研究生: |
羅喬 Lo, Chiao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
當代言同領域多項產品時,專家代言人與藝人代言人對產品態度偏誤修正量之影響 The Influence of Endorser Expertise on Bias Correction Magnitude, When Endorsing Multiple Brands in Highly Relevant Categories |
指導教授: |
蕭中強
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 42 |
中文關鍵詞: | 偏誤修正量 、專家代言人 、藝人代言人 、多項代言 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:124 下載:23 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來專家代言人的代言效果佳,導致曝光度日益劇增,例如潘懷宗、吳念真等人,也因為他們的形象正面、高人氣又具專業知識,而開始跨足其他領域產品代言,並同時代言多項產品。本研究欲了解專家代言人在進行多項代言時,消費者是否會對代言人產生自我推論,認為其代言可信度下降,並成功察覺出偏誤的存在而在對代言人或產品、品牌產生評價時進行修正,這樣的偏誤修正效果在藝人代言人身上又有何不同,本研究並進一步專注在同領域內的多項代言,希望了解這對消費者產生偏誤修正的影響。
本研究分為前測與主實驗,在前測中由受測者選出喜愛程度、可信度、產品相關性程度無異,但專業程度有所分別的專家和藝人代言人,最終結果為陳意涵和盧彥勳;接著於主實驗中利用前測所選出的兩位代言人,分別設計使其代言目標產品irunning慢跑鞋,以及其他同為運動領域之相關產品,在受測者閱讀完連串廣告後再詢問其對目標廣告、代言人等之評價,並比較不同情境組別之評價差異。
研究結果顯示假設H1部分成立,其藝人代言人有出現偏誤修正情形,但專代言人並沒有明顯的出現偏誤修正的現象。至於假設H2為不成立,專家代言人的型況下多項代言並沒有明顯較單項代言做出修正。
本研究之研究結果雖未能如預期之成功,但主要可歸納出幾項重點,首先是對涉入程度操弄的不成功,應再將問卷簡易化,並希望可以一對一訪談來增加涉入程度。另外希望未來的相關研究可將廣告實體放入前測中,避免樣本誤差的出現,未來研究若能朝這幾個方向進行修正,相信仍有很大的機會能證實本研究之假設。
中文文獻
蘇柏諺 (2014).專家代言人與藝人代言人進行同領域多項產品代言對消費者產
偏誤修正之影響—以運動領域專業代言人為例 (未發表的碩士論文).國立台灣師範大學管理研究所 [Su, B. Y. (2014). The English Title in Italic. (Unpublished master's thesis). Graduate Institute of Management, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.]
英文文獻
Rice, D. H., Kelting, K., & Lutz R. J. (2010). Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements: The influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology Volume 22, (2), 249-259
Frieden, J. B. (1984). Advertising spokesperson effects: An examination of endorser
type and gender on two audiences. Journal of Advertising Research
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Kelly, H.H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
Craig, S. C., McCann, J.M. (1978). Assessing communication effects of energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (September), pp. 82–88
MacKenzie, Scott B. and Lutz R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 48-65.
Lafferty, B. A. and Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, (February), 109-116.
Zhou L., & Whitla P. (2013). How negative celebrity publicity influences consumer attitudes: The mediating role of moral reputation. Journal of Business Research Volume 66, Issue 8, August, Pages 1013-1020
Mowen, Stephen W. Brown, and Meg Schulman (1979). Theoretical and empirical
extensions of endorser effectiveness. AMA Educators' Conference Proceedings, ed. Neil Beckwith et al. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 258-262
Ohanian, Roobina (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 39-52.
Ohanian, Roobina., Kertz, C.L. (1992). Source credibility, legal liability, and the law of endorsements. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11, 12-23.
Ohanian (1991). The impact of celebrity spokepersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising, 31, pp. 46–54
Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo and David Schumann (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), 2, 135-146.
Tripp, Carolyn. Jensen, Thomas D., Carlson, Les (1994). The effects of multiple product endorsements by celebrities on consumers’ attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(March) 535-547
Lipman, Joanne and John B. Hinge (1991). Will Michael Jordan jump to Gatorade? Wall Street Journal (July 12), sec. B, p. 3.
R.B. Money, T.A. Shimp, T. Sakano (2006). Celebrity endorsements in Japan and the United States: Is negative information all that harmful? Journal of Advertising Research, 46, pp. 113–123
Sherif, M., Hovland, C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press.