研究生: |
謝漢偉 Han-wei Hsieh |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
筆記對英語演講理解效益之研究 Effects of Note-taking on Listening to Academic Lectures |
指導教授: |
陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 111 |
中文關鍵詞: | 筆記 、演講 、聽力理解 、記憶維持 、筆記品質 |
英文關鍵詞: | Note-taking, Lecture, Listening Comprehension, Retention, Note Quality |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:21 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文旨在探討筆記內容對外語學習者英語演講理解之影響與記憶維持力之相關性。學習者自身反思做筆記之重點亦是本文之研究重點。
本研究參與者為一位大學教師以及修習其中級聽講練習的兩班英語系學生,共四十一位。受試學生隨機分為可參考筆記組及不可參考筆記組。兩組學生於聽完一篇有關綠茶的英語演說後,完成五題概括性以及十題細節性的選擇題。在一週後,回想測驗內容。完成資料蒐集後,受試學生的筆記內容依其總字數、訊息單位、可作答性、效率性、完整性、及主要訊息為衡量的指標一一統計。在初步分析完畢後,並與四位學生進行深入訪談。
研究結果顯示,在六項指標中,有顯著性相關依序為可作答性、主要訊息、訊息單位、及完整性。根據訪談者指出,若能瀏覽題目針對「可作答性」做筆記則是最有助益的指標,若該情況不被允許下,在眾多訊息中選擇紀錄「主要訊息」則最有助益。分析高成就者和低成就者的筆記內容亦發現,上述的兩項指標印證其對於聽力理解的高度指標性。題型方面,概括性問題在統計上顯示和筆記內容任何一項指標皆無顯著性差異,然而細節性問題則和前面探討的結果一致,這項研究結果在訪談中,參與者亦指出同樣的結果。回想的訊息單位,因在可否參考筆記的變相操控下,兩組的量上呈現了極大的差異,可參考筆記組回想的訊息單位較不可參考筆記組多一倍以上。而不可參考組的回想數量則代表著前週所記的訊息已消失幾近八成。而大部分剩下的訊息為主要訊息,次要訊息的消失速度遠大於主要訊息。
因此,本研究建議教師在運用英語演講訓練聽力時,宜導引學生分辨出主要訊息,並設計相關活動讓學生習得如何記載訊息單位而非只是逐字抄寫。在測驗細節性問題時,筆記更顯得其重要性,教師宜給予做筆記機會。最後,為能強化學生學習,提供學生回顧筆記的機會亦有其必要性。
The present study aims to explore the relationship between EFL learners’ note contents and listening comprehension (LC) performance on English lectures along with their retention. In addition, the issue of learners’ reflections on how to take notes is addressed.
The participants in the study were a college professor and 41 English majors who were enrolled in her course, Intermediate Aural-Oral Training. These students were randomly divided into two groups – reviewing and non-reviewing. After listening to a lecture about green tea, they were asked to complete an LC test consisting of 5 global questions and 10 local questions. One week later, both groups had to complete a recall task. The initial analysis was followed up by the interviews with the participants to gain a better insight.
The results showed that out of the six criteria, test-answerability, major information, information unit, and completeness reached the significance level in correlation with the subjects’ LC performance. A further analysis of the performances of the high achievers and low achievers, it was found that the best predictors of the subjects’ performance were test-answerability and major information. Concerning the question type, the global questions failed to show any significant correlation with their subjects’ note contents. Contrarily, local questions were significantly correlated with the note contents and were in agreement with the previous findings. In the recall task, when required to write down as much as they remembered, the reviewing group jotted down almost twice as many information units as the non-reviewing group, indicating the effects of note-reviewing. The non-reviewing group in fact lost approximately 80% of information and retained only 20%.
Based upon the findings, it is suggested that language teachers may guide students to differentiate major information from minor information. In answering local questions, language teachers may train students to take notes and offer them a chance to take notes. Finally, in order to reinforce students’ learning, reviewing notes deserves its prominence.
Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and information density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 439-444.
Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Annis, L., & Davis, J. K. (1975). The effect of encoding and an external memory device on note-taking. Journal of Experimental Education, 44, 44-46.
Armstrong, W. H. (1956). Study is hard work. New York: Harper & Row.
Arnold, H. F. (1942). The comparative effectiveness of certain study techniques in the field of history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 449-457.
Ash, P., & Carlton, B. J. (1953). The value of note-taking during film learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 121-125.
Asher, J. (1977). Learning Another language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.
Ausubel, D. (1963). Cognitive structure and the facilitation of meaningful verbal learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 217-221.
Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Students’ lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 28-32.
Barnett, J. E., DiVesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note0taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 181-192.
Becker, J. D. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In b. Nash-Webber & r. Schank (Eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing, 1, 70-73. Cambridge, MA: bolt, Beranek, & Newman.
Bell, J., & Burnaby, B. (1984). A Handbook for ESL Literacy. Agincourt, Ontario: Dominie Press.
Benson, M. J. (1989). The academic listening task: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 421-445.
Boyle, J. P. (1987). Is listening comprehension a separate factor in language ability? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 25, 238-256.
Brown, G. (1978). Understanding spoken language. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 271-283.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983), Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrier, C. A., & Titus, A. (1981). Notetaking and passage styles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 385-397.
Clarke, M. A. & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles for the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27, 135-154.
Chaudron, C., Loschky, L. & Cook, J. (1988). Quality of lecture notes and second language listening comprehension. Technical Report No.7, Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii, Moanoa.
Chaudron, C., Loschky, L., & Cook, J. (1994). Second Language listening comprehension and lecture note-taking. In Flowerdew, J. (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 75-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, C. Y. (2003). Some notes on English listening tests. English Teaching & Learning, 28(1), 61-82.
Cheng, P. S. (1996). The effects of note-taking on Chinese college students’ listening comprehension performance. Master Thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.
Christiansen, H. D., & Vargata, M. L. (1975). Study power: Better study skills, greater success in college. Tucson, AZ: Peter Juul Press.
Connor, U.(1984). Recall of text: Differences between first and second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(2), 239-256.
Cook, J. R. S. (1975). A communicative approach to the analysis of extended monologue discourse and its relevance to the development of teaching materials for ESP. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Coulthard, R. M., & Montgomery, M. (1981). The structure of monologue. In R. M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 31-39. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Crawford, C. C. (1925). Some experimental studies of the results of college note-taking. Journal of Educational Research, 12, 379-386.
DeCarrico, J., & Nattinger, J. (1988). Lexical phrases for the comprehension of academic lectures. English for Specific Purpose Journal, 7, 91-102.
DiVesta, F. J., & Grey, G. S. (1972). Listening and note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14.
Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., and Trathen, K. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62-88.
Dunkel, P. (1988). The content of L1 and L2 Students’ lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 259-281.
Dunkel, P. & Davy, S. (1989). The heuristic of lecture notetaking: Perceptions of American & International Students regarding the value & practice of notetaking. English for Specific Purpose, 8, 33-50.
Dunkel, P. Mishra, S., & Berliner, D. (1989). Effects of note taking, memory, and language proficiency on lecture learning for native and nonnative speakers of English. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 543-549.
Dunkel, P., & Pialorsi, F. (1982). Advanced listening comprehension: Developing aural and note taking skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Dudley-Evans, A., & Johns, T. F. (1981). A team teaching approach to lecture comprehension for overseas students. The teaching of listening comprehension, 30-46. London: The British Counsil.
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522-532.
Eisner, S., & Rhode, K. (1959). Note taking during or after the lecture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 301-304.
Eykyn, L. B. (1992). The effects of listening guides on the comprehension of authentic texts by novice learners of French as a second language. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of South California.
Faw, H. W., & Waller, T. G. (1976). Mathemagenic behaviors and efficiency in learning from prose. Review of Educational Research, 46, 691-720.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note-taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1974). Note taking and recall. The Journal of Educational Research, 67, 291-292.
Fitzgerald, J. (1994). How literacy emerges: Foreign language implications. Language Learning Journal, 9, 32-35.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L (1992). Student perceptions, problems, and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, 23(2), 60-80.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L, (1996). Lecture perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lectures. RELC Journal, 27(1), 23-46.
Fowler, R. L., & Barker, A. S. (1974). Effectiveness of high-lighting for retention of test material. Applied Psychology, 59, 358-364.
Fox, T. J. E. (1999). Listening in on monologues and dialogues. Discourse Processes, 27(1), 35-54.
Frase, L. T. (1970). Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors. Review of Educational Research, 40, 337-347.
Frommer, J. (1989). Listening, looking, and learning with MacLang. CALICO Journal, 6(4), 51-71.
Green, J. M. & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
Goodman, K. S. (1970). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In Singer, H. and Ruddell, R.B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Hale, G. A., & Courtney, R. (1994). The effects of note-taking on listening comprehension in the test of English as a foreign language. Language Testing, 11(1), 29-47.
Harverson, W. & Haynes, J. (1982). Literacy training for ESL adult learners. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hartley, J. (1976). Lecture handouts and student note-taking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 13(2), 58-64.
Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36, 13-14.
Hartley, J., & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations on the efficacy of lecturing. Educational Review, 20, 30-37.
Hartley, J., & Fuller, H. (1971). The use of slides in lectures: An exploratory study. Visual Education, August-September, 39-41.
Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note-taking. Universities Quarterly, 28, 225-235.
Howe, M. J. A. (1970). Note-taking strategy, review, and long term retention of verbal information. Journal of Educational Research, 63, 100.
Howe, M. J. A. (1976) What is the value of taking notes? Improving College and university Teaching, 24, 22-24..
Jensen, C., & Hansen, C. (1995). The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance. Language Testing, 12(1), 99-119.
Idstein, P., & Jenkins, J. R. (1972). Underlining vs. repetitive reading. Journal of Educational Research, 65, 321-323.
Jennings, M., Fox, J., & Graves, B. (1999). The test-takers’ choice: An investigation of the effect of topic on language test performance. Language Testing, 16(4), 426-456.
Johnstone, R. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17(2), 123-143.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating note-taking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.
Kiewra, K. A., & DuBois, N. F., Christensen, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: A comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
Kiewra, K. A., & DuBois, N. F., Christensen, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between notetaking variables and achievement measures. Human Learning, 3, 273-280.
Kiewra, K. A., & Mayer, R. E., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 120-123.
Krashen, S. D., (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Laycock, S. R. & Russell, D. H. (1941). An analysis of thirty-eight how-to-study manuals, School Review, 49, 370-379.
Lebauer, R. S. (1984). Using lecture transcripts in EAP lecture comprehension courses. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 41-54.
Lebauer, R. S. (1988). Learn to listen; listen to learn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lin, T. Y. (2005). Effects of note-taking on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Master Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Locke, E. A. (1977). An empirical study of lecture note taking among college students. School Review Research, 77, 93-99.
Maddox, H. (1963). How to study. London: Pan Books.
Maddox, H., & Hoole, E. (1975). Performance decrement in the lecture. Educational Review, 28, 17-30.
Markham, P., & Lathaam, M. (1987). The influence of religion-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning, 37, 137-170.
McClendon, P. (1958). An experimental study of the relationship between the note-taking practices and listening comprehension of college freshmen during expository lectures. Speech Monographs, 25, 222-228.
McLeish, J. (1968). “The lecture methods”, Cambridge Monographs on Teaching Methods, Number One. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Montgomery, M. (1977). Some aspects of discourse structure and cohesion in selected science lectures. Master thesis, University of Birmingham.
Murphy, D. F. & Candlin, C. N. (1979). Engineering lecture discourse and listening comprehension. Practical Papers in Language Education, 2, 1-79. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.
Norton, L. S. (1981). The effects of note taking and subsequent use on long-term recall. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 18, 16-22.
Nye, P. A. (1978). Student variables in relation to note-taking during a lecture. Programmed Learning & Educational Technology, 15, 196-200.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.
Olsen, L. A. & Huckin, T. N. (1990). Point-driven understanding in Engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 33-47.
Palkovitz, R. J., & Lore, R. K. (1980), Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 159-161.
Paul. W. (1974). How to study in college (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Peper, R. J. & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note-taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514-522.
Peper, R. J. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34-38.
Peters, D. L. (1972). Effects of note-taking and rate of presentation on short-term objective test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 276-280.
Powers, D. E. (1986). Academic demands related to listening skills. Language Testing, 5(1), 1-38.
Raygor, A. (1970). Listening and note-taking: A program for self instruction. New York: McGraw Hill.
Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, and procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 219-240.
Riochards, J. P., & McCormick, C. B. (1988). Effect of interspread conceptual prequestions on note-taking in listening comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 592-594.
Rivers, W. M., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to teaching of English as a second or foreign language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Samuels, S. J. (1984). Factors influencing listening: Inside and outside the head. Theory into Practice, 23, 183-189.
Sheffield, E. F. (1974). Teaching in the universities: no one way. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effect of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 179-189.
Shohamy, E., & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23-40.
Sherman, J. (1997). The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing, 14 (2), 185-213.
Sotiriou, P. (1984). Integrating college study skills: Reasoning in reading, listening, and writing. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641-656.
Strevens, P. (1977). New Orientations in the Teaching of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Su, S. W. (2003). The effects of text types on listening comprehension, Proceedings of the Twelfth international Symposium on English Teaching, 511-520. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Tannen, D. (1982). The oral literate continuum of discourse. In Tannen, D., (Ed.), Spoken and Written Language, 1-6. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
Teng, H. C. (1996). The influence of notetaking on EFL lecture comprehension. Journal of Yunlin Institute of Technology, 5(2), 165-168.
Teng, H. C. (1997). The influence of text type and question type on English listening tests. English Teaching & Learning, 23(1), 5-18.
Teng, H. C. (1998). Analysis of college students’ performance on an EFL listening test, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, 797-796. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Todd, W. B., 7 Kessler, C. C. (1971). Influence of response mode, sex, reading ability, and level of difficulty on four measures of recall of meaningful written material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 229-234.
Trayor, R. (1985). The TOEFL: An appraisal. ELT Journal , 39(1), 43-47.
Van Dijk, T., & Kintsh, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: N.T. Academic Press.
Weiland, A., & Kingsbury, S. J. (1979). Immediate and delayed recall of lecture material as a function of note taking. Journal of Educational Research, 72(4), 228-230.
Weissenreider, M. (1987). Listening to the news in Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 71, 18-27.
Wilt, M. (1958). A study of teacher awareness of listening as a factor in elementary education. Journal of Educational Research, 43, 626-636.
Yates, V. (1979). Listening and Note-taking. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Yarington, D. J. (1977). Surviving in college. Indianapolis: Bobbs-merrill Educational Publishing.
Young, L., & Fitzgerald, B. (1982). Listening and learning lectures. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.