scores obtained from the top managers, middle managers and employees included in the sample.

    This study analyzes the Glocalization of Corporate Social Responsibility in the modern society and how it affects to the Business Performance of organizations in Spain and Taiwan. In order to empirically analyze these factors, the researcher developed the Glocal CSR model including the United Nations Global Compact and the Local Influences as the main dimensions that influence CSR, and lastly relating CSR with Business Performance. The structural equation model was conducted through a quantitative approach by surveying manufacturing organizations from Spain and Taiwan. The results from both countries support the effects of the glocal dimensions on CSR while also demonstrate the influence of CSR on Business Performance in both
    countries. Moreover, the research includes T-test analyses comparing on one side Spain and Taiwan, while lastly comparing the self-perception scores obtained from the top managers, middle managers and employees included in the sample.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 Background of the Study ........................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................. 5 Questions of the Study ............................................................................................... 5 Significance of the Study ........................................................................................... 6 Delimitations of the Study ......................................................................................... 7 Limitations of the Study ............................................................................................ 7 Definition of the Terms ............................................................................................. 8 List of Acronyms ....................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................. 11 United Nations Global Compact .............................................................................. 11 The Local Influences of CSR ................................................................................... 17 The Necessity of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Society .................. 19 The CSR Concept: Evolution, Definition &Characteristics ...................................... 21 CSR & Business Performance ................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................... 41 Research Framework ............................................................................................... 41 Research Hypotheses ............................................................................................... 42 Research Procedure ................................................................................................. 47 Research Method ..................................................................................................... 49 Population ............................................................................................................... 49 Sample .................................................................................................................... 50 Data Collection........................................................................................................ 51 Measurement Method .............................................................................................. 52 Pilot Study............................................................................................................... 53 iii Validity and Reliability ........................................................................................... 53 Reliability Analysis ................................................................................................. 54 Descriptive Analysis ................................................................................................ 55 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) ...................................................................... 55 Student T-Test for Independent Samples ................................................................. 56 CHAPTER IV DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AND PILOT TEST RESULTS ..... 57 Pilot Test Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................... 57 Main Study Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................ 61 Spanis’s Sample Descriptive Statistic ...................................................................... 65 Taiwan’s Descriptive Statistics ................................................................................ 67 Different Rank Employees Descriptive Statistics ..................................................... 69 CHAPTER V MAIN STUDY FINDINGS ............................................................... 73 Main Sample Results ............................................................................................... 73 Spain’s Sample Results ........................................................................................... 80 Taiwan’s Sample Results ......................................................................................... 87 Paired T-Test Comparative Analysis of Spain and Taiwan ....................................... 94 Paired T-Test Comparative Analysis of Different Rank Employees’ Perceptions ..... 96 CHAPTER VI CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. 105 Conclusions & Managerial Implications ................................................................ 105 Conclusions from the Comparative Analysis between Spain and Taiwan ............... 109 Conclusions from the Comparative Analysis between Different rank Employees ... 110 Future Research Recommendations ....................................................................... 112 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 113 APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE ENGLISH VERSION………………………121 APPENDIX B: QUESTIONNAIRE CHINESE VERSION .................................. 129 APPENDIX C: QUESTIONNAIRE SPANISH VERSION................................... 136 APPENDIX D: PILOT TEST RESULTS .............................................................. 144

    REFERENCES

    Adams, C.A., Hill, W.Y. & Roberts, C.B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in western Europe: Legitimating corporate behavior? British Accounting Review, 30, 1–21.

    Argandoña, A. & Hoivik, H. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: one size does not fit all. Collecting Evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 221- 234.

    Bartolomeo, M. (1994). A new tool for environmental accounting: An approach from Italy. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 14(1), 6-8.

    Beaujolin, F. (2004). European trade unions and corporate social responsibility: Final report to the European trade union confederation. Brussels: ETUC. Retrieved from:
    https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&v
    ed=0ahUKEwiNjZHxjZ3LAhVEH5QKHRTTDcYQFggaMAA&url=https%3A
    %2F%2Fwww.etuc.org%2FIMG%2Fdoc%2FCSRCESfinal3_EN1.doc&usg=A
    FQjCNE1MnxLVKSsmTWBYcXmiR_
    vd085Q&sig2=yOOwHUT5jCcHkSaH4eALpg&cad
    =rja.

    Boardman, C. M. & Kato, H. K. (2003). The Confucian roots of business Kyosei. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 317-333.

    Boletín Oficial del Estado [BOE] (2008). Real Decreto 221/2008, de 15 de febrero, por
    elque se crea y regula el Consejo Estatal de Responsabilidad Social de las
    Empresas. [Spanish Government. BOE nº 52, 29 February 2008]. Retrieved
    from: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2008-3868.
    Bondy, K., Moon, J. & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social
    responsibility in multi-national corporations: Form and implications. Journal of
    Business Ethics, 111(2), 281-299.
    Campbell, J. (2007). Why should corporations behave in responsible ways? An
    institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management
    Review, 32(3), 946-967.
    Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional
    construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
    Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social
    responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International
    Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
    Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] (2015). The world factbook 2015. Retrieved from
    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.
    114
    Cetindamar, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally
    responsible behavior: The case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal
    of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163-176.
    China Britain Business Council [CBBC] (2015). One belt one road. A role for UK
    companies in developing China’s new initiative. Retrieved from
    http://www.cbbc.org/cbbc/media/cbbc_media/One-Belt-One-Road-mainbody.
    pdf.
    Club de Excelencia en Sostenibilidad [CES] (2013). Estudio multisectorial sobre el
    estado de la responsabilidad corporativa de la gran empresa en España. 2013.
    Retrieved from
    http://www.clubsostenibilidad.org/main.asp?id_pagina=43&id_doc=43&id_pagi
    na_red=26.
    Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business
    Horizons, 50(6), 449-454.
    Combs J. G., Ketchen D. J., Crook T. R. & Shook C. L. (2005). The dimensionality of
    organizational performance and its implications for strategic management
    research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 2(5), 259-286.
    Commission of the European Communities [CEC] (2001). Promoting a European
    framework for corporate social responsibilities. Retrieved from
    https://www.iisd.org/business/issues/eu_green_paper.aspx.
    Christophe, B. & Bebbington, J. (1992). The French Bilan Social: a pragmatic model
    for the development of accounting for the environment? A research note. British
    Accounting Review, 24(3), 281-290.
    Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37
    definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
    15(1), 1-13.
    Do, J. P. & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO
    activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder
    perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73.
    Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR. The problem with assuming that companies can
    do well while also doing good is that markets don’t really work that way.
    Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3, 23-29.
    Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, multifaceted
    job-products, and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics,
    131(2), 319-335.
    Duran, M. B., & Radojicic, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and
    nongovernmental organizations. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Linkoping
    University, Sweden.
    115
    European Commission [EC] (2013a). An analysis of policy references made by large
    EU companies to internationally recognised CSR guidelines and principles.
    Retrieved from:
    http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/10372/attachments/1/translations/en/r
    enditions/pdf.
    European Commission [EC] (2013b). Informe sobre la responsabilidad social de la
    empresa española. Una propuesta para Europa. [Report about social
    responsability from the Spanish private sector. A proposition for Europe]
    Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/spain/pdf/informe-responsabilidad-social.pdf.
    European Commision [EC] (2013c). Public opinion in the European Union. Retrieved
    October from
    http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb80/eb80_first_en.pdf.
    European Commission [EC] (2014). Corporate social responsibility. National public
    policies in the European Union. Compendium. Retrieved from
    https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/corporate-socialresponsibility-
    national-public-policies-european-union-compendium-2014.
    Fernández Martín, R. M., de la Fuente del Moral, F. & Gago, P. (2011). Corporate
    social responsibility across Europe: A good example from the Nordic Countries?
    Helsiknky University Discipline of Economics Discussion Paper 648.
    Foss, N. J. (1997). Chapter 5. Resources, firms, and strategies: a reader in the resourcebased
    perspective. England: Oxford University Press.
    Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge
    University Press.
    Garriga, E. & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the
    Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.
    Gond, J. P., El-Akremi, A., Igalens, J. & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social
    responsibility influence on employees. Nottingham University ICCSR Research
    Paper Series No.54-2010.
    Gray, R.H., & Symon, I.W. (1992). Environmental reporting: BSO/Origin. Integrated
    Environmental Management. 2, 8–10.
    Global Reporting Initiative [GRI], United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] & World
    Business Council for Sustainable Development [WBCSD] (2015). A guide for
    business action to advance the sustainable development goals. Draft for public
    comment. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgsproposal.
    Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (2005). Corporate social
    responsibility across Europe. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
    116
    Hair, J. F., Tatham, R., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Academic
    Internet Publ. Retrieved, from:
    http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=ZWrWAAAACAAJ.
    Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial
    least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage: Thousand Oaks.
    Harjoto, M. A. & Jo, H. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and operating
    performance. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 8(1), 59-71.
    Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders,
    stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management
    Journal, 31, 58–74.
    Hertz, N. (2004). Corporations in the front line. Corporate Governance, 12(2), 202-209.
    Huizing, A. & Dekker, H.C. (1992). Helping to pull our planet out of the red: an
    environmental report of BSO origin. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5,
    449–458.
    Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations?. Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
    Isaksson, L. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A study of strategic management
    and performance in Swedish firms. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
    http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1117&context=thes
    es.
    International for Standardization Organization 26000 [ISO]. (2010). ISO 26000: 2010,
    Guia para la responsabilidad social [Guidance on Social Responsibility].
    Jorgensen, H. B. (1993). The “green account” of the Danish steel works Ltd. Social and
    Environmental Accountability Journal, 13(1), 2-5.
    Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in
    enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary
    findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544.
    Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic
    management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
    Kaufmann, M., & Olaru, M. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility on
    business performance–can it be measured, and if so, how. The Berlin
    International Economics Congress 1, 1-19.
    KPMG. (2011). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting
    2011.
    KPMG. (2013). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting
    2013.
    117
    López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and
    corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index.
    Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.
    Lim, A. & Tsutsui, K. (2011). Globalization and commitment in corporate social
    responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy
    effects. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 69-98.
    Linnanen, L., & Panapanaan, V. (2002). Roadmapping CSR in Finnish
    companies. Helsinki University of Technology Press, 2, 27-28.
    Low, K. C. P., & Ang, S. L. (2012). Confucian leadership and corporate social
    responsibility (CSR), the way forward. Journal of Business Research, 2(1), 85-
    101.
    Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social
    performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of
    Marketing, 76 (6), 198–213.
    Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the
    United States: Insights from businesses' self-presentations. Journal of
    International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
    Maon, F., Swaen, V., & Lindgreen, A. (2015). One vision, different paths: An
    investigation of corporate social responsibility initiatives in Europe. Journal of
    Business Ethics, 1, 1-18.
    Marca España & Foretica (2014). Informe RSE y Marca España: empresas sostenibles,
    país competitivo. [CSR Report and Marca España: sustainable companies,
    competitive country]. Retrieved from:
    http://www.spainsif.es/sites/default/files/upload/publicaciones/Informe_RSE_Y
    _MarcaEspana_digital2.pdf.
    Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good... and
    does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and
    financial performance. Harvard University Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
    Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.
    McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate
    social responsibility, resource based theory and sustainable competitive
    advantage. Journal of Management, 37, 1480-1495.
    McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility:
    Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
    McKinsey and Company (2004). Assessing the Global Compact’s Impact. Retrieved
    from www.wbcsd.ch/web/projects/advocacy/imp_ass.pdf.
    118
    Ministerio de Empleo y Seguriadad Social [MESS] (2014). Gobierno de España.
    Estrategia española de responsabilidad social de las empresas. Retrieved from:
    http://publicacionesoficiales.boe.es/.
    Mercer, L. L. C. (2009). Shedding light on responsible investment: Approaches, returns
    and impacts. Retrieved from http://www.mercer.com/articles/1423880.
    Mishra, S. & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm
    performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571-601.
    Moir L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate
    Governance, 1(2), 16–22.
    Moon, S.-G., & deLeon, P. (2007). Contexts and corporate voluntary environmental
    behaviors: Examining the EPA’s green lights voluntary program. Organization
    & Environment, 20(4), 480-496.
    Moore, D., McCabe, G., Duckworth, W., & Alwan, L. (2008). The practice of business
    statistics. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company:
    Nguyen, L. (2014). Measuring the United Nations Global Compact on company’s
    corporate social responsibility and their business performance. (Unpublished
    Master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.
    Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and
    strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-
    49.
    Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial
    performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 103-441.
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research:
    Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Robbins, S., Judge, T. A., Millett, B., & Boyle, M. (2013). Organisational behaviour.
    Australia: Pearson Higher Education.
    RobecoSam (2014). The sustainability yearbook 2014. Retrieved from:
    http://www.sustainabilityindices.
    com/images/RobecoSAM_Sustainability_Yearbook_2014_Low-Res.pdf.
    Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneityheterogeneity.
    Global Modernities, 25, 44-57.
    Runhaar, H., & Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing corporate social responsibility: An
    assessment of the contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR strategies in
    the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 479-495.
    Sharma, B. (2013). Contextualising CSR in Asia: Corporate social responsibility in
    asian economies. Singapore: Lien Centre for Social Innovation.
    119
    Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. New York: John Wiley &
    Sons.
    Shih, C.P. & Jimenez, E. J. (2016, May). Analyzing the United Nations Global Compact
    and the Local Influences effects on Corporate Social Responsibility and
    Business Performance of Taiwan´s manufacturing industry. Proceedings of the
    2016 International Conference on Human Resource Development, Taiwan, 14,
    18-28.
    The Economist (2008). Just good business. Special report on CSR. January, 19th.
    retrieved from Jean-Pascal Gond et al. 2010. “Corporate social responsibility
    influence on employees”. ICCSR Research Paper Series, 54, 1-47.
    United Nations [UN] (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable
    development. Retrieved from
    https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publicati
    on.
    United Nations Development Group [UNDG] (2015). Delivering the post-2015
    development agenda. Opportunities at the national and local levels. Rerieved
    from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1909UNDPMDG-
    Delivering-Post-2015-Report-2014.pdf.
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC] (2016). Taking
    the Paris Agreement forward: Tasks arising from decision 1/CP.21. Retreieved
    from:
    http://unfccc.int/files/bodies/cop/application/pdf/overview_1cp21_tasks_.pdf.
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] (2007). After the signature. A guide to
    engagement in the United Nations Global Compact. Retrieved from
    https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/241.
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] (2014a). Guide to corporate sustainability.
    Shaping a sustainable future. Retrieved from
    https://www.globalcompact.de/wAssets/docs/Nachhaltigkeits-CSRManagement/
    un_global_compact_guide_to_corporate_sustainability.pdf.
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] (2014b). Global Compact international
    yearbook. Retrieved from http://www.adecco.com/en-US/csr/Documents/globalcompact-
    yearbook-2014.pdf.
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] & Deloitte (2010). UN Global Compact
    management model. Retrieved from
    https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/231.
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC] & DNVGL (2015). Impact. Transforming
    business, changing the world. Retrieved from
    https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/1331.
    120
    United Nations Global Compact [UNGC], DNVGL, Monday Morning & Sustania
    [MM&S] (2015). Global opportunity report 2015. Retrieved from
    globalopportunitynetwork.org/the-2015-global-opportunity-report.pdf.
    van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate
    sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics,
    44(2–3), 95–104.
    Wang, Q., Dou, J. & Jia, S. (2015). A meta-analytic review of corporate social
    responsibility and corporate financial performance The moderating effect of
    contextual factors. Business & Society, 15, 1-39.
    Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International
    Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 50–84.
    World Business Council for Sustainable Development [WBCSD] (2000). Corporate
    Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. Geneva: World Business
    Council for Sustainable Development

    下載圖示
    QR CODE