研究生: |
唐書志 Tang, Shu-Juh |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
中學數學實習教師教學表現預判之信念結構 |
指導教授: |
謝豐瑞
Hsieh, Feng-Jui |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
數學系 Department of Mathematics |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 351 |
中文關鍵詞: | 實習教師 、教師信念 、教學信念 、信念系統與信念結構 、教學表現預判(EOP) 、教學信念叢集 |
英文關鍵詞: | The Intern Teacher, Teacher Beliefs, Teaching Beliefs, Beliefs System and Beliefs Structure, Expectation or Evaluation of Performance, Teaching-Belief Clusters |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:304 下載:38 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在本研究中,教學活動與教學內涵都是教師的一種教學表現。本研究即是探討中學數學科實習教師(以下簡稱為「實習教師」)對他們實際從事教學時可能實施各類教學活動或選用各類教學內涵之頻率(統稱為「教學表現頻率」)的看法,以及其數學教學相關信念與教學表現頻率之間的關連。更具體地說,本研究的目的有四,分別是:(1)探討實習教師對其數學教學的教學表現預判(expectation or evaluation of performance,EOP)與教學信念叢集(teaching-belief clusters,TBC);(2)建立研究中所浮現各個TBC間的結構;(3)釐清實習教師EOP之數學教學表現和TBC的關連;(4)嘗試發展能夠解釋實習教師EOP之某些數學教學表現的信念結構模型。
實習教師對自己數學教學的「教學表現預判(EOP)」,指的是他們「對自己實際從事數學教學時可能之表現的評判及預期」;而「教學信念叢集(TBC)」的概念則源自T. F. Green在1971年的著作。本研究的有效樣本數為123,是採取隨機抽樣方式,從全台十九所中學師資培育機構參加96學年度第一學期教育實習的中學數學實習教師中抽出而得。藉由問卷調查法、相關分析法、因素分析法、逐步迴歸分析法與結構方程模式分析法(SEM),研究中發現的主要結果分成以下五方面:
一、實習教師對自己數學教學活動之EOP受到五項因素共同影響,對自己數學教學內涵的EOP則受四項因素共同影響,這些EOP呈現出教學活動方面偏向傳統,教學內涵方面重視數學概念結構的特徵。另一項特色則是實習教師預判自己會常常培養學生數學能力、數學價值與正向情意。整體而言,實習教師的EOP是保守中重視培養能力情意的穩健格局。
二、實習教師的各類數學教學相關信念,包括數學學習信念、數學信念、環境制度信念,也分別受到若干因素共同影響,並且可以利用相關係數各自畫出關連性的強弱結構,區分出幾個明顯的TBC。
三、可以利用統計方法,包括計算相關係數、進行因素分析、建立結構方程模式等等,建立能恰當描述實習教師數學教學相關信念的TBC。透過這種統計方法得到的TBC,具有下列意義與特徵:
1.扮演了簡化資料與精鍊信念結構訊息的重要角色,具可操作性。
2.這些TBC,不只是一群指標信念的單純集合,而應被視為在心理上經過「運算(或運思)」的結果。
3.更進一步說,TBC還是心理運算的動態「過程」。其浮現必須是將指標信念抽象化,從中萃取共同因素,而萃取因素的主要來源,為原本指標信念裡的「對象」和「屬性」。
4.TBC傾向於和整個信念系統有關。當整個系統出現信念的異動,TBC就有可能在內涵與測度上有所變動,甚至在瓦解之後重新「另起爐灶」,另外聚合。
四、可以利用統計方法,分別建立實習教師傳統教法層面、多元教法層面,以及教學媒體層面教學活動實施度的信念結構模型。即使是單一數學教學表現的信念結構,也牽涉到許多信念的複雜關連。
五、前述三個信念結構模型中,都存在一個匯聚多項其他教學層面重要性的信念叢集,本研究稱為「教學重要性聚集(TIC)」。各個模型中的TIC可以承接許多不同類別信念之影響,轉而影響該項教學層面的重要性信念,進而影響該項教學層面之實施度與EOP。TIC的成分包含有實習教師認為下列教學內涵對於數學教學有多重要的信心:(1)培養解題、表徵、溝通、推理證明、數學內部連結等數學能力。(2)培養學生對數學的正向情意態度,像是喜歡數學或喜歡學習數學,或者覺得數學有價值、是自己能力所及的。
壹、中文部分
1.Angeles, P. (民89):哲學辭典。台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
2.Blakemore, S.與Frith, U. (民96):樂在學習的腦(游婷雅譯)。台北:遠流。
3.Braithwaite, V. A.與Scott, W. A.(民86):價值觀(張志學譯)。載於J. P. Robinson,P. R. Shaver與L. S. Wrightsman(主編),性格與社會心理測量總覽(下冊:信念、態度及特質篇,頁849-945)(楊宜音與彭泗清等人譯校)。台北:遠流。
4.Gleitman, H. (民87):心理學(上)(洪蘭譯)。台北:遠流。
5.Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D.(民84):教學媒體與教學新科技(張霄亭校閱,李文瑞等人譯)。台北:心理出版社。
6.Jensen, E. (民92):大腦知識與教學(梁素霞譯)。台北:遠流。
7.Maruyama, G. M. (民95):結構方程模式的基本原理(陳玉樹,黃財尉與黃芳銘譯)。高雄:麗文文化。
8.Miller, R.L., Acton, C., Fullerton, D. A., & Maltby, J. (民95):SPSS在社會科學的應用(莊文忠譯)。台北:五南。
9.Newberg, A.與Waldman, M.R. (民97):為什麼你信我不信(饒偉立譯)。台北:大塊文化。
10.Rokeach, M. (1960/民67):開放與封閉的心理(張平男譯)。台北:黎明文化事業公司。
11.王恭志(民89):教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98。
12.王凱平(民95):中等學校健康與體育領域實習教師教學信念之研究。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
13.王雅觀(民95):國中教師應用科技之教學歷程探究:地理科教師應用教學科技之個案研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
14.甘漢銧(民85):詮釋教學媒體的種類。載於國教輔導叢書第二十輯,教學媒體的理論與實務(頁3-7)。台北市立師範學院。
15.甘漢銧與陳福源(民85):教學媒體空間的規劃。載於國教輔導叢書第二十輯,教學媒體的理論與實務(頁9-32)。台北市立師範學院。
16.朱苑瑜(民90):國中實習教師之教師信念改變與其影響因素之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
17.宋玉如(民97):中學數學教師應有的數學教學特質研究──學生觀點。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所教學碩士論文(未出版)。
18.沈亞梵(民83):教學媒體自製與應用。台北:師大書苑。
19.李其維(民87):皮亞傑心理邏輯學。台北:揚智文化。
20.李茂能(民98):圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。台北:五南。
21.李瑜霏(民93):國民小學教師之建構式教學信念及教學行為之研究:以數學科為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
22.佐藤正夫(1998):教學論原理(鍾啟泉譯)。北京:人民教育出版社。
23.周子敬(民96):統計套裝軟體-精通SPSS。台北:全華科技。
24.林進材(民86):國民小學教師教學思考之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
25.林震岩(民97):多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用。台北:智勝。
26.吳正成(民94):台東縣國民小學教師教學信念與實踐之探究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
27.吳明隆(民96a):SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南。
28.吳明隆(民96b):結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。台北:五南。
29.吳明隆(民97):SPSS操作與應用:多變量分析實務。台北:五南。
30.吳曉華(民93):桃園縣國中教師利用網路資源融入教學之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
31.邱皓政(民94):量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。台北:雙葉書廊。
32.邱皓政(民95):結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。
33.卓佩玲(民88):國民中學實習教師教學思考之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
34.洪秋如(民94):臺北縣國民小學教師教學信念、班級經營策臺北縣國民小學教師教學信念、班級經營策略與教師滿意度之關聯性研究。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
35.胡炯濤(2000):數學教學論。廣西南寧:廣西教育出版社。
36.高強華(民81):教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意義。師大教育研究所集刊,34,85-112。
37.唐書志(民88):終生學習概念下高職補校學生的數學之旅。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
38.唐瑞芬(主編)(2003):數學教學理論選講。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
39.徐照麗(民89):教學媒體:系統化的設計、製作與應用。台北:五南。
40.涂榮豹、王光明與寧連華(編著)(2006):新編數學教學論。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
41.曹才翰(2004):中學數學教學概論。北京:北京師範大學出版社。
42.教育部(民92):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要:數學學習領域。教育部。
43.教育部(民93):普通高級中學必修科目「數學」課程綱要。取自http://search.moe.gov.tw/hysearch/cgi/redirect.exe?url=http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0037/7.doc&group=ZC&title=。
44.教育部國語推行委員會(民83):重編國語辭典修訂本。取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw。
45.許志瑋(民93):以TAM為基礎探討影響教師接受資訊科技融入教學之因素。華梵大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
46.陳仕芳(民94):國小教師教學信念之個案研究。國立台南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
47.陳沛涵(民97):屏東縣國小教師使用國語科教具教學需求、意願與滿意度之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
48.陳玫禛(民94):國小音樂教師教學信念與師生互動之個案研究。臺北市立師範學院音樂藝術研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
49.陳淑英(民82):教學媒體—理論與實務。台北:泛亞印刷。
50.陳淑敏、張玉倫(民93):幼兒教師教學信念與教學行為之探究。屏東師院學報,第二十一期,pp.1-36。
51.陳順宇(民94):多變量分析。台北:華泰文化。
52.陳順宇(民96):結構方程模式。台北:心理。
53.陳聖濟(編著)(2001):初中數學活動課研究。湖南長沙:湖南師範大學出版社。
54.張太平,張一岑與蔡匡忠(民96):SPSS統計建模與分析程序。台北:文魁資訊。
55.張佩琦(民97):運用臆測教學提昇國三學生數學學習成效──以相似形為例。國立高雄師範大學數學教學碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
56.張佩瑛與蔣治邦(民89):課堂內師生問答互動之研究:國小數學課問答互動中教師教學信念與教學處理的關係。教育與心理研究,23,99-121。
57.張春莉與王小明(2004):數學學習與教學設計:中學卷。上海:上海教育出版社。
58.湯才偉與鄭美儀(2006):教學信念的學習過程:個案的探究。發表於香港中文大學香港教育研究所優質學校改進計畫「學校改進與夥伴協作」兩岸三地研討會。
59.湯仁燕(民82):國民小學教師教學信念與教學行為關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
60.莊威冠(民87):國小職前實習教師教學信念之分析。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
61.莊麗嬌(民92):應用問題中心教學與合作學習理論於高職數學教室之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班碩士論文(未出版)。
62.葉育玟(民96):國小語言課程的教室互動中學生主導發言之分析。國立屏東教育大學英語研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
63.黃芳銘(民91):結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。
64.黃芳銘(民93):社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。台北:五南。
65.黃鈺雯(民93):嘉義地區國小高年級教師教學態度、師生互動與學生學習動機之關係研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
66.楊雅婷(民94):應用多媒體電腦輔助教學於九年一貫數學課程-統計圖表。逢甲大學應用數學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
67.廖婉雯(民92):高中英語教師對溝通式教學法的教學信念及其教學行為之探究。國立台灣師範大學英語研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
68.劉柏宏(民93):從美國「數學戰爭」看台灣的數學教育。數學傳播,28,4,3-16。
69.劉威德(民88):教師教學信念系統之分析及其與教學行為關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文(未出版)。
70.鄭毓信(民87):數學教育哲學。台北:九章出版社。
71.鄭毓信與李國偉(民88):數學哲學中的革命。台北:九章出版社。
72.蔡志仁(民89):動態連結多重表徵視窗環境下橢圓學習之研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究碩士論文(未出版)。
73.蔡鳳芝(民94):職前教師在教學實習課程中教學信念與教學反省行為之探究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
74.賴長泰(民92):國中數學實習教師教學能力成長之詮釋研究。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
75.謝文仁(民92):澎湖縣國小教師對九年一貫課程的教學信念及其教學行為之研究。國立台南大學國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
76.顏銘志(民85):國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
77.豐田秀樹、前田忠彥、柳井晴夫(民98):結構方程模式分析入門:探討原因的統計學(陳耀茂編審)。台北:鼎茂圖書。
78.羅玗貞(民90):國中英語科教師利用資訊科技於教學之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
貳、西文部分
1.Abelson, R. P. (1979). Differences between Belief and Knowledge Systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355-366.
2.Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
3.Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4.Anderson, J., White, P., & Sullivan, P. (2005). Using a Schematic Model to Represent Influemce on, and Relationships between, Teachers’ Problem-Solving Beliefs and Practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), pp.9-38.
5.Arbaugh, F. Lannin, J. Jones, D. L., & Park-Rogers, M. (2006). Examining Instructional Practices in Core-plus Lessons: Implication for Professional Development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 517-550.
6.Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group Beliefs: A Conception for Analying Group Structure, Processes, and Behavior. London: Springer-Verlag.
7.Bauch, P. A. (1984). The Impact of Teachers' Instructional Beliefs on Their Teaching: Implications for Research and Practice (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED252954).
8.Beswick, K. (2004). The Impact of Teachers’ Perceptions of Student Characteristics on the Enactment of their Beliefs. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.111-118).
9.Beswick, K. (2005). The Beliefs/Practice Connection in Broadly Defined Contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39-68.
10.Beswick, K. (2007). Teacher’s Beliefs That Matter in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 95-120.
11.Brown, E. T., Karp, K., Petrosko, J. M., Jones, J., Beswick, G., Howe, C., & Zwanzig, K. (2007). Crutch or Catalyst: Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding Calculator Use in Mathematics Instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 107(3), 102-116.
12.Burchfield. R. W. (1987). The Compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary: complete text reproduced micrographically (Volume I: A-O). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and Knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan
14.Chapman, O. (2002). Belief Structure and Inservice High School Mathematics Teachers Growth. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.177-193). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
15.Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ Thought Processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
16.Cooney, T. J. (1985). A Beginning Teacher’s View of Problem Solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324-336.
17.Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E., & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing Beliefs Structures of Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306-333.
18.Cooney, T. J. (2001). Considering the Paradoxes, Perils, and Purposes of conceptualising teacher development. In F.-L. Lin (Ed.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp.9-31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1987). The Descartes' Dream: The World According to Mathematics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.Dossey, J. A. (1992). The Nature of Mathematics: Its Role and Its Influence. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp.39-48). New York: Macmillan.
21.Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. (1990). The New Encyclopedia Britannica (Volume 2). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
22.Ernest, P. (1986). Social and Political Values. Mathematics Teaching, sep., pp.16-18.
23.Ernest, P. (1989a). The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics. In P. Ernest, (Ed.), Mathematics Teaching: The State of The Art (pp.249-254). London: Falmer Press. Retrieved DEC 25, 2008, from http://www.people.ex.ac.uk/PErnest/impact.htm
24.Ernest, P. (1989b). The Knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of the Mathematics Teacher: a Model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
25.Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. London: The Falmer Press.
26.Ernest, P. (1998). Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
27.Fang, Z. (1996). A Review of Research on Teacher Beliefs and Practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.
28.Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics Teaching and Classroom Practice. In F. K. Lester, Jr., (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.225-256). Charlotte, NC, U.S.: Information Age.
29.Furinghetti, F. & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.39-57) Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
30.Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, Meta-Affect, and Mathematical Belief Structures. In G. C Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp.59-71). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
31.Goldin, G., Rösken, B. & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs - No Longer a Hidden Variable in Mathematical Teaching and Learning Processes. In J. Maaβ & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and Attitudes in Mathematics Education (pp.1-18). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
32.Green, S. B. (1991). How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), pp. 499 – 510.
33.Green, T. F. (1971). The Activities of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3/4), pp. 381-391.
35.Hannula, M., Kaasila, R., Laine, A., & Pehkonen, E. (2005). Structure and Typical Profiles of Elementary Teacher Students’ View of Mathematics. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol.3, pp.89-96. Melbourne: PME.
36.Hersh, R. (1986/1998). Some Proposals for Reviving the Philosophy of Mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics (pp.9-28). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
37.Howson, A. G., Kahane, J. P. (Eds.) (1986). School Mathematics in the 1990s (ICMI Study Series, v.2). Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
38.Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics Teaching and Mathematics Teachers: A Meta-Case Study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 32-44.
39.Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of Research on Teacher Belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
40.Kuhs, T. & Ball, D. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains ofknowledge, skills and disposition (Research Memo). Lansing, MI: Center on Teacher Education, Michigan State University.
41.Leatham, K. R. (2006). Viewing Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs as Sensible Systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91-102.
42.Leder, G. C. & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring Mathematical Beliefs and Their Impact on the Learning of mathematics: A New Approach. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.95-113) Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
43.Leder, G. C., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (2002). Setting the Scene. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.1-10) Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
44.McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on Affect in Mathematics Education: A Reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.575-596). New York: Macmillan.
45.McLeod, D.B. & McLeod, S. H. (2002). Synthesis - Beliefs and Mathematics Education: Implications for Learning, Teaching, and Research. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? London: Kluwer Academic.
46.Murphy, P. K. & Mason, L. (2006).Changing Knowledge and Beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd Edition, pp.305-323). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
47.NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
48.NCTM (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
49.NCTM (1998). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Discussion Draft. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
50.NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.
51.NRC (National Research Council) (Eds.), (1989). Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
52.Nespor, J. (1985). The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching: Final Report of the Teacher Beliefs Study (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED270446).
53.Nespor, J. (1987). The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
54.O’Loughlin, M. (1989). The Influence of Teachers' Beliefs about Knowledge, Teaching, and Learning on Their Pedagogy: A Constructivist Reconceptualization and Research Agenda for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED339679)
55.Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing Students’ Mathematics-Related Beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.13-37) Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
56.Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
57.Patton, M. Q. (1991). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd edition). India: Sage Publications.
58.Pehkonen, E. & Furinghetti, F. (2001, June). Problems on the Use of the Concepts "Belief" and "Conception". In Riitta Soro (Ed.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs X. Proceedings of the MAVI-10 European Workshop (pp.47-54). Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland. Retrieved NOV 20, 2008, from http://www.uni-duisburg.de/FB11/PROJECTS/MAVI/Proc10.doc
59.Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr., (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.257-315). Charlotte, NC, U.S.: Information Age.
60.Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a Beginning Elementary School Teacher’s Mathematics Beliefs and Teaching Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576.
61.Richardson, V. (1996). The Role of Attitude and Beliefs in Learning to Teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd Ed.) (pp.102-119). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
62.Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. London: Jossey-Bass.
63.Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of Knowledge: An Introduction to Epistemology and Education. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
64.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp.334-370). New York: Macmillan.
65.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a Theory of Teaching-in-Context. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED462374)
66.Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The Math Wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253-286.
67.Scott, A. L. (2005). Pre-service Teachers’ Experiences and the Influence on their Intentions for Teaching Primary School Mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 62-90.
68.Scriven, M. (2000). Belief. In Encyclopedia Americana (Year 2000 edition, V.3, p.501). Grolier.
69.Sigel, I. E. (1985). A Conceptual Analysis of Beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental Belief Systems: The Psychological Consequences for Children (pp.345-371). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70.Sigel, I. E. (1992). The Belief-Behavior Connection: A Resolvable Dilemma? In I. E. Sigel, A. V. McGillicuddy-Delisi, & J. J. Goodnow (Eds.), Parental Belief Systems: The Psychological Consequences for Children (Second Edition) (pp.433-456). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71.Skott, J. (2001). The Emerging Practices of a Novice Teacher: The Roles of his School Mathematics Images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 3-28.
72.Speer, N. M. (2005). Issues of Methods and Theory in the Study of Mathematics Teachers’ Professed and Attributed Beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361-391.
73.Steen, L. A. (1988). The Science of Patterns. Science, 240(4852), 611-616.
74.Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Related to Mathematics Instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 213-226.
75.Sullivan, P. (2005). Using a Schematic Model to Represent Influences on, and Relationships between, Teachers’ Problem-Solving Beliefs and Practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 9-38.
76.Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept Images and Concept Definition in Mathematics with Particular Reference to Limits and Continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, pp.151-169.
77.Tall, D. (1992). The Transition to Advanced Mathematical Thinking: Functions, Limits, Infinity, and Proof. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp.495-511). New York: Macmillan.
78.Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept Image and Concept Definition in Mathematics with Particular Reference to Limits and Continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, pp.151-169.
79.Taylor, L. M. (2005). Introducing Cognitive Development. New York: Psychology Press.
80.Thompson, A. G. (1984). The Relationship of Teachers’ Conceptions of Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching to Instructional Practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
81.Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp.127-146). New York: Macmillan.
82.Törner, G. (1997). Views of German Mathematics Teachers on Mathematics. In J. A. Dossey & J. O. Swafford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. I, pp.275-281). Columbus (OH): ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. Retrieved DEC 20, 2008, from http://logistik.math.uni-duisburg.de/pdf/PME-NA-19.pdf
83.Törner, G. (2002). Mathematical Beliefs – A Search for a Common Ground: Some Theoretical Considerations on Structuring Beliefs, Some Research Questions, and Some Phenomenological Observations. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.73-94). London: Kluwer Academic.
84.Wilson, M. S. & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics Teacher Change and Development: The Role of Beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp.127-147). London: Kluwer Academic.