社交媒體的發展為教育帶來了新的可能性。透過社交媒體，學生可以更容易地分享與討論，許多研究開始探討在社交媒體學習環境下的學習行為，但較少討論性別因素造成的影響。然而現有研究已發現性別組合在社會學習環境中將產生影響。因此，本研究擬探究不同的性別與性別組合，對於社交媒體輔助學習的影響。
本研究使用Facebook社交媒體的社團功能輔助高中之電腦科學教學，以三所臺北市高中一年級學生為實驗對象，將六個班級以跨校方式分為三種組合(男女混合、女女組合、男男組合)，研究中觀察不同的性別與性別組合在Facebook社交媒體上的問題解決表現與歷程之影響。以性別組合為自變項，而問題解決表現、問題解決方法為依變項，將可歸納並分析不同的性別組合對社交媒體上問題解決表現和問題解決方法之影響。
研究結果發現男男組合的學習者比女女組合的學習者和男女混合的學習者利用Facebook社交媒體輔助學習能有較好的問題解決表現，同性組合在Facebook社交媒體輔助學習中亦有較好之問題解決表現。在討論內容方面，三種性別組合使用Facebook社交媒體進行討論皆著重於探索想法、社交以及發表題外話。男男組合在問題解決上有較高的表現可能來自於其在問題解決歷程上較能進展到後面的階段，而其他性別組合由於意見易產生分歧則停留在較初始的階段。本研究結果可提供進行社交媒體輔助教學中性別分組與教學策略設計之參考。

Social media development for education has brought new possibilities. Through social media, students can more easily share and discuss, many studies began to explore the learning behavior in social media learning environment, but less discussion of the impact of gender factors. However, existing studies have found that a combination of gender impact in the social learning environment. Therefore, the present study was to explore different combinations of sex and gender, media-assisted learning for social impact.
This study uses the Facebook social platform for high school computer science education, online social behavior of the observed high school students in the social platform. According to the type of online social behavior of students on the platform to explore different types of online social behavior learners construct knowledge. Will be grouped into the outlet on the type of social behavior, and may explain the social platform to construct knowledge and online social behavior.

朱則剛(民83)。建構主義知識論的起源與近代哲學知識論的趨勢。教育工學的發展與派典演化，173-219。臺北：師大書苑。
社群服務發展概況(2011.07)。創市際月刊報告書。取自http://news.ixresearch.com/?p=4299
黃湘武(民82)。皮亞傑理論在科學教育上的應用研究。北京：遠流。
黃湘武（民69）。皮亞傑認知心理學與科學教育【專論】。科學教育雙月刊，37，12-17。
甄曉蘭、曾志華(民86)。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究所學報，3，179-208。
Ann M. Gallagher,Richard De Lisi,Patricia C. Holst,Ann V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi,Mary Morely,Cara Cahalan (2000).Gender Differences in Advanced Mathematical Problem Solving.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75, 165–190
Amani, A., Alamolhodaei, H., &Radmehr, F. (2011).A gender study on predictive factors of mathematical performance of University students.Educational Research, 2(6), 1179-1192.
Brophy, J.(2012). Classroom Management as Socializing Students into Clearly Articulated Roles.Journal of classroom Interaction, 45(1), 41-45.
Beck, L. L. &Chizhik, A. W. (2008).An Experimental Study of Cooperative Learning in CS1.ACM Computer & Information Science Education,205-209.
Burnett, M., Fleming, S. D., Iqbal, S., Venolia, G., Rajaram, V., Farooq, U., Grigoreanu, V., &Czerwinski, M. (2010). Gender Differences and Programming Environments: Across Programming Populations. ESEM’10
Bosch, T.E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town.Communicatio, 35(2), 185-200.
Chen, C. M.& Chang, C. C. (2011). Mining learning social networks for cooperative learning with appropriate learning partners in a problem-based learning environment.Interactive Learning Environments, 00(0), 1-28.
Croson, R. &Gneezy U. (2009).Gender Differences in Preferences.Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1-27.
Corich S., Kinshuk, &Hunt L. (2004). Assessing Discussion Forum Participation:In Search of Quality.International Journal of Instructional Technology and DistanceLearning.1(12), 3-12.
Chao, Y. C. J., & Lo, H. C. (2011).Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language.Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395-411.
Ding, N., &Harskamp, E. (2006). How partner gender influences female students' problem solving in physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 331-343.
DU, H. S., & WAGNER, C. (2007).Learning With Weblogs: Enhancing Cognitive and Social Knowledge Construction. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, 50(1), 1-16.
Dawley, L. (2009). Social network knowledge construction: emerging virtual world pedagogy. On the Horizon, 17(2), 109 – 121.
Eagle, S. (2012). Learning in the early years: Social interactions around picturebooks, puzzles anddigital technologies. Computers & Education, 59, 38-49.
Fadi, P., Deek, M. T., &McHugh, J. A. (1999).A common model for problem solving and program development.IEEE Transactions on Education, 42, 331-336.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education.The American Journal of Distance Education,15(1), 7–23.
Hara, N.,Jay, B.C.,& Angeli C.(2000).Content analysis of online discussion in an appliededucational psychology course.Instructional Science,28, 115-152.
Haven,C.（2009, May 6）'Stanford Open Office Hours' comes to Facebook【新聞群組】。取自http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/may6/facebook-050609.html
He, S., & Wang, P.(2008).Web 2.0 and Social Learning in a Digital Economy.IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, 1121-1124.
hotseat 取自https://www.purdue.edu/hotseat/Login?ReturnUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.purdue.edu%2fhotseat%2f
Hou, H. T., &Wu, S. Y. (2011).Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study.Computer & Education, 57, 1459-1468.
Inkpen, K., Booth, K., and Klawe, M. (1991). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: The Importance of a Collaborative Environment for Computer-Based Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.EGEMS Technical Report 94-5
Jackson, A. & Kutnick, P. (1996). Group work and computers: the effects of type of task on children's performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, 162-71.
Jacobs, S., Egert, C. A., & Barnes, S. B.(2009. Oct.). Social Media Theory and Practice: Lessons Learned for a Pioneering Course.39thSEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-5.
Joiner, R., Messer, D., Light, P.&Littleton, K. (1998). The Effects of Gender, Expectations of Success and Social Comparisonon Children's Performance on a Computer‐based Task. Educational Psychology, 18(3), 319-326.
Kayri, M., & Çakır, Ö., (2010). An Applied Study On Educational Use of Facebook as A Web 2.0 Tool: The Sample Lesson of Computer Networks and Communication. International journal of computer science & information Technology (IJCSIT), 2(4), 48-58.
Kong, S.C., Ogata, H., Arnseth, H.C., Chan, C.K.K., Hirashima, T., Klett, F., Lee, J.H.M., Liu, C.C., Looi, C.K., Milrad, M., Mitrovic, A., Nakabayashi, K., Wong, S.L., Yang, S.J.H. (eds.) (2009). Gender and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL). Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education [CDROM]. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Kuech, R. (2004). Collaborative and Interactional Processes in an Inquiry-Based, Informal Learning Environment.Journal of Classroom Interaction, 39( 1), 30-41.
Keogh, T., Barnes, P., Joiner, R., & Littleton, K. (2000).Gender, pair composition and computer versus paper presentations of an English language task.Educational Psychology, 20, 33-44.
Lauren, B. (2009). Twittering Dante.School Library Journal, 14-15
Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education,50, 627-639.
Lee, M., (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-basedcooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 549-577.
Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of Problem-based online asynchronous discussion in E/M-learning environments.Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122-1135.
Marrouat, C. &Benyagoub, K. (2013, Mar. 21). Social Media – A History: Infographic (updated) [Online forum comment].Retrieved fromhttp://www.creativeramblings.com/social-media-history-infographic-updated/
McCharty, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology ,26(6), 729-740.
Nuutinen, J., Sutinen, E., Botha, A., & Kommers, P. (2010). From mindtools to social mindtools: Collaborative writing with Woven Stories. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 753-775. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00973.x
OpenStudy 取自http://openstudy.com/
Piaget & Garcia,R.(1974).Weight and Its Compositions with Spatial Dimension, Understanding Causality,85-94. (originally published in France,1971)
Pear, J.J., &Crone-Todd, D. E. (2002).A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction.Computers & Education, 38,221–231.
Pena-Shaffa, J. B., & Nichollsb, C. (2004).Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction incomputer bulletin board discussions.Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
Ross, J.A., Scott, G., &Bruce, C.D. (2012).The Gender Confidence Gap in Fractions Knowledge: Gender Differences in Student Belief-Achievement Relationships.School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 278-288.
Robinson-Stavely, K., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender and reactions to computers: Studyinghuman-computer interaction in the social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 168–183.
Roblyer, M.D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., &Witty, J. V. (2012). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134-140.
Socialbakers取自http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-overview-statistics/
Sanders, J. (2005). Gender and technology in education: A research review. Retrieved February 12, 2006, from www.josanders.com/pdf/gendertech0705.pdf
Severiens, S. & Dam, G. T. (1997). Gender and gender Identity Difference in Learning Styles. Educational Psychology 17.79-93.
Scanlon, E. (2000). How gender influences learners working collaboratively with science simulations. Learning and Instruction10, 463-481.
Voyles, M. M., Fossum, T., Haller, S. (2008). Teachers Respond Functionally to Student Gender Differences in a Technology Course. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 45(3), 322-345.
Underwood, G. & Underwood, J.D.M. (1998).Children’s interactions and learning outcomes with interactive talking books.Computers Education, 30, 95–102.
Underwood, J., Underwood, G., and Wood, D. (2000). When does gender matter? Interactions during computer-based problem solving. Learn and Instruct10,447-462.
Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperativesmall groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33-44.
Wang, Q. Y., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y. Q., & Liu, M. (2011). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology. 43(2), 49-52.
Yen, J. C. & Lee, C.Y. (2011).Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment.Computers & Education,56,138-145.
Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203.