研究生: |
陳靜芝 Ching-Chih Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
從一位資優班教師的角度看 疑似亞斯伯格症資優生與學校環境交互出的面貌 On Aspects of the Interaction between a Gifted Student with Suspected Asperger’s Syndrome and the School Environment: A Gifted Education Teacher’s Point of View |
指導教授: |
陳美芳
Chen, Mei-Fang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 260 |
中文關鍵詞: | 疑似亞斯伯格症資優生 、充實學習 、人際關係 |
英文關鍵詞: | gifted student with suspected Asperger’s syndrome, enrichment learning, interpersonal relationship |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:221 下載:42 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
採取質性個案式的方法,我以資優班教師的角度,探究一位疑似亞斯伯格症資優學生~王語任(化名)在小學學校環境中交互出的種種生活面貌。透過訪談研究參與者與重要他人、觀察研究參與者,以及蒐集其相關創作及檔案資料。研究結果顯示:在整個小學階段,個案(語任)的行為特質與身心發展,在學校環境的脈絡中交織影響;同時,學校環境本身也在不同的面向,以不等的程度回應著個案(語任)的發展。研究有如下的發現:
一、特質:從困境中被發現並得到相應的支援
語任在疑似亞斯伯格症且兼有語文極端優異的特殊性,超過一般老師、同儕能夠理解或接受的範圍,因為這些特質造成師生、同儕間彼此的一些衝突或誤會,透過學校制度運作上的彈性,給予他學習情境轉轉換的機會。另外,語任個人偏灰暗的情緒,也能被有經驗的老師覺察與重視,形成長期的陪伴與一同成長的甜蜜關係。
二、機會:在優勢能力上的展露得以延展關係
語任在語文表現上的絕佳優異能力,與華山國小這個重視語文特色發展的學校,容易被學校看見與重視,有了相得益彰的交會。接受良師長期的服務,讓語文優勢能力更進一步提升。參與資優班的學習及相關比賽的活動,語文表現的發揮獲得同儕的肯定與認同。也就是語任在優勢能力上的展露受到學校老師們關注與讚賞,老師在不同面向給予他多元的協助,形成了語任在學校裡重要的支持力量。在自我察覺與調適裡,與學校同儕能有所交流與討論,享受到與同儕互動上的快樂。
三、標籤:隱而晦見的模糊標籤得到輔導的協助
語任模糊的標籤,讓他在學校氛圍裡被當成適應有困難的學生而非特殊需求的學生,學校對語任的回應方式,也就採取輔導的策略給予協助,而非特教的介入。而語任展露出的獨特性,無法用一般亞斯伯症的理論來解讀,他的特出表現形塑了一種新的可能。
Abstract
The qualitative case study, in a gifted education teacher’s point of view, aims at investigating aspects of the interaction between a gifted student with suspected Asperger’s syndrome and the school environment.
To explore the interaction, the researcher interviewed the subject and significant persons, observed him directly, and collected his literary work and personal files. Generally, the subject’s behavior and mental development were highly affected by the school context; the school responded to the subject’s needs and difficulties on various dimensions and degrees. The very complicated interference was observed, described, and interpreted in this study. The study claims that:
1. Characteristics: The subject is discovered and supported in terms of his difficulties.
The specialty of the subject’s verbal excellence exceeded possible comprehension of his teachers and classmates, but it resulted in conflicts and misunderstandings. Yet the school responded the subject’s special needs intensively by adjustment of administrant system. Experienced teachers, for instance, took care of the subject’s occasional melancholic moods, and developed an intimate relationship between them. Gifted education functioned as a vital supportive system as well.
2. Opportunities: The reveal of the subject’s strength extends his relationship among teachers and classmates.
In the elementary school, focusing on language arts, the subject’s verbal ability was elicited and promoted. Specifically, as he participated in humanity curricula of the school’s gifted resource classroom and contests about language arts, his excellent language talent was recognized and appreciated by teachers and classmates. That is, the teachers offered a wide range of assistance regarding his talent in language. Further, through self-awareness and accommodation, he could be engaged in the peer interaction at school.
3. Labels:The ambiguous labeling is applied to the subject so that he obtains counseling treatment.
Because of his unclear diagnosis, the subject was regarded as a student with adaptive problems rather than a special needs one. By this, the supports from the special education system might not be the proper intervention, for the school, to take with him, so that they provided guidance and assistance from the perspective of counseling. His uniqueness cannot be clearly defined as a typical Asperger ‘s syndrome. More possible understanding the subject could be made as considering his outstanding performance.
一、中文部分
丁雪茵、鄭伯壎、任金剛(1996):質性研究中研究者的角色與主體性。本土心理學研究,6,354-376。
江麗美(譯),(David Henery Feldman原著),(1999):資優兒童與人類潛能發展。臺北:桂冠。
吳昆壽(2004):資優障礙學生學校生態系統研究。特殊教育與復健學報,12,81-97。
李奉儒等(譯),(Rebort C. Bogdan & Sari Knopp Biklen 原著),(2001)(2005第六刷):質性教育研究理論和方法。嘉義:濤石文化。
林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育上的應用。中正大學教育研究所主編:質的研究方法 ( pp.239-262 )。高雄:麗文文化。
林皛玫(2004):自閉症奇才奮力成長的敘說研究--以二位星兒為例。屏東師範學院特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
花敬凱(譯),(Barbara Clark 原著),(2007):啟迪資優--如何開發孩子的潛能。臺北:心理
侯書宇、侯書寧(譯),(Kenneth Hall 原著),(2005):星星小王子。臺北:久周文化
胡純、郭靜姿(2004):兩位學前障礙資優幼兒的特質表現。資優教育季刊,93,34-36。
唐諾(2005):閱讀的故事。臺北:印刻出版社。
孫玉蕙(2007):國小亞斯伯格症英語奇才口語敘說及相關能力之研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教學碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
張正芬、吳佑佑(2006):亞斯伯格症與高功能自閉症早期發展與目前症狀之探究。特殊教育研究學刊,31,139-164。
教育部(2007):中華民國資優教育白皮書編訂。臺北市:教育部。
郭靜姿(2000):談資優生的個別化教學。資優教育季刊,35,16-21。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。
曾瑞蓉(2007):亞斯伯格症與高功能自閉症青少年自我覺察與憂鬱問題之關係研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
湯志民(2003):優質學校環境規劃與問題探析。初等教育學刊, 14, 49-82。
黃文慧(2001):從生活標籤看兩位特殊學生的成長故事。臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃文慧(2002):雙重特殊學生(2E)的研究研流、特質與鑑定之啟示。資優教育季刊,83,10-20。
黃文慧(2003):人我眼中的雙重特殊學生~以一個電子專長的亞斯伯格資優學生為例。資優教育研究,3(2),85-108。
楊宗仁等(譯),(Brenda Smith Myles & Richard L. Simpson原著),(2005):亞斯伯格症—教育人員及家長指南。臺北:心理出版社。
鄒小蘭(2006):另類天才─亞斯伯格資優生初探。資優教育季刊,101,22-30。
趙永芬(譯),(Oliver Sacks原著),(1996):火星上的人類學家。臺北:天下遠見。(原著出版年:1995)
劉淑蓉(2007):中學科學與數學教師對學校環境知覺之比較研究。科學教育學刊, 15(1), 53-72。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。
蔡典謨(1997):資源整合與資優教育。資優教育季刊,64,6-10。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯(譯),(D. Jean Clandinin & F. Micheal Connelly原著),(2004):敘說探究—質性研究中的經驗與故事。臺北:心理出版社。
盧台華、鄒小蘭、胡宗光(2006):弱勢族群資優教育。第二屆全國資優教育會議
羅湘敏(1990):亞斯伯格症。載於特殊教育論文集(二),105-136。
二、英文部分
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
Anthony,T., Bianco,M., & Bieber,B. (2005). Twice-exceptional students gifted students with disabilities:an introductory resource book. In William J. Moloney (Ed.). Colorado: Colorado Department of Education
Attwood, T. (2003). Understanding and managing circumscribed interests. In M. Prior (Ed.), Learning and behavior problems in Asperger syndrome (pp.126-147). N ew York : Guilford Press.
Baldwin, A. Y., & Vialle, W. (1999). The many faces of giftedness: Lifting the masks. Belmont, CA:International Thomson Publishing.
Baron-Cohen S.(2002). Is Asperger Syndrome Necessarily Viewed as a Disability?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(3), 186-191.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological system theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.) Annals of Child Development (V.6, pp187-251), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Cash, A. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22(1), 22-27.
Church, C. Alisanski, S. & Amanullah, S. (2000). The social, behavioral, and academic experiences of children with asperger’s syndrome. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(1), 12-20.
Clark, B. (1986). Optimizing learning: The Integrative Education Model in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Clark, B. (1988). Growing up gifted (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted (4rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Coleman, L. J.(1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(3), 105-111.
Ehlers, S., & Gillberg, C. (1993). The epidemiology of the Asperger Syndrome: A total population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiartry, 34(8), 1237-1350.
Erickson, F. & Shultz, J(1977). When is context? some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1(2), 5-9.
Firth, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Gallagher, S. A. & Gallagher, J. J. (2002). Giftedness and Asperger’s syndrome: a new agenda for education. Gifted Child Today,25(1), 58-63.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
Hashman, M. (2004). Gifted and learning disability, attention disorders and Asperger’s synderger. The journey : a handbook for parents of children who are gifted and talented. (pp. 59-66). Canada: Alberta Associations for Bright Children.
Henderson, L. M. (2001). Asperger’s syndrome in gifted individuals. Gifted Child Today, 24(3), 28-35.
Karnes, F. A. (2004). Gifted/autistic students. In F.A. Karnes, K. Besnoy, & E. Shaunessy, etc.(Eds.), Appropriate practices for screening, identifying and instructing gifted/disabled youth (pp.5-33). Session presented at the Mississippi Association for Gifted Children Conference, Jackson, MS.
Kay, K. (2000). Uniquely gifted: Identifying and meeting the needs of the twice-exceptional student. NH: Avocus Publishing Inc.
Klin, A. & Volkmar, F. R. (2000).Diagnostic issues in Asperger syndrome. In A. Klin, F. R. Volkmar, & S. S. Sparrow (Eds.), Asperger synderger (pp.25-71). New York : Guilford Press.
Klin, A. & Volkmar, F. R. (2000).Treatment and intervention guidelines for individuals with Asperger syndrome. In A. Klin, F. R. Volkmar, & S. S. Sparrow (Eds.), Asperger synderger (pp.340-366). New York : Guilford Press.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.
Little, C. (2002). Which is it? Asperger’s syndrome or giftedness? gefining the differences. Gifted Child Today,25(1), 58-63.
Lynette, M. (2001). Asperger’s syndrome in gifted individuals. Gifted Child Today Magazine. 24(3), 28-35.
Lovecky, D. V. (2004). Different Minds Gifted Children with AD/HD, Asperger Syndrome, and other Learning Deficits. London and Philadelphia :Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Maddux, J. E. (2002). Stopping the madness: Positive psychology and the deconstruction of the illness ideology and the DSM. In C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp.13-25). NY: Oxford University Press.
Myles B. S., & Simpson, R. L. (2000). Asperger’s syndrome: A study of thecognitive profiles of 37 children and adolescents. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 146-153.
Myles, B. S., Bock, S. J., & Simpson, R. L. (2001). Asperger’s Syndrome Diagnostic Scale. Austin, TX: PRO- ED.
Myles, B. S. (2005). Children and youth with Asperger syndrome:strategies for success in inclusive settings. California : Corwin Press.
Neihart, N. & Montana, B. (2000).Gifted children with asperger’s syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly. 44(4), 222-229.
Pariso, A. (1991). School climate and student motivation for academic excellence. NASSP Bulletin, 75, 110-112.
Plucker, J. A. (1998). The relationship between school climate conditions and student aspirations. Journal of Educational Research, 91,240-246.
Reis, S. M. & Burns, D. E.(1987). A school wide enrichment team invites you to read about methods for promoting community and faculty involvement in a gifted education program. Gifted Child Today, 49(2),27-32.
Safran, S.P. (2000). Asperger syndrome: The emerging challenge to special education. Exceptional Children, 67(2), 151–160.
Safran, J. S. & Safran S. P. (2001). School-based consultation for asperger syndrome. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(4), 385-395.
Seagoe, M. (1974). Some learning characteristics of gifted children. In R. Martion, The identification of the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of schools.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Torrance, E. P. (1989). Are we teaching our children to think about the future? Gifted Child Today, 12 (6), 48-50.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted & talented learners (3rd ed). Denver: Love.
Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). School level environment and student outcomes in mathematics.Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 6, 309-326.
Wing, L (1981). Asperger’s Syndrome: A clinical account. Psychological Medicine, 11, 115-130.
Williams, K. (2001). Understanding the student with Asperger's syndrome: Guidelines for teachers. Retrieved March 12, 2007, from the Online Asperger Syndrome Information and Support Web site: http://www.udel.edu/bkirby/asperger/karen%5fwilliams%5fguidelines.html
World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and releated health problems-Tenth revision. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.